User talk:Liridon/Archive2

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- ~riley (talk) 19:33, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks :) .--Liridon (talk) 19:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Watermarks

Another user with funny watermarks not understanding WP licensing: [1]

do you want to send him a note?

përshëndetje, --Albinfo (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

@Albinfo: too late .--Liridon (talk) 11:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Liridon,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Anna Tomowa-Sintow.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Anna Tomowa-Sintow.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 01:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for notification @JuTa: I know, you can delete it any time. Couldn't find what type of licence they have, also tried to contact through they website, still no response.--Liridon (talk) 09:11, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic view of Shebenik-Jabllanicë National Park from Black Stone Peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but saturation/contrast should be reduced to get a more natural look --Uoaei1 04:04, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 8.jpg

File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 22:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 3.jpg

File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 21:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 1.jpg

File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 21:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penguins at Boulders Beach, Cape Town (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone bathtubs, Theth - 2018 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone bathtubs, Theth - 2018 (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matterhorn & wooden cottages & skiers, March 2019 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matterhorn & wooden cottages, March 2019 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matterhorn, March 2019 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matterhorn, March 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 21:01, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulders Beach, Cape Town (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted --Podzemnik 03:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC) Please align the horizon and remove the CA. --Ermell 06:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)  Done--Liridon 17:50, 5 September 2019 (UTC) Still leaning to the right. The disturbing person on the left should be cropped out IMO. --Ermell 07:04, 6 September 2019 (UTC) Done some more changes --Liridon 09:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luzern - Mount Pilatus - March 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Chme82 19:55, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bela di Supra (Upper Belica).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fixing persepective and geo tag would be great --Podzemnik 03:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)  Done--Liridon 17:50, 5 September 2019 (UTC)  Support Good good --Podzemnik 03:54, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm - Kungsträdgården - April 2019 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Clear detail, good exposure and colour, pleasing scene. --Bobulous 18:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm - Boat - April 2019 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a small rotation ccw --Michielverbeek 20:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC) Tilted in cw direction --Poco a poco 20:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC) Made some changes. --Liridon 19:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC) Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luzern - Chapel Bridge - March 2019 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 12:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm - city views - April 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zürich - Kirche Enge - March 2019 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:02, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zürich - Kirche Enge - March 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:13, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struga Panorama, October 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for the challenges of this shot. --Axel Tschentscher 06:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Liridon,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mali i Thatë from Magaro Peak, September 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:46, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Liridon,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Your best shot 2019

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

It's early 2020, which means it's time again to look back at photographs taken over the course of the past 12 months. As always, I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2019 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2019

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking Jablanica Mountain, January 2020 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 18:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic view from Black Stone peak, Jablanica Mountain, January 2020 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:08, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking Jablanica Mountain, January 2020 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strange CA, very strong in the lower right, probably not repairable. I would also require at least an approximate GPS position for such pictures. Also the description is much too general for me. --Smial 10:54, 13 January 2020 (UTC) adden new version, + geolocation --Liridon 20:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Thx for adding additional information, but the CA hasn't gone. --Smial 23:08, 21 January 2020 (UTC) Further reduction of CA is done. --Liridon 08:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC) Regarding the high resulution it's good enough now. --Smial 20:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking Jablanica Mountain, January 2020 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Further reduction of CA is done. --Liridon 08:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC) Regarding the high resulution it's good enough now. Do you have an idea why the problem only appears so strongly on one side? Is the lens perhaps decentered?--Smial 20:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC) Thx @Smial: , can be it, I have to check in future photo shoots.--Liridon 18:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jablanica Mountain in Autumn, 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jablanica Mountain, Autumn, 2019 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Some traces of CAs and somewhat strange sharpness distribution (foreground sharp, left midground unsharp, background almost shart again – huh?), but overall nice and good. --Aristeas 08:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jablanica Mountain in Autumn, 2019 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 16:38, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jablanica Mountain, in background Ohrid Lake Autumn, 2019 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's good, but horizonth isn't stright and on the right we see the someone cut. --Tournasol7 14:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Adjusted horizont and fixed half-cut. --Liridon 11:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC) Because all mentioned issues have been addressed, we should change the state of this image to promotion. --Aristeas 10:09, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Liridon. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 05:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

@Tiven2240: Thnaks for notification.--Liridon (talk) 07:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jablanica mountain in winter 2020, in right side is highest peak Black Stone, and in left side Chumin peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 09:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on May 30, 2020

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I’d like to invite you to our group’s first Virtual Meeting on Saturday, May 30, 2020. The meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Please take a look at the meeting page and add your name to the list of participants if you’re planning to attend.

Hope to see you in a week! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiker in Jablanica mountain in winter 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs additional categories --Poco a poco 09:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC) Added more categories there. --Liridon 08:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)