Last modified on 24 April 2011, at 15:45

User talk:Guérin Nicolas/Archives1

Return to "Guérin Nicolas/Archives1" page.
Français : Bienvenue sur Commons, Guérin Nicolas/Archives1!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png Les premiers pas

Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué.

Icon apps query.svg Obtenir de l'aide

Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.

Transmission icon.png Outils et astuces
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Vous avez fait une erreur ?
  • Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : {{bad name|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}}
  • Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

le Korrigan bla 00:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


Image:Moloch_cc03.jpgEdit

Image deletion warning Image:Moloch_cc03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

C-M 23:03, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

✓ Done : the problem has been fixed (the author of the picture released it in GFDL). Guérin Nicolas (messages) 14:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ibn haithem portrait.jpgEdit

Bonjour. Il faudrait justifier que cette production du gouvernement irakien est bien libre de droits d'auteur. Sebjarod 16:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Bonjour. Moi, je laisse tomber quand je vois ceci. En effet, pour les billets, chacun fait ce qu'il veut d'images d'objets en deux dimensions qu'il n'a pas créées (ça me dégoûte pour le respect des véritables auteurs... mais bon). Sebjarod 11:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

✓ Done : The problem has been fixed, the image is now under the license {{PD-Iraq}}, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Money of Iraq (2007-03-25). Guérin Nicolas (messages) 14:20, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Category:citys of villages of NavarreEdit

Hello, which happens is that in wiki in Spanish we always used the traditional name in Castilian although that I believe that Navarrese name will be solved with official # REDIRECT Them has of 4 types: Castilian single official in, two name official one for Castilian and the other for the euskera, are with this symbol name official in Castilian euskera and together/and name official single in euskera. Great work yours, I tapeworm intention to organize this but the truth me towards a little great thanks, a greeting.--miguillen 23:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC) PD: This is a automatica tradución of.Hola , lo que pasa es que en la wiki en Español usamos siempre el nombre tradicional en castellano aunque eso creo que se solucionará con los #REDIRECT Los nombre oficiales en Navarra hay de 4 tipos: oficial solo en castellano, dos nombre oficiales uno para el castellano y otro para el euskera, se muestran con este símbolo nombre oficial en euskera y castellano junto / y nombre oficial solo en euskera. Gran trabajo el tuyo, yo tenia intencion de organizar esto pero la verdad se me hacia un poco grande. gracias , un saludo.

Royal castle at EstellaEdit

You have add the image titled Image:Compostela_0411.jpg to the category of "Estella-Lizarra". I was born there and live there, and can say that this photo has not been taken in Estella because there is no any building similar to this one. You can see the real royal palace here. I have undone your edition. Thanks and excuseme because of my bad enghlis. --LiMaX 20:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Philip Greenspun illustration projectEdit

Thanks for the heads up, I put it in the wrong namespace. It is now in the correct Commons: namespace. Still needs a cat though. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Flickr imagesEdit

Hi. As a result of your request at Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers, I have added you to the reviewers list. Please see the instructions at Commons:Flickr images/reviewers and add {{user trusted}} to your userpage. You can ask me if you need any help. Cheers, giggy (:O) 23:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

G'day, in answer to your questions;
  • No, you don't need to use a script. I don't, I just manually add the code ({{flickrreview|USERNAME|~~~~~}}). Whatever is easiest for you.
  • With images such as Image:2371403246 e88fd8dca5.jpg, you don't need to make a deletion request (and while it's commendable, there's no obligation to search Flickr for the image either). Before I became an admin, when coming across copyvios uploaded from Flickr I'd just tag them with {{copyvio}} and include a link to flickr in my tagging. If no source is provided, you can just add {{subst:nsd}} and remove the Flickr tag.
Hope this helps...thanks for helping out! :) giggy (:O) 23:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

QuestionEdit

Hallo! Ich habe gesehen, dass du dich mit Cats hier auskennst. Ich habe ein kleines Problem mit den Cats. Ich habe die Cat: <Fläsch> angelegt, dann aber gesehen, dass sie nicht als Unterkat von <Cities and villages in the canton of Graubünden> erscheint. J' éspère que tu comprend ce que je veux dire, sinon, je vais essayer de l'expliquer en français. Merci! --Parpan 05:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank - perfekt! --Parpan 08:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Port Lincoln ParrotEdit

Thanks for uploading the photo of this parrot. Have you got any photos showing the front of the bird? Snowmanradio (talk) 10:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

It should have a yellow belly and a black on the top of its head. Commons has photographs of the Twenty-eight Parrot, another one of the four subspecies of the Australian Ringneck, with a green belly and a red forehead. If you could get some more photos from different angles, it would help complete the set and help to illustrate the Australian Ringneck page on the en wiki. The commons has quite a lot of parrot photographs, but they only cover about 60% of the parrot species. With parrots it is sometimes best to get photographs of both male and female, but I am not sure if there are any big differences with the Port Lincoln Parrot. If there are any Rosellas, it would be good to have photographs of pairs as the females are less bright in some (but not all) of the Rosella species. The juveniles of the Crimson Rosella have green backs. Some zoos have a particular subspecies of a parrot and it would be well worth recording these details, And this is just some of the Australian parrots. Good hunting. Snowmanradio (talk) 23:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

TranslationsEdit

Hi Gúerin Nicholas! Thanks for offering translations for the new upload form. Were you aware that there already excists French versions of those messages? MediaWiki:UploadFormPreviewOverwriteError/fr etc. If you'd like an administrator to change some of those excisting texts, please leave a message at the talk page of the relevant message, like MediaWiki:UploadFormPreviewOverwriteError/fr. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 13:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

