Leafnode

Year 2007 Year 2008 Year 2009

Is this a copyright violation?

Hi. I saw you had given Laurent1291 a warning for uploading copyrighted material. I noticed he had uploaded a TV Network logo, and I find it strange that it doesn't "meet" the criteria for copyright because it is too little stylished. Is this true? Could Image:TVNORGE_logo.png possibly be a free image? 193.157.252.133 09:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

There is a very thin line between logos ineligible for copyright and copyrighted material. In this case, I'd lean toward an opinion that this logo is indeed to simple. --Leafnode 13:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Important proposal

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Leafnode!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:58, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Gravitational slingshot.svg is uncategorized since 8 May 2009.
• Image:Stachledraht DDos Attack.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Amplituda falowania.svg was uncategorized on 11 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Formularz "Prześlij plik"

Witam. Czy można/mógłbyś zmienić na stronie http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang=plownwork domyślny tekst w okienku "Oryginalne źródło:" z "Praca własna osoby przesyłającej (own work by uploader)" na szablon own, a także dodać w opisie okienka "Data:" zalecany format zapisu daty, czyli rrrr-mm-dd ? Zwykle uploaderzy tego nie zmieniają, tudzież wstawiają datę wg własnego uznania, a potem inni redaktorzy wszystko poprawiają, szkoda na to czasu. Pozdrawiam, --Chrumps (talk) 16:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Komentarz do pola "data" zmieniłem, ale co do źródła nie mam pewności - z kilku języków które sprawdziłem, żaden nie stosuje szablonów w tym miejscu - to jest jeszcze do przedyskutowania. --Leafnode 06:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 570870973d03f5b2c337bf51b899866a

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Polish rank images

I noticed you have tagged them with the PD-Polish Government template. Ok, however, the images still do not have a source of where they come from. If you can find the sources, great. If not, they still need to be deleted for having a lack of source information. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 23:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Most of them have author properly indicated, as they were re-created basing on official design. For the rest, I will work on getting proper sources for them. I'm just letting you know that they are not abandoned :) --Leafnode 05:58, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

File:MalmsburyCalderHighway.JPG

Any reason why this was deleted without even giving me the chance to fix what any reasonable person could see was simply an oversight in not adding a licence? I have uploaded thousands of my own photographs but apparently my work is to be deleted on sight if unlicenced. Even in commons there is supposed to be some sort of deletion process. If you undelete the file (and let me know what is going on), I will add the correct licence immediately. -- Mattinbgn/^talk 19:07, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

This file was deleted because it was marked with {{No license}} tag for more than 7 days - so it wasn't deleted "on sight". It's a standard procedure, and while if this image was tagged with no license template manually you should be notified about this mistake, omitting to add license tag while uploading file won't leave any notice on your discussion page, but that is the risk. On upload page it is clearly stated "Licensing: none selected (add a license tag in the summary box above, or this file will be deleted)". Mistakes can happen - I've restored the image, tag it, and everything's fine :) --Leafnode 19:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: File:Bur logo 90.jpg

Whether the file is deleted or restored makes little practical difference to processing the OTRS ticket, if/when a valid permission is received we can restore it easily enough. As a practical matter I don't think files should be exempted from Commons licensing policy just because the uploader says they sent a mail to OTRS - the 30 day lag on OTRS pending is probably about right (unfortunately), but so is the 7 day for no license.

With respect to File:Bur logo 90.jpg, the file had no license specified on upload and the assertion of permission states: "...use this BuR-logo on wikipedia...". Therefore we have no indication of what free license the file is under if it was tagged with GFDL and OTRS pending I'd say keep it live, as we would have reason to believe the file was GFDL. In this case, there is no on-wiki reason to believe it is freely licensed, we can hardly use it if we don't know the license.

In this case, there was an email sent to OTRS. Summary of the info provided: "Please can I have a pic to use on WP?", "Here's a file". No indication of a license, and I'd be hesitant to call it "permission to use on Wikipedia". I see no reason to restore at this point as the OTRS volunteer working the ticket has +sysop here...--Nilfanion (talk) 00:31, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Moje grafiki

Witam

Właśnie też szukałem i rzeczywiście chyba nie ma takiego prawa że tablice muszą być zamazane. Wczroaj wrzuciłem nową wersję zdjęcia POLONEZ 1500 słubice.JPG, POLONEZ MR'83 1.5C.jpg. Czy można usunąć jedną z tych wersji ? --FSO rozmowy kontrolowane 16:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Re:Images from Lithuanian Ministry of Defense

Hi mate, sure I do. They are available on Wikimedia OTRS system, under the ticket #2009040110056227. Cya, M.K. (talk) 12:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

I would love to do that, but I wondering - shouldn't {{OTRS received|id=2009040110056227}} tag must be placed by different editor rather then uploaded, in order to avoid mistakes, etc? M.K. (talk) 12:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

