User talk:KCVelaga/Archive/2016

Deleted content

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello KCVelaga/Archive/2016, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Anniversary of APS.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

If you do not agree with the deletion, argue in COM:UDEL why should be restored. Yours sincerely, Alan (talk) 13:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • contribs) 08:32, 06 November 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

 

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear KCVelaga/Archive,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Indian Flag and Amar Jawan Stupa with Quotation.jpg

 
File:Indian Flag and Amar Jawan Stupa with Quotation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    17:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon at Golconda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This might have ben an excellent composition if you would have taken some steps back. However I think quality is high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 20:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tea Plantations in Ooty (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:14, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Homage to Dr Velaga Venkatappaiah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 16:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Field Marshal KM Cariappa.jpg

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Field Marshal KM Cariappa.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Captain Gurbachan Singh Salaria.jpg

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Captain Gurbachan Singh Salaria.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Thanks for reviewing the file and correcting the license. Initially what is the template that is to be added to the Permission field of the description, so that a reviewer (admin) finds it and confirms it? For example, for files uploaded from Indian Navy website, {{Indian navy}}. --Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 13:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

That is {{License review}}. It will trigger a note that someone should review it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Please sign your postings

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
 
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 08:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Please sign your postings

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
 
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 08:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Field marshal SHFJ Manekshaw.jpg

 
File:Field marshal SHFJ Manekshaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 09:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "KCVelaga/Archive/2016".