Welcome to Kjetil_r's talk page!

Please include the article name in the header for new topics, and sign & date your entries by inserting " ~~~~" at the end. Thanks!

NOTE: I will respond to your comments here, though I may place a duplicate response on your talk page for your convenience.




Babel user information
no-N Denne brukeren behersker norsk (bokmål)morsmålsnivå.
eo-1 Ĉi tiu uzanto povas komuniki per baza nivelo de Esperanto.
de-1 Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf grundlegendem Niveau.
en-3 This user has advanced knowledge of English.
Users by language

Thomas Heftyes gate 2 edit

Jeg vet ikke når det skjedde, men det har åpenbart vært en omregulering i begynnelsen av Thomas Heftyes gate, slik at tidligere nr. 2, som du har lagt inn tre bilder av, nå er nr. 14 C og D, jf. Finn Kart. Dermed bør nok filene flyttes, og det er kanskje enklest hvis opplasteren gir flyttemeldingen. I alle fall er jeg ikke sikker på hvilken begrunneelse jeg skal gi: Obvious error er ikke så veldig obvious, men krever forklaring med konkrete karthenvisninger osv. Jeg har forresten bilde av den nåværende nr. 2 (tidl. 2B). -- Vinguru (talk) 08:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jeg kan få sørget for flytting, men regner med at bygningene nå er Frederik Stangs gate 14? Mvh. Kjetil_r 11:10, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hei, ja, beklager, det burde jeg ha fått med. Vinguru (talk) 11:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Gatebilder edit

Du gjør virkelig en kjempeinnsats med bilder av gater/veier i Oslo i disse dager. Du vet vel at bilder er temaet for konkurransen i uke 29 og 30? Med dine bilder skulle det vanke ganske mange poeng. -- Vinguru (talk) 05:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jeg la tilfeldigvis merke til konkurransen her en dag ja. Mulig jeg melder meg på, har ikke helt bestemt meg ennå. Hilsen Kjetil_r 07:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Kristian vangen IMG 0057.jpg edit

File:Kristian vangen IMG 0057.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kristian Vangen (talk) 12:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Schildoh.png edit

File:Schildoh.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bølerlia (september 1957).jpeg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bølerlia (september 1957).jpeg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
MCMLXXXIX 22:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Grace_Cathedral edit

Category discussion warning

Category:Grace_Cathedral has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Drbones1950 (talk) 21:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 05:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Delaware flag.JPG edit

File:Delaware flag.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ruth Reese (1959).jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ruth Reese (1959).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
1989 03:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
It's very strange, many photos by Klaus Forbregd in the collection by NTNU now give an «Authorization failure» error. We have moved many of them over to Commons, so the problem applies to more files than the Ruth Reese picture. In any case: I have emailed the institution, asking if there is a technical glitch here. Regards, Kjetil_r 15:22, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:LA in LA County map.png edit

File:LA in LA County map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 18:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Elefant Masai Mara.jpg edit

File:Elefant Masai Mara.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Liv Kari Eskeland (2017-10-05).jpg edit

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Liv Kari Eskeland (2017-10-05).jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.
Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi Mdaniels5757. The photo was reviewed shortly after being uploaded ([1]), and was correctly tagged at the time. I don't think it should be deleted just because the Flickr account changed the license at a later time. Regards, Kjetil_r 21:03, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi Kjetil_r. Yes, it was tagged as being marked with the Public Domain Mark, but the Public Domain Mark is not a valid license -- it has no legal effect, so it's like the photo was never licensed at all. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Norunn Tveiten Benestad (2017-03-25).jpg edit

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Norunn Tveiten Benestad (2017-03-25).jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.
Mdaniels5757 (talk) 01:04, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kjetil, if you want to save this image, you need to provide evidence (for example via archive.org/is) that at the time of upload, it had a Commons-compatible license on Flickr. --Túrelio (talk) 06:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Túrelio, like in the thread above, it used to have the PD mark, and was flickrreviewed here on Commons ([2]). I don't think we're doing ourselves a favor when deleting photos that used to have a free license. Regards, Kjetil_r 07:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Arve Jurtizen.jpg edit

Hello Kjetil r. What do you think of moving this file to correct filename according his real last name which is of course Arve Juritzen and not Arve Jurtizen ? Best regards Migrant (talk) 22:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it should obviously be renamed. Move requested here: [3]. Regards, Kjetil_r 06:30, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Request edit

Hello.

