User talk:Lvova/Deletion requests and warnings&tokens

Image Tagging Image:Rfid-in-books.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rfid-in-books.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE! ¿…? 09:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

done. Please, use this link lvova 10:09, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:A_Man_Without_A_Country.png edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:A_Man_Without_A_Country.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ChristianBier 09:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

done. Use my RUSSIAN TALK PAGE, please! lvova 10:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Mudan_MD_6106.JPG edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Mudan_MD_6106.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Svens Welt 20:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token d40d4fc97cd42a903cb2313d0e81bc8c edit

Image:The_children_-_victims_of_adult_vices_(propaganda).jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:The_children_-_victims_of_adult_vices_(propaganda).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ViperSnake151 (talk) 20:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Инрик.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Инрик.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 07:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. Sdrtirs (talk) 09:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Hogowl.gif edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Hogowl.gif has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Sdrtirs (talk) 09:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 3199f704cbe5c88c8780542d8d1b58a0 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 9e2d233c3d5fad3619479f328c93b952 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File tagging File:2_Type_094_submarines.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2_Type_094_submarines.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2_Type_094_submarines.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 16:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hallo edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

English: Welcome to the Commons, Lvova!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 08:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Как загрузить файл с другого проекта edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Нажимаю Upload file выходить табличка - указал один или несколько файлов, которые невозможно найти. Adaykz 19:45 30 июля 2008.

Для разгрузки файла из другого проекта надо или сохранить файл себе на диск и потом уже с него загрузить, указав источник, либо воспользоваться commonshelper. Подробнее - на ru:Википедия:Проект:Перенос свободных изображений на Викисклад. lvova (talk) 19:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Malva.JPG edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Вот это надо как-то исправить, я там написал

Русский: Цветок шток-розы розовой (Alcea rosea), или "мальвы" (к роду мальва не принадлежит) English: Alcea rosea flower

а там ниже тоже надо исправить, а то это уже было вставлено в статью "мальва", что не есть правильно.

Сейчас там написано:

ru Цветок мальвы en Malva's flower

что вводит в заблуждение, см. здесь:[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.124.78.251 (talk • contribs)

ru:ВП:ПС :) lvova (talk) 10:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

~ edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Прошу прощения за крайне неэтичное поведение на странице Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Winter Palace on Night.jpg. Это выглядело очень некрасиво с моей стороны. :( Оскорбительные реплики на странице номинации в избранные изображения зачеркнул. Ferrer 12:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Lvova!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image:Панцирь телеозавра.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

My own photo. edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Здравствуй, Стася!

Спасибо тебе за прекрасную фотографию меня. Она мне тоже очень нравится! Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 15:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fridrih I, Summer garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 22:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caesar, Summer garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 22:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woman in pink, summer garden (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Good quality, but I'd crop it to focus more on the statue. -- H005 00:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
DoneI've uploaded the cropped version of this file. Lvova 10:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
That was a bit too tight, I've made it a litle wider. -- H005 23:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thank you :) Lvova 06:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 850th anniversary of Moscow.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Minor fluff on background which could be removed but otherwise good. --Iotatau 21:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 850th anniversary of Moscow - revers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Again minor fluff but otherwise good. --Iotatau 21:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 21:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War - revers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 21:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 21:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 40th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 40th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War - revers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 60th anniversary Armed Forces of USSR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 60th anniversary Armed Forces of USSR - revers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War - Revers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would benefit from a top crop. --Iotatau 11:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
ok, Done Lvova 12:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, QI now. --Iotatau 12:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Man statue in Lazenki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleja Solidarnosci.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

My congratulations. --Rave (talk) 09:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Floods in QI edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 12:54, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

My English isn't good enough for argumentation of my opinion. Thanks for link, I glad that I don't exceed the limits that seems in discussion. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 13:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:MGTU statue 5.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

File:MGTU statue 5.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--A.Ceta (talk) 14:04, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

And comparable images of you show the same problem --A.Ceta (talk) 14:04, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

And almost all those category, isn't it? Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 14:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Statue of Lermontov in Moscow zoom.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Lermontov in Moscow zoom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO.--Jebulon 15:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Surikov na Prechistenke.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Surikov na Prechistenke.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --Jovianeye 02:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

connectivity project edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Hello. I'm Horus @ ThaiWikipedia. I have a question to ask: I think putting templates in that mediawiki page will make it seperate from the main namespace, right? Well, I haven't seen any different about the article number.

