Hyacinth

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hyacinth

Archives /Archive

Suspect wrong in File:Roman numeral analysis major, natural minor, harmonic minor, melodic minor.png

Hello,

I suspect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numeral_analysis#/media/File:Roman_numeral_analysis_major,_natural_minor,_harmonic_minor,_melodic_minor.png has some wrongs. 1. At the first line (C major), should the sixth one be "vi"? (You used "vii") 2. At the same line, should the seventh one be B diminished? (You used "m") — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llf (talk • contribs) 06:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) User:Llf means this file. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

@Llf: If you wish to link to a file inline, without displaying the file, use a colon ([[:File:Roman numeral analysis major, natural minor, harmonic minor, melodic minor.png]])

Please sign and date your comments on talk pages (it is required per Commons:Signatures). Using four tildes (~) is the easiest way.

Thanks for catching the error! I'll fix it and upload the correction. Hyacinth (talk) 01:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Accompanied_by_audio

Accompanied by audio has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 13:02, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Bad SVG

Hi Hyacinth, you tagged a lot of file with Bad SVG. Thank yu for your contribution.
But want you wanted to tag was (in most cases) a librsvg bug; it made the drawings bad loking, but with "Bad SVG" we classify SVG images with emdedded raster graphics. This can be misunderstood, but should not be mixed up. -- sarang♥사랑 12:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

@Sarang: Would you prefer {{Rsvg bug}}? Hyacinth (talk) 23:54, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

As you can see, at Chinese jump rope moves or positions.svg and others I changed the tag from "bad" to "bug". -- sarang♥사랑 08:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Template:Trimming

Template:Trimming has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:26, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Radiohead "Creep" ostinato.png

File:Radiohead "Creep" ostinato.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 07:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Tonic

Tonic has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 04:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Hyacinth, thank you for your input on Category:Tonic. However, I think the changes you made (moving things from that category to a new category) should have waited until the discussion was complete. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

fractal islands

Hi. You have changed name of category fractal curves to fractal islands. What do you mean island here ? If closed curve, then it is subtype of curve. I have found only one link to that name. Is it a standard use ? Have a nice day/ --Adam majewski (talk) 08:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

File:G-sharp melodic minor scale ascending and descending.png

File:G-sharp melodic minor scale ascending and descending.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

193.116.250.93 00:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

The more Wikipedians abuse me and the more spam bullshit I have to deal with the less reasonons are left for me to use Wikipedia. Why are healthy edits discourage and spam like this bull are allowed? I shouldn't contribute if I have to compete with spam, just like a professional athlete shouldn't have to compete with canned food. Hyacinth (talk) 04:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm sick of people taking jokes seriously as "respecting the process", when they obviously don't, and then being accused, while being serious and respecting the process, of not respecting a process that does not yet exist. Hyacinth (talk) 04:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

"Nonsensical & disruptive nomination". Hyacinth (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Maple Leaf Rag seventh chord resolution.png

Hello,

Looks like a timing error in the last 2 notes of bar 2, treble staff. In the original sheet music, these are an 8th note followed by a 16th note. This has been copied into Wikipedia's "Jazz" page. I tried to correct that, but it then said "Musical scores are temporarily disabled", so I cancelled it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frunsorl (talk • contribs) 22:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@Frunsorl: PNG files and the scores which were/are "temporarily disabled" are different things. The file is a PNG image, usually supported by a MIDI file or other audio. The "scores" are computer programming that create scores and, potentially, audio files to accompany them. If you're going to propose another rhythm you should, ideally. have a source, such as a score, book, or article, to support your assertion. Hyacinth (talk) 05:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

OK, here's a scan of the original: http://www.musicsheaf.com/scores/joplin/mapleleaf/scan3.html#img — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frunsorl (talk • contribs) 16:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Pinh How do you know that it's nor the final resolution and not a previous repetetion? Hyacinth (talk) 16:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi. These last 4 bars of the piece are unique. Obviously only the 2nd volta is shown in the snippet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frunsorl (talk • contribs) 20:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

You can and should sign your posts with four tildes. On Wikipedia verifiability is valued over anything, including the truth. So if you feel that something is obvious, you should find verifiable source claiming that the obvious is the truth. See: WP:V Hyacinth (talk) 15:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Hyacinth. In the scan I referenced above, the final 2 bars are the 1st and 2nd voltas at the end of the piece. Just before them are the 1st 3 bars of the snippet. The last 2 chords of the 2nd of these bars show the timing difference I mentioned. Frunsorl (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

@Frunsorl: Since Wikipedia verifies reliability/relies on verifiability, you'll have to admit a better source than your witness of the score, such as the crediting for the actual score itself. Hyacinth (talk) 02:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Peano Sierpinski carpet 4.png

File:Peano Sierpinski carpet 4.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Huntster.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Vectorized Composite number Cuisenaire rods 10.png

Hi, I vectorized your upload, Composite number Cuisenaire rods 10.png, as Composite number Cuisenaire rods 10.svg. Thanks! --Smitop (talk) 14:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

About File:Aschbeg in op.19.png

I noticed that you originally uploaded this file back in 2010 as a non-free file. It has since entered the public domain in Austria (70 years after the author's death) and as such has been brought over to Commons. However, we do not have the original, non-reduced file. It was created in a program called Sibelius 5, and I was wondering if you could upload the original file. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Oinkers42 Why? The reduced image is not a copy of an original. What about reduction creates copyright? You're asking me to have a user contact me and ask me reduce my pngs before uploading. Hyacinth (talk) 18:13, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

The reason why I asked was to get the larger file, not any indication that the reduction caused a copyright violation. I wanted the larger file in order to replace this file with the original, as to have a larger image. Sorry about the confusion though. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

@Oinkers42: How's the new upload? Hyacinth (talk) 01:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 13:23, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

About File:Staircase_of_largest_squares_abacaba_pattern.svg

I believe that this file does not accurately represent the abacaba staircase. The sides of each square should be exactly double the length of the previous square. The "c" and "d" squares should poke out between the aba groups. I'm going to create a new version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skuck (talk • contribs) 13:51, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

created .svg version (via TikZ) of one of your diagrams

Hi, just wanted to let you know I made some TikZ code which creates a vector graphics version of your file File:Farey diagram circle packing 6.png. You also created a version showing the order 4 Farey sequence of the real line... but numbered it incorrectly as if it was the order 5 version! I've submitted a rename request; once completed I'll upload a .svg version of the order 4 Farey diagram of the real line too. Page 20 of Hatcher has a diagram showing the vertices of the graph labelled with the corresponding rational numbers. Neuroxic (talk) 14:07, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Template:Category disambiguation

Template:Category disambiguation has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim55 (talk) 13:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Template:PD ineligible

Template:PD ineligible has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Q28 (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:Ethnic_and_religious_slurs

Ethnic and religious slurs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

RZuo (talk) 14:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)