User talk:Llez/Archives/2010 (2)

Tobacco set

Hi Llez. I'm very amazed at your set was not already promotted as VI, because I think it's very informative and well done.  Done now. I hope it will not be discussed !--Jebulon (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Nicotiana tabacum (Tobacco).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Nicotiana tabacum (Tobacco).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nelumbo nucifera 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latonia seyfriedi 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 13:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Hornisse

I can not understand your point for the Hornet. I do not speak English and the automatic translator does not help. I believe that you see included suggested tighter framing. But I'm not sure. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoploscaphites Discoscaphites 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Liberty !!

Sorry for "my" own Lady Liberty ! When i saw "yours", I thought that it could be funny to show "mine" the same day. I hope you are not hurt, it's only a joke, even if my comment says the truth ! However, your pic is better than mine.--Jebulon (talk) 17:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

==

Congratulations!
The [[Commons:Valued image candidates/{{{1}}}|set of images]] you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the [[Valued image set: {{{2}}}]].

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
scope.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

==

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Phytolacca americana (American Pokeweed).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Phytolacca americana (American Pokeweed).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Liberty Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well... Only a copy, but a nice pic, nevertheless --Jebulon 17:46, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbiola nobilis (Noble Volute), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:07, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:30, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punica granatum 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 18:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Synchiropus splendidus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 14:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cymbiola nobilis 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cymbiola nobilis 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ranunculus bulbosus (Bulbous Buttercup), Corm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:28, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Liberty (Paris), Île des Cygnes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The best for this scope. Could you add the heading of the geolocalisation? Yann (talk) 18:59, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 Done  Comment The photo was taken from a "Bateau Mouche" on the River Seine.

 Oppose Please notice you can see at least two others statues of Liberty in Paris. This one , and another in the Musée des Arts-et-Métiers. The statue in the Jardin du Luxembourg, and the statue in the musée des arts et métiers (no photo available yet I'm afraid) are both originals models from Bartholdi , used for the building of the great one. The statue shown here, in Île des Cygnes in Paris, is a copy of the statue of New York. The point is to chose between a "disturbing" background and History--Jebulon (talk) 23:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

 Comment: As there are various statues in Paris, I restrict the scope now on the Statue of the Île des Cygnes (the most renowned and most photographed Statue of Liberty in Paris). --Llez (talk) 06:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

 Support Agree with this explanation/restriction. Best in new scope now, opposition removed.--Jebulon (talk) 09:24, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Question What makes it recognizable from another version in another place, in this view? --Myrabella (talk) 18:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Each statue has another pedestal. --Llez (talk) 19:51, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Is that all? It looks like one has golden flame and letters, while the other yellow flame and uncoloured letters. And like one has the head turned and the other straight - or does it depend on perspective? --Ikar.us (talk) 11:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
• Scope looks comvoluted. Statue of Liberty on Île des Cygnes (Paris) or Statue of Liberty (Île des Cygnes, Paris) would be a better order. --Ikar.us (talk) 20:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment There exists a catogory on commons "Statue of Liberty (Paris)" in which all the pictures of this statue are listet. So this category seemed a good scope to me and it should be left. The addition "Île des Cygnes" refers to a single statue out of three in Paris and defines it well IMO. Otherwise one should create a new category and tansfer all the pictures of the statue of the Île des Cygnes into this new category. But makes it sense? --Llez (talk) 21:01, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
  • For three different statues, three different categories are appropriate. And the scope doesn't need to have the same wording as the category to which it's linked. Categories may change anyway, the scope is forever. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:23, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please notice that the texts on the plaque hold by the Lady are different: Here we may read : 4 juillet 1776 = 14 juillet 1789 (in gold letters). In New York we have :IV july MDCCLXXVI (in relief), and in Jardin du Luxembourg we have 15 de novembre 1889 (sculpted).--Jebulon (talk) 00:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Because of the scope wording and of the categorization to be improved. I think the scope should be precised in "Replica of the Statue of Liberty , Île des Cygnes, Paris" or something like that, with a link to a specific category to be created. It is important to say that it is a replica in the scope IMO. There are many all around the world (see en:Replicas of the Statue of Liberty; fr:Répliques de la Statue de la Liberté). --Myrabella (talk) 13:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

  Most readers will recognize that a Statue of Liberty located not in New York isn't the original. And if we assume readers without previous knowledge about "the" statue, we would have to be even more precise: Replica of the Statue of Liberty (New York, USA), located in ....

  And is an exemplar located in Paris and made by the original sculptor a simple replica, or could it be regarded as a second instance of his idea?

  So to avoid redundance as well as interpretation, I'd drop the "replica" part. --Ikar.us (talk) 20:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

  •  Comment It is a replica, but with an interesting story (see en:Île des Cygnes). And an image without any background may be misleading for hasty users. --Myrabella (talk) 21:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
    • After checking, it is a cast bronze sculpture made after an original plaster scale model by Bartholdi, this latter used for the conception of the big one (see [1] and [2]) => scope wording request dropped. --Myrabella (talk) 07:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
  • But it's still desirable to sort the different statues in different categories. --Ikar.us (talk) 09:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
    •  Info A category already exists for the statue in 'Jardin du Luxembourg' : Category:Liberty Enlightening the World (Jardin du Luxembourg). I propose to create a similar Category:Liberty Enlightening the World (Île des Cygnes) and to keep (or to rename in the plural) "Category:Statue of Liberty (Paris)" as the parent category of both. --Myrabella (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2010 (UTC) PS : there is at least one image of the third statue, in the 'Musee des Arts et métiers' : File:CNAM-IMG 0630.jpg --Myrabella (talk) 20:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
      • There is Category:Replicas of Liberty Enlightening the World in France. Is a intermediate category for Paris needed? I suggest to place them all in the national cetagory. (Neglecting the fact that at least one isn't a replica, just for the categorization.) --Ikar.us (talk) 21:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
        • None of us noticed the category related to the statue in the Jardin du Luxembourg at the beginning... Keeping an intermediate category would ease users' search in Category:Statues in Paris I guess. If an user didn't know that 'Jardin du Luxemboug' is in Paris, he wouldn't have a clue looking in Category:Replicas of Liberty Enlightening the World in France. As the present category is imprecise, it would need a rename. It is simpler to create it, IMO. --Myrabella (talk) 21:59, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
          • I see. And the arrondissement level makes it more difficult to find statues in Paris. --+Ikar.us (talk)
            • OK, I'm going to deal with that. --Myrabella (talk) 22:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
              •  Done Tidying up Category:Statue of Liberty (Paris). Link adapted in the scope (but not the order of the words yet). --Myrabella (talk) 22:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

 Info Thanks for all contributions and comments. I've learned a lot about the Statues within the last days! --Llez (talk) 20:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rauvolfia serpentina (Snakeroot), Fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - All criteria meet --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:49, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pliohippus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pliohippus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very didactic --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very good. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

English Wikipedia FP

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Cymbiola nobilis 01.jpg, was nominated on the English Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Jujutacular T · C 15:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lambis truncata (Giant Spider Conch), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good composition --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:55, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support very good --George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:56, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 21:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Promoted Valued Image Set

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Rhododendron tomentosum (Marsh Labrador Tea).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Rhododendron tomentosum (Marsh Labrador Tea).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salvia sclarea (Clary Sage), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equus greyvii (Grévy's Zebra), Skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very didactic. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:06, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saururus cernuus (Lizard's tail, Water-dragon, or Swamp Root), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:07, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lambis truncata 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lambis truncata 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Equus grevyi 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Equus grevyi 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helix pomatia 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Biodiversity Photo

Hello H. Zell,

My name is Rita. I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal.

We are working on a brochure/roadbook of Biodiversity of Lisbon and we like very much your photo. This roadbook is to free distribution. Can we use one of your photo of Briza máxima*? We refer your name just like we do with the other photographers. What´s the name do you want we put on the brochure?