I don't know if that is inappropriate, whats why I am asking :) In any case feel free to add those tags. Thanks, M.K. (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Well oky, will do myself. Thanks for the help. M.K. (talk) 16:00, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Done :) M.K. (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Template:Photo-by-Wojciechowscy

Nie rozumiem dlaczego zmieniles licencje z {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} na {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}. Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 12:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Wygladalo to na zmianę ponieważ "{{GFDL<noinclude>|category=</noinclude>|migration=relicense}}" pokazuje na stronach plików {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Ale masz racje, strona [1] ma link do {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} wiec zmiana Template:Photo-by-Wojciechowscy jest prawidłowa. Powinieneś wyjasnic tego typu zmiany na Template talk:Photo-by-Wojciechowscy. Dobrze ze jesteś w kontakcie z autorami i ze dodali wzmiankę na temat cc-by-sa na ich stronie. Nie podobało mi się ze Commons zmienilo licencje wszystkich ich plików z GFDL and GFDL+cc-by-sa bez porozumienia z autorami (zakładam ze nikt się ich nie spytał przed zmiana licencji). Pozdrowienia. --Jarekt (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Rzeczywiscie tereny wspinaczkowe sa w Stanach bardzo dobre, ale Tatry czy skalki Pod-Krakowskie, tez sa niezle. Poporzadkowalem troche wszystkie pliki w Category:Photographs by Marek and Ewa Wojciechowscy. Czy moglbys poprawic Template:Photo-by-Wojciechowscy/pl i zamienic Template:Photo-by-Wojciechowscy/Test na Template:Photo-by-Wojciechowscy? Mozna tez skasowac Template:Photo-by-Wojciechowscy-GFDL. --Jarekt (talk) 13:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Dziekuje. Wspomniales ze "dodanie explicite kategorii Category:Photographs by Marek and Ewa Wojciechowscy było niepotrzebne, bo szablon to dodaje". Juz nie dodaje. Dodalem ta kategorie do szablonu z jakis rok temu tymczasowo bo nie chcialem zmieniac kazdego pliku. Teraz mialem okazje to poprawic. Tak przy okazji, jesli korespondujesz z Wojciechowskimi to moze zapytac ich o wieksze wersje tych plikow, a takze wersje bez znakow wodnych. Usuwanie tych znakow wodnych za biera czas i czesto niszczy zdjecia (porownaj File:1 Bielsko Biala 05.jpg z orginalem). Takze http://www.poczta-polska.pl/mw/ twierdzi ze ma 33,244 zfjec a my mamy 1,692. Warto by bylo skopiowac pozostale 31,552 w jakis automatyczny sposob.--Jarekt (talk) 17:22, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.

:) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry?

You don't have to be sorry. Your vote seems honnest, and I'm in the same struggle as you for a better FP level. But as for describing Machu Picchu as a pile of ordinary rubbles... yes, that IS a profanity! Cheers. --S23678 (talk) 12:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

About self-nominations, I think it's a necessary evil since, at least for people like me, FPC is probably the biggest motivation I have at making the best possible pictures. Since I am aiming at high standards in my voting as well, I'm not making a lot of friends here... (same as you, as I can see). So, I doubt anybody will ever nominate one of my pictures for that reason. So, no self-nomination = no contributions on commons, for me. --S23678 (talk) 22:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papio hamadryas Warsaw ZOO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice picture --Pudelek 15:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Jersey_granate.svg

whtat's the problem about it?--Mpiz (talk) 12:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

and the only solution at this problem is delete it?--Mpiz (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

if it is a big problem delete it again or rename it--Mpiz (talk) 08:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Laboratorio grafico of it.wiki will change the format--Mpiz (talk) 09:33, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Possible nominations

Following your coment on self nominating, I'd like you to give your opinion on these pictures. I think there could be at least 1 possible FP among them, but I'd like some external advices. Mbz1 already gave me his opinion on these ones as well. If you have time as well, you could have a look at my recent pictures of Peru (in "Cuzco" and "Machu Picchu" sections, the other pictures are a lot older), to see if there's one worth nominating. Thanks --S23678 (talk) 04:49, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

File:124 - Machu Picchu - Juin 2009.jpg

File:99 - Machu Picchu - Juin 2009.jpg

File:93 - Machu Picchu - Juin 2009.jpg

File:103 - Machu Picchu - Juin 2009.jpg

File:102 - Machu Picchu - Juin 2009.jpg

File:100 - Machu Picchu - Juin 2009.jpg

File:32-Taxpn-US-Marines-Soldiers.jpg

File:32-Taxpn-US-Marines-Soldiers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sv1xv (talk) 21:23, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

A couple of Tadorna ferruginea

Hello. Thank you for your remark "Left-bottom duck's head almost blends with the background. Generally objects do not pop out of the background enough" about the File http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates#File:A_couple_of_Tadorna_ferruginea.jpg . There is an alternative here. May I please ask you to take a look at it, if you have a time? Best regards --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:26, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Sundeep Malani.jpg

