Last modified on 15 September 2014, at 05:31

User talk:Kulmalukko

Return to "Kulmalukko" page.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kulmalukko!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Image:Piglet stuffed animal.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright Image:Piglet stuffed animal.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--BrokenSphere 01:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bionicle bad guy.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright Image:Bionicle bad guy.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--BrokenSphere 01:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Skipper's pipes.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright Image:Skipper's pipes.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--BrokenSphere 01:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Kulmalukko!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Candykingpussi.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Candykingpussi.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

GeorgHHtalk   20:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

BarnstarEdit

Barnstar-camera.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Carrotkit (talk) 12:37, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Tartu statue wilde vilde.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tartu statue wilde vilde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Madrid - Segovia Bridge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madrid - Segovia Bridge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

A barnstar for you!Edit

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
For multiple contributions of high quality images. Tupungato (talk) 15:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Mass deletion requests of images uploaded by meEdit

Good morning,

I have responded to the first deletion request you made here, outlining my reasons why I think these files should be kept. Would you mind refraining from nominating any further files I have uploaded for deletion, until at least the discussion of the first batch of images has been completed? As it's causing extra work having to defend each new image nominated? It would help me if we can discuss the nominations you have made so far first. I know we don't agree on the issue of these files being kept or not, but I think it would be good for the discussion to be decided first before proceeding with a further round of nominations. Thanks for any reply. Rept0n1x (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello. I answered there. Briefly: according to my opinion there is no sense to keep pictures, which are too similar. It's hard to look for something in category, which includes much of the similar pictures. --Kulmalukko (talk) 10:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the reply. Allow me to apologise for my earlier hasty comments. I wasn't happy to see such a large number of my files suddenly nominated for deletion, as I don't have time to reply to the deletion argument on all of them. I do respect your opinion. I just believe it is better to give all users the choice to pick which photograph they personally prefer is better, so I do not personally agree with this type of deletion. I believe one user might think picture A is better than picture B, but another user might think the opposite. Of course you are completely correct to carry on nominating further images for deletion as I know you disagree with me. In that respect, I was wrong to ask you to stop nominating photographs for deletion. I do think though there may be a way to "bundle" all deletion requests on to one single page to make it easy to contain the relevant discussion in one place - that would be very useful. In the meantime I will continue to reply on the deletion request pages. Thank you. Rept0n1x (talk) 15:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok, no problem. I did not mean to offend you and I hope you continue to contribute in Wikimedia project. Not to get retired. I'm still strongly of the opinion that almost similar pictures should be deleted. --Kulmalukko (talk) 18:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Btw, there is a possibility to make a mass deletion request. But in this case it is not suitable. In mass deletion the reason of all the deletions should be told in one page. In this case each picture, which is nominated for deletion, needs a link for the similar image file. --Kulmalukko (talk) 18:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
OK thank you for the reply and the kind words and no offence taken! I've retired several times in the last few years - I always seem to come back. It's OK, although I personally think the files should be kept, I will respect the community consensus, whatever the decision. :) My one remaining concern is that I do not have time to express my opinion on such a large number of separate deletion requests made in such a short time, although I fully understand your reasons for doing it. I have some further discussion I would like to make about the files. So I will concentrate my further discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bolton Art Gallery, Library and Museum (2).JPG later this evening. I think that these deletion requests should lead to a wider community discussion because until today I was not aware of this type of deletion request and I do have some general further points to make about it. So the first file you selected above, I will hold the discussion there. Also, I agree with your point now that the separate deletion discussions can't be merged. Kind Regards, Rept0n1x (talk) 18:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your nominations are ridiculous Kulmalukko, mass nominating all these in scope pictures uploaded by a single user is just crazy. Please refrain from doing that in the future. Multichill (talk) 10:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello KulmalukkoEdit

Hi Kulmalukko, you have nominated some of my pictures for deletion. I agree, if images are blurred these should be deleted. But when you say redundant I disagree on that part. I have left it on people to decide. Thanks! Anupamg (talk) 07:26, 19 September 2013 (IST)

Kindly stop saying redundant, I agree on deletion of blurred/poor picture quality. There are education centers, scholars, folks, that might wish to prefer two or more pictures. Simply nominating for deletion does not make any sense, try to understand the reason behind it. I agree on 2-4 pictures, not on mass deletion. Please refrain. Thanks! Anupamg (talk) 07:24, 3 October 2013 (IST)

