User talk:Lukeno94

Return to "Lukeno94" page.
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lukeno94!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 10:10, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I reverted you edit on DigiTv1 file. This file does not qualify for speedy deletion. Next week I will present all DigiTv1's uploads for regular deletion, but you can do it yourself also, if you want. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Uh, yes it does qualify. It's definitely a copyvio, even if I don't know the exact source; this user has copyvioed another image on the same person, and is a known hoaxer. Also, it's very clear that the image has been deliberately added in order to perpetrate the hoax, since it is unequivocally NOT the person the uploader claims to be. So I've reverted your edit. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
DigiTv1 is problematic user, this is clear from his userpage. But I am not sure, that he is hoaxer. I am not sure, that this is copyvio, especially your have not given any evidence for that. I am not sure, that wrong person is in the photo. All this can be true, but I am not sure. Regular deletion request allows to discuss all these things. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Not sure he's a hoaxer? You're aware of his other image, which we on enwiki have found to be a copyvio and pertain to a different person, right? You're aware that this particular image is clearly of exactly the same person as that one, right? If you're still somehow not convinced, read [1]. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
No, I am still not convinced. This is possible, as I said. Regular deletion request will be the best. It is not so important to delete these photos today. If they are deleted during a week, this is more-less the same. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Well, if you're not convinced, and you've read the enwiki thread I linked to, then your understanding of English must be terrible. The evidence is rock-solid that this is a hoaxer, and one of their photos of this person has just been deleted as a copyvio. Also, stop marking your reversions as minor when they very clearly are not; although if you stop reverting altogether, that would be a better idea. Your move. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Last modified on 5 March 2014, at 22:27