Please respond to: rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt

Thank you very much.

Best Regards.

-   http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Briza_maxima_001.JPG   

Rita Neves

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taraxacum officinale 003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 21:44, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Biodiversität Photo

Biodiversität Photo Hallo H. Zell,

Mein Name ist Rita. Ich arbeite in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, das ist ein Public Organismus in Portugal.

Wir arbeiten an einer Broschüre arbeiten / Roadbook der Biodiversität von Lissabon und die wir sehr gerne Ihr Foto. Das Roadbook ist die kostenlose Verteilung. Können wir ein Foto von Ihrer Briza maxima *? Wir verweisen Sie Ihren Namen genau wie wir mit den anderen Fotografen. Wie lautet der Name willst du setzen wir auf die Broschüre?

Bitte zu reagieren: rita.neves @ cm-lisboa.pt

Vielen Dank.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen.

- Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Briza_maxima_001.JPG

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merychippus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful -- Archaeodontosaurus 07:22, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forteresse de Salses 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:48, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Merychippus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Seconded. Lycaon (talk) 09:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:44, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Helicopter_SA_330_Puma_005.JPG

File:Helicopter_SA_330_Puma_005.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

132.199.33.94 15:15, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Forteresse de Salses (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Agree. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:36, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 17:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helicopter SA 330 Puma 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yay, finally someone else with a pic of an aircraft. Airwolf 14:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balearica regulorum 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think this is a Balearica regulorum. Luc Viatours picture of the same place has this caption. --Ikiwaner 18:48, 5 September 2010 (UTC)  Done Sorry, my mistake and thanks for the hint. You are right, it is B. regulorum, the Grey Crowned Crane. I changed the description and the category and the file is renamed. --Llez 16:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)  Support now, good portrait. --Quartl 07:20, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbiola imperialis (Imperial Volute), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Well done, criteria met for studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Agree. Image fulfils criterion 5 per info in file description. Lycaon (talk) 07:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:41, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mesohippus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 17:43, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cymbiola imperialis 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cymbiola imperialis 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- MJJR 21:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Four solaire 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Four solaire 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

3 fehlbestimmte Bilder korrigiert

Hallo Llez/Archives/2010 (2),

Ich habe Ihre Bilder Image:Potentilla_reptans_001.JPG, Image:Potentilla_reptans_002.JPG und Image:Potentilla_reptans_003.JPG von Potentilla reptans zu Potentilla indica geschoben. Die Außenkelchblätter sind ebenso wie die (auf dem Habitusbild allerdings nur teilweise erkennbaren) dreizähligen, erdbeerähnlichen Blätter typisch. Das fünfzählige Blatt in der Mitte ist wohl eine große Ausnahme. Oder es gehört doch zu einer anderen Art als die Blüten. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Helicopter SA 330 Puma manoeuvre.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Helicopter SA 330 Puma manoeuvre.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mesohippus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:19, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forteresse de Salses 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr gut! Der gebogene Weg macht das Bild dynamisch und gibt ihm zugleich Tiefe. --Ikiwaner 15:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zea mays 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 06:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good, Impressive --Jebulon 23:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Podarcis hispanica (Iberian Wall Lizard).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 08:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grau de Leucate 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good and informative.--Jebulon 23:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aesculus glabra 010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good picture of the main object but background imo oversaturated --Mbdortmund 00:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)  Done Better now? --Llez 04:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Hard colors, but this post processing looks good to me. QI IMO.--Jebulon 21:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melo aethiopica (Crowned Baler), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Nice work, criteria met for a studio shot --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archaeopteryx lithographoca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for the picture.--Archaeodontosaurus 06:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balistoides conspicillum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:07, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pterois antennata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some correctible CA on the fish due to the water, IMO--Jebulon 16:51, 25 September 2010 (UTC)  Done As far as possible --Llez 17:04, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Still little CA, but visible only at highest resolution. Nice view an useful. Thanks for improvements.--Jebulon 22:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paramblypterus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met, best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 11:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Melo aethiopica 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Melo aethiopica 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: VIS Castanea sativa