Hello, Anupamg. I think that there is not sense to keep similar pictures. Since there is no significant differencies between the similar images, they dont't have educational value. And if a category contains many similar pictures, it makes the user hard to search for something through the category. (On the other hand in many cases of your uploads, there are similar images thus that part of them are more blurred. The bad ones should be deleted and the best one may be kept.) --Kulmalukko (talk) 07:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

I still don't agree with you. But if you have decided to nominate, please go ahead. Probably, you may nominate all of my contributions for deletion. I should also request admin for deletion of all my contributions, and probably to deactivate the account as well. Thanks!  :D Anupamg (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2013 (IST)

Well, you make your own decicions. I would advise you to upload the pictures, but not to upload the similar pictures. --Kulmalukko (talk) 09:52, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:LG전자, ‘소녀시대 함께하는 쿠키 데이트’ 행사 개최 (5).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:LG전자, ‘소녀시대 함께하는 쿠키 데이트’ 행사 개최 (2).jpgEdit

Hello, I commented to Commons:Deletion requests/File:LG전자, ‘소녀시대 함께하는 쿠키 데이트’ 행사 개최 (5).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:LG전자, ‘소녀시대 함께하는 쿠키 데이트’ 행사 개최 (2).jpg. thanks. --Puramyun31 (talk) 12:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

DRs of duplicatesEdit

When you nominate a duplicate for deletion, it is very helpful if you give us the actual file name of the duplicate, not just "here".

That is, please do not use this

"Redundant. Similar, better straightened image is here."

but please do use this:

"Redundant. Similar, better straightened image is File:Itimad-ud-Daula’s_Tomb_227.jpg"

Being able to see that the two files are 227 and 228 of the same series is helpful to the closing Admin.

Thanks, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok, maybe it's better to do so. --Kulmalukko (talk) 17:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Test youEdit

Hola Kulmalukko! i want test you about ur skill of finding same pictures. so, ur name show everything. u ar not a Muslim, u ar not from Middle East,u r not udnerstand Arts from Middle east, and u cant read arabic or persian writing. u see these pictures same? [Mohammad Rasul al-Allah Mosque - Ghal'e Now Zone -Nishapur Tiling 03.JPG] , [Mohammad Rasul al-Allah Mosque - Ghal'e Now Zone -Nishapur Tiling 04.JPG] and [Mohammad Rasul al-Allah Mosque - Ghal'e Now Zone -Nishapur Tiling 05.JPG] ?? yes, u see them same, bcz u cant read Quran verses in Arabic writing especially wrote on tiles as art. You should be more careful about deleting pictures,many users love their pictures even they Blurred or anything. Why blureed pic deleted??? u think all pple of the worl are rich and can buy best camera?? no. Wikimedia Commons a database of 19,023,372 freely usable media files to which anyone can contribute . are all of that 19,000,000 are best pic and can be Picture of the day??? no. our pic show truth and seleted pic just show picturing echnique.Sonia Sevilla (talk) 14:16, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

why u dont answer me? bcz im not from Finland or Europe ??
Hello. I have made deletion requests for a few of your pictures, because similar pictures exist. By keeping the similar images don't give educational value to the existing image collection. You can check the deletion policy here. Especially, if we have two similar images: good quality and bad quality, the lower quality image may be deleted and the better quality image kept. --Kulmalukko (talk) 22:09, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. are nude and nude pic use for EDUCATION?????? in which school???Sonia Sevilla (talk) 00:15, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
In Commons the term educational doesn't mean school education. Project scope page says that educational means providing knowledge; instructional or informative. The picture of nude body provides information about a body as a picture of a building provides information about a building. The pictures in Commons doesn't need to be useful just in the school systems. (On the other hand the nude pictures may be useful also in schools in case of biology/health education/sexual health knowledge.) --Kulmalukko (talk) 11:15, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
nud pic is immoral.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Akbar's TombEdit

I've noticed you proposed many similar photos for deletion. I just want to point out that you should use Commons:Mass deletion request, and not nominate each photo separately. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

The mass deletion request is not useful in many cases, if each photo needs individual link to the similar image file and sometimes also other explanation (blurred, dark etc). But maybe mass DR is useful, when many pictures are similar to each other and then they don't need an individual explanation/links. --Kulmalukko (talk) 11:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Kiev - memorial.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kiev - memorial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LGA talkedits 08:15, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Kiev - memorial2.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kiev - memorial2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LGA talkedits 08:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Before the entry of the Chinese New Year, I bestow upon thee this Star of Hope. Cheers. Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 02:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

