User talk:Greyhood

Return to "Greyhood" page.
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Greyhood!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Greyhood!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/HolodomorEdit

Hi! I've recently noted the discussion over scholar sources for population loss in Ukrainian SRR due the 1933 Famine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/02_October_2011/Holodomor#Issue_2_-_victim_estimates and if it will be intresting for you I'll suggest "a third party view" - Source provided by Paul Siebert is nice - but there a magor point is missed - all of them estimate population losses for USSR in general - not for Ukrainian SRR - as Holodomor article scope is about. The major and highly graded scholar sources is missed - http://books.google.com/books?id=MTxiVqfUdL4C&printsec=frontcover&hl=uk&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

were at page 16 provided brief description about sources on topic - and specifically mentioned Conquest figure as it has no value in scholar terms of meaning.

Page 19-30 gives a detailed explanation on population loss estimations applyed - were calculated figures on death exceed given at tables at page 30.

  • France MESLE and Jacques VALLIN are demographers - they posess a sole profession in the world which deal with demography (birth, death). ThanksJo0doe (talk) 07:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, Jo0doe, it is very interesting. Demographic studies are very important on that topic, for sure we should use them! GreyHood Talk 18:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
As far as I know - it's only one published scholar work with full description about the method of exceed death for 1930 period estimations, specifically targeted the Ukrainian SRR and based on common for demographical statistics method. It's pure statistics - without any " popular demands". en:INED - is highly respected by UN SD institution.The same data was presented by author at 2008 Conference http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXE7z4HhjpU :29, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
[1]. GreyHood Talk 19:01, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks. If you are so brave to plan to include a food assistance section - I definitely reccomend not to use a printed in Russia sources ( I hope you understand why). So, if you are intresting in doing so - plase make a look at http://www.amazon.com/Years-Hunger-Agriculture-1931-1933-Industrialisation/dp/0333311078# with text February 1933 "the Politburo authorised the issue of over 800,000 tons of grain as seed to North Caucasus, Ukraine, the Lower-Volga Region, Urals and Kazakhstan; and a further 400,000 tons was issued before the end of the spring sowing. ... Between February and July no fewer than thirty-five Politburo decisions and Sovnarkom decrees - all secret or top-secret - authorised in total the issue of 320,000 tons of grain for food." This included 194,000 tons of food aid for Ukraine. A total of `nearly 2 million tons' was issued for seed, food and fodder. (you can see it at page 424-426) also can be on some extent usefull http://www.archives.gov.ua/Sections/Famine/Publicat/Fam-Pyrig-1933.php (published as book with isbn=978-966-518-419-5 - document № 237. ThanksJo0doe (talk) 09:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again! GreyHood Talk 19:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
  • I've note that the mediation was closed at the stage 2. So just for your info - an open letter by Maksudov (real name Babyonyshev) http://igrunov.ru/cat/vchk-cat-names/friends/babenyshev/1245325559.html with number of death - На время великого голода конца 1932го начала 1933 годов приходится не больше 2 миллионов погибших. And seems to me there a hoax in current lead :

anywhere from 1.8[5] to 12 million[6] ethnic Ukrainians - there nothing about ethnicity in sources cited http://www.melgrosh.unimelb.edu.au/documents/SGW-UkranianFamine_mortality.pdf page 5 - also it's a recent publication (2001). Similar story with 12 million - this highly criticized figure even not given for Ukraine - but for whole USSR. Claim over - estimates to between 2.4[7] and 7.5[8] million - Anatoliy Vlasyuk, Nationalism and Holodomor, p.53 - I've failed to find any scholar value of the "Drohobych portal" either who is Anatoliy Vlasyuk which opinion was added http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holodomor&diff=432628923&oldid=432528549 by Ljudyna. Nor sources suggested a were said to have been killed as a result of the famine If you'll have any intent to deal with this story and will need sources - please do not hasitate to ask.Jo0doe (talk) 10:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Putin drives a yellow Lada through the Amur Highway 1.jpegEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)


