Last modified on 22 May 2015, at 11:00

User talk:Lokal_Profil


Wiki humor.png
Wiki humor.png
If you arrived at this page in order to answer a message on your talk page I ask you to answer there instead. At the same time as I posted on your talk page I also added you to my watch list by pressing the "watch" tab on the top of the page. By doing this I am automatically informed when you answer the message.


Archive >


timezones in RussiaEdit

Hello, Maybe you won't have time but i saw you made the actual map of time zones in Russia. The fact is they changed their rules this Sunday and the map needs an update. I'll ask to others if you can not. For the moment I only have those 2 articles New time in Russia on 2014, 26 oct and Donetsk & Luhansk as a reference, which is not enough i guess but is still a start. Thank you.

If you can tell me which districts have been shifted and how then I can try to put together a new map. /Lokal_Profil 18:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Sure. The zones, changes and a map/control website Time&Date map (beware : they slow down if you refresh too often). Someone already made this map so maybe you will only have to check and nothing to draw (?)... Thank you. The main article is Time in Russia.
@2a01:e35:39d2:9350:3d33:fc56:2c3f:4792: Finally got time to look at it. Looks good but I cleaned up some of the errors which have been building up over previous versions. Nice to se how the original maps have taken on a life of their own =) /Lokal_Profil 23:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Afghanistan district reform?Edit

Dear Lokal Profil,

I was using File:Map of Afghanistan, Districts and Provinces.svg from you to draw a map of poppy cultivation. I used Afghan opium survey, p. 9 as template. The I noticed, that in some provinces district borders does not match by any means. Do you know, whether there was a district reform in Afghanistan?--Kopiersperre (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't actually know but considering that "my" map is from 2009 it is more than likely. Is the missmatch true for all provinces or only some? I guess the first step would be to look at en:Districts of Afghanistan and check if that (and other language versions) is up to data. POssibly there might also be info in en:List of splits and creations of districts in Afghanistan. If nothing else an up to date basemap would definitely be worth having. /Lokal_Profil 16:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Text syns inte på kartaEdit

Hej Lokal Profil! Jag använde din File:SWE-Map_Län2007.svg för att göra en karta över sveriges regioner och landsting File:SWE-Map_RegionerochLandsting2015.svg men det blir en svart ruta över texten. Vet du hur man fixar det? Mvh, Portunes (talk) 18:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Hej!. Kul att kartan används. Jag antar att du har skapat din fil i Inkscape. Inkscape lägger tyvärr till ett objekt runt sina texter som inte stöds av andra svg-visare än Inkscape. För att fixa det markerar du den aktuella texten i Inkscape, går till menyn och väljer "text"->"Convert to text" (eller motsvarande svenska). Spara och ladda upp igen så ska boxen försvinna. Hojta till om det fortfarande strular. /Lokal_Profil 17:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
File:SWE-Map_Län2007.svg är förresten inte den bästa grundkarta att använda. Jag skulle istället rekommendera File:SWE-Map_Län.svg som är fullt kompatibel med de andra kartorna i [[User:Lokal_Profil/SWE-Map_Documentation|SWE-Map setet]. /Lokal_Profil 17:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Map of Russia - Time Zones (October 2014).svgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Map of Russia - Time Zones (October 2014).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

93.106.29.228 14:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Need to Hire Heraldry ArtistEdit

I am looking to hire an artist to create vector coats of arms for me. Please contact me at coadb@mail.com.

