User talk:Holger.Ellgaard/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Erskine och Möller-Nielsen.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Ralph Erskine porträtt av Sundahl.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ralph Erskine porträtt av Sundahl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 15:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Fjärilsstigen skylt 2015.jpg

And also:

File:Fjärilsstigen skylt 2015a.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Mälarpromenaden skylt 2015a.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Mälarpromenaden skylt 2015a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 00:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Stina W 2.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Stina W 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 00:26, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

File:H55 6.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:H55 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Didym (talk) 23:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Natura2000logo.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Natura2000logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Basvb (talk) 20:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:Ljuskronan och Ljussaxen

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo, hast du vergessen diese Kategorie in Category:Public housing in Sweden einzusortieren oder liegt der Flickr-Fotograf mit seinem miljonprogrammet-Tagging hier falsch? Die "Einstufung" als Sozialwohnungsblocks schien mir aufgrund Architektur, Größe und Lage der Anlage durchaus plausibel, aber nachdem du den Architekten wusstest kennst du vielleicht auch die Umstände der Errichtung. Danke für die tollen neuen Fotos! FDMS 4 01:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Das "de:Millionenprogramm" lief von ungefähr 1965 bis 1975 während Ljuskronan och Ljussaxen zwischen 1958 und 1972 entstanden, also teilweise miljonprogrammet. Und sicherlich passt Category:Ljuskronan och Ljussaxen auch noch in weitere Kategorien. Für mich sind "Category:Buildings in Gröndal" und "Category:Bertil Karlén" massgebend. Tschüss --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Commons:File renaming - Criterions

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

If you rename your own uploads, you should use Criterion #1. Read the table on Commons:File renaming page, please ;-) In this case should be Criterion#1, #3 or #4, but not #5: I don't see any vulgarities and adds there. But Criterion#1 is best: it has no conditions to fulfill.
The proper template is:
{{rename|Kabukicho along Yasukuni Street, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 2011-03-20 (by Peter Stewart).jpg|3|This location is not {{C|Akihabara}}, but {{C|Kabukichō, Tokyo}}. For details, see Note on description.}}
{{rename| ''new name'' | ''the number of the Criterion'' | ''verbal explanation''}}
for example: {{rename|Skånelaholm huvudbyggnad mot sydväst 2015a|1|typo}}
{{rename|Skånelaholm huvudbyggnad mot sydväst 2015a|1|mistake}} Have a nice day :-) Wieralee (talk) 07:38, 10 June 2015 (UTC

OK! Thank You for helping me! Have a nice day! --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

One more time ;-) There's something wrong with this file name: [1]. It's occupated. Choose a new name, please. Wieralee (talk) 08:07, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, I don't understand. The new name is "File:Skånelaholm inre flygeln mot nordväst 2015" and name "File:Skånelaholm södra inre flygel 2015.jpg" will be deleted. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

1) It would be never deleted - it would have a redirection inside.

2) The new name is busy, there's another file with this name on Commons File:Skånelaholm inre flygeln mot nordväst 2015.jpg

Wieralee (talk) 08:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Oh - I see!! Sorry!--Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Skånelaholm inre flygeln mot nordväst 2015

File:Lillienhoffska palatset skylt.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lillienhoffska palatset skylt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 11:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Lillienhoffska palatset skylt.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

File:Lillienhoffska palatset skylt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 22:20, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the mess. Probably my fault. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 22:23, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Upp till kamp!

Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

Holger, för fasiken! Försvara våra bilder! Edaen har hjälp till. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Hej! Jawohl! Jag lämnade mitt namn på tyska namninsamlingen. Vad för hjälp har Edaen? --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:05, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Här Holger! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:17, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Achso! Jag trodde du menade EU-omröstningen att beskära panoramafriheten som var idag. Den innebär att vi inte längre får avbilda byggnader som är ritade av arkitekter döda för 70 år sedan och senare. Jag är less på commons diskussioner, dessutom på engelska, men skall göra en insats. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:42, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