KPI photosEdit

Thank you for viewing my photos. Yes I made several pictures, at least with/without flash and did not review them for better version. But I don't always agree with your selection that version with flash is better. In many cases it has wrong flattened out colors. --Ilya (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

excuse meEdit

excuse me. im in not good mood for checking my pictures,so i uploaded similar photos. nobody thanks me. i uploaded many pictures from iran,but i dont see an iranian user thank me and give me hope.we work free here we need hope.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 21:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

answer me, do u speak english?--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 23:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
? --Kulmalukko (talk) 23:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Do you enjoy by deleting my pictures?--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 01:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Actually I'm not able to delete pictures. But I think it's not enjoyable. --Kulmalukko (talk) 11:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

all thanksEdit

Hi Kulmalukko, Thank you to have a look to my pictures.I also was vandalized after your visit, I have seen that you know of copyrights etc, well enjoy creativecommons, best regards by skapheandros  talk to me

Hello. I don't know what do you mean. I have not seen your user name, maybe I have categorized the images uploaded by you? --Kulmalukko (talk) 11:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Ai-Petri - view2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ai-Petri - view2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ai-Petri - hillside.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ai-Petri - hillside.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ai-Petri2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ai-Petri2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Koktebel - horse.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koktebel - horse.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kazantyp - beach.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazantyp - beach.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Alupka2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alupka2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Tampella2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tampella2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tammerkoski3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tammerkoski3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Jyväskylä harbour pier.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jyväskylä harbour pier.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Chernobyl nuclear plant5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chernobyl nuclear plant5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Callelongue port.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Callelongue port.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Calanques view.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calanques view.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Calanques view2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calanques view2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Shcholkine view.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shcholkine view.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Picture of the Year 2013 Results AnnouncementEdit

Picture of the Year 2013 ResultsEdit

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Kulmalukko,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Koordinaattien maakooditEdit

Hei! Kiitokset koordinaattien lisäämisestä luokkiin (esim. tämä). Muistathan kuitenkin asettaa region-parametrin oikein (tässä tapauksessa FI=Suomi tai FI-08=Keski-Suomen maakunta); HR-21 viittaa Zagrebin kaupunkiin Kroatiassa. Parametrin jättäminen kokonaan poiskin on parempi vaihtoehto kuin väärä koodi. Maakohtaiset koodit löytyvät esimerkiksi englanninkielisestä Wikipediasta sivulta en:ISO 3166-1 alpha-2. Terveisin, ––Apalsola tc 17:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Ok, en tullut huomioineeksi koko aluemerkintää. Hyvä, kun huomautit. --Kulmalukko (talk) 18:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Kiev - statue.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kiev - statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 18:49, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 20:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 12:18, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Postojna - building2.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Postojna - building2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Postojna - building4.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Postojna - building4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Postojna - Hotel Kras.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Postojna - Hotel Kras.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Postojna - Notranjska Museum.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Postojna - Notranjska Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Postojna - Stjenkova ulica.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Postojna - Stjenkova ulica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Postojna - Ulica 1. maja 1.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Postojna - Ulica 1. maja 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:29, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Postojna Brne.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Postojna Brne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:31, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Postojna6.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Postojna6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Postojna7.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Postojna7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Postojna - playground2.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Postojna - playground2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:41, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

File:Tartu bridge.JPG is affected. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Petäjävesi - Kirkkolahti.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petäjävesi - Kirkkolahti.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Please delete thisEdit

My work. It was deleted but I got no reason why and I thought by accident. I uploaded it again. But as I know, it should be deleted because Romanian copyright system which lacks permission about statue photos. Thank you. Gubbubu (talk) 10:52, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Category changesEdit

Could you explain me, what are you doing? You removed the category Old Town Square. Why? The picture depicts Old Town Square. You add "the church" category and now due to your act it is twice in the same category.--Juandev (talk) 20:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Juandev. That the picture must be in category Church of Our Lady in front of Týn, because the picture is about the church. The church category is a sub category of the category Old Town Square, so I removed the Old Town Square category. (Ofcourse the picture needs only one church category, it was mistake to give the same category twice.) --Kulmalukko (talk) 20:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

I disagree with you. I think the picture is especially in those categories, which characterize the image. Lets have two examples:

  1. picture depicts the church in detail - than picture is in the church category only (and church category is in the category of location)
  2. picsture depicts both church and square - picture is in two categories, for a square and for a church. Of course church category is than in the square category.--Juandev (talk) 05:11, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Krd 05:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)