-John L.

iPhone AvailabilityEdit

Hi there. Per this request, can you please update IPhone 3G Availability.svg and File:IPhone 3G Worldwide.svg to mark Serbia as available? Thanks, Stickee (talk) 01:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Done :) /Lokal_Profil 01:43, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Smiley.svg Thank you. Stickee (talk) 02:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Template:CC-BY-RAÄEdit

Hi, I'm contacting you because you changed this template's license from CC BY 3.0 to CC BY 2.5 SE. This is usually considered a license revocation, so if the institution has previously licensed all lowres versions under the CC BY 3.0, that license should be put back into its licensing template. Has that been the case?    FDMS  4    16:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Please ping me in any response, as I've been working on this set of images (my commenting about the license on some images from this source disagreeing with the one currently at the source in IRC was what prompted this question). Revent (talk) 17:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
@FDMS4, Revent: It was some time ago but if I remembered correctly the source webpage only used to say CC BY, since 3.0 was the standard at the time it was believed (by us/Commons users) to be 3.0. When I contacted them about it they clarified that the particular version they had chosen was 2.5-SE (I believe they at this point also clarified this on the homepage, and started to make it clearer when an image was PD and when it was CC BY). So it's not a question about RAÄ changing their license but of us having assumed a version which was not the correct one... as far as a I remember.
That said it must be a special case indeed if it hinges on some detail of CC BY 2.5 SE which is not compatible with CC BY 3.0 unported./Lokal_Profil 07:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation! In the future, please never assume any license versions as "CC BY" or "CC BY-SA" aren't sufficient releases.    FDMS  4    19:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, this was mainly just to clarify... I have been going through some of the older uploads from that source (adding creator templates and metadata) and had noticed inconsistencies in the licensing... there were some marked as 3.0, some as 'generic' cc-by (i.e. 1.0), and some with the source-specific template... RAA currently shows that they use 2.5-se (which is what the template uses) so I've been using the template where the license we give doesn't match (most likely uploader errors, seeing the 'cc-by' icon and not looking at what version it links to. Revent (talk) 07:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
@Revent: Great. In case you haven't found it already I built a tool a couple of years ago to automatically populate a {{Kulturmiljöbild-image}} based on the id of their images. Might be useful if you come across more old ones. /Lokal_Profil 13:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Nice... yes, there are many that are not using the source-specific templates. That will make it faster.. I came across these from looking at 'implicit creator' files, and noticed that "Pål-Nils Nilsson" in particular had many from there, then found the specific templates.. just noticed you poked at least one of the ones I had messed with. Other than the date (I wasn't that sure about saying '1970's based on "Bilden troligen från mitten av 1970-talet" when it also said "Okänt datum" on the source page, but no complaint) I take it you don't have issues with the edits? Revent (talk) 20:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
No issues just happy someone is giving them som much needed love =) /Lokal_Profil 16:58, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Flickr-no known copyright restrictionsEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Flickr-no known copyright restrictions has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hchc2009 (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

StudentsångenEdit

Hej!

  1. Den här filen "File:Noter till Studentsången av Prins Gustav - Livrustkammaren - 78468.tif " innehåller en märklig kommentart om en rysk mässkåpa som verkar ha hamnat fel...
  2. Är det tillåtet att göra en ny beskuren version utan den svarta ramen och utan noterna ovanför Studentsången som inte har med den att göra? Jag skulle vilja göra det.

Vänligen, Rex Sueciæ (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Svar på fråga två: Licensen är CC0 så det är helt klart tillåtet. Bra ide om beskärningen! Ainali (talk) 07:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hej. Som Ainali säger så är det bara att köra på med beskäringen. Hittar inte kommentaren om mässkåpan... var det på samma bild? /Lokal_Profil 08:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Medeltida vapenEdit

Hej! Jag skriver en artikel om borgerliga vapen i Sverige och undrar om du har lust att rita de äldsta kända vapnen. Blasoneringarna är från Ranekes Svenska medeltidsvapen och tinkturerna är okända:

  • Henrik Sunnodag (1320): Delad, 1. Hjorthorn bjälkvis med taggar upp mot sinister
  • Engelbert Vit (1323): Tre blad med stjälkar förenade i trepass.
  • Henrik Borchardsson Hvit (1344): En sparre över hjul åtföljd ovan av två halva hjul fästa på sparren

MVH /Elzo 90 (talk) 11:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Lokal Profil".