Lamiot

Français : Bienvenue sur Commons, Lamiot!

Les premiers pas Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Obtenir de l'aide Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.		Outils et astuces Indiquez par Babel les langues que vous maitrisez, ainsi que vos compétences infographiques Toutes vos importations de fichiers sont visibles sur votre galerie. Signez vos messages sur les discussions en tapant ~~~~ Utilisez CommonSense pour trouver les bonnes catégories pour vos fichiers. Pour créer un lien vers un fichier, tapez : [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], cela donne : Image:Foo.jpg Si vous importez des fichiers d'un autre projet (comme Wikipédia), utilisez l' outil prévu pour. Vous avez fait une erreur ? Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : {{bad name|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}} Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

le Korrigan →bla 11:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Eros Borghese Louvre Ma235.jpg

Hi Lamiot. I notice you added category:Erotic art to this picture. Why? It doesn't seem very erotic to me. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 09:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

hello. I made it, because Eros is the god and/or symbol of Love, and sometimes present in erotic art also. It is more for a reference than as an erotic sculpture (as you said). You car remove from the category if you prefer. (sorry for my bad english)

Ah, OK. Il y a déjà la catégorie category:Eros, donc ça fait un peu doublon. Autant ne pas décevoir les curieux qui fouillent category:Erotic art ;-) Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC) P.S. : ton cadre Babel n'est pas appelé correctement. Si tu veux je fais la carrection.

Suis encore débutant. C'est quoi un "cadre babel" ?--F. Lamiot 10:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Tu as mis {{User fr}} sur ta page d'accueil. Normalement ça prend place dans un cadre (cf. ma page d'accueil) où tu déclares les langues que tu connais. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Merci, ai corrigé ca--F. Lamiot 11:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Tip top ! Bonne continuation sur Commons ! Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

note to gastropod images

Hello, image Image:Tandonia budapestensis.jpg and other has got its own page. (Which is categorized in category with family name.) So there is no need for other categorization. --Snek01 12:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Modification photo La danse

Bonjour, tu as modifié une de mes photos sur la sculpture "La danse" et je voudrais savoir pourquoi ? Ne peut-on pas laisser les deux versions en parallèle ?

Oui bien entendu, en général, les auteurs sur ce type de modification préfèrent un remplacement (ex voir un des messages précédent sur cette page de discussion), notamment pour ne pas occuper de l'espace mémoire.

Quand il y a une information supplémentaire dans le décor, je conserve toujours les 2 images.
Ici, si tu le souhaite, on peut conserver les deux photos. Merci en tous cas pour cette photo qui était très belle et bien cadrée.--F. Lamiot 10:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

En fait, je me disais que le fait que la statue soit du musée d'Orsay comptait (l'article le mentionne très clairement) et qu'il aurait été préférable de voir le décor autour. Je ne sais pas ce qu'en penseraient d'autres personnes. Tu crois qu'on peut demander une sorte de vote quelque part ? Sinon je suis très maniaque, mais tu n'as pas tout tout effacé autour de la statue ;). Benh 21:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Bravo pour ton regard exercé, oieil de lynx. En chaussant mes meilleurs lunettes, j'ai effectivement trouvé quelques imperfections que j'ai corrigé.
Si tu penses utile d'avoir une photo de la sculpture dans son décor (il y en a au moins déjà une autre je crois sur Wikimedia commons, :exemple ), tu peux remettre la version précédente en lui donnant le même nom de fichier et en ajoutant le nom du musée, ou un chiffre (0, ou 1) par ex). Bien à toi
--F. Lamiot 08:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC).

Catégories - images

Salut Lamiot, Merci pour ton message. Je suis au courant pour les catégories, j'ai dû les télécharger rapidement depuis un ordinateur de l'université (où il y a une connection haut débit) puis finalement, j'ai oublié d'apposer les catégories une fois de retour à la maison. Je compte bien tout reclasser, une fois que j'aurai un peu de temps.. ! À+ Colocho 03:42, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

The Singapore Skyline category edit

Image:Singapore Skyline Panorama.png

I can't help but wonder why do you tag the image as light pollution. I take it as an insult to our city. We're one of the least polluted cities in the World especially when it comes to light pollution. The shot was taken at 7pm and also the camera's exposure was slightly over exposed to highlight the surrounding lightings. However I cannot conceive your idea that it is considered light pollution. I have already sorted its categories for this image, so I hope there won't be any more unnecessary edits.

Hello. I think I have understood what you want to say. Congratulation, your photograph is very beautiful and technically very successful.
I know well that Singapore does many efforts against water pollution, air pollution, and perhaps luminous pollution (I don't know), especially in the capital which is less enlightened the night than other capitals of the world, like London, Paris, New York, Wahington or Tokyo, or the cap in south-africa which are very enlightened the night (and
This has many true impacts on fauna and perhaps the flora, and perhaps on human health).
This is why more and more people are interested now in the concept of luminous pollution, which has also undirects links with greenhouse effect, and the wasting of electric power, or the production of dandgerous nuclear waste.
Aesthetically, this does not remove anything with the beauty of these cities the night (as you can see on http://flatplanet.sourceforge.net/maps/images/lightpollution_2000_fixed.png), and to your picture.
In an old part of my life, I was designer and I worked glass and the crystal. It is a job where the beauty of the objects comes from the light. I do also some photographs of night landscape. But I see each year (in my country and all the countries where I go) a less black sky and less and less visible stars. 15 years ago, I went in the desert of the Sahara in the night, and I could not sleep so much the sky was beautiful and spangled. The vision of the starry sky is also a splendid spectable (and important for humain being), as beautiful as that of the large enlightened buildings the night. Many architects or photographers use this light in the night for their work. Some architects try to light the ground without lighting the sky. They try to make a beautiful lighting, without obstructing the butterflies, the bat or the aquatic animals.
If you want to remove the tag, ther is no problems for me, but a category can also contain images which clarify the subject, in various manners ; It would have been possible to write in the comment that Singapore was less enlightened than other cities the night... and thus to présent this picture as a good example for others cities.
But made as you want. Continue in any case to make beautiful photographs, and thank you to place them at the disposal of evrybody in the world, via wikimedia commons.
--F. Lamiot 11:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Hmm.... I see your point too. Alright, I hope we two have came to an agreement, thanks anyway for your photographic comments!

Someformofhuman 15:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Great series: "Efflorescence_verte..." - care to put them into the gallery?

The set of algal bloom photos that you uploaded on August 24 is brilliant: good to great photos and sufficiently sickening-looking to drive home the point of how serious algal blooming can become. Could you take the time to add your pictures into this gallery: Algal bloom? They would fit there very well. Friendly regards --Ronja 12:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, of course. It is done.--F. Lamiot 20:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! The Algal bloom gallery is starting to look quite useful now. If you happen to find somebody else's algal bloom pictures, which are not yet in the gallery, could you please ask them to add their pictures there (or if it is just one picture, be bold and add it yourself)? That would be a great help. Friendly regards --Ronja 06:17, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Retouche de Image:Zone_rougeRed_Zone_Map.jpg

Bonjour Lamiot,
Je désirais simplement t'informer que j'ai effectué quelques corrections sur la carte de la Zone Rouge que tu as créé. Notamment dans la légende ("complèement" -> "Complètement") et sur les libellés des villes Paris, Toul et Nancy qui souffraient d'une surimpression accidentelle.
Très Cordialement
Zertrin 16:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Bien vu.. Bravo et merci.. Beau travail.--F. Lamiot 13:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Cyanobacteria Dead Fish

Greetings from South Carolina ETV and Knowitall.org at Knowitall.org! I am a Curriculum Coordinator for Knowitall.org, currently developing and correlating content for RiverVenture.org. I was wondering if you would you be willing to contribute the use of your pictures like "Efflorescence_verte_1_CyanobacteriaDeadFish.jpg" to the RiverVenture Web site (http://www.riverventure.org/). The picture would be used in a new, upcoming module that will focus on the geology of the coldwater, mountain stream ecosystem of Carrick Creek at Table Rock, South Carolina, so we are searching for pictures like this one to help illustrate the water cycle. Knowitall.org is ETV's portal to FREE, Web-based multimedia featuring a collection of interactive sites for K-12 teachers, parents, and students. You'll find animated games and simulations, virtual tours, research resources, close-up investigations of the environment and much more! There are many South Carolina-related resources here, too. It is a valuable educational tool that can enhance learning by allowing children to interact with quality, standards-based information and content. We would happily give you credit for use of your photo(s). Please just send me an e-mail reply as to whether you are willing to share and on what terms and conditions.

In the instances we use your photograph, we will be happy to publish it with a courtesy credit in the form of a watermark on the photo reading "Lamiot," or whatever you prefer. Please let us know if you would like it to say something else specifically. Your work will be protected under copyright of the ETV Commission, used as content and for promotion connected with ETV's newest module of RiverVenture and Knowitall.org, and related projects. We would be sure to notify you when the Carrick Creek module of RiverVenture goes up, and you could let us know if you have any objection to the use of your photos in the site. We will do our best to help you maintain creative control of your work. Thank you very much, again!

Regards,

Samantha S. Cofield Eastman, Curriculum Coordinator SCETV Department of Creative Services. You can reach me at seastman@scetv.org

Ok, I send you an email. (thank you for your pedagogic work).--F. Lamiot (talk) 23:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Bon usage ?

Bonjour, je constate que vous utilisez les templates de cette facon : {{en}}Apple et {{fr}}Pomme, sans y inclure le texte correspondant, comme ca : {{en|Apple}} et {{fr|Pomme}}. Est-ce que c'est un choix délibéré ? Bien a vous, Frédéric (talk) 12:14, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

bonjour Frédéric.. Eh bien.. il me semble avoir vu 3 ou 4 façons différentes d'utiliser le template.. et je ne sais pas trop ce qui est le mieux. Je n'ai pas encore pris le temps d'étudier ça. --F. Lamiot (talk) 19:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Lamiot!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:ONEMAPêcheDélégationsInterrégionales2008.jpg is uncategorized since 17 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:TourMercure6444.jpg was uncategorized on 28 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Ceti6479.jpg was uncategorized on 28 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:EthiopianWolfSkull.jpg was uncategorized on 3 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Morgat2011 96.jpg was uncategorized on 11 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Morgat2011 92.jpg was uncategorized on 11 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
• Image:WarkworthweirSeuilNewZealand.jpg was uncategorized on 10 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Trainées2011 09 16 13.jpg was uncategorized on 16 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:39, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Code propriété intellectuelle Fr.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Lamproie Planer57.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Transports européens 2005 Rail.jpg was uncategorized on 24 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:ConcrétionsStalactiteCalcaireBétonMétroTranspole1.jpg was uncategorized on 20 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:49, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Surfréquentation.jpg was uncategorized on 15 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

1er contact

Bonjour, j'ai lu votre message. Le dessin était sur une toile de coton. Cordialement,--Mm5962 (talk) 11:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Tropenmuseum

salut. veuillez ne pas supprimer le {{De [1] -> [2]. Merci. Bennylin (talk) 16:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

license disputed

Hello, the image File:Hungary_ajka_toxicspill_october9_2010_dgDetail.jpg is a modified version of the original which have its license disputed. Just maybe you wanted to know. --grin ✎ 10:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

This original image has been filed by DigitalGlobe, the producer of the image itself (that's me who asked him if he would offer an image to illustrate the Wikipedia article on the crash Ajka).
I am not an expert on the license, but I believe he used a license copies and other uses, asking only that the image source is cited. Is not allowed on Commons? --F. Lamiot (talk) 12:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure I properly understand you, so please help me clarify:

1. Is the account Digitalglobe is yours? If yes, could you send the permission email or document to <permissions at wikimedia dot org> email and quote back the OTRS ticket it replies?
2. If the account isn't yours how could we assure that the image was authorised under the said license by DigitalGlobe, Inc? Again, a permission email from their official email (obviously using their official mailserver) is required, as I do not have the means to see the connection between a commons account and a company.
3. The said permission would be okay, but I cannot verify its validity. How can I be sure that DigitalGlobe, Inc. have given the permission?

If you could help to resolve this it would be nice. Thanks. --grin ✎ 11:54, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello Frin.. I'm not "Digitalglobe" and the acount of Digitalglobe is not mine.. I believe DigitalGlobe (on W. Commons) is the account opened by the societuy Digital Globe, wich is the owner and producer of the image (as if NASA had opened an account with name "nasa" to submit an image from NASA). But I asked them to do that (if they agree).. Before than, I have been sending (2010/10/12 2:14) an email to Digital Globe (info@digitalglobe.com) to ask to this society (producer of satellital pictures) if it could give a picture to Wikipedia (with a good licence, adapted to wikipedia).
Here above the contents of the mail that I sent them to request this picture (or another)

Hello. I am one of the many people (Volunteer) who write collectively and collaboratively encyclopedia Wikipedia.
You have posted photos on Flikr extraordinary mudslides red aluminum plant in Hungary. Thank you for that picture (on Flickr). We would be happy to put one of these photos illustrate the articles of Wikipedia.
It would be possible with a licensing proposed by Wikimedia Commons. Would you - exceptionally - to give away one of your pictures (http://www.flickr.com/photos/digitalglobe-imagery/5072153937/ for instance), possibly with averaged definition if you prefer), so it could illustrate articles from Wikipedia (potentially over 120 languages).
If yes , you can load it into Wikimedia commons through the page:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Accueil
As category you can choose : Category:Ajka alumina plant accident.
If you do that, thank you very very much
Sorry for my broken English, I'm French
F lamiot, from french wikipedia project? I think Digital globe is really the owner of this picture. For me, there is no problem
--F. Lamiot (talk) 19:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

As far as I see they never have acknowledged your email and never have asserted that the account is theirs. The account neglected to reply the question on his talk page, so I cannot really assume its validity. Anyone can create an account "digitalglobe", that's zero proof, I'm sorry. If you can get them replying your email, that'd be useful. I tried to email the account, but I am not holding my breath. --grin ✎ 21:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Additional info on the topic: DigitalGlobe official license page basically rejects any free use, including libre usage, commercial usage, alteration and other limited rights. --grin ✎ 12:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello Grin... yes, precisely, this is why I sent them an email (copy above) asking them to submit themselves, by creating thier own special account on commons, one of their images (if they accept, of course), under the commons license that they choose.
Just this single image, loaded on Commons, is licensed commons. --F. Lamiot (talk) 06:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Cervical Xray Extension.jpg

Thank you for the translation. I added some more to the summary. I am planning on uploading all five in this neck series and then all five in the low back series with similar summary. I would like to get it right so it can be copied to others. Stillwaterising (talk) 21:04, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

It is a very good idea. Many Wikipedia pages will benefit.--F. Lamiot (talk) 21:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Image sur pollution lumineuse

Bonjour Lamiot,
la page fr pollution lumineuse a engagé une discussion (voir historique) sur l'aspect publicitaire d'un paragraphe notoirement retaillé par jb.Henry . Corrélativement, cette image dont tu es l'auteur donne 2 mentions à une marque, dont l'adresse du site internet. Si tu as 2mn, pourrais-tu stp flouter les références à la marque sur l'image et rééditer l'image ?
Merci ! Et bien à toi
Mianreg (talk) 17:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

je viens de jeter un oeil sur l' historique de la page, car je n'avais rien trouvé dans la page de discussion. Je n'avais effectivement pas porté attention à cet aspect des choses. Suite à ta remarque, parfaitement judicieuse, j'ai déjà enlevé le nom de la marque du commentaire de l'image sur Commons. Je suis un peu gêné par le fait d'enlever le nom de l'appareil lui-même, car c'est en quelque sorte faire un "faux" (Faut-il alors aussi rechercher les milliers d'images de commons qui contiennent des noms de marque ([File:First Class Cabin.AA.Red wine.2006.jpg], image qui me parait par ailleurs encyclopédiquement peu utile) et supprimer le nom ? ou considère t on qu'il s'agit d'une partie informationelle originale de l'image.. un juste milieu est toujours difficile à trouver. Mais il est vrai que dans ce cas, le fabricant a mis sur son produit beaucoup d'informations écrites en lettrage assez visible pour qu'on puisse assimiler ce texte à de la publicité (bien que ça ne vante pas en soi le matériel), en particulier pour le n°téléphone bien grand et bien visible. Je suppose que ce sont les références directes au site commercial qui gênent et je le comprend.. Je floute donc bien volontiers, en espérant qu'on ne me le reprochera pas (je fais ca dans la journée). Bien à toi, et merci pour cette remarque.
PS : je n'ai pas compris le sens de certains des retraits du paragraphe que tu évoques ci-dessus par jb.Henry, qui est pourtant spécialiste de la télédetection (selon la page de présentation du contributeur). Mais il est vrai que ces "progrès" dans le domaine sont très récents.. Je pense qu'il a effacé ces quelques petits paragraphes parce que non directement sourçés.. Je vais donc réétudier la question.. Je rencontre bientôt un groupe de spécialistes de la télédétection qui s'intéressent notamment à la pollution lumineuse (qui s'intègre peu à peu dans le champ de l'aménagement du territoire, via le Grenelle de l'environnement et ses suites légales (Loi Grenelle II notamment), je les interrogerai sur ces nouveaux "champs du possible" et verrai s'ils ont des sources écrites à me proposer.. mais j'ai d'autres priorités pour le moment (je m'occupe néanmoins de l'image). Je vois que tu as neutralisé et tu as bien fait l'aspect "disponible à la vente".. Peu-être aurait on pu conserver néanmoins le fait que ces produits sont maintenant disponibles pour le grand public (c'était le sens du paragraphe.. il ne s'agissait pas de faire du "promotionnel"), ainsi que l'allusion au test du Sky Quality Meter, par Pierantonio Cinzano, qui lui n'a rien de commercial (c'est l'auteur du rapport de l'Atlas mondial de la clarté artificielle du ciel nocturne qui a fait le tour du monde et qui est devenu une référence internationale tout à fait reconnue et absolument a-commerciale. On doit pourvoir reformuler ca de manière plus claire et plus neutre.. Merci en tous cas d'avoir fait l'effort de rechercher l'auteur de l'image et le contacter, plutôt comme cela arrive parfois que de la proposer à la suppression, ce qui est toujours très frustrant pour les contributeurs qui voient leur travail s'évaporer, sans toujours comprendre pourquoi. </ref>.
--F. Lamiot (talk) 07:00, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

== Pays de Brest ==

Bonjour, Je suis l'animatrice du projet Wiki-Brest et je me demandais si vous habitiez ou étiez fortement attaché au Finistère. Je vous pose cette question car nous sommes en train de créer une communauté de wikipédiens liés au Pays de Brest. Cordialement. Gaëlle FILY (talk) 13:38, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Disons que je connais mieux le secteur de la pointe de Crozon et que la culture (musique y compris) m'intéresse, et de puis longtemps. Je vous accompagnerai sans doute de loin, mais avec plaisir; --F. Lamiot (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Liste de discussion brest

Bonjour Lamiot, Je vous invite à vous inscrire à la liste brest@wikimedia.fr. Nous communiquerons sur les actions en lien avec les projets de l'association wikimedia (portant les projets wikipédia, commons ...) qui se déroule sur Brest et ses environs comme :

• collecte commons
• ateliers divers (wikipédia, commonist pour importer facilement des photos sur commons)
• couverture d'évènements comme "Tonnerres de Brest 2012"
• ...

Pour vous y inscrire il faut m'envoyer un mail à l'adresse suivante contact (at) wiki-brest.net

--Gaëlle FILY (talk) 08:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Céramique KabyleCirca1900.jpg

Bonjour,

Si elle a été faite en 1900, cette photo est probablement libre de droit. Mais pour étayer la chose, il faudrait en indiquer la source : peu probable quand même qu'il s'agisse d'un travail personnel, ou alors bravo pour la longévité ! Et aussi la catégoriser comme il faut (PD-Old). Faute de licence correcte, elle est susceptible d'être supprimée. Cordialement, --Fanfwah (talk) 14:26, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Merci.. Telle était mon intention, mais avec le "nouveau" menu déroulant de la fenêtre d'importation des images, comment accède t on à cette catégorie pd-old ? Faute de mieux et comme l'image est très visiblement ancienne, j'ai supposé que commons me demandait de considérer comme travail personnel la récupération et retraitement de cette image. Quant à la source, là, c'est un oubli effectivement malheureux, merci de m'avoir prévenu. J'ai chargé simultanément un groupe de plusieurs images de cette nature, je vais les vérifier et corriger ces problèmes. Merci encore --F. Lamiot (talk) 19:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Haute résolution

Une personne sur otrs nous demande si tu aurais une version haute résolution de [3] pour utiliser dans une brochure. As tu la possibilité d'uploader une meilleure résolution ou pas ? Merci d'avance Anthere (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC) ;non ? Anthere (talk) 12:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Bonsoir Anthere... Désolé, je n'ai pas mieux.

ok merci Anthere (talk)

File:Cazin Traité des plantes médicinales.jpg

Bonjour Florent,
J'ai importé une image d'une page scannée. Faut-il créer une catégorie François-Joseph Cazin, sachant que pour l'instant il n'y a qu'une illustration ? Existe-t-il des pages d'homonymie sous Commons, équivalentes à celles de WP ? Parce que Cazin est déjà utilisé.
Pour info, l'an prochain, ce sera le 150ème anniversaire de la mort de cet illustre personnage du Pas-de-Calais (Samer-Calais-Boulogne).
D'avance merci. --Christian COGNEAUX (talk) 02:48, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Bonsoir Christian. Tout d'abord, félicitation pour ton travail sur François-Joseph Cazin. Concernant le document que tu as importé (ceci je suppose) : tu peux lui-même le classer dans une ou plusieurs catégorie(s) telles que [[Category:Biologists from France]] ou [[Category:Botanists from France]] ou qq chose de ce type.. Oui, dans ce cas, tu peux créer une [[category:François-Joseph Cazin]] (ce qui en attendant d'autres images, donnera qq chose comme ceci sauf si tu vois une autre catégorie dans la quelle la photos s'inscrirait mieux. (Remarques en passant, l'intérêt qu'il y aurait à lier ceci à un wiki-généalogie (à imaginer) , tant pour wikipédia que pour commons.. En attendant tu peux aussi dans Wikimedia commons “tagger” l'image avec les catégories [[Category:1788 births]] et [[category:1864 deaths]]. Ainsi tu prépares la boite pour ranger de futurs éventuels autres documents..
A bientôt et merci pour tes contributions. Si tu as une difficulté pour ce faire, dis le moi. Au début on bricole un peu, puis on s'habitue vite. --F. Lamiot (talk) 22:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Christian, j'ai commencé à importer les planches de Gallia du Traité de 1868.--Als33120 (talk) 11:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WaterPollutionOilDeule.jpg

Hi - I would like to know would it be possible to use the image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WaterPollutionOilDeule.jpg to print on a t-shirt range? Wikimedia suggested I contact you directly because they were not sure how I would credit you. If you approve this and have any suggestions I look forward to hearing from you. I am producing a range of t-shirts with images of pollution which are both beautiful and yet socially and ecologically aware. I look forward to hearing from you soon

Ok, no problem. I simply ask you to write in small edge of the image: Photo: Wikimedia commons, F. Lamiot

Question Zone rouge

Bonjour, Je recherche des informations sur la zone rouge (impropre à la culture) définie après la Première guerre mondiale. Vous avez inclu une carte dans la page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_rouge_%28s%C3%A9quelles_de_guerre%29, présentant cette zone rouge. Pourriez vous m'indiquer où vous avez trouvé les informations menant à la création de cette carte s'il vous plait ? Merci: message déposé par Nitnelave

re: Guicherd, J., & Matriot, C. (1921). La terre des régions dévastées'. Journal d'Agriculture Pratique, 34, 154-6. ou voir archives départementales des zones concernées. D'autres ouvrages ou thèses ont aussi publié je crois la carte ou des extraits (A vérifier).--F. Lamiot (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Question for Lamiot based on one of your posts

Dear Lamiot, Pardon me for writing in English. I only know a few words of French, pero se poco Español.
For a book I am writing on obstacles to environmental solutions, I would like to obtain a photo of this canister but showing the complete wording of the part of the label that refers to warm blooded animals. I assume it says something to the effect that the product is safe for warm blooded animals. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT#mediaviewer/File:DDTDichlordiph%C3%A9nyltrichlor%C3%A9thane7.JPG

I realize it might be impossible to capture the entire relevant text in one photo. A transcript would also be valuable, especially if combined with a photograph of the front of the label.

I gather from your Wikipedia page that you took the photo and may therefore either have the canister or know where it is located.

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I would appreciate any help you can provide. Merci beaucoup, Peter Schulze ; Professor of Biology and Environmental Science ; Austin College ; Sherman, TX USA

Translation made by google : Neocide. Ciba Geigy DDT; 50 g Dichlordiphenyltrichlorethane 10% ; Destruye parásitos como pulgas, piojos, hormigas, chinches, cucarachas, moscas, etc. ; Espolvorear Neocide ocultar los bichos y los lugares donde hay insectos y sus puntos de cruce. Permita que el polvo en el lugar el mayor tiempo posible ; Destruye los parásitos del hombre y de su casa ; La muerte no es instantánea, que inevitablemente se produce dentro de un tiempo más o menos; Fabricación francés ; Inofensivo para los seres humanos y animales de sangre caliente ; Certain y duradero efecto. inodoro ; caja de polvo --F. Lamiot (talk) 21:06, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:TourbièreVredPanneau4.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 18:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

File:LamotteHenri Martin LesGodillots1932.jpg

File:LamotteHenri Martin LesGodillots1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 04:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Limoniscus violaceus

Hello!
Sorry for speaking english (and german) only...
May we use your pictures of Limoniscus violaceus and other species in texts about areas and species protected due to the "council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora" (see http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1992:206:TOC for a french version)?n
all non profit of course; your name will be writen beyond the picture, of corse toonThank you very much --Kai.pedia (talk) 21:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

yes of course, you can copy the picture here : https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e5/Limoniscus_violaceus.jpg
and you just have to cite  : Lamiot/Wikimedia Commons/CC-BY-SA.
if you want to use other images from me : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Lamiot&ilshowall=1 (with access to other pages of picture, down on this page), it's better to ask to the author a permission, perheaps, he will be able to help you to get a better version or another better picture (we have millions of pictures)
...And you can also do the same thing with all the pictures of Wikimedia commons (even if you want make profit with he picture, but you hate to conserv the open licence cc-by-sa
to know more about what you can do with our pictures : ( translation with google => be careful) : Wiederverwendung von Inhalten außerhalb von Wikimedia
or see same thing in french
In Dankbarkeit, können Sie (wenn Sie möchten) eine Spende an die Wikimedia Foundation, die Wikipedianer hilft der ganzen Welt zu arbeiten und bieten Ihnen diese Bilder. Ich wäre sehr froh, dass unsere Fotos können für den Naturschutz verwendet werden ; Und im Gegenzug um uns zu helfen, wenn Sie die Dokumente zu veröffentlichen, wenn Sie können, können Sie sie eindeutig zu veröffentlichen offenen Lizenz (cc-by-sa-Lizenz der ganzen Welt anerkannt), die alle Wikipedias der erlauben wird Welt, um die Ressource zu Wiederverwendung leichter (anders als mit kurzen Anführungszeichen). (fr : en remerciement, vous pouvez faire (si vous le souhaitez) un don à la fondation wikimédia qui aide les wikipédiens du monde entier à travailler et vous offrir ces photos ; je serais très content que nos photos puissent servir à la protection de la nature, et en échange, pour nous aider, quand vous publiez des documents, si vous le pouvez, vous pouvez les publier clairement en licence ouverte (cc-by-sa, licence reconnue dans le monde entier), ce qui permettra à tous les wikipédias du monde entier de les citer ou réutiliser plus facilement (autrement que par des courtes citations).--F. Lamiot (talk) 13:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Myxomycète

Bonsoir,
En parcourant Commons je suis tombé sur cette photo :

• 

Il ne s'agit pas d'un champignon mais d'un myxomycète, très probablement Ceratiomyxa fruticulosa (Müller) Macbride.
Amitiés, Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Bravo et Merci. J'avais mis plusieurs photos de cette espèce (très jolie) sur la page consacrée aux espèces à identifier. Deux personnes m'avaient presque en même temps bien aidées, et effectivement c'est bien un myxomycète. Nous avons également penché pour Ceratiomyxa fruticulosa. As tu aussi des compétences mycologiques et mycomycétiques? Si oui je dois avoir qq part 2 ou 3 photos que je n'avais pas non plus réussi à identifier ? Je m'apercois au passage que j'ai oublié de créer un article sur l'espèce..
Tout aussi amicalement --F. Lamiot (talk) 19:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

GLAM Lille - Musée d'histoire naturelle

Hi Lamiot, thanks for the great photos of crytals. But I have to admit that your German is not the best.--Kopiersperre (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm really sorry, but you're totally right. I am French, a little English speaker and very bad with German. Do not hesitate to write me (here for instance) the perfect sentences in excellent German, and I will be able to copy the files under each picture ; Thanks.. --F. Lamiot (talk) 18:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Lamiot,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

"Thylacine" photos

Hi, this[4] is not a Thylacine, but an African hunting dog, Lycaon pictus. FunkMonk (talk) 22:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

photo Chenilles_processionnaire_ligne.jpg

bonjour Vous avez mis en ligne sur https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chenilles_processionnaire_ligne.jpg une photo de chenilles processionnaires du pin. je travaille pour le compte du FREDON ile de France (Fédération Régionale de Défense contre les Organismes Nuisibles) sur des panneaux d'information au grand public sur la chenille processionnaire. je voudrais savoir s'il était possible d'utiliser cette photo pour les panneaux ? Si oui l'auriez vous en haute résolution et quel crédit photographique faut-il porter sur les panneaux ? cordialement ronan le guellec

Ronan LE GUELLEC ronan@comillus.com tél : 01 46 58 05 57 mob : 06 64 37 22 61 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.127.129.45 (talk) 17:45, 02 September 2016 (UTC)

Belles du Nord

Bravo et merci pour ce reportage exceptionnel. --Als33120 (talk) 10:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Merci Als33120 ; ce fut un grand plaisir pour nous, d'autant que le musée et les deux restauratrices nous ont très gentiment accueilli et que c'était un jour ensoleillé qui nous a fourni une très belle lumière pour les photos (nous avons travaillé entre midi et deux avec donc une lumière presque zénithale qui donne un effet très "naturel" aux sculptures. En outre, deux de ces sculptures sont vraiment exceptionnellement magnifiques.
Et à notre tour de te remercier pour tes améliorations apportées à l'article Belles du Nord
--F. Lamiot (talk) 20:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Discussion privée

Bonjour, je suis sur votre page de discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxanebardin (talk • contribs) 14:09, 03 October 2016 (UTC) --Roxanebardin (talk) 14:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Ravi de faire votre connaissance

Bien le bonjour. --McLanders (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Coucou

One two, one two, this is a test.

--Valentin1377 (talk) 14:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Rebellion

Je n'ai pas envie de répondre. Merci. --Roxanebardin (talk) 14:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Salutations

Test de communication, tentative de premier contact. --Laurietteetjulira (talk) 14:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:Notif:utilisateur:Cbyd Ok, bien reçu.

Everything you need is linked here

Hello, Lamiot. You have new messages at Ellin Beltz's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Maquette Palais des Beaux-Arts de Lille 02.jpg

File:Maquette Palais des Beaux-Arts de Lille 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

File:EclairageEuropeAtNightBenjamin D. Hennigccbysa3.0.jpg

File:EclairageEuropeAtNightBenjamin D. Hennigccbysa3.0.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

—LX (talk, contribs) 12:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Media from Open Access journals

Bonjour Lamiot,

if you upload media from Open Access publications, please categorize them into the right "Media from..." category. For this file it would be Category:Media from PLOS ONE.

It's also desirable to link the DOI with brackets: [[doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010315]] gets rendered doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010315.

Cheers --HarzBuff (talk) 13:21, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Judas goat Chèvre de Judas.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Judas goat Chèvre de Judas.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Judas goat Chèvre de Judas.jpg

File:Judas goat Chèvre de Judas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started It is a world event. The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. Here you can find more details. This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017 Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Outils pour produire de la vidéo libre

Salut Florent, Je compte faire une séquence vidéo sur la base d'une présentation en conférence et je me demande ce que je pourrais utiliser pour sortir un format acceptable pour commons (Commons:File types). J'ai regardé différents outils, mais sans obtenir de WebM ou Ogg. Je me suis dit qu'avec Chti'plouf, la question avait du être abordée. Comme je vais principalement poser ma voix sur des images, ça me semblait très proche. Si tu as les références des outils utilisé pour la production, je me dis même que ça pourrait faire l'objet d'un "cours" sur wikiversité : "Comment produire du média audiovisuel libre." (ex. d'application avec Chti'plouf).

--RP87 (talk) 09:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Oui bien sûr que nous avons abordé la question, mais hélas si je sais filmer des animaux, des plantes et des milieux, je n'ai jamais pris le temps de me former au montage et aux logiciels. En particulier je ne maitrise pas le .ogg.
Les essais que j'ai fait pour de courtes séquences étaient potables, mais quand nous avons tenté de convertir le film "les secrets de la Deûle" (beaucoup plus lourds en termes d'octet, même compressé au mieux) pour le déposer sur Commons la conversion était très mauvaise (image très dégradée sur les bords, franchement inacceptable), et je n'avais hélas pas du tout le temps de me plonger dans la technique.
Oui trois fois oui, une mini-vidéo de type Mooc serait vraiment bienvenue pour ne pas dire urgente et indispensable ... ou encore mieux qu'il y ait une outil de conversion automatique, de qualité et facile à utiliser sur Commons (ou faire en sorte que Wikimedia commons accepte d'autres formats ? je n'ai pas été voir s'il y avait d'autres "bonnes" alternatives)..
Ex : J'ai plus d'un téraoctet de vidéo qui pourraient illustrer wikipédia ou être utile dans d'autres wiki, mais pas de temps pour les basculer ni même les bien légender. J'ai songé à trouver un stagiaire ou un assistant, mais il faut qu'il soit bon en montage vidéo (pour ne garder que ce qui est vraiment intéressant et pédagogique) et qu'il ait de bonnes connaissances en biologie/écologie subaquatique pour distinguer ce qui est intéressant, le classer et le légender de manière pertinente.. ou j'attends d'être à la retraite si je survis jusque là (à moins de trouver un riche mécène ?). Les 2 caméras que nous testons en ce moment avec une école d'ingénieurs pour le Ch'tiPlouf ne sortent pas hélas de ficher en .ogg. et ca prend du temps de faire des conversions. Bonne continuation en tous cas, tiens moi au courant. Idée : monter une petite "vidéo-task force" a sein de commons, qui pourrait donner lieu à quelques hackathon pour améliorer .ogg ou le faciliter ? --F. Lamiot (talk) 07:50, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

PS : il y a aussi WebM--F. Lamiot (talk) 11:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

En fouillant sur framalibre, j'ai vu deux utilitaires potentiel [5] [6], mais rien de bien clair, à jour, maintenu en 2017. Bref, il manque des briques pour un production libre jusqu'au format. Je vais poser la question côté peertube. Ça serait cohérent avec ce projet également.

@+ --RP87 (talk) 14:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Ecoducs

Bonjour,
Pour ces fichiers File:ÉcoducFL Vers Luxembourg.jpg File:ÉcoducLuxembourgFL2.jpg représentant un tunnel au Luxembourg, il ne s'agit pas d'un écoduc, en plus il n'est pas situé sur l'autoroute Bruxelles-Luxembourg.
Bien à vous --Les Meloures (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Merci et double bravo pour votre sens de l'observation ou votre mémoire. J'ai été un peu trop rapide quand j'ai téléversé cette image dans Commons ; Ce n'est effectivement pas un véritable écoduc (stricto-sensu comme le serait celui de Groenendael, conçu exclusivement pour cet usage), mais il a néanmoins pour certaines espèces, de fait une fonction d'écoduc (vous pouvez le vérifier avec google maps et sa vue aérienne); et à l'époque sur ce trajet sa végétalisation transverse à l'autoroute permettant le passage d'animaux d'une berme à l'autre de la tranchée autoroutière faisait exception (et il y a d'ailleurs toujours assez peu d'écoducs sur cet axe est-ouest (même si c'est moins pire que sur l'A1 francais qui n'en a aucun). Concernant le lieu, j'ai eu un peu de mal à le retrouver, mais il s'agit du tunnel Howald situé sur l'A6-A1 au Luxembourg dans le prolongement de l'autoroute Bruxelles-Luxembourg, mais de l'autre côté par rapport au côté belge (c'est à dire vers l'Allemagne). Merci encore. J'ai corrigé la légende de l'image (que j'avais déjà oublié). --F. Lamiot (talk) 14:50, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

ParatonnerreLille

Bonjour, je me suis permis de préciser que le fichier File:ParatonnerreLille.jpg concerne l' École Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers (Lille). Cordialement --Pierre André ^(talk) 17:37, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup pour cette délicate attention,
en effet, j'aurais pu et du le préciser
(rem : la cheminée donne des signes de vieillesse. J'espère qu'elle sera restaurée et non abattue, c'est l'une des dernières du secteur)--F. Lamiot (talk) 13:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:AquaductParEkimTanNederland2008July.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:AquaductParEkimTanNederland2008July.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Leoboudv (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Photo reprint permission

Hello Lamiot
I am a researcher on visual perception and I am working on an article about the perception of shape transformations that I want to publish in a scientific journal. I would love to use your photo of a gnawed tree ('Gnawed_wood_Bois_rongé_1') posted at "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gnawed_wood_Bois_rong%C3%A9_1.JPG" for illustration purposes. It would be great if you could get in contact with me so that I can explain to you the details of the project.
Kind regards, Filipp Schmidt, PhD ; University of Giessen, Germany — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schmf (talk • contribs) 08:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Désolé pour ma réponse tardive : Bien sûr, vous pouvez réutiliser mes photographies (et n’importe quel autre ficher de Wikimédia Commones) à condition de préciser sous la photo : Photo : Lamiot [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], from Wikimedia Commons. Je vous recontacte par mail. --F. Lamiot (talk) 09:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

In English : Sorry for my late response: Of course, you can reuse my photographs (and any other file from Wikimedia Commones) provided you specify below the photo: Photo: Lamiot [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], from Wikimedia Commons. I contact you by email. - F. Lamiot (talk)

Photo du casque d'Agris

Casque d'Agris

Bonjour Je suis décoratrice pour une série France 2 et je dois faire une couverture de livre sur les Celtes. J'aimerais savoir si je peux utiliser votre photo du casque d'Aris pour mettre sur la couverture ? Il s'agira d'un livre parmi d'autres, je ne sais pas à l'avance si le livre sera filmé ou non, ou très peu, ou flou… Je ne sais pas trop où citer la licence CC, je peux la mettre à l'arrière du livre mais je ne suis pas sûre que ça se verra. Merci pour votre réponse et très bonne journée à vous.
Emilie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrehldenn (talk • contribs) 07:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Oui @Adrehldenn: mais attention ce n'est pas Aris, mais Agris qui était propriétaire ou porteur de ce casque magnifiquement ouvragé (et il faut l'imaginer avec toutes les petites pièces décoratives qui ont disparu)... et il faut effectivement que la mention de mon nom (Lamiot) et de la licence cc-by-sa 4.0 apparaissent soit sous l'image, soit ailleurs, mais alors en indiquant bien à quelle page elle s'applique, c'est impératif juridiquement parlant ; la formule habituelle (minimum) est Photo : Lamiot [CC BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)], de Wikimedia Commons. En échange, n'hésitez pas - si vous le souhaitez - à verser un petit quelque chose à la fondation Wikimedia ou à Wikimedia France qui permet à Wikipedia et à Wikimedia Commons d'exister (Certains éditeurs nous envoie aussi un exemplaire de l'ouvrage ou du film, c'est gentil à eux). Je suppose que vous avez prévu d'aussi citer le musée d'Angoulême dans la légende, il le mérite. Je suppose que vous avez repéré que j'ai télévisé plusieurs photos du même casque.. vous pouvez toutes les utiliser
--F. Lamiot (talk) 15:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Pont de Térénez 53.JPG

Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

bonjour Thesupermat, je vois que ce n'est pas la seule image concernée... j'ai déposé quelques éléments de réponse (à débattre ? A partir de quand un chantier de construction devient une l'oeuvre d'art que son auteur a conçu ? ) sur la page ad hoc --F. Lamiot (talk) 16:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Monument lion Verdun.jpg

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 15:54, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

File:3299317001 83d3e62e43 otyphusLiceDdt.jpg

File:3299317001 83d3e62e43 otyphusLiceDdt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

File:4755267414 3e28f331cd bTêteCire.jpg

File:4755267414 3e28f331cd bTêteCire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 04:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Lamiot,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Composition de l'atmosphère terrestre

Bonjour Lamiot,

il y a déjà sept années, vous avez importé sur Wikimedia un graphique sur l'évolution de la composition de l'atmosphère terrestre, réalisé à partir d'un Pour la Science de 1996. Comme j'avais lu que le taux d'oxygène avait varié depuis les dinosaures, je me suis étonné que la courbe soit plate et vous propose ces deux liens (voyant aussi que vous êtes toujours actif) :

• [7]
• [8]

Kahlores (talk) 03:41, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ENR GLOBAL RENEWABLE ENERGY EMPLOYMENT BY TECHNOLOGY, 2012-2018 Irena fr 2019.jpg

Copyright status: File:ENR GLOBAL RENEWABLE ENERGY EMPLOYMENT BY TECHNOLOGY, 2012-2018 Irena fr 2019.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ENR GLOBAL RENEWABLE ENERGY EMPLOYMENT BY TECHNOLOGY, 2012-2018 Irena fr 2019.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:ENR GLOBAL RENEWABLE ENERGY EMPLOYMENT BY TECHNOLOGY, 2012-2018 Irena 2019.jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Indice de genre (Égalité homme femme) Index Scores Country Map 2019 fr.png

Copyright status: File:Indice de genre (Égalité homme femme) Index Scores Country Map 2019 fr.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Indice de genre (Égalité homme femme) Index Scores Country Map 2019 fr.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 21:24, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Égalité homme femme Index Scores Country Map 2019.png