Hello Llez! Thank you for your comment. I don't think that I'll change my vote though, since it only adds to the set. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falcatus falcatus (Cladodont-toothed Stethacanthid Shark), Fossil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:38, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Ginko Biloba

Carschten a été plus rapide que moi pour le vote. Les feuilles sont utilisées en allopathie pas en homéopathie, comme tonique veineux. Les fruits au bout de quelques jours sente très très mauvais :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equine evolution.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I suggest putting in the caption dimensions of the complete skeleton, and it will be perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment The sizes are given in the first vertical annotation box. Do you think it is not sufficient? The intention was, not to have too much text in the picture itself, but to give additional information to the different parts of the picture by annotations. --Llez (talk) 07:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support The image is very good. I propose to amend only the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
  •  InfoFurther informations given in the boxes --Llez (talk) 21:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Castanea sativa (Sweet Chestnut).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Castanea sativa (Sweet Chestnut).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Well done! George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ginkgo biloba 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice colors and comp, good DOF --Carschten 12:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthias anthias 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy, but very pretty. Mattbuck 10:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Equine evolution.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Equine evolution.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leucate, Centre conchylicole.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I would say it is difficult to see that it is a center of oyster farming, because we don't see the usual racks, bags, or cages where oysters are cultivated (example). --Myrabella (talk) 22:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Info The oysters are cultivated in the center of the Etang de Leucate (beginning behind the bridge in the background). "Grau de Leucate" is a connection between the Etang and the Mediterranean. Here the oysters are landed and sold by the oyster farmers. The official name of this site is "Centre Concylicole". Therefore I chose this as scope and not "oyster farming" or so.
•  Comment "Centre conchylicole" means concerning shellfishes , not only oysters (Centre ostréicole). Furthermore, what illustrates Myrabella's example is a "parc à huîtres", that's why I think that Llez's scope is right. I'll wait for competitors, other opinions or infos, but this image can be promouvable as VI IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 23:28, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:48, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I need convincing for criterion III. Nothing on the picture links to shells/shell culure. All I can see is some small boats and some sheds. Lycaon (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment I remember "Centre Concylicole" is the official name of the site you see in the picture, and it is a part of the village of Leucate (as Fishermens Wharf is a part of San Francisco). So I chose the Scope "Leucate" with the subscope "Centre Conchylicole" in the same way as "Fishermens Wharf" would be a subscope of "San Francisco". It is a part of the oyster farming in this region, but only a part (therefore not "Oyster Farming" as subscope). The boats are the boats of the oyster farmers. They sell the oysters in the buildings you see on both sides of the canal. I didn't make a set of severeral picturs (showing both sides of the buildings, and the farming in the Etang) for I wanted only show this site, otherwise one should make a set on Oyster and Shellfarming respectively in this region. --Llez (talk) 16:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Nothing on the picture links to shells/shell culure. It is simply false, sorry. Left, one can read a sign "Huîtres-Moules" ("Oysters-Mussels"), which are shells, as I know. One can see, right, another sign "Degustation", which may be linked to the first, IMO. At the end, right, I see a "bag" or "cage", in use for oysters culture. I support.--Jebulon (talk) 00:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I add some annotations. Please delete if useless.--Jebulon (talk) 00:25, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Playing the devil's advocate. Say I'm a non European viewer. Is this a good representative for this scope (at review size) or do I need to read up on local French culture to understand it? Is the scope not too narrow? Even if this item deserves a scope, is this view unambiguously illustrating it? Lycaon (talk) 04:07, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
  • In my opinion, this picture is a good representative for this scope, and illustrates it unambiguously. Sorry if french signs in a french place are in French, and maybe needs for read up a little on local french culture (not always uninteresting). Does this item deserves a scope, and is this scope not too narrow ? That is the question. The eternal question of "scopes". If one do speak about other things like a species or an identificated person, one may have problems with the scope, and endless discussions. It looks really very easy to oppose all VICs by protestations around the scopes. Another  Question (nothing personnal): is "Playing the devil's advocate" assuming good faith in "Commons"? But maybe I am a bit too lenient with other candidates (because of my own lack of quality in my work...) ?--Jebulon (talk) 09:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
    •  Comment Note that the French article on Leucate doesn't mention the place—but it doesn't mention either the oyster farming in Leucate, which is a traditional and famous production of the area (see this news/advertisement) in French), so we can consider it's a rather incomplete article. --Myrabella (talk) 18:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 21:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geoteuthis bollensis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support single image in this scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:47, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Megalaspides 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chicoreus ramosus 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chicoreus ramosus 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loasa vulcanica, Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment - Please remove the comment in the brackets, it shouldn't be part of the scope. --109.66.194.132 17:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Done as proposed --Llez (talk) 21:09, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support all criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Théviec!

