User talk:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/Archive 8

0 Haltinne - Château.jpg

Hallo, I was not really convinced by the new version, so I made an own try. Feel free to rollback if you don't like it. --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pleurotus ostreatus JPG2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI.--ArildV 10:06, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Ange à la couronne de P. Naldini - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but the sky is a bit noisy, and there is a slight CA. Could you please remove the many dust spots (some are annotated). All correctible IMO.--Jebulon 17:15, 26 November 2011 (UTC)  Done suivant conseils prodigués -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:12, 27 November 2011 (UTC)For me, good now, thank you.--Jebulon 11:35, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hensies RN1cJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too excessive noisegrain reduction? Lost a lot of detail. See also images note.--ArildV 09:32, 24 November 2011 (UTC)  Done Please check the new version -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:32, 27 November 2011 (UTC) OK now IMO.--ArildV 09:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Botassart - Tombeau du Géant (1)JPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:35, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Bruxelles - Petit Sablon - Blanchisseur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oui.--Jebulon 14:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Prunus serrulata - Kalmthout (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Betula uber JPG1Fe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, although crop a bit too tight --Gidip 19:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acer griseum JPG01b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Gidip 19:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Publicité murale - Houdeng-Aimeries.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- MJJR 22:17, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Signature

Bonjour, je crains que tu n'aies oublié de signer ta dernière proposition d'image de qualité de l'Ange sur le Pont-Saint-Ange à Rome.--Jebulon (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thieu - Canal du Centre 080109 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarcienne Eo1b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Persée et Méduse

Bonsoir Jean-Pol GRANDMONT.

Je te remercie d'avoir jugé que mon Persée était de qualité suffisante. Je dois néanmoins te signaler, pour la bonne forme, que j'ai modifié l'image depuis ton vote. Un de nos amis (Archaeodontosaurus) m'a fait remarquer par mail que le socle souffrait d'une aberration de perspective. Il a raison, j'ai donc corrigé. L'image étant techniquement meilleure maintenant, cela n'a pas vraiment d'importance, et je ne l'ai pas mentionné sur la page des propositions. Mais je crois devoir à l'honnêteté de te prévenir au cas où tu souhaiterais revenir sur ton premier choix.

Bien amicalement, --Jebulon (talk) 18:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

PS amusant: as-tu un rapport avec Marie-Claire ? Elle est de Mons comme tu sembles l'être, et a fait la même faute en anglais sur sa page de présentation ("somme images I've uploaded"), avec deux "m" à "some", comme s'il s'agissait de la Somme en France. Marrant, non ? --Jebulon (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonifacio Cal1JPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit oversharpened but overall ok. --kallerna 18:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strépy-Bracquegnies JPG10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Sallertaine - Moulin de Raire (1).jpg

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

je vous remercie pour le mot que vous m'avez adressé suite à mes premières requêtes de QI. J'ignorais l'importance de ce critère de perspective redressée. Contributeur depuis longtemps sur fr.wiki, je suis encore débutant sur commons. Du coup, j'ai modifié cette image, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hôtel_de_préfecture_de_la_Loire-Atlantique_-_Nantes.jpg, avant de la soumettre ce matin-même à la sagacité de tous :)

Cordialement, Selbymay (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Aiguilles de Bavella JPG1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Seneffe - La volière du château (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 11:33, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pholiota squarrosa JPG3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Twig on left side is distracting. --Gidip 19:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)  Support QI & Useful (Tu devrais mettre une échelle ou donner cette information dans la légende, ce serait parfait) --Archaeodontosaurus 17:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC) -- Merci pour ce conseil dont je tiendrai compte à l'avenir.

Ville-Sur-Haine

I loved your image of the old bridge there. Did you happen to also make one of the Passerelle George Price? It would make a nice addition to the WP article about him.LeadSongDog (talk) 22:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Quercus suber JPG1.jpg

J'aime bien ce chêne, mais on ne voit pas bien le tronc. or les informations sont là tu devrais pouvoir les "sortir". Si tu as le temps intéresses-toi à VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajaccio San1JPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Moonik 08:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Ange au titulus de Giulio Cartari - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work and nice composition. --Haeferl 18:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sorbus 'Leonard Messel' JPG1b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful good caption

QIC

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

Merci pour tes bonnes intentions et les remarques sur l'amélioration de mes images. C'est chose faite pour le Fichier Folie_Saint-James.jpg dont j'ai redressé la perspective et j'ai recadré un peu plus serré. La nouvelle version est déjà rechargée et disponible sur Commons. Par ailleurs, j'aime beaucoup tes photos pour leur beauté et leur ambiance. Les couleurs de l'automne sont si bien captées, avec ce brin de lumière qui donne aux choses une nouvelle vie. N'ayant pas encore beaucoup d'expérience technique j'ose pas toujours les promouvoir, laissant la place aux expertes des aberrations chromatiques et d'autres poussières. Cala ne m’empêche pas de respirer leur atmosphère et de les admirer. Bien à toi --Moonik (talk) 15:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

• Merci Jean-Pol --Moonik (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto-Vechio Port1aJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pancratium illyricum JPG1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --Stu Phillips 15:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/0 Quercus suber - Filitosa JPG1.jpg

Bonjour,

Il semble qu'il y ait un problème dans la création de la candidature pour une image de valeur. Pourrais-tu la refaire ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 04:41, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Je confirme, tu as utilisé la mauvaise ligne pour "introduire" ton image; c'est la première pour les photos simple et non la seconde pour les SET que tu as utilisé. le mieux et de mettre : Withdrawn dans la ligne Statut et de recommancer sur le bon formulaire. Nous avons tous eu des début difficile avec les "mystères" de VI... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enghien 050918 (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 16:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Rencontre Wiki Loves Monuments

Bonsoir M. GRANDMONT,

Un petit message pour vous réaffirmé ma sympathie suite à notre échange lors de la cérémonie de remise des récompenses du concours Wiki Loves Monuments.

Vous m'aviez demandé un lien vers quelques autres de mes photos : sur mon compte flickr, vous pourrez trouver l'ensemble de ces photos, dont l'intérêt est très variable.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigpilou/

Dans l'attente de vos nouvelles.

Bien cordialement,

Pierre-Louis FERRER

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Davidia involucrata 'Vilmoriana' 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyssa sylvatica JPG1b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very nice --Taxiarchos228 10:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fraxinus excelsior 'Aurea pendula'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambron-Casteau JPG04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very nice --Moonik 12:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)