En italique, svpEdit

Bonjour, merci de noter que les noms binomiaux des espèces doivent etre ecrits en italique. Et je suggere de mettre aussi un lien vers la galerie de l'espece, si elle existe. Par exemple, Picus viridis est beaucoup mieux que Picus viridis. Bien a vous Frédéric (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Port Lincoln ParrotEdit

Thanks for your Port Lincoln Parrot and other parrot photographs. Much appreciated. Snowmanradio (talk) 07:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Your photograph of the Neopsephotus bourkii and the conures are also much appreciated. And also the lovebirds, amazons, Australian parakeets ... Snowmanradio (talk) 11:35, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Caligo memnon (Wroclaw zoo)-1.JPGEdit

Une image peut avoir des endroits surexposés en raison des réglages de la caméra, et est possible même lorsque la lumière ambiante est très basse. L'histogramme de l'image peut indiquer si des endroits sont saturés par une surexposition. Cela dit, je n'appuie pas le FPX puisque je ne crois pas que l'image soit mauvaise, mais je ne suis pas encore décidé si je vais voter en faveur de l'image, et donc, je ne peux pas retirer le FPX. --S23678 (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Concernant l'histogramme, vérifie s'il y a un pic à l'extrême droite du graphique. Plus il est important, plus la proportion de l'image surexposée est grande. Le pic indique que la scène originale contenait de l'information sur une plage d'exposition plus large que ce qui a pu être capté par la caméra. Toutes les données qui normalement devraient se situer au delà de la droite du graphique sont concentrés dans le pic. La même chose est vraie pour une sous-exposition, mais le pic se trouve à gauche. Une vérification pour chacune des couleurs permet également de voir dans quelle couleur se situe la surexposition.
  • Concernant ma façon de voter, c'est en fait très personnel comme approche. J'évalue les pours et les contres, et je les compare. Mais spécialement, j'ai besoin d'avoir ce petit "wow" qui fait que j'ai envie de regarder la photo de plus près. Je crois que je suis plus sévère que la moyenne des gens qui votent, mais je crois que Commons a tout à gagner si nous sommes très sélectifs dans ce que nous appelons nous-même "nos images exceptionnelles"
  • Laisse-moi le temps de regarder ta gallerie et je te reviens avec mes impressions. --S23678 (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Impressions sur tes photosEdit

Je vais tout d'abord mentionner quelques points à propos de tes images, en les considérant toutes comme si elles étaient FPC
  • Habitat naturel: la présence d'une cage, d'égratignures de vitre d'aquarium ou de lumière aux tons non-naturels est habituellement mal reçue chez les FPC. Un semblant d'habitat naturel, ou mieux, une photographie d'animal sauvage aide généralement pour marquer des points.
  • Sujet décentré: On a tous tendance à centrer parfaitement le sujet de la photo puisque logiquement, le sujet principal devrait être au centre. Mais souvent, un décentrage au tiers de la photo permet d'ajouter de la profondeur à l'image, et dans le cas d'animaux, de l'intégrer plus facilement à son environnement.
  • Cadrage: Soit le cadrage est très serré (capture d'un visage, d'un détail), soit il inclut le sujet en entier, mais pas entre les 2.
  • Arrière plan: lorsqu'il est hors de focus, doit être d'un motif et d'une couleur ne détournant pas l'attention du sujet principal.
Je n'ai pas fini de regarder toutes tes photos, mais les suivantes sont celles qui ont du potentiel tant qu'à moi:

--S23678 (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Images de QualitéEdit

DOF = Deep of Field = Profondeur de champ: La profondeur de champ est en fait quelque chose qui théoriquement n'existe pas. La lentille de la caméra a toujours une mise au point exact et parfaite à une seule distance de l'objectif. Plus que l'on s'éloigne de cette distance, plus la mise au point est hors focus. La profondeur de champ est donc théoriquement nulle (ce n'est pas un champ, mais un point exact). Mais en photographie, la mise au point est considéré exacte quand l'erreur de mise au point est plus petite que la taille du microcapteur de pixels sur le CCD. Il y a donc un espace avant et après la distance de mise au point théorique où le sujet est au bon focus : le DOF.

Il y a 2 façons faciles de faire varier le DOF:

  • L'ouverture: Plus l'ouverture est grande, plus le DOF est petit, mais plus de lumière est captée.
  • La distance de prise de vue: Plus la distance de mise au point est éloignée, plus le DOF sera grand. Le DOF est en quelque sorte une règle de 3: si une photo prise à 1m a un DOF de 1 cm, pour avoir un bon focus sur un objet de 10 cm de profondeur, il faudrait prendre la photo à 10 m (Ce n'est pas exact, mais une bonne représentation). Une très grande distance permet de tout avoir au bon focus. --S23678 (talk) 21:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 208ba838b26138065610c5e0940af36fEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Would you ..Edit

please stop to make and fill categories of plants on species-level? Thanks a lot! Denis Barthel (talk) 22:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

The vote is over ten in favor of categories and not galleries, one person voted twice -- so I don't count that vote at all and me who thinks that they can exist together (both categories and galleries). Denis Barthel, if you know how to say stop then you also know where to find the current information about this.
I personally invision a whole new generation of nice users who are capable of making nice galleries when the images are worthy of the extra time, and categories -- that the old this way not that way world (which the software at least is bigger than) will mature with this idea. It is complex, I understand that. Denis Barthel: Take a deep breath and imagine making a gallery without taking apart the category.
Thank you both for your contribution. I worry about the day that the software is more capable than the people using it. -- carol (talk) 07:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Removing CategoriesEdit