File:Putin drives a yellow Lada through the Amur Highway 1.jpegEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:08, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Poland can into Wikipedia.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Poland can into Wikipedia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 02:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I just want to say that I do support 'Poland can into Wikipedia' staying on wiki. You responded about my 'keep' vote,
Lol what a smart vote. Sounds like keep but contains a hidden call to delete and resurrect the old drama.
I'm not 100% sure what this means! But anyway the only delete votes are from EEML members or their unindicted supporters who go on a rampage of attempted censorship anytime someone posts something about Poland not conforming to their heroic/victimised Polish folktales, and I feel this is very relavant when evaluating their vote. If I could change the wording to better convey my point, please advise! 74.190.0.35 21:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Well thank you for your support. It's just that when I was creating the cartoon a had not any single thought about any actual Wikipedia editors. My point was to illustrate the meme. In the cartoon, Polandball just has assumed a typical role it often plays in Polandball cartoons. As for the pattern of nationalistic editing, almost any countryball could have been in place of Polandball - and in fact I intend to illustrate other countryballs as well - see Russia for the beginning, more to follow.
If you really want the cartoon to be kept onwiki, please remove the parts of your comment related to EEML and any specific editors - they are not really relevant here, and we need not escalating drama. Then I'll remove my response. Or strike both the named parts of your comment and my response. GreyHood Talk 21:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
edited as suggested. I hope this is better. 74.190.0.35 21:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, but you would better remove any mention of "offense". GreyHood Talk 22:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rd232 (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Spelling query in recent stripEdit

Should "oh no" be "oh noes" or am I just out of tune with teh interntz? Rich Farmbrough, 00:54 21 April 2012 (GMT).

You mean this? Yes, this seems to fit nicely, thx! GreyHood Talk 12:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
I've fixed it in the strip. GreyHood Talk 12:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
UR teh kewlz. Rich Farmbrough, 16:59 24 April 2012 (GMT).
Smile fasdfdsfoiueire.svg GreyHood Talk 22:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Rich cannot into Wikipedia?.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rich cannot into Wikipedia?.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sven Manguard Wha? 21:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:New Zealand can into Wikipedia.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:New Zealand can into Wikipedia.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 — billinghurst sDrewth 12:58, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Due to the nature of the cartoon nature, and from the EXIF data, I would like to see a clear statement of own work, and a corresponding release of licence via the Commons:OTRS process. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:00, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
I've sent a permission letter. GreyHood Talk 13:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

File:New Zealand can into Wikipedia.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New Zealand can into Wikipedia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Some photos for youEdit

In relation to this, let me say that others may take great stock of what is written in it, but frankly, I wouldn't wipe my dogs arse with The Daily Mail; nor any British shitrag for that matter, given their propensity to actively invade the private lives of people; whether that's chasing Princess Di to her death in chasing a fucking photograph, or hacking into the phones of dozens of people. The British press is the epitome of bottom feeding scum suckers, and this piece from the Daily Mail is no different. And they know this piece is to be used as shitrag, because no-one had the balls to put their name to it.

Anyway, I've found 2 free photos for you to insert into the Vladimir Putin article on English Wikipedia if you so desire.

I would suggest placing one of these photos (probably the sailing one) right next to where it is stated "Their photographs have never been published by the Russian media, and no family portrait has ever been issued."

It will be quite lulzy watching people's responses to the posting of these photos, given the shitrag comments in the article. russavia (talk) 23:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Aeroflot photosEdit

Hey mate, I've had a mate in Moscow give me a collection of photos to upload from the Aeroflot Airbus A320 olympic livery unveiling. See at Category:Aeroflot Airbus A320 Olympic livery unveiling

Some could be used on articles, such as:

What do you think? russavia (talk) 07:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Religion in Russia.pngEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Religion in Russia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kürbis () 15:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol givenEdit

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 21:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Thx! GreyHood Talk 15:26, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 openEdit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year


Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 09:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi mate, this is not my nomination of course. russavia (talk) 09:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Last modified on 7 March 2013, at 09:25