If you can, answer me at th:User talk:Horus, thanks. --ThHorus (talk) 09:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

ok. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 12:30, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. --ThHorus (talk) 13:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dear Lvova,

thank you for your communication on Tarandine Wikipedia. How can I configure MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage? Best regards --Joe Taras (talk) 08:11, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Can you create roa-tara:MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage with wikified (* [[template:example]]) list of templates that marks disambigations pages in your wiki? Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 08:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thank for your support but in this period I can't follow this thread. Actually there aren't disambiguation page in Tarantine Wikipedia because there are few voices. When this Wiki will grow we'll create these pages and we can manage with your system. Thank you again and regards. --Joe Taras (talk) 20:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've done. I've created the disambiguation template on Tarandine Wikipedia and I've put them in the page roa-tara:MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage. Bye --Joe Taras (talk) 19:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Moksha Wiki Disambig Page edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Anastasiya, I do not have rights to edit http://mdf.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage. The page you requested is here We do not have admins for the moment ( --mdf:User:Khazar_II

Я видела Ваше сообщение. Не знала, что админов совсем нет :( Сейчас попробуем что-нибудь придумать, что с этим делать :) Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 17:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Спасибо, Анастасия! Нас там, мягко говоря немного. Я бы сказал, что постоянно - один )--Khazar II (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

RE: from pa wiki pa:User talk:Gman124#connectivity_project edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, Anastasiya,

so the diambiguation page just needs the links to all the disambiguation pages right. we only have one page thats a diambig template. so is this what you needed at that page? (it hasn;t been translated yet though, also it is one of the old copy that was deleted before)? Also please let me know if something else is needed. also sorry for the late reply. Gman124 (talk) 03:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for reply, it isn't late! Yes, this view of the page is what we need. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 06:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ok. well if anything else please let me know here, at the english wiki, or at the pa wiki. thank you. Gman124 (talk) 14:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

If u have any questions regarding the dv.wiki, dont hesitate to ask me. Cheers.

--Glacious (talk) 21:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

yi.wiki edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you for setting up the reports on toolserver for yi.wiki How do we import the results into a page in the wiki?--Redaktor (talk) 22:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Our way is post statistic (ru, uk) and templates (on isolated and dead-end articles), but it requires some settings - at least {{Connectivity project root}} (described here) and {{Total amount of isolated articles}}. You can write to mashiah

toolserver.org, he know everything about this.

Excuse me, that I didn't see question in yiwiki. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 04:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I shall follow this up. --Redaktor (talk) 04:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

re:connectivity@pawiki edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi not sure i understand what thats for, or how to do that? Gman124 (talk) 13:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Mashiah is creator of the process of translation. The process is so strange that I can't describe it in English well; please, write him to mashiah

toolserver.org. I think he can describe process better than I. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 16:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks … edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

… for having categorized some of my recently uploaded images! :-) Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The last Wikimania made many for Malbork, I think. ;) Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 20:08, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

You make really good pictures. I have never been to Malbork, but your pics (and those of the other visitors) gave me the opportunity of a virtual intensive tour. Thank You! --Concord (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm embarrassed :) Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 05:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Здравствуй, Стася!

Поздравляю!

Хотел тебе в русскоязычном разделе Википедии картинку повесить с фейерверком, а потом подумал, что не буду там изображать из себя невесть кого, и не буду выбирать из найденных картинок, а сделаю тебе галлерею здесь :-).

Удачи! Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 21:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deprecated License edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Ballyporeen.JPG, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 16:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ballingarry, 1848..JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ballingarry, 1848..JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

