Last modified on 14 November 2014, at 22:00

User talk:Fakirbakir

Return to the user page of "Fakirbakir".
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fakirbakir!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Fakirbakir!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Laborfalvi Róza - Szekely?Edit

She was born in Miskolc, not in Szekely Land... (Iaaasi (talk) 08:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC))

Her father József Benke was a Székely noble.Fakirbakir (talk) 09:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Medieval_Old_Hungarian_script.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Medieval_Old_Hungarian_script.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Iaaasi (talk) 11:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

1054 SchismEdit

Please stop manipulating the sources!

Your book says "monasteries and convents belonging to the Byzantine Church were founded sporadically in the eleventh century", not "Byzantine Churches were spread sporadically in the eleventh century in Hungary"

If the Hungarian Kings refused to build Orthodox monasteries, it does not mean other did not already exist since before the Hungarian coming from Siberia, or that Hungary did not have a large Orthodox population (Iaaasi (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2011 (UTC))

What are you talking about? Hungarian kings established Byzantine monasteries (in central Hungary, Tihany, Visegrád etc), Andrew I was the 'biggest' founder of Orthodox churches......Fakirbakir (talk) 12:06, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Moreover there was a pagan mass...Large Orthodox or Catholic population in the 10-11th century??? NO WAY...Fakirbakir (talk) 12:08, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
According to your map 95% of Hungary was Catholic, even if this confession was oficially adopted only 54 years before (in year 1000). I see no pagan mass on your map, and the way you are drawing the Orthodox areas is 100% original research. This map: [1] presents the official religions of European countries, not the religious beliefs of the population. If you insert the term "official religions" in the image descriptions from articles, I can accept it in this form and I will stop the dispute (Iaaasi (talk) 12:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC))

StopEdit

with overwriting this file: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polska_992_-_1025.png you are engaged in revert warring and you violating Commons:OVERWRITE policy which says that you should upload your POV file version under different name. If you revert once again I will report you. Also, map that you want to overwrite is sourced, see the source: http://ingner.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/boleslaw_chrobry_mapa.jpg PANONIAN (talk) 08:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

also please refrain yourself from inflammatory nationalistic comments such is this one. I find your statement highly provocative and ethnically insulting. PANONIAN (talk) 08:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your threatening advice. Fakirbakir (talk) 12:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
It was only friendly advice. You should behave like civilized person. Otherwise, some other people might report you because of inappropriate behavior. I will not do that, this time. PANONIAN (talk) 14:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
"You should behave like civilized person"....... If you behaved well you would not use this tone.Fakirbakir (talk) 16:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
This tone? Well, after I told you that your comment is insulting for me you posted exactly same comment on my talk page. Why? One insult was not enough? Do you consider this behavior "civilized"? PANONIAN (talk) 18:08, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Central EuropeEdit

Szia!

I am writing to you because of this edit, where you claimed that File:CentralEurope.png has "plenty of sources" on its page. That is true, but a clarification is needed. Originally, the file had absolutely no source between 30 June 2009 and 2 June 2012, when I started adding them in support of map changes made by me (my proposals were to include the whole of Romania and the Baltic states)

I'd like to invite you to participate at a civilized talk page discussion in order to reach a consensus regarding the regions that should be marked as being in Central Europe.

The main disputed issue is the inclusion of Eastern and Southern Romania, that was contested by User:Csendesmark Iaaasi (talk) 07:52, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Ethnic map of 11th century.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ethnic map of 11th century.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codrin.B (talk) 09:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

MapEdit

Hello,

Can you actually demonstrate the source that you used that they are really supporting your map? How did you made this map from this sources if they are not available online? You must have this books. If so, can you demonstrate atlest one of the 2 newly added sources? If you could demonstrate it would make things a lot clearer. Thank you.Iadrian yu (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

File:StoneShield from Pecs.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:StoneShield from Pecs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 23:11, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

"pls do not modify Ramsey Muir's work"Edit

Hi. Never I modify an art work. But Ramsey Muir is a cartographer, not an artist. I accept modifications on my maps if I'm wrong, why can we not modify a Ramsey Muir's work if something miss ? --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 23:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

I do not want you to modify my upload. I will not start a debate about historical issues. Please respect my request. Thank you. Fakirbakir (talk) 23:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
I respect your will but this is not collaborative. According with Muir and many other english maps from this periode, Vlachs are appearing only in the XIV c., many centuries after the break down of the roman influence in the Balkans. From where are they growing ? From some seeds in the ground ? All studies about languages and toponymics show a pastoral romance-speaking dispersed population (later melting with the Slavs, the Magyars, the Pachenegs and the Comans) on the both banks of the Danube... But I understand this is not your preoccupation... --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Kingdom of Hungary Literacy 1900.pngEdit

Hello! I've created the map File:Kingdom of Hungary Literacy 1900.png 2 years ago and I am wondering if it is usable of wikipedia. Do you think that the county names on purple background aren't legible enough? Iaaasi (talk) 21:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

They are legible enough. The problem of legibility can be fixed up easily. I think this map is quite usable.Fakirbakir (talk) 22:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

A discussion that you might be interested in...Edit

...is taking place at File_talk:Lands_under_Louis_the_Great_in_the_middle_of_the_14th_century.jpg Iaaasi (talk) 09:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Please don't make blind reverts. The Southern borders of the map are clearly wrong a per modern historiography. Louis the Great only had authority over some parts of Northern Bosnia, and it is questionable that the actual Bosnia was vassal at that time. But the major problem is Serbia, which was certainly not a vassal state at that time. Also, the borders are so s wrong, Bosnia ruling northern parts of Albania and Macedonia? Please find me a single source for that. Sorry, I suppose Hungarians may like this map very much because it makes his rule over enormous territory, but at least in the South, that didn't happened at the alleged time. The map doesn't match to any maps of modern historiography for that period, and is a map made in the 19th century with obvious lack of information. It is not usual to use centuries old maps with majos factual errors as historical maps when they don't correspond to historical facts we know nowadays from that period. The map cannot be used as a historical fact as it was used in many articles. FkpCascais (talk) 16:42, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
I does not matter if the map is wrong or right. Look you can't "censor" Homolka's view. Fakirbakir (talk)

File:Oligarchs in the Kingdom of Hungary.pngEdit

Helló! Jó lett a térkép, ám Pok Miklós és a nemzetség nevét rövid -o-val írjuk, mert nekik természetesen nem sok közük van a nyolclábúakhoz. :) Másrészt, hamár bizonyos nevek angolosítva lettek, akkor lehetne konzekvensen a többit is: Stephen Ákos, Matthew Csák, Stephen Babonic. Üdv, --Norden1990 (talk) 22:00, 14 November 2014 (UTC)