Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jean-Lou Justine!

-- 13:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Jean-Lou Justine!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:26, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Parasite (journal) cover of November 2012.jpg edit

 
File:Parasite (journal) cover of November 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Je viens d'envoyer un mail à Jean-Lou Justine, l'éditeur du journal, pour voire si c'est bien vous, et pour clarifier les licenses de ces fichiers. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Parasite (journal) 2013 cover 1000pix.jpg edit

 
File:Parasite (journal) 2013 cover 1000pix.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:53, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! The image can not be licensed under Creative Commons Conditions since the author died long before this license creation. However it's the case of public domain, so I've corrected the license tags. Note also that the “source” field fits better for references. The “description” field should be used for information on the object depicted. Best wishes, Mithril (talk) 03:12, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

OK ! Thank you for the information, and good job with the picture improvement. Jeanloujustine (talk) 03:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
See also the changes in File:Lernaeolophus sultanus on Pristipomoides filamentosus New Caledonia.tif: the copyright holder is the creator (photographer). Mithril (talk) 03:28, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Good job! Please feel free to use this photograph in Russian pages - it deserves it! Jeanloujustine (talk) 04:02, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for entering the Silhouette photo challenge. Unfortunately the image is not a photograph and is not your own original work. Sorry. -- Colin (talk) 13:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Lim Lee Hong Susan.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lim Lee Hong Susan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

DAJF (talk) 02:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Parasite (journal) 2013, 20, 6 - Randrianambinintsoa, Phlebotomus.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Basvb (talk) 15:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

License of Parasite magazine edit

Hi Jean-Lou Justine,

The magazine Parasite which you've uploaded quite some files from has an ambiguous copyright statement on its site. On this page a link to a NON-commercial language is given as the license. While the license agreement seems to be in line with commons licenses. An ambiguous license like this combined with the precautionary principle might mean that the files can't be on commons. Are you in a position where you can get the magazine to clarify the license situation on their copyright page? Mvg, Basvb (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


Thank you for this interesting remark. Clearly, the legal document of value here is the licence agreement, which is signed by authors and includes the statement: "3. I agree to the Creative Commons Attribution License

(http: //creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)". However, you are right that a sentence in the website is in contradiction with this. I will contact the publisher.Jeanloujustine (talk) 10:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Satyu Yamaguti.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Satyu Yamaguti.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

DAJF (talk) 14:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Marionfyfea adventor (Geoplanidae) - Saveuse, France.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marionfyfea adventor (Geoplanidae) - Saveuse, France.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The author of the file says he did sent an OTRS. Curiously, it ask not been taken into account. I will ask him to send it again. Jeanloujustine (talk) 06:57, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Template:Parasite edit

Bonjour Jean-Lou Justine,

are you doing this upload with some kind of script or software? May you please tell me how do you do the categorization?--Abschreibbar (talk) 13:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

a request edit

Dear Jean-Lou Justine, I am an Italian zoologist and I was asked to write some chapters for an Italian University textbook of systematic zoology currently in progress. I have to treat some groups, among which are Nematoda. I found in commons.wikimedia.org an image of the life cycle of Pheromermis vesparum that would be especially suitable for representing an example of parasitic nematode. Since I am not sure about copyright limits, I would like to ask you if it is possible to reproduce it (modifying legends in Italian language) : of course credit to the web site or to the owner of the image will be acknowledged. Waiting for your news, thank you in advance. Maria Balsamo maria.balsamo@uniurb.it — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.42.112.174 (talk) 16:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply