Last modified on 26 February 2014, at 14:29

User talk:Lantuszka

  • Discussion
Return to the user page of "Lantuszka".
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lantuszka!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Zgoda dla ZachętyEdit

Na OTRS nadeszła zgoda na objęcie licencjami GFDL (wszystkie wersje) i CC-BY-SA (wszystkie wersje) dzieł do których prawa autorskie posiada Zachęta, a które załadujesz na Commons. Proszę dodawaj w szablonie każdego dzieła:

Permission={{OTRS|2010032810007532}}

Zwróć też proszę uwagę na użyte licencje powinny to być CC-BY-SA-ALL oraz GFDL. Sp5uhe (talk) 09:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Lantuszka!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Piotr_Cywinski_with_order_received_for_contribution_to_the_developement_of_polish-jewish_dialogue.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Piotr_Cywinski_with_order_received_for_contribution_to_the_developement_of_polish-jewish_dialogue.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 23:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

1) the GFDL, you said it yourself, is not {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Be careful what license template you select, cc-by-sa-3.0 is something completely different and has nothing to do with GFDL.

2) Please provide a deeplink to the website and the image. --Martin H. (talk) 23:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

This (http://www.prezydent.pl/gfx/prezydent/pl/defaultaktualnosci/48/778/1/2015621653.jpg) is a deeplink to the graphic. the one i've uploaded is a derivative of this one. On that web it's only requested to mention that basic link (www.prezydent.pl) on a derivative work - and this is what i've done. Please suggest any further solutions if I may do something better. --Lantuszka (talk) 00:10, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

cathegory: Zachęta National Gallery of ArtEdit

It's better not to categorise it and wait till there will be 200 or more files in one category? If you know it better wouldn't be better to simply correct it!!!


i had already corrected, just thought it would've been kind to leave you a note cause you were the one who cathegorised. See in modern art it's a very flexible division between what is sculpture and what instalation etc. plus the object on commons might be a still of a movie - while you had cathegorised it as "instalation" (see "Film" by Althamer) or a painting that you cathegorised as "instalation" (see Sasnal). p.s. and please sign your comments in user's discussion like here above. thank you --Lantuszka (talk) 20:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

GLAMEdit

Julia, Boston9 mówi ze możesz być zainteresowana ta dyskusja --Jarekt (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)