Thank you, I'm the wrong version at the time of loading. I work too. But fortunately I have real friends. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megalaspides.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support single image in this scope, and very good one --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Cathedral 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Known (and now categorized) as "Arnoul de Metz".--Jebulon 22:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eustrombus gigas (Queen Conch), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good. All criteria met.Lycaon (talk) 15:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Well done --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:57, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Cathedral 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eustrombus gigas 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eustrombus gigas 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus marmoreus (Marbled Cone), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support It is now the reference representation --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:34, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 23:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Masking

Hello ! First I would like to say to you that I like your pics very much !
I've put an annotation on your skeleton image, because I've seen a very little problem of masking. By the way, even I generally prefer black masking, I have to say that this one is very nice. Congratulations. Regards from Paris.--Jebulon (talk) 00:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bryonia dioica (Red Bryony), Root.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Request - Drop the parentheses--Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 18:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment I also think you went overboard with your thesaurus here ;-). Better only leave the most used vernacular name. Lycaon (talk) 19:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
  •  Done Red Bryony is the most common name. --Llez (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met. Lycaon (talk) 06:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:07, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Ginkgo biloba (Ginkgo).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Ginkgo biloba (Ginkgo).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Well done! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Cathedral 003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 09:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conus marmoreus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbo imperialis (Giant Green Turbo), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support good studio work --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 06:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Delphinus delphis (Short-beaked Common Dolphin), Skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:53, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Metz Cathedral 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Metz Cathedral 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Delphinus delphis skeleton

Hello mein Freund
Congratulations for the FP above !!
I noticed for you on "your" skeleton three very small masking issues, easily fixable.
Very nice, indeed.
Freundlichen Grüssen--Jebulon (talk) 23:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delphinus delphis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportQI & Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbo imperialis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 16:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fossil Thunnus (Tuna).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:43, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tonna galea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, not exceptional, but good--Lmbuga 17:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Magnifique !

Hi Llez.
Juste un fref message pour te féliciter de l'image "Tonna Galea", promue ci-dessus, et candidate FP. C'est très beau. Très réussi techniquement, mais aussi très riche, très délicat et très poétique je trouve. La nature est merveilleuse, merci de participer à nous la faire découvrir mieux. Congratulations again. Seht gut, noch einmal. Danke--Jebulon (talk) 23:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Micromys minutus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 14:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tonna galea (Giant Tun), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Once more a great addition to our VI's. Best in scope. Lycaon (talk) 23:45, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crassostrea gigas (Pacific Oyster), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment -- Well, I'll consider supporting the nomination if you send me a sample (with same whine, please) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC); PS - I suppose this is not the same species as "les huîtres portugaises" -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Info You are right. "La Portugaise" is Crassostrea angulata, it was cultivated in former times. Now it is nearly completely replaced in culture by "La Japonaise" Crassostrea gigas.
  PS: At the moment, I can't offer you french oysters, but what about a good german wine? --Llez (talk) 14:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
  • As for me, I am not very interested to receive a sample of empty oysters ;-). --Myrabella (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Gladly accept the bribe. I'll send the address :) Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Bribery ! Shame on you, Alvesgaspar ! because atlantic french oysters are much tasty than mediterranean. What do you like, as french white wine ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment -- White whine? Brrr, that's a lady's drink. Je préfère le pinard avec un bon fromage (quand on n'a pas du vin portugais, bien sur!) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
    •  Comment Poor old friend... Why do you will make me angry. Why ? I'm a very gentle and kind man ! Ok. I will send you some different french white wines soon to shut the debate. Send the adress by e-mail if you dare ! --Jebulon (talk) 23:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:23, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Aconitum napellus (Monkshood).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Aconitum napellus (Monkshood).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Alternative background

Hello Llez.

Thank you very much for support. You are right, as you know, the background of "Cour Marly" is very distractive. Nevertheless, I have changed the background with a similar color, taken from the original file, and made a new background. Do you agree ? May I consider that I have still your support now ? Thank you for a short message on the review page.--Jebulon (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sinosauropteryx GMV 2124.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It seems to me, from my recollection, that the specimen of Karlsruhe, is a copy. It should be noted. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
  ** Info Done, noted "Replica" in the description. --Llez (talk) 14:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I received confirmation it is a copy (from Trieste).
•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 20:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Four solaire d'Odeillo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, valued constuction --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tonna galea 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tonna galea 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Branched murex

Hi, your beautiful pic was the Choice of the week and is displayed at the top of the "Features and admins" page in next week's edition of The Signpost. Are you OK with the panoramic display (to show the readers the details)?

On a slightly different matter, I wonder whether you would be able to judge next week's featured picture promotions at the en.WP? It just means choosing the best, in your opinion, and writing up to, say, 140 words. It would need to be done next weekend (we normally copy-edit judges' text).

Please let me know if you're able to be our guest.

Link for reply

Tony1 (talk) 13:30, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crassostrea gigas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metz Cathedral 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes--Jebulon 22:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homalocantha anatomica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Homalocantha zamboi (Zambo’s Murex), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mikadotrochus hirasei (The Emperor's Slit Shell), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support very good, criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:25, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Mikadotrochus hirasei 01.jpg

Hello Llez
Concerning the shell above, I've found (by accident) in the French WP an article about... shells on japanese stamps (! Wikipedia is formidable !), with the japanese name of it. So I added a french/japanese caption in the file description page. Grüsse.--Jebulon (talk) 16:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikadotrochus hirasei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:53, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macrocheira kaempferi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wow! --Carschten 13:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lambis millepeda (Millipede Spider Conch), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Achatina achatina (Giant Tiger Land Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:40, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lambis millepeda 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirounga leonina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a tad soft, but fair enough. -- Rama 13:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Bolinus cornutus

Je suggéré d’éclaircir un peu et ce sera parfait. Amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macrocheira kaempferi (Japanese Spider Crab).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Can we have a VI of a mock-up of the subject? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

• I think it is fine. It may not be the most valued in main-scope, if a good image of a living individual is available, however. Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:49, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry, it’s not a mock-up, it's a dissected specimen. That’s a difference. I remember, that in the last weeks a lot of pictures of beetles have been promoted as VI with a spicule in their body. I don’t think that spicules are a typical characteristic of living beetles! Criterion 3 says. „Must illustrate its subject well” and not “Must be living”. Sometimes a dissected specimen illustrates better the characters than a living one. --Llez (talk) 06:41, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  •  Best in Scope I didn't know it was real. I think this should be included in the description. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
    •  Done --Llez (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirounga leonina (Southern Elephant Seal), Male skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:07, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolinus cornutus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bolinus cornutus (Horned Murex), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:37, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinosauropteryx GMV 2124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 18:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Copiapoa calderana.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 17:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

