|(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)|
SieBot 12:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
re: deletion requestEdit
Hey - no worries, I hope you will enjoy contributing to Commons & that you will find your way around easy enough! Let me know if there are any questions. Kind regards, Deadstar (msg) 15:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
You may be interested to know aboutEdit
- en:User talk:Poetlister
- en:WP:ANI#Poetlister unblock clarification
- en:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Runcorn (review)
—Random832 19:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
deprecated function in your monobook.jsEdit
Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.
If he had been uploading pictures of female Wikipedia users which the users had previously gotten deleted, and did not wish to be further disseminated, then a GFDL licence might not have saved them from deletion... AnonMoos (talk) 15:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for participatingEdit
Due to concerns raised about the photos of Taxwoman, other related images are being deleted also (again), and I have deleted one of yours in the interests of completeness. See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Image issues reported on enwiki for details.
There have been numerous calls for the people involved in this to verify their identity, and those calls are being renewed again. I realise this is quite an onerous request for someone like yourself who has such a limited involvement in the wiki, but if the others like Poetlister do, it will lend credibility to your own images being of yourself. We need to sort this out once and for all; my apologies for the confusion while this plays out. John Vandenberg (chat) 02:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Poetlister sockpuppet. Info here. Has engaged in numerous discussions on Commons in which Poetlister also engaged, clearly violating sockpuppetry policies in the process. Giggy (talk) 11:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)