Can you add the border of South Sudan which became independent in 2011 in File:Fgm map.gif and File:Fgm map german.gif? See also Category:Maps needing South Sudan political boundaries, in case you are interested in adding missing South Sudan borders and labels.

Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello.
Can you update and correct these maps? They are good maps and are used across Wikipedia.
Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 08:48, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi, sorry for not getting back to you sooner, I forgot about your request because I have been on vacation.
I haven't done much map editing the last couple of years, so I might be a bit rusty, but I will do my best to try to update them later today. Regards, Kjetil_r 09:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much! Maphobbyist (talk) 07:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Longyearbyen vapen.jpg edit

File:Longyearbyen vapen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 20:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Østfold vapen.png edit

File:Østfold vapen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 22:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

NLOD edit

@Kjetil r: Hei Kjetil. Jeg ser at det er du som har opprettet Template:PD-NorwayGov og lurte på om du derfor kunne hjelpe til med å lage en ny mal for NLOD. Altså, Norsk lisens for offentlige data eller Norwegian License for Open Government Data på Engelsk. En oppsummering av vilkårene finner du her: https://data.norge.no/nlod/no/ og den fullstendige juridiske lisensteksten finner du her: https://data.norge.no/nlod/no/2.0/. Det finnes også en fullstendig versjon på engelsk her: https://data.norge.no/nlod/en/2.0/ hvis det kan være av nytte. Hadde vært flott om du kunne hjulpet til med dette da dette er litt utenfor mitt kompetanseområde. --Worldlydev (talk) 18:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hei! Det er lenge siden jeg har gjort slikt på Commons, men det er gode muligheter for at jeg finner ut av det. Jeg prøver å få det til allerede i kveld. Hilsen Kjetil_r 19:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Worldlydev: Hva tror du om Template:NLOD? Den finnes nå på norsk (bokmål) og på engelsk, med Kjetils hjemmesnekrede (og Creative Commons-inspirerte) oversettelse av kortversjonen, siden jeg ikke fant noen offisiell engelsk oversettelse av disse. Også skrev jeg ikke noe dokumentasjon, kanskje det er noe du kan gjøre? Se Template:NLOD/doc. Hilsen Kjetil_r 20:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Malen ser fantastisk ut, er jo akkurat dette jeg trengte. Dessverre er ikke jeg helt sikker på hva som burde skrives i dokumentasjon, men jeg er sikker på at noen andre kan gjøre dette da dette er en ofte brukt lisens så det er nok noen som er interessert i å gjøre dette. For min del var det bare viktig at en slik mal ble opprettet slik at jeg kunne flytte noen filer jeg har tidligere opplastet over til riktig lisens. Tusen takk for hjelpen :) --Worldlydev (talk) 21:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Drangedal komm.png edit

File:Drangedal komm.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 17:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Hammerfest kommunevåpen.jpg edit

File:Hammerfest kommunevåpen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Krødsherad komm.png edit

File:Krødsherad komm.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 17:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 16:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 i Norge edit

Hi there! I see that you have participated in the Norwegian part of Wiki Loves Monuments in previous years. Thank you very much! I'd like to inform you that the 2022 edition of the contest has just started, and I want to encourage you to participate this year as well!

Photos are not required to have been taken this year – they can be from any time, as long as they are uploaded during October 2022. Maybe you have some more pictures from previous years that can be uploaded for this year's contest?

You can read more about it on the contest page. Thanks, and good luck! Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (talk) 17:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Statsikon.png edit

File:Statsikon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 12:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Siljan komm.png edit

File:Siljan komm.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 15:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Buickcityflint.JPG edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Buickcityflint.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Buickcityflint.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply