Last modified on 17 February 2014, at 05:22

User talk:Ludvig14

Return to "Ludvig14" page.
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ludvig14!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Heia ludvig! gratulerer med døden!:D

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Krutitsy Metochion1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krutitsy Metochion1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

VysokopetrovskyMonastery StPeter.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VysokopetrovskyMonastery StPeter.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Autopatrol givenEdit

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 17:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Ludvig14,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 18:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Borovsk TransfigurationChurch2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borovsk TransfigurationChurch2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Dimitrovgrad Samarskaya24.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimitrovgrad Samarskaya24.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kolomna ChurchRenewalTempleResurrection.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna ChurchRenewalTempleResurrection.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Dimitrovgrad International95a.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimitrovgrad International95a.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Moscow ChurchAnnunciation Petrovsky Park8.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ChurchAnnunciation Petrovsky Park8.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Moscow Kuskovo DryingHouse.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Kuskovo DryingHouse.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Moscow Kuskovo Palace5.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Kuskovo Palace5.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

SPb - Peter's Сurtain and Menshikov Bastion of Peter&Paul Fortress.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SPb - Peter's Сurtain and Menshikov Bastion of Peter&Paul Fortress.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

YuP StGeorgeChurch4p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! YuP StGeorgeChurch4p.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Moscow ChurchAnnunciation Petrovsky Park7.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ChurchAnnunciation Petrovsky Park7.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

KolomnaKremlin MarinkinaT.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KolomnaKremlin MarinkinaT.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Valaam UpperGarden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valaam UpperGarden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valaam ResurectionSketeRefectory.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valaam ResurectionSketeRefectory.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Valaam GephsimanskiySketeChurch.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valaam GephsimanskiySketeChurch.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kolomenskoe SaviourGates.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe SaviourGates.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kolomenskoe AscensionChurch tim.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe AscensionChurch tim.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Kolomenskoe WoodenPalace.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe WoodenPalace.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Moscow ChurchTheotokosIviron Vspolye.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ChurchTheotokosIviron Vspolye.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Klyazma ChurchHolyMandylion.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klyazma ChurchHolyMandylion.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Tsarevo ChurchStNicholas4.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tsarevo ChurchStNicholas4.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kamenka(Nerl).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamenka(Nerl).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

КатегоризацияEdit

Когда ты памятники отправляешь в категорию типа Cultural heritage monuments in Xxx District, ты не могла бы к ним сразу добавлять и географические категории? Например, Xxx District, или по селу (если есть), в городе иногда бывает Buildings in xxx или Churches in xxx. Если они туда не попадут, их потом сложно будет найти.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Ага, спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Я думала, опять все неправильно... Кстати, я еще в прошлом году обнаружила (на примере Александрова), что организация категорий типа Здания в XXX - Улицы XXX и до кучи еще и Культурное наследие XXX кажутся мне нелогичными и не понимаю их взаимную иерархию (кто кому подчиняется, а где они должны быть параллельными). И я подозреваю, что то, что я там накатегоризовала, было весьма неудачным решением. Так что, извини, но ошибки будут продолжаться - Ludvig14 (talk) 15:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
В моём понимании это три параллельные линии. То есть в идеале здание, если у него нет своей категории, должно быть категоризовано по улице, по типу (например, церковь) и как памятник культурного наследия. Проблема в том, что сейчас, кроме самых больших городов, так категоризовать не получится. Для культурного наследия категории всюду есть (где нет, я потом пройду и создам). А уже по зданиям в городе не всегда. Так что, действительно, отправлять здание одновременно в категорию Трубчевск и Культурное наследие Трубчевска нелогично, так как вторая включена в первую. Но если дом в категорию Трубчевск при этом не включить, то тот, кто когда-нибудь создаст категорию Здания в Трубчевске, может его просто не найти. Но это всё, в принципе, не смертельно, прошлый год нет смысла перерывать. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Здания и культурное наследие, да, параллельные. Но при большом числе памятников получается огромная категория и твой вариант, когда под каждое здание делается новая категория, мне удобным не кажется, ибо часто лучше видеть все сразу, а не бродить по подкатегориям в поисках нужного объекта (тут, кстати, очень помогают списки памятников). Вместо этого я в Александрове пыталась группировать дома хотя бы по улицам, но быстро поняла, что и это плохой вариант, потому что имеются изображения и рядовых зданий и это ничем не помогает с памятниками. Так там все осталось в неудовлетворительном состоянии и ничего с этим сделать я не смогла. - Ludvig14 (talk) 16:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Нет, я под каждое здание не делаю новую категорию, только когда там много файлов. Но, в общем, да - и так плохо, и так.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Buildings_by_Alexey_ShchusevEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Buildings_by_Alexey_Shchusev has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Jebulon (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Panoramic views of Peter & Paul FortressEdit

См. вопрос на User_talk:Ymblanter#Петропавловское. Kaluga.2012 (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Ludvig14,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Ludvig14,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Pskov StCosmas&DamianChurchGremyachaya1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pskov StCosmas&DamianChurchGremyachaya1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Pskov HodegetriaChurch1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pskov HodegetriaChurch1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Pskov StCosmas&DamianChurch sPrimostiya2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pskov StCosmas&DamianChurch sPrimostiya2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.