Copyright status: File:Égalité homme femme Index Scores Country Map 2019.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Égalité homme femme Index Scores Country Map 2019.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 23:54, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Hungary ajka toxicspill october9 2010 dgDetail.jpg

File:Hungary ajka toxicspill october9 2010 dgDetail.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: COM:CSD#F4, insufficient permission per Ticket:2010102910006171. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:30, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Ouverture de mon compte faux-nez

Bonjour Lamiot , je me suis inscrit il y a quelques temps comme participant à WP: PB : Connaissances personnelles / nouvelles enquêtes. Pour valider mon inscription et prouver que mon compte n'est pas celui d'un faux-nez Benutzer:Pierre André Leclercq. , je dois obtenir au moins trois confirmations de personnes qui m'ont rencontré. Nous nous sommes vus aux palais des Beaux Arts de Lille dans le cadre des "Plans Reliefs". Si tu peux valider ma procédure, j'en serais ravi. Bien amicalement à toi --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:27, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Désolé je viens de lire ce msg que maintenant. Je confirme volontier ton existence dans le monde réel et tes compétences de photographe.. ce message suffit-il ou dois-je faire ça ailleurs ? Bien à toi --F. Lamiot (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:European_green_infrastructure

Category:European_green_infrastructure has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 10:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CGDD 2019 Rapport Env France Donut des limites planétaires avec plancher et plafond.png

Copyright status: File:CGDD 2019 Rapport Env France Donut des limites planétaires avec plancher et plafond.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:CGDD 2019 Rapport Env France Donut des limites planétaires avec plancher et plafond.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:% of SUVs in total car sales world market 2010 2018.png

File:% of SUVs in total car sales world market 2010 2018.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ces balles ont probablement été tirées durant la guerre civile aux Etats-Unis.jpg

File:Ces balles ont probablement été tirées durant la guerre civile aux Etats-Unis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Changement de catégories

Bonjour,

Je voulais juste mentionner que j'ai changé les catégories de certaines de tes cartes sur les traînées de condensation vers Category:Contrails diagrams et que j'ai ajouté à cette dernière Category:Cloud forcing.

Pierre cb (talk) 13:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Problème avec Force hydraulique ratio Hydraulic Force fr from Lidingo.png

Bonjour. Sur le dessin Force hydraulique ratio Hydraulic Force fr from Lidingo.png, il y a 2 aires A1, et une formule qui mentionne A1 et A2... Zetud (talk) 00:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Messagerie lille@wikimedia

Bonjour F. Lamiot, J'ai reçu me message sibyllin me signalant que les paramètres de configuration du quota de compte de messagerie pour mon compte lille@wikimedia.fr n'étaient plus valables et de ce fait la taille de la boîte aux lettres pour ve compte ne pouvait plus m'adresser de messages. Use the email account password. Incoming Server: IMAP Port: 993 POP3 Port: 995 Outgoing Server: SMTP Port: 465. Google signale que ce lien est suspect car il renvoie à un site non fiable en l'occurrence la page server777.shared-lvps01.com. A moins que tu ne sois l'auteur d'une relance du groupe lillois, j'activerais mon mot de passe, mais au préalable j'ai cru bon te signaler cet email. Bien amicalement.--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Sperme spermatogenèse délétionFertility2ComonsFL2.jpg

File:Sperme spermatogenèse délétionFertility2ComonsFL2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

24.178.6.186 18:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Licences des images de brevet ?

Salut,

Connais-tu les licences applicables pour les images dans les brevets qui ont expirés (plus de 20 ans) ? Je souhaites employer celles-ci https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/008074381/publication/DE29910215U1?q=pn%3DDE29910215U1 dans des articles sur la contraception.

RQ: Rien vu dans l'aide.

@+ Rudy

PS: J'ai bloqué une épuisette sous un chapelet d’œufs de crapauds. J'espère que les poissons restants seront tenus en échec. Chez des voisins, têtards de grenouilles vertes et carpes koï se partagent une belle marre. Serait-il pertinent d'en récupérer pour les mettre en "ruisseau" ?

--RP87 (talk) 08:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Capture d’écran 2022-07-13 à 04.55.07.png

Copyright status: File:Capture d’écran 2022-07-13 à 04.55.07.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Capture d’écran 2022-07-13 à 04.55.07.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Indicateur disparition papillons France INPN 2022.png

Copyright status: File:Indicateur disparition papillons France INPN 2022.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Indicateur disparition papillons France INPN 2022.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tortue rigole dessèchement quartier Cauteleux 1930.jpg

Copyright status: File:Tortue rigole dessèchement quartier Cauteleux 1930.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tortue rigole dessèchement quartier Cauteleux 1930.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)

In other languages (translate this)

Please use SVG Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Pont de Térénez 54.JPG

And also:

• File:Pont de Térénez 56.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:MethaneInfographicGlobalCarbonProject2016ccBySa Fr.jpg

File:MethaneInfographicGlobalCarbonProject2016ccBySa Fr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:1emploiPrécaritéStatista France 18 07 2023.jpg

And also:

• File:Records Chaleur Monde 10 juillet 2023.jpg
• File:Réchauffement climatique Statista 2022.jpg

Yours sincerely, Larryasou (talk) 08:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Indicateur disparition papillons France INPN 2022.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Indicateur disparition papillons France INPN 2022.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Indicateur disparition papillons France INPN 2022.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Larryasou (talk) 08:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition

Bonjour Lamiot,

Au nom de l'équipe d'organisation de Wiki Science Competition 2023 en France, je tenais à vous remercier de votre participation. En 6 semaines, 838 photos ont été partagées, de 51 personnes, dont beaucoup de nouveaux contributeurs (57 % des comptes créés spécialement pour le concours). En nombre de photo, cela place la France à la 2e place, juste derrière la Macédoine. C'est assez encourageant pour un concours qui n'est habituellement pas organisé en France.

Toutes les photos de l'édition française sont regroupées dans cette catégorie. Et les lauréats sont indiqués sur cette page.

L'équipe d'organisation française en a terminé pour cette édition 2023, le jury international va prendre le relais. Nous vous tiendrons informé s'il y a une édition française en 2024.

Pyb en résidence (talk) 15:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)