EU-omröstningen gick väl sådär: allt förblir som det är nu. En sak som bekymrar mig är frågan om bilder på Internet. Vissa påstår ju att panoramafriheten inte gäller där. Här finns det till exempel informationsmaterial (propaganda) från BUS där det står så. Jag hoppas innerligt att BUS förlorar i målet mot WMSE. Om EU-parlamentet hade fått igenom kravet på tvingande panoramafrihet i hela EU, hade frågan ändå lösts på ett bra sätt tids nog. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:22, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Hej Stefan4! Ja, jag följde EU-debatten och omröstningen och det var väl bra (för oss i Sverige) att ingenting ändrades. BUS är liksom Fotografers Förbund part i målet och företräder sina medlemmar. Det betyder inte att de alltid har rätt. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:17, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Det jag har sett i media och på Internet är att kunniga jurister verkar ha lite olika åsikter om vad som gäller. Det betyder förmodligen att det är oklart vad som gäller. Det är väl även därför som Högsta domstolen beviljat prövningstillstånd; HD brukar inte döma om självklarheter. I en sådan situation väljer förstås BUS att stödja det förslag som är mest ekonomiskt lönsamt för BUS' medlemmar. Vet du om det blir någon rättegång någon gång? --Stefan4 (talk) 17:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Hej Stefan4! Så vitt jag förstår ligger ärendet nu hos HD. När rättegången blir av vet jag inte, men här kan du följa en aktuell tidslinje: Tidslinje och samling av länkar relaterade till BUS stämning av Wikimedia Sverige. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Nya Slussen modell.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Nya Slussen modell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Citymodellen 2.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Citymodellen 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 11:38, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Holger.Ellgaard. Hast du die mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung von File:Sördalens konstgång 2012.webm auf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq3yVyeWqz0 gesehen? Gruss --Capricorn4049 (talk) 10:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Nein, aber jetzt. Da fehlt die Nennung des Urhebers. Wie geht man dagegen an? Gruss --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 11:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Ich weiss auch nicht so genau. Vor allem macht es der "Guía Vida Sostenible" mit System. Hier steht ein Bisschen was, was man machen kann. Ich habe ihm zu meinem Video, dass er gestohlen hat eine Nachricht dieser Art hinterlassen. Gruss --Capricorn4049 (talk) 12:04, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Danke! Mal sehen ob ich mir die Mühe mache. Tschüss --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 12:23, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Cirkus Europa Nyhammar 2013a.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Cirkus Europa Nyhammar 2013a.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera ^(talk) 14:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Susegårda

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hej, Jag såg dina bilder på Susegårda i Stavnäs och blev nyfiken på huset. Såvitt jag kunde se verkar huset tillskrivas Ferdinand Boberg och inte Ragnar Östberg. Är det en förväxling, eller finns det andra källor som pekar ut Östberg? Kul förresten att den Djuröbron fick lite uppmärksamhet.--ArildV (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Hej, kul att du tyckte om min broartikel. Var extrem svårt att samla in uppgifter via nätet, men fick sedan stor hjälp av Skärgårdsmuseets klipparkiv. Det var även Skärgårdsmuseet som tipsade om Susegårda (tyvärr f.n. i förfall). Susegårda ritades samtidigt som Waldemarsudde av Boberg och byggdes av samma entreprenör som Waldemarsudde och byggnadsmaterial från gamla Waldemarsudde användes i Susegårda. Det kan man läsa i "Stavsnäs by - en kulturhistorisk värdefull miljö i Värmdö kommun" av Johan Aspfors. I min verksförteckning av Bobergs arbeten är Susegårda dock inte med. Därför bör man väl säga att Susegårda "tillskrivs" Boberg. Det skall alltså vara Ferdinand Boberg och inte Ragnar Östberg. En förväxling av mig. Tack för uppmärksamheten! Hälsningar Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 09:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Apropå en annan sak. user:Boberger har haft kontakt med Stockholms stad om att vi ska få komma in i Kolingsborg och fotografera interiören innan de börjar riva. Det verkar lösa sig, men datumet är inte bestämt än. Vi tänkte att du kanske skulle vilja vara med också?--ArildV (talk) 16:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Absolut! Meddela mig när det blir aktuellt på min svenska användarsida. Tyvärr är ju väggmålningarna inte fria. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Pathé Polka-Marche nr 6729 (1905).webm

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Holger, kannst du da bitte noch etwas mehr zur Musik sagen? Ich möchte nur sicher sein, dass es da bei Motd keinerlei Probleme mit dem Copyright gibt. Gruß aus Marburg, --Pristurus (talk) 13:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Leider nicht. Ich habe vergeblich versucht, den Urheber ausfindig zu machen. Die Aufnahme ist von 1905 und ich nehme an, dass der Urheber seit 70 Jahren tot ist. Wenn dir das zu unsicher ist, nehme ich die Nominierung zurück. Kein Problem! Gruß aus Stockholm. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brodtener Ufer Sept 2014b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ringhals.JPG

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)