my pictures of statues

Hello Llez. This is to inform you that I send you an E-mail concerning your kind comments of my statues in my user page.
I hope you've received it.--Jebulon (talk) 15:06, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for improvements, very nice indeed. How did you do ? --Jebulon (talk) 22:18, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eustrombus gigas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 20:34, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lambis millepeda 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lambis millepeda 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbinella pyrum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful George Chernilevsky 06:59, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dianthus knappii (Hairy Garden Pink).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support very good work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbinella pyrum (Great Rapa Chank), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:01, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:37, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Bryonia dioica (Red Bryony).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Bryonia dioica (Red Bryony).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:53, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lambis truncata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 09:40, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cordulagomphus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very rare object --George Chernilevsky 09:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC) French translation of the caption added.--Jebulon 11:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cordulagomphus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support pigment would be a better word than color... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 14:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chicoreus ramosus 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 19:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bolinus cornutus 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bolinus cornutus 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siratus alabaster 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:16, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melo aethiopica 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 06:54, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Dimetrodon

Now it does is legitimate to change the old images of Dimetrodon, by yours as to what will be promoted. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siratus alabaster (Alabaster Murex), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Persea princeps, Leaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:08, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chelydropsis murchisoni 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 15:48, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dimetrodon incisivum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 15:43, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fossil Dimetrodon, Skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Why the scope is not Fossil Dimetrodon? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
* Comment As normally a species is a suitable scope, I chose this. But if you think the other to be better, no problem. I changed the scope from Dimetrodon incisivum to Fossil Dimetrodon --Llez (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met best in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:22, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Citrullus colocynthis (Colocynth).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Citrullus colocynthis (Colocynth).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chelydropsis murchisoni.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all crietria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

temporal bone

Thank you for your message and congratulations for "la photo du jour". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Turbinella pyrum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Turbinella pyrum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cassis cornuta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Compsognathus longipes 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI Damage to the framing right, even if the plate stops here --Archaeodontosaurus 08:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cassis cornuta (Giant Helmet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

VI-Kandidat Zea mays

Hallo Llez! Ich bin deinem Vorschlag gefolgt und habe den scope auf "Zea mays, Vascular bundle" geändert. Grüße, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis midae (Midas Ear Abalone), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All crietria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:15, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyclurus kehreri.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:16, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Archaeotherium mortoni VI

Désolé pour Archaeotherium mortoni ce n’est pas ton travail qui est en cause mais la restauration qui est très mauvaise. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:26, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

The Photographer's Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		I hereby award H. Zell, a.k.a. User Llez, The Photographer's Barnstar for 15 Featured pictures on Commons, other perfect photos and his admission to the restricted club Meet our photographers. Well done! Keep going! Mit freundlichen Grüßen --George Chernilevsky talk 12:34, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hexaplex radix 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI - Good choise of background --Archaeodontosaurus 15:21, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cassis cornuta 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cassis cornuta 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hexaplex (Muricanthus) radix (Radish Murex), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I also like the color of the background (that it's not white and doesn't blend with the color of the items). Thanks! --APTOC (talk) 04:08, 18 December 2010 (UTC)  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:22, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis midae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:56, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archaeotherium mortoni 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Rama 13:49, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archaeotherium mortoni, Cranium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose Archaeotherium Buffalo Museum of Science.JPG Is better. Your photography is very good but the object is very bad, the red paint that was put on and that it accumulated in the cracks gives a totally artificial. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

•  Info Red paint removed --Llez (talk) 13:33, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Well done! Will show your work to the curator for him to do remove the varnish. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

* * * :) * * *

Ich wünsche Dir fröhliche Weihnachtsfeiertage und alles Gute und ganz best im Neuen Jahr!
--George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:09, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cassis flammea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:27, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Siratus alabaster 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Siratus alabaster 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sauroctonus parringtoni 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! --George Chernilevsky 11:51, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cassis flammea (Flame Helmet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:53, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chrysanthemum weyrichii (Dwarf Chrysanthemum), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sauroctonus parringtoni, Skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope excellent picture! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:46, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trochactaeon conicus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and valuable as the others. --Ximonic 11:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoplophoneus primaevus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 14:25, 27 December 2010 (UTC)