Kpisimon

English: Welcome to the Commons, Kpisimon!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Filnik 13:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:SardesSynagoge.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Kpisimon!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

• Image:EfesMuseumArtemis.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 955025ce2afc8e6ef79ba5aa864ca5e9

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Crusader Castle on the banks of the Euprates.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Arslantaş

Hello, Kpisimon. You have new messages at CeeGee's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CeeGee (talk) 05:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Which ?

Hi You have photographs about Bergama museum. Can you please be specific as to which museum these images belong (̃Bergama or Pergama in Berlin ) Thanks.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 18:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Nedim, the town in Turkey is called Bergama and the Berlin museum is called Pergamon Museum. So my photographs are taken in Bergama, Turkey. Greetings --Kpisimon (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Lisimacus & Alexander

Hello: True, Lisimacus is not Alexander, but the bust of the coin is Alexander with horns, it is the God Horus once dead. The coin is from Lisimacus but the portrait is from Alexander. And the category is Category: Alexander the Great on coins posthumously for my is correct. --Lliura (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Ok! --Kpisimon (talk) 15:32, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Kpisimon,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Assos Castle

Geehrter Herr Klaus-Peter Simon, Ich mag es nicht, wenn jemandem über etwas das ich geschrieben habe „Nonsense“ schreibt. Offensichtlich haben Sie nicht verstanden was ich meinte. Ich meinte zwei Sachen: 1. „Castle“ ist ein Wort, das man nützt vor ein ziemlich eingeschränktes Verteidigungswerk. Sonnst würde man reden van „Stadtmauer“ oder etwas ähnliches. Ich gestehe das es ziemlich Große „castles“ gibt, aber von einer ummauerten Stadt wie Diyarbakir (oder Assos, mit 3200 Meter an Mauern) wäre es lächerlich von „Diyarbakir Castle“ zu reden. Ich bin in Assos gewesen, und erinnerte mich nicht da ein „castle“ gesehen zu haben. Bruchteile und Türmen der Stadtmauer, ja, und beeindruckend groß. Aber kein „castle“. 2. Deshalb suchte ich weiter nach „Assos castle“ und fand schnell das es so etwas gibt, aber in Griechenland. Sehen Sie mal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assos_Castle . Es was deshalb das ich Ihr Bild die Kategorie „Assos Castle“ entnommen habe. Ich habe dazu aufs Englisch meine Erklärung gegeben, namentlich „Note that there is a category "Assos Castle" in the Assos-category. Though the Turkish name Behramkale has the word "kale" (castle, fortress) in it there seem to be only some defensive towers in the village, the actual Assos Castle is definitely not that. See the Wikipedia for it's description. I will transfer the German-language named single picture to the Assos one”. Das sie so etwas “Nonsense” nennen und dann wieder das Falsche Wort „castle“ nützen ärgert mich sehr. Ich habe gesehen das sie, aufs Deutsch, sehr viele beeindruckende Beitragen geliefert haben und nehme an das sie ins allgemeine wissen was sie machen, aber das „nonsense“ hätte ich gerne „ruckgängig gemacht“ gesehen. Ich bin Niederländer, auch von 1949, lese täglich sehr viel Englisch, aber kenne auch andere sprachen, deshalb diese Antwort aufs Deutsch. Dosseman (talk) 09:28, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Dossemann, entschuldige bitte die Wortwahl, es war nicht bös gemeint. Der Berg wird auf Türkisch Assos Kalesi genannt, die deutsche Bezeichnung, auch in der Literatur, ist "Burgberg von Assos" oder "Akropolis von Assos", deshalb ist es meiner Meinung nach durchaus berechtigt, von Assos castle zu sprechen, auch wenn es vielleicht keine Burg im engeren Sinn ist. Aber wenn es Dir besser gefällt, dann ändere es eben wieder, ich werde es dabei belassen. Grüße --Kpisimon (talk) 10:49, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ḫattuša Modell Büyükkale.jpg

Copyright status: File:Ḫattuša Modell Büyükkale.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ḫattuša Modell Büyükkale.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 23:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Hallo @JuTa: , danke für die Benachrichtigung, ich habe die vergessene Lizenz nachgetragen, kann ich den Baustein jetzt selbst löschen oder muss das jemand anderes machen? Grüße --Kpisimon (talk) 09:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Hallo, den "no license" Tag hab ich nun entfernt. Da das Modell aber wohl selbst urheberechtlich geschützt ist und COM:FOP Turkey darauf nicht zutrifft, habe ich nun einen regulären Löschantrag gestellt. (leider) --JuTa 10:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Ḫattuša Modell Büyükkale.jpg

File:Ḫattuša Modell Büyükkale.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 09:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Grundriss Tempel 2.jpg

Copyright status: File:Grundriss Tempel 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Grundriss Tempel 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)