I have seen that in a number of cases you created for a plant a new sub-category and replaced the original category by the sub-category. For example the sub-category Category:Genista_acanthoclada. I suggest to keep in such cases one photo which is most characteristic also in the higher category. If the user does not know the exact sub-category he/she can select on basis of the image which sub-category to choose instead of looking into 20 sub-categories --Wouter (talk) 09:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Denis BarthelEdit

Hi, sorry to disturb you but i had a bad message from User talk:CarolSpears on my talk page and reading his talk page i found a message from you threating about the same topic. I'm doing catorization of species (and article/gallery when i have more time), but CarolSpears told me to stop! I think i'm not stupid but giving me just an order without any explanation/reason, i simply don't agree. So, i just would like to know from you if there's any reason (guidelines?) for avoiding creation of species categories? Best regards. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 07:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I do not completely understand this. I recently made species categories for much (most) of Category:Malvaceae and I make species categories almost always when I renovate an image from an old book about it. Today, I found that Category:Lilium pyrenaicum which I made recently had been emptied and made into categories. I left a message with the person who did this asking them to wait for an agreement.
I would encourage you to make categories and to not take apart galleries or categories. Anyone who tells you that this is what they do here needs to look at the places where that is discussed to confirm that. -- carol (talk) 07:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your message, can you just give me a link to the vote/discussion in 2005, i would be very pleased. I just want to say additionally i can understand that CarolSpears removes cats from galleries, but i cannot understand that he removes also that from pictures leaving them without any cats (see Image:Dertosensis1.jpg to Image:Dertosensis9.jpg and Image:Lilium leichtlinii var leichtlinii.jpg). Is there any very good reason for that? Best regards. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 08:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Usually I add categories to galleries. I have only removed family names from categories when the genus category exists (I cleaned out a large family last week and put them into subfamily, genus and species). It is rare that I remove a category from a gallery -- they (the gallery makers) can't handle it mentally! So galleries that I have made species categories get to live in both genus and species categories due to the delicate nature of the gallery makers.
Commons:Categories vs Galleries is the recent discussion with opinions and experiences shared at Commons talk:Categories vs Galleries and Bartel got a mention at Commons talk:Categories vs Galleries#Resolution_.3F. -- carol (talk) 08:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
It would be nice, also, if you could type the whole word category the same as you are typing the whole word gallery. The "cats" and "gals" war is old and it give the appearance that you are a happy part of it. -- carol (talk) 08:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I will read the pages, i didn't that the word "cat" instead of "category" might be disturbing (for me it's just a shortcut). I have to go now. Thanks for page links and advises. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 09:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
It gets abused. -- carol (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, i need an advise from you: if there's a gallery and a category about a species, should i categorize the gallery with only the species category, or with only the genus category, or with both? Best regards. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 08:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

That is a nice template that is going on the galleries that you make. What reason do you really need advice from me? -- carol (talk) 08:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
I am going to put this chat here where it will be helpful to you, perhaps. I have left plenty of examples of what I do around. I do what I do. Other people do other things. I tried, for example, to have images of plant parts in the places where the plant descriptions start to use them but they were removed due to an idea and motivation to not have images in both the parent directory and the subdirectory. There are good reasons for that and good reasons to not have that. Interestingly enough, the TOL gallery makers never suffer from having that rule applied to them. The wiki rules are suggestions, some users seem to have them bend towards them more than other users.
The rules do not often "bend" towards me. -- carol (talk) 09:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I have recently read that User:Ikiwaner speaks for all of commons now, perhaps you should find out what we do from this user! Isn't it nice to have such a user? -- carol (talk) 09:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Escudos de Artazu y ArruazuEdit

Arruazu y Artazu son dos pueblos diferentes localizados en puntos distintos de Navarra. Ambos tienen escudo que curiosamente tienen la misma descripción Artazu: Trae de oro y un árbol de sínople. Arruazu: Trae de oro y un roble al natural. Ambas descriciones dan el mismo resultado aunque en el segundo habría que modificar el color del tronco. Para estos casos he usado la misma imagen como hay otros casos en Navarra. Bazta-Valcarlos-Zugarramurdi Para más dudas consulta el Armonial de escudos de Navarra Un saludo --miguillen (talk) 13:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Vallée du MarcadauEdit

Cher Nicolas,

Comme promis voici l’identification des photos de plantes de la Vallée du Marcadau. Ce sont manifestement des plantes de la région subalpine en sol acide.

Remarque : La détermination précise de quelques plantes n’est pas certaine : indiquée par un (?), voire impossible : indiquée par sp. sans photo de la plante entière ou au moins des feuilles.

  • Photos 1, 26, 27 & 28: Knautia dipsacifolia (?). Vraisemblablement pas une Scabiosa sp.
  • Photos 2 & 3: Dianthus deltoides
  • Photos 6 & 9: Dactylorhiza maculata
  • Photos 7 & 8: Prunella sp. (soit Prunella laciniata à fleurs violettes soit hybride Prunella laciniata × grandiflora)
  • Photos 10 &, 11: Carlina acaulis
  • Photos 12 & 13: Thymus pulegioides (ou espèce apparentée)
  • Photos 14 &, 15: Cirsium palustre
  • Photo 16: Dianthus hyssopifolius
  • Photo 17: Linaria alpina
  • Photo 18: Epilobium anagallidifolium (en fruit)
  • Photos 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 29, 81 & 82: Eryngium bourgatii
  • Photos 21 & 22: Carduus defloratus
  • Photo 30: Phyteuma sp.
  • Photos 31 & 32: Carlina acanthifolia (en bouton)
  • Photos 33, 34, 35 & 100: Digitalis purpurea
  • Photo 36: Campanula sp. (recta ou hispanica ?)
  • Photos 40 & 41: Saxifraga aizoides
  • Photos 43, 44, 69 & 70: Aconitum napellus s.l.
  • Photos 45 & 50: Erica tetralix
  • Photo 46: Trifolium alpinum
  • Photo 48: Calluna vulgaris
  • Photo 49: Sedum anglicum (?)
  • Photos 51 & 52: Allium victoriales (en fruit) (?).
  • Photo 54: Trifolium repens
  • Photos 55 & 56: Thymus serpyllum
  • Photo 58: Galles sur un Rhododendron ferrugineum
  • Photo 60: Campanula scheuchzeri
  • Photos 61 & 62: Caltha palustris (fruits)
  • Photo 63, 64: Parnassia palustris
  • Photos 67, 68, 90 & 91: Hypericum richeri subsp. burseri
  • Photos 72 & 75: Eriophorum angustifolium
  • Photos 73 & 74: Narthecium ossifragum
  • Photos 76 & 77: Angelica razulii (?)
  • Photos 78 &, 79: Gentiana burseri subsp. burseri (en fin de floraison)
  • Photo 80: Stachys officinalis (?)
  • Photos 83 & 84: Anthyllis vulneraria
  • Photos 85 & 86: Sedum hirsutum
  • Photo 87: Adenostyles alliariae subsp. hybrida (?)
  • Photos 88 & 89: Geranium pyrenaicum
  • Photos 92 & 93: Lactuca perennis
  • Photos 94 & 95: Gallium verum
  • Photo 103: Pinus uncinata

Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 08:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Gentiana burseriEdit

Cher Nicolas,

Voici comment distiguer Gentiana burseri de Gentiana lutea quand elles sont défleuries.

  • D'abord le type de stations :
    • G. lutea pousse surtout à relativement basse altitude et de préférence sur sol calcaire
    • G. burseri pousse généralement à plus haute altitude et sur sol acide
  • Ensuite la morphologie :
    • G. lutea a généralement un grand nombre de verticilles de fleurs. Les bractées sont courtes et en forme de cupule (Gentiana lutea)
    • G. burseri a généralement moins de verticilles de fleurs. Les bractées sont plus longues :et les bractées inférieures ont la même forme que les feuilles (Gentiana burseri)

Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 06:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Identification fautiveEdit

Tu as raison. Les trois photos prises au jardin botanique de Wroclaw ne sont certainement pas des Gentiana burseri susp. villarsii, mais d'une gentiane asiatique (du groupe tibetica ou dahurica ?). La susp. villarsii du sudouest des Alpes se différentie de la subsp. burseri des Pyrénées par ses fleurs ponctuées. Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 09:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thum.

Removing genus catEdit

Hi Guerin,

you remove the genus cats, please stop doing this. It makes me and many others do extra clciks which are completely unnecessary. The specieas categories in tehmselves are useless, and i'd much like to remove them all, but at least please leave the genus cats. Teun Spaans 20:32, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Images du proche-orient ancien.Edit

Merci pour tes contributions, et merci de penser à moi. J'ai juste un problème pour te répondre : je ne connais pas très bien ces périodes. Je pense que les bronzes du Lorestan sont intéressants, de même que tout ce qui a pu être trouvé à Suse. Le mieux est de t'adresser à Pentocelo qui te répondra plus précisément que moi. Sur la WP francophone, tu peux aussi t'adresser à Zunkir. Fabienkhan (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ibn haithem portrait.jpgEdit

Image deletion warning Image:Ibn haithem portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 02:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok, comme ça on y voit plus clair : l'image avait dû être supprimée, mais l'admin qui l'a fait a dû se planter quelque part, puisque la page apparaissait toujours. À priori c'est parce qu'elle est issue d'un billet de 2003. Sémhur (talk) 11:26, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Guérin, I just found out about this deletion discussion. I have created this account over here, and joined in the discussion at the deletion page. Hope you can swing by there again and let me know what you think about my thoughts. Deamon138 (talk) 08:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Le Clot - La Norma.jpgEdit

Salut peux-tu me dire si cette image est bien celle d'une station de ski des Alpes. C'est juste parce qu'elle apparaît dans l'article d'une station de ski des Pyrénées (voir http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Err-Puigmal ). Qu'elle est la bonne station. Amicalement. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 07:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Oui, je confirme, c'est bien la piste du Clôt de la station de la Norma en Haute-Maurienne, en Savoie. Je ne sais vraiment pas comment cette photo s'est retrouvée dans les Pyrénées! Je te laisse le soin de la retirer! ;-) Merci d'être attentif, continue comme ça! --Floflo (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Alhazen.jpgEdit

The license information for this image claims that the work is public domain because the copyright term has expired. When was the image drawn? Can you add a URL for the original source of the image? Thanks. Wronkiew (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

✓ Done Hi and thanks for the message, i added the basic missing information on that file. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 16:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
I restored the license information request tag because the essential source information is still missing. In order for the image to be public domain, the original author or copyright holder and the date of publication must be known. Unless I'm missing something, the only source information that you added was a note that it was transferred from en.wiki. Who was the artist who sketched Alhazen? Wronkiew (talk) 06:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


Image deletion warning Image:Alhazen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Guérin Nicolas (messages) 07:35, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: I think i will never transfer again files from en.wp to Commons: it's the second time that the associated license on en.wp looks fake and that this license is only checked after two years, this is not really serious. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 07:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

✓ Done Original picture on en.wp was finally unfree -> deleted. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 18:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Iraqi Dinar 1982 Ibn al-Haitham.jpgEdit

The bill does say 1981 on it. The person who originally scanned it claimed that it was from 1982. I don't know if Image:Ibn haithem portrait.jpg can be considered a faithful reproduction for PD purposes. Perhaps it can be re-cropped from the 1982 bill? Wronkiew (talk) 16:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Campanule des PyrénéesEdit

Cher Nicolas,

Il ne s'agit certainement pas d'une Campanula raineri qui est une endémique des Alpes bergamasques (région comprise entre le Lac de Côme et le Lac de Garde).

Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 07:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

{{Populate category}}Edit

Hi Guérin Nicolas, you might like this template, you can use it to automaticly fill up a category like Category:Greenovia diplocycla. Multichill (talk) 08:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, i will try. For the name of the gallery, should i input its name or leave the mentin hint? Guérin Nicolas (messages) 08:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
If the gallery and the category have the exact same name (like Greenovia diplocycla and Category:Greenovia diplocycla) you can add {{Populate category}}. If the gallery has a different name, you have to supply a hint. After you added the template the template will tell you on which galleries the bot is going to work (example without hint, example with hint). Multichill (talk) 08:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
I made a try at Category:Pelargonium cotyledonis. How long does it takes to populate? Guérin Nicolas (messages) 08:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Looks good. The bot runs every hour (currently at :35). Please dont hop talk pages, i have a watchlist and i use it :-). Multichill (talk) 09:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 09:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Unfortunatly that wouldnt produce any results. The images the bot works on have to be either in {{Uncategorized}} or in one of the parent categories (Category:Pelargonium in this case). Category:Conservatoire botanique national de Brest is neither of those so the bot wont touch Image:Pelargonium cotyledonis02.jpg & Image:Pelargonium cotyledonis03.jpg. I wrote it this way to prevent errors and vandalism. You can find a list of pages my bot *will* work on at User:Multichill/Category suggestions. Multichill (talk) 09:12, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Ok i see the point. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 09:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
We dont want Petrus to end up in Category:Porn actors ;-) Multichill (talk) 09:23, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Sure ;) I try again to call your bot when i will see an appropriate gallery : Category:Pelargonium peltatum should be good. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 09:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

I used this template, but the bot populated the categories with a few number of images due to the fact that most of the images had already categories. Would it possible to have a special permission like trusted user which would allow to populate the categories with images even if they have already other categories? Guérin Nicolas (messages) 11:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I have been thinking about it and might implement this in the future. Multichill (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

imageEdit

Hi, here it is the image link http://flickr.com/photos/chane58/312128949/ --Vilarrubla (talk) 18:34, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry but I'm not the holder of that image. I'm really interested in some help because it is dificult to find pictures from some parts of the Catalan Pyrenees (I write mostly in the Catalan Wikipedia). PD: I supose that Cadi Coop image can't upload because it is a logo? I don't know it when I put it but I uploaded it because it is more than a logo in la Seu d'Urgell it's like the underground logo of London. --Vilarrubla (talk) 23:38, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your help. It has been useful. ;)--Vilarrubla (talk) 19:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Problème SignatureEdit

Bonjour,

Sur la page FPC, J'ai vu qu'une de tes signatures, ouvrait une balise sup, mais ne la fermait pas. Je ne sais pas si c'est ton modèle qui est mal fait, ou si une personne l'a effacé par inadvertance (ou malveillance !). Peux-tu voir s'il te plait ? merci ! Benh (talk) 18:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

C'était sur un de tes votes, sur un FPC delist ici. Mais c'est sûrement qqun car ta signature sur ma page ne produit pas l'erreur. Tu ne peux voir car j'ai corrigé ! désolé ! Benh (talk) 20:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

spam toolsEdit

It certainly looks as if you were given a spam tool that put that template onto the categories you were making here.

If you have a keyboard, can you try something for me? Instead of using "gallery.js" try editing the gallery page (the link to edit the page is found in several locations on the gallery page). Manually type [[Category:gallery name]] (using whatever the gallery name is where I have put the words "gallery name") and save that. Then, using the now red link on the gallery page (at the lower parts of the page using monobook skin and at the upper parts of classic skinned pages) click through that and add it to the correct category. The correct category for a species would be the genus.

I use the classic skin and this is so easy to be manually accomplished that it is not needful to use a tool for, in my opinion. -- carol (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

I will consider your request, i just tried such tools to see how it works. Note : please, do not discuss about species categories and templates on my candidature page for adminship, it is not really the appropriate page, do it here as it is the most appropriate space. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 20:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough, can you find the portion of your contributions where you were not using javascript to work here? And, respectfully, this is a how-to I would nicely give to new users and not to a person requesting administrative privs after 2.5 years of activity. Please review what you are saying is not respectful here. -- carol (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
You are not a real person are you? Whoever is managing this user instance, please withdraw that admin request, thank you. -- carol (talk) 20:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Personal attacks are not allowed here. Please consider people with more respect. Thank you. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 20:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Do you have any evidence that you were not a javascript just mindlessly pasting things? Respectfully asked, carol (talk)

Catégorie CrocusEdit

Bonjour Nicolas,

Pour ton info : Après avoir mis de l'ordre dans la catégorie "Cyclamen" j'ai commencé à mettre de l'ordre dans celle des "Crocus".

C'est un travail de longue haleine, car cette catégorie contient un grand nombre de photos dont beaucoup étaient ou sont encore mal classées. J'ai loin d'avoir terminé !

J'ai ainsi vidé quelques catégories obsolètes et reclassé leurs photos dans les catégories correctes.

Pas mal de photos de la catégorie "Crocus vernus" étaient des photos de crocus de Hollande (cultivars de Crocus vernus et de Crocus flavus à grandes fleurs). Je les ai placées dans la catégorie "Crocus cultivars". NB : La plupart des photos de l'actuelle catégorie "Unindentified crocus" peuvent probablement être également placées dans la catégorie "Crocus cultivars".

Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 15:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Ta question : Pourquoi Crocus aureus est-il catégorisé dans Crocus flavus? Réponse : Crocus aureus est un synonyme de Crocus flavus.Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 09:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Ta question : C'est bizarre sur la wikipedia anglophone, crocus aureus est une redirection qui pointe vers crocus vernus, les deux sont-ils synonymes? Réponse : Crocus flavus ' (Syn. C. aureus)et d'autres espèces à floraison printanière ont été tous nommés par différents auteurs Crocus vernus, cf. notamment Flora Europaea - Crocus vernus. C'est ainsi que les crocus de Hollande à grandes fleurs sont considérés comme des cultivars de Crocus vernus s.l.. Ce sont en fait des cultivars de Crocus vernus et de Crocus flavus. J'ai corrigé le tir sur nl:Bonte krokus. Je n'ai pas vérifié la en:Crocus vernus. Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 13:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC) PS : Merci pour l'info sur la classification. Je vais immédiatement la mettre en pratique.
Pour ton info : Après une discussion circonstanciée avec l'utilisateur Ezhiki qui m'avait reproché d'avoir vidé le contenu de la redirection "Crocus aureus", cette redirection doublement fautive a été retirée par Mattinbgn. Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 10:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC) PS: J'ai entre-temps continué le nettoyage de la Catégorie "Crocus".
Je viens en outre de supprimer la catégorie obsolète "Crocus aureus" et j'ai placé son illustration dans la catégorie "Crocus flavus". Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 16:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Saint-Lary-Soulan.JPGEdit

Bonjour je viens de faire la modif , il faut dire que mon anglais est trés rudimentaire ce qui explique aussi mon vote sans commentaire Paternel 1 (talk) 13:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

je viens de faire le tour des photos j'espère ne pas en voir oubliés Paternel 1 (talk) 12:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

IfDEdit

I noticed you voted to keep this image: [1] Unfortunately, however, the image is almost certainly a copy vio. It was certainly copied from this web page: [2] The license is stated at the bottom: 'Copyright © 1996 Dr. Charles S. Finch, III, MD' If Commons uses it, we are violating Dr Finch's rights. By the way, user Crucifixion is very infamous for his copy vios. See the messages at the bottom of his talk page: [3] Most of his Commons images are just copy vios sadly. I hope this helps to increase your assessment of the situation. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Many ThanksEdit

Cross of Sacrifice.jpg
Dear Guérin Nicolas,
Thanks for your support of my Request for Adminship. I’m honored by your trust.


Cheers, SterkeBak

Au cas ouEdit

J'ai assemblé les deux parties avec Hugin (en les faisant se recouper.)

http://esby.free.fr/perso/images/temp/image.jpg

Esby (talk) 08:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Je crois que tu pourrais rajouter le site web original (pas le mien mais celui ou j'ai récupéré les images.) en expliquant que l'image est domaine publique et que donc leur licence est abusive. Même si un scan n'ouvre pas droit au copyright, ils l'ont quand même réalisé, cela permet aussi de localiser l'œuvre originale si ils en sont dépositaire. Esby (talk) 11:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
En France, la numérisation n'ouvre aucun droit au copyright, même si la BNF aurait tendance à prétendre le contraire. Il s'agit de reproduction en deux dimensions à l'identique, donc pas de 'threshold of originality', maintenant, créditer la personne ou l'organisme ayant scanné ou restauré le document reste la moindre des choses. Pour bien faire, il faudrait vérifier avec la loi espagnole si c'est identique. Esby (talk) 13:16, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear Administrator!Edit

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...
Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | +/−

Guérin Nicolas, congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Also consider joining #wikimedia-admin, the cross-wiki coordination channel for Wikimedia administrators. Any member of the channel can invite you in temporarily, but you need an invite exemption from a channel operator to get in whenever you want. Please come to #wikimedia and ask for an invite. Any admin from any project is welcome.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references....

Hope you will enjoy it. -- Cecil (talk) 18:32, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


Youpi ! Bon amusement ! le Korrigan bla 18:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

UpdateEdit

Thanks for the comments on that IfD. I trust only 3-4 of Crucifixions images which have the correct Metadata. The rest are pure copy vio. Admin Collard on Commons told me flat out once that "we know most of his work are copy vios even if we can't locate where he got the images from"...or words to that effect. BTW, I just got a legitimate replacement for that copy vio which is in the Met museum of NY: Image:Funerary relief of Amenemhet I from El-Lisht by John Campana.jpg from a flickr owner who agreed to change the license to let it be used on WP. So, I would say: 'problem solved.' With kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

  • BTW, is there a Rfa page where I can check who is running for an Adminship on Commons. Personally, I am upset that I couldn't vote to support SterkeBak during his Rfa here. As usual, I am the last to know about such things sadly. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

FélicitationsEdit

Cher Nicolas,

Avant toute chose, mes félicitations pour ta nomination.