Hi, i uploaded an image of Indian film director, Sundeep Malan, with his permission. He has sent evidence of his permission to wikimedia commons yesterday. However, an OTRS ticket has not been issued as of now. As an OTRS volunteer, could you please verify whether he did in fact send it. Thanks. Joyson Noel (talk) 07:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Joyson Noel (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Could you please also do the same for File:Tony DSouza.JPG. He has given evidence of his permission a couple of days back, but an OTRS ticket has not been issued so far. Thanks. Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 03:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Piłsudski

Niestety... Gdybym miał, nie byłoby problemu, ale postanowiłem najpierw wykadrować - no i klops. Wolf (talk) 17:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Jeśli zostawiłeś coś z efektów mojej pracy, to popełniłeś NPA, pomijając mojego nicka <ironiczny chichot> Wolf (talk) 18:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

BQmUB2009019

Gracias por eliminar la imagen que no había manera de modificarlo ni quitarlo. Un saludo

Request

Hi, could you please delete this. There is already a duplicate of this file on commons?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alfred_Dreyfus_old.jpg

Thanks. Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 20:55, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Here it is: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dreyfus-annee-de-sa-mort.jpg

Merry Christmas Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 17:04, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Pat Condell

Hi, i uploaded an old image of Pat Condell which was taken from his website. Even though he did send evidence of his permission to Wikipedia, an OTRS ticket was still not issued. As such, i request you to look into it. Thanks. This is the link:

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Condell_Brunel.jpg

Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 14:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Could you please send the inquiry yourself? You can contact him here Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 17:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Lista grafik

Witaj. Oto lista grafik do usunięcia, o których pisałem:

• File:LBL77RN.jpg - z powodów prywatności;
• File:Tabliczka znamionowa Hyundai Accent.jpg - j.w.;
• File:Wikipedysta Rudi.jpg - parę lat temu załadowane, do niczego niepotrzebne;
• File:Wikipedia - Baner Rudiego.gif - "raczej" nieaktualne;
• File:Biłgoraj - panorama.jpg - z powodów osobistych.

Piott (talk) 19:02, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

i tu to samo co wyżej, tylko załadowane z mojego drugiego konta:

• FIle:BiłgorajPanoramaa.jpg

PiotrekW (talk) 19:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Fortress Warsaw

Hi Leafnode. Pls have a look here - I just realized, that you have been doing the bigger Warsaw fortification and the Modlin onces. Which both are great. I actually prepare a series of articles for de:wp about all Warsaw regional fortification (e.g. see here) and to have a good scheme of the Warsaw one would be very important/helpful (for related articles in pl:wp too, I guess). Maybe you can help, --Wistula (talk) 12:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

... great, thank you a lot. But no hurry, it doesn't has to be in the next days, I will need weeks to finish my article series. --Wistula (talk) 14:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Admin inactivity

Hello Leafnode, you might be interested in this discussion: Commons_talk:Administrators/De-adminship#Activity -- A9 (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Space_shuttle_US.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Space_shuttle_US.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Space_shuttle_US.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jatkins (talk) 19:36, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Mapa Warszawski Rejon Umocniony.svg

File:Mapa Warszawski Rejon Umocniony.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Rego_Nayak.jpg

Please delete this image i uploaded. I'm not satisfied with it's quality. Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 18:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Space_shuttle_USSR.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Space_shuttle_USSR.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Space_shuttle_USSR.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Space shuttle USSR.jpg

File:Space shuttle USSR.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

ChiZeroOne (talk) 07:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Leafnode. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you abf «Cabale!» 15:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:SSME2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SSME2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Colds7ream (talk) 16:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

A script in your user namespace may stop working in February 2012

Hi Leafnode, I found the deprecated function akeytt somewhere in your user-namespace, e.g. Special:MyPage/monobook.js, . It is likely that this will cause JavaScript errors after Commons is updated to MediaWiki 1.19 in February. You can simply remove this function-call as it currently does nothing. If you have a copy of user-messages in your script, you may remove it and instead activate User Messages in your preferences. Please also note that addLink is now natively supported by mw.util.addPortletLink. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 10:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Leafnode. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of your inactivity in the past six months.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at the current inactivity run page within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, OdderBot (talk) 11:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Archimedes pi.svg

File:Archimedes pi.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sceptic1954 (talk) 09:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

De-admin message

Hi Leafnode. I regret to inform you that soon you'll loose the admin bit as you failed to make 5 log actions since last run, see here. Trijnstel_talk 11:33, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Leafnode. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Leafnode~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

21:45, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Astp-S74-17843.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Huntster (t @ c) 07:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:AST-32-2686.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Huntster (t @ c) 19:05, 18 December 2021 (UTC)