Karol Szapsza

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Karol Szapsza!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Copyright violations

---

Hello Karol Szapsza. You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yann (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:MakingArticle9007.jpg

Chyba przesadzasz. Osobę bardzo trudno rozpoznać bo ani twarzy, ani otoczenie nieszczególne. Takim szablonem należałoby opatrzyć wszystkie zdjęcia, gdzie widać osobę nie będącą częścią zgromadzenia (czyli np, jeśli robię zdjęcie wsi i ktoś tam tyłem do mnie idzie o kilkadziesiąt metrów też). (w dodatku to autoportret osoby wiedzącej co robi). Ciacho5 (talk) 18:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Re: Loga SVG

Mam nowszą wersję Inkscape, 0.91, i u mnie również nie widać żadnych napisów na czarnej belce. Może spróbuj zapisać obrazek jako „plain SVG” albo „optimized SVG” i zobacz co się stanie. Jeśli to nie pomoże, to spróbuję coś pokombinować, ale nic nie obiecuję ponieważ nie jestem specjalistą od SVG i Inkscape. jdx ^talk 18:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Twój Kwiat

I have change your Picture but i think, the DOF is with f/2,6 to small for QI, sorry. --Ralf Roleček 23:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EN57-1448, 855, 1443.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAN NL 202 (420) – MKS Skarżysko-Kamienna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:30, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAN NM 152 (425) – MKS Skarżysko-Kamienna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Hubertl 14:10, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Krajno-Zagórze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

EN57-1903.JPG

Nie masz tego zdjęcia w pliku raw? Gdyby go dobrze wywołać fotka spokojnie otrzymałaby QI. Pzdr. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MP 40 machine gun, with folded stock..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama of Krajno-Zagórze and the surrounding area..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Scope must linked to category or gallery on the Commons. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry @Jacek Halicki: I forgot about that. I've just added link to the category. Kszapsza (talk) 19:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! School buses of Bałtów Jurassic Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Landscape of Skarżysko Książęce, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electric multiple units EN57-19xx series.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bus stock of Zwierzyniec Bałtowski.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ET22-695 + ET22-2040 in Skarżysko-Kamienna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 19:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eiffel Tower miniature in Krajno-Zagórze.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:52, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Perspektywa

Obejrzyj sobie te dwa filmy: [1], [2]. Przyda Ci się to. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eiffel Tower miniature in Sabat Krajno amusement and miniature park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Picture have tilt and perspective problems. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:56, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

What do U accurately mean? Kszapsza (talk) 11:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

See notes. It's easy to fix. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

 Done. Kszapsza (talk) 20:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Tilt is corrected, but are still perspective problems. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:52, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Further changes  done. Kszapsza (talk) 19:53, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:09, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Lego Ambulance Team.JPG

And also:

• File:Lego builder with hammer drill.JPG
• File:Lego Chef.JPG
• File:Lego Fire Fighter.JPG
• File:Lego Police Officer.JPG
• File:Lego robber.JPG

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

File:AIDS.DOS.Virus.png

File:AIDS.DOS.Virus.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Bosch-Logo.svg

File:Bosch-Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Madzia29734 (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Blend for Visual Studio computer icon.png

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Ad:Quality image candidates

I do shoot RAW. Previously it was said that my photos were oversharpened, so now probably I exaggerated the other way with sharpening… My question is: is it possible to re-nominate photo after correcting shortcomings indicated at the first nomination? Karol Szapsza (talk) 12:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC) The focus was also not well done and it is impossible to correct this in Lightroom, just make a new photo from this composition. Please don't renominate this photo because I have change my review. I am waiting for you new version and if it is a decline again you might ask for a discussion (yellow colour) and more people will review your photo --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prawy Brzeg Wisły – manewry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:35, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stegna Gdańska train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Is train station the right English translation? Train stop? Charles (talk) 22:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

• Yes, it is. Train station in railway terminology is a term used to describe the facility where trains stop, and where are several tracks for crossing train traffic from different direction. Stegna Gdańska has 3 platforms and three main tracks making possible to cross trains from three directions: Sztutowo, Mikoszewo and Nowy Dwór Gdański. Train stop would be proper for small train facilities that consist of only main track and platforms (w/o additional tracks nor crossings). Karol Szapsza (talk) 16:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
• Thanks, but there are no platforms visible, so how can this have the scope train station? Charles (talk) 19:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
• There is in fact platform visible, it is just an unpaved area between people standing and the train itself. Not only hardened areas can be named platforms; there are many train stations in Poland where there are unpaved platforms with only white kerbstone (named officially (pol.) „krawędź peronowa” – (eng.) „the edge of the platform”). Platform form can not be used to deciding if a facility is and station or train stop. As I said before: the condidtion to use name „station” is occurrence of many tracks in the area of the railway facility; and there are many tracks in the area of Stegna Gdańska (compare: 54°19′40″N 19°06′53″E on OpenStreetMap – multiple tracks visible so fulfilling „station” term, or Polish Railway Database: https://www.bazakolejowa.pl/index.php?dzial=stacje&id=4914&ed=0&okno=historia – term „stacja” – „station” used – instead of „przystanek osobowy” – „train stop”) Karol Szapsza (talk) 23:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rybina – stacja kolejowa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Only the front is not unsharp, but also not sharp enough. Other parts are not sharp enough at all. I advise you to improve your focus, shoot in RAW and make sharper in Lightroom. --Michielverbeek 05:01, 28 August 2017 (UTC)  Comment Please upload new version for reconsideration --Michielverbeek 07:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)  Comment Corrected sharpening, removed CA + lens corrections made Karol Szapsza 10:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC) The sharpening is better, a weak support --Michielverbeek 06:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rybina train stop.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skarżysko Milica train stop.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I do like the picture and it is used but is the color temperature off? Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:40, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Windows 8.1.png

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 08:33, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ABC Skarżysko-Kamienna ul. Mikołaja Kopernika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:08, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2018 (UTC)