Pour ton info : Voici le message que je viens d'adresser à Jean-Marc Rosier

J'ai pu identifier ta photo Crocus at north of the montagne sainte Victoire by JM Rosier 1.JPG. Il s'agit de l'espèce Crocus versicolor, un crocus printanier endémique du sud-ouest des Alpes (France et Italie). La couleur de la fleur varie de blanc à bleu violacé - d'où le nom versicolor. On la reconnaît facilement par la striation caractéristique de son périanthe.
J'ai catégorisé la photo sur Commons et l'ai placée sur la page Crocus dans la galerie des espèces printanières pour lesquelles des photos sont actuellement disponibles sur Commons.
Pour ton info, il existe 4 espèces de Crocus en France :
  • Deux espèces à floraison printanière :
    • Crocus vernus subsp. albiflorus : toutes les montagnes, sauf les Vosges
    • Crocus versicolor : sud-ouest des Alpes, endémique
  • Deux espèces à floraison automnale :
    • Crocus nudiflorus : Cévennes et Pyrénées
    • Crocus ligusticus (Syn. Crocus medius) : sud-ouest des Alpes et Apennins ligures, endémique

Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 07:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

OrnitosophieEdit

Deux-Esprits étant dans l'impossibilité de vous répondre directement je me fais son relais pour vous signaler que le logo que celle à mise en ligne est la reproduction d'un symbole dont l'origine se confond avec celle de la civilisation puisqu'on le retrouve employé sur les sites de Tarxien à Malte, sur les pentes des monts Ida de Crête et de Troade en Anatolie, dans la grotte de Cumes prés de Naples, dans les temples bouddhistes Indiens, Tibetins, Chinois et Coréens, jusque plus prés de nous, sur les ailes des appareils de la JAL. Cela dit, si vous désirez l'effacer, ne vous en privez pas car peu ici méritent de l'utiliser sans risquer d'en pervertir la signification. Cordialement, Dany.

Category:Images from Wikis Take Manhattan by Mark Frank and Chloe CarliEdit

I have now filled in all the missing fields in Category:Images from Wikis Take Manhattan by Mark Frank and Chloe Carli. Thank you.--Pharos (talk) 11:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

ResponseEdit

@ User_talk:MBisanz#Flickr_review. MBisanz talk 17:54, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bateau bleu.JPGEdit

Bonjour,

Merci de ton message. Si le faut supprimez la. Je ne m'oppose plus au suppression de mes photos par principe. Je ne fait que le constater et le deplorer, c'est tout. Par contre, je ne mets des photos que sur commons. A bientot. CaptainHaddock (talk) 17:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Lamproponius guerini and taxonomic categories of PhasmatodeaEdit

Is it correct like I did it now (look here and also Category:Pachymorphidae please)? Thank You for advises? --Drägüs (talk) 13:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Vallée du Marcadau 100.JPGEdit

I've blurred the background of the image, how does it look? Perhaps a crop as well? Commons:Graphic_Lab_School/Images_to_improve#Can_you_improve_this_picture_.28decreasing_the_noise.29.3F

Liens entre page perso de photographes CommonsEdit

Bonjour.

J'ai créé sur ma page un chapitre appelé "D'autres photographes talentueux". Vous pourriez créer un chapitre similaire sur votre page perso Commons et m'inclure dedans. --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Mise à la retraiteEdit

Bonjour Nicolas.

A la fin de ce mois je serai mis à la retraite. Je vais profiter de cette retraite légèrement anticipée pour me consacrer (encore) plus intensément à la botanique et à Wikipédia

Dès que j'aurai une nouvelle adresse courriel je te la communiquerai.

Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 08:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

File:RiseAgainstlive2006.jpgEdit

I am confused as to why this image was deleted. According to the tags on Flickr, the work can be copied, distributed and transmitted. I don't understand how this prohibits its use on Wikimedia. Timmeh37 (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Image impossible à transférer sur WFEdit

Bonjour Guérin

J'essaye d'importer des images sur WF, mais cela ne fonctionne pas pourtant les images ont des licenses Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5, Attribution ShareAlike 2.0 and Attribution ShareAlike 1.0. Voici un exemple File:Almoravid Dynasty 1073 - 1147 (AD).PNG [4] Merci --Great11 (talk) 04:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

image Javier Maroto AranzábalEdit

Bonjour Guérin nicolas, nous avons vu que vous avez effacé notre photo 'javier maroto aranzábal' de wikimedia commons. Nous ne comprenons pas pourquoi parce que c'est une photo de notre proprieté. Pouvez-vous, s'il vous plaît, nous expliquer porquoi et nour dire comment est-ce que nous devons le refaire correctement. D'avance, merci. --Grupomunicipalpp (talk) 20:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Prunella hastifoliaEdit

Cher Nicolas,

Je viens de créer la catégorie Prunella hastifolia et d'y téléverser deux photos de cette espèce que je possède dans ma rocaille. Ces plantes proviennent de semis de plantes qui poussaient à Font Romeu (Pyrénées orientales).

Tu te souviendras que j'ai identifié la brunelle que tu avais photographiée dans la vallée du Marcadau comme étant un hybride, car elle avait des bractées foliacées sous l'inflorescence. Tu remarqueras que ce n'est pas le cas de celles poussant dans ma rocaille, qui sont donc des Prunella hastifolia.

Amicalement, --Réginald (To reply) 12:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Psittacula krameri (Wroclaw zoo).JPG, File:Psittacula krameri (Wroclaw zoo)-1.JPGEdit

I recategorised these two files to place them with other domesticated variants of the species, separate from natural wild individuals. Why did you revert this as though it were vandalism? - MPF (talk) 17:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

They are bright yellow, not the natural green wild-type colour; that very clearly is a sign of domestication. And they have (per the en:domestication article) "become accustomed to human provision and control". But even if you disagree with this, it is not right to use the 'revert' facility for a disagreement of opinion; it is too inflammatory, as it is something normally reserved for vandalism, not for undoing legitimate edits that one happens to disagree with. - MPF (talk) 20:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup! MPF (talk) 23:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Image manquanteEdit

Salut, il semblerait que tu es oublié d'uploader cette image.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Palais_de_Rumine_(Lausanne)-12.JPG

Esby (talk) 06:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Photographers BlackbeltEdit

Wikipedia laurier photo.png
Judo black belt.PNG
THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
J'ai l'honneur de vous décerner la Photographers Blackbelt (ceinture noire des photographes) pour vos photos remarquables et excellentes.
--ComputerHotline (talk) 18:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Image effacé (réponse)Edit

Merci de ton intervention, cela me convient très très bien ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 13:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Re : RécompenseEdit

Ah merci pour ta récompense, cela fait plaisir :) C'est parce que j'ai passé les milles imports d'images aussi? Guérin Nicolas (messages) 13:59, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Go-game-ear-reddening.jpegEdit

File:Go-game-ear-reddening.jpeg wasn't Flickr-washing, in my humble opinion. The file was uploaded to commons at around the same time it was uploaded to flickr. What's more, at the same time several pictures like the one uploaded to commons were uploaded to flickr. Erik Warmelink (talk) 01:24, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

You answered «since the original license is "all rights reserved" on Flickr, we cannot upload it on Commons», and I agree, we can not upload it to commons. However, the photographer may upload it and as far I can tell the photographer was the one who uploaded the picture to commons. Erik Warmelink (talk) 11:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, he didn't upload it from Flickr to Commons: he uploaded it to Flickr and to Commons. He owns the copyright, he can give a copy to Flickr under a restrictive license and another copy to Commons with an almost unrestricted license. As far as I know, he can not withdraw the "free" license and so he can not sell an exclusive license. Erik Warmelink (talk) 11:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Yes, undeleting followed by a standard deletion request sounds great. I am not even sure that it should stay, but I do think that some discussion might be worth the trouble. At the very least, I will learn something about policy. Erik Warmelink (talk) 12:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, and my apologies for that big pictures (for a red link "File" or ":File" are almost the same, not so for a blue link). Erik Warmelink (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

POTDEdit

Bonjour :) There has been a change in the POTD arrangement for the coming days (you can see the justification at the POTD talk page) and File:Su-27UBM Radom 2009 c.JPG was selected for September 30. As you can probably see, the picture lacks the majority of captions, including the French one. The appropriate template - Template:Potd/2009-09-30 (fr) - still contains the previous caption, for the photo moved to October 1. I would greatly appreciate it if you could substitute it with a translation of the English caption which you can find here: Template:Potd/2009-09-30 (en). If at the moment when you read this the two captions are already identical, it means someone already changed them. In that case, sorry for you trouble. Airwolf (talk) 10:52, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Galemys pyrenaicusEdit

Mais oui, j'ai encore plus des photos sur le desman. Quand j'aurais le temps, je les téléverserai chez Commons. La photo t'a plût? As-tu un spéciel intérêt sur les desmans? Tu en as besoin de quelqu'un ou d'un detail? Peut-être, le long de ce mois, je pourrai photographier encore plus. --DPC (talk) 13:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Une autre A+ --DPC (talk) 08:09, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Très bien! J'ai traduit les notes à l'espagnol.--DPC (talk) 14:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
La troisième A+ --DPC (talk) 17:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Notes de la troisième traduitées. Merçi.--DPC (talk) 10:27, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Col d'AgnesEdit

Bonjour Nicolas. La photo du Col d'Agnes n'a pas été prise depuis un sommet mais depuis un replat sur la pente d'une petite colline située en face du col. Cette colline n'a pas de nom particulier sur la carte IGN 1:25000. La géolocalisation de l'endroit de prise de vue mentionnée sur la page de l'image est assez précise si je me souviens bien. -- Basilus (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

This DREdit

It was a mistake to restore this image. Admin captain tucker tried to contact the flickrowner with no success. I recommend it be deleted too. Sorry, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't see where the mistake is: i deleted myself such a picture, then i got a reclamation from the uploader (that the copyright holder agreed to upload such a picture), so i decided to restore it and to nominate it for deletion in order to have a votation from users. This is the normal procedure and i explained carefully the situation in the [introduction of the deletion request. So, where is the mistake? Can you explain me? Thanks. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 12:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
  • No there was no mistake sorry. Admin captain tucker tried to contact the flickrowner and got no response. So, it had to be deleted eventually. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Personal rightsEdit

Bonjour Nicolas. J'ai besoin de votre aide, s'il vous plait. J'ai publié ici des photos, tout en ignorant les regles de Commons à propos de la violations des droits des personnes que j'ai fotografié. Je n'ai jamais reçu le consensus pour la pubblication. C'est ma faute et je m'excuse. Comment faire pour les effacer? Est-ce que vous pourriez m'aider? Les photos sont: File:A woman's portrait.JPG File:Portrait d'une femme.jpg File:A girl looking at herself in the mirror.jpg Merci beaucoup. Alessandro Zangrilli

Just for your information. Alessandro has asked 12 admins at the same time to perform these deletions. In between, regular DRs have been filed for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portrait d'une femme.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:A woman's portrait.JPG, whereas the third image is heavily used on many projects. I would recommend not to file a speedy without any further input from the uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 13:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

De-adminship warningEdit

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Guérin Nicolas/Archives1. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Huib talk Abigor @ meta 08:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Season greetingEdit

Cher Nicolas,

Je te souhaite un joyeux Noël et une excellente année 2011. J'espère que nous pourrons continuer à collaborer pour améliorer le contenu botanique cette remarquable encyclopédie.

Amicalement, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 14:02, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

PS : Y a-t-il autant de neige à Zürich ? Chez nous dans le centre de la Belgique, ce sera le premier Noël blanc depuis mon enfance.

Admin inactivityEdit

Hi Guérin Nicolas. I am sad to tell you that your adminship has been removed in acordeance with our inactivity policy. If you'd like to be a sysop again, I'd kindly ask you to request so at COM:RfA. Sorry to tell you this bad news, abf «Cabale!» 15:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


Hi Guérin Nicolas, as you are no longer admin, would you mind to remove the admin-bit from your babel-box. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 22 April 2011 (UTC)