When you transfer images edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! When you transfer images could you please fix the description page after the transfer? You can find more information here Commons:Moving_to_Commons#Check_the_image. It would be a great help! --MGA73 (talk) 19:20, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't sure that I can handle with categorisation, that's why I check description but don't remove templates, sorry. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 19:37, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you do not know the category just leave the {{Uncategorized}} - no problem - but you can still fix the other issues (example [2]) :-) --MGA73 (talk) 19:55, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your edit looks like hoodoo %-) Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 20:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Malbork, stained-glass window in the church02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Ваши фотографии медалей edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Гм, на мой взгляд, на ваши фотографии медалей следует поставить дополнительный шаблон лицензии -- лицензию собственно на фотографии. Сейчас на них висит только шаблон {{PD-RU-exempt}}, который касается самих медалей, а не их фотографий. Trycatch (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Думаете?.. Делала по аналогии с прочими увиденными файлами. Впрочем, я так понимаю, от двойного лицензирования беды не будет, так что - сейчас сделаю. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 13:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Думаю, да, т.к. по практике Викисклада подобная фотография тривиальной не считается, и аналогичные фотки, взятые из сети без разрешения фотографа, регулярно удаляются (пример). Ну а если в загружаемой работе есть ваш вклад, защищаемый АП, то логично, что вы должны как-то отпустить его под свободной лицензией. Trycatch (talk) 14:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Да, логично. Извиняюсь за ошибку. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 14:03, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 07:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Repina square.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lugabus.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lugabus.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 10:50, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Three kozuli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems good. Mattbuck 13:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kozuli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slaski tydzien 5047.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice symmetry, detail, color --Daniel Case 02:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Question Grand-Master of what, please ?--Jebulon 21:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Info Count Palatine Francis Louis of Neuburg, bishop of Breslau since 1683, archbishop of several dioceses, Hochmeister of the Teutonic Order (1694-1732). --Rave 09:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC) very interesting, thank you very much.--Jebulon 11:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC).Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! T-34-85 at Mound of Glory (machine-gun left).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Ianare 20:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slaski tydzien 5004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO, such a circle needs a better (symmetric, like a nice square) framing. The crops, then the composition, are not good...--Jebulon 00:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
cropped. --Lvova 09:16, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Better, thank you, even if the crop is too tight a bit, now... --Jebulon 21:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slaski tydzien 5072.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slaski tydzien 5062.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slaski tydzien 5070.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bigblack_gra4.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bigblack_gra4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Fagot+koroviev.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Fagot+koroviev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.186.230 08:20, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Profile edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

«…and the bot in ruwiki, ukwiki, bewiki and ruwiktionary…» А be-x-old-wiki? ;) --Renessaince (talk) 14:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm lazy and the single updating of all userpages is my dream :) Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 14:18, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Motorokr E6 ekonsole.png edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Motorokr E6 ekonsole.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

←fetch comms 01:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Санкт-Петербург. Собор преподобного Исаакия Далматского.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:49, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

WLM-12 edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago25 comments4 people in discussion

Как обещал, пишу, что надо сделать, чтобы в следующем году провести конкурс по всей России.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

1. Решить, участвуют только памятники федерального значения или и местного тоже. В этом году участвовали все. Оба решения имеют свои преимущества. Федеральных меньше, больше вероятность, что по ним за год удастся всё подготовить. Зато федеральные есть даже не во всех субъектах федерации: например, по памяти, в Курганской области ни одного дореволюционного нет. Поэтому не всем будет интересно участвовать. Лично я бы сделал по всем, хотя там работы очень много, думаю, десятки тысяч.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

2. Убрать из списков (или сделать выделенный фон, так, чтобы было понятно, что фотографии грузить нельзя) всё, что нельзя грузить из-за свободы панорамы. На самом деле вне больших городов таких памятников немного (в основном всякие могилы красноармейцев), и их выделить легко - в первом приближении всё, что до 1917 года, грузить нельзя. В принципе, мне кажется, я бы мог это относительно быстро сделать, но для этого списки должны лежать тут, либо на мете - в русской Википедии я не участвую, а сайт WM.RU я и подавно редактировать не буду ни при каких обстоятельствах. В принципе, списки всё равно рано или поздно надо будет переводить как минимум на английский, и переведённые так или иначе должны лежать на мете, но я не уверен, что это сейчас самое главное.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Если это сделать и даже если больше не сделать ничего, то конкурс в следующем году можно проводить. От того, что в базе полно ошибок, принципиально ничего не меняется: фотографии будут всё равно выкладывать только тех памятников, которые физически существуют и могут быть сфотографированы. Никакой лучшей центральной базы, насколько я знаю, в природе не существует. Местные власти и общественные организации (например, Архнадзор в Москве) знают ситуацию хорошо, но не до всех можно достучаться. Про некоторые объекты из базы точно известно, что они утрачены. Такие можно со ссылками или без ссылок туда добавлять. В принципе, если министерству культуры это интересно (в чём я не уверен), то можно им передать список ошибок в базе (которых там полно безотносительно достоверности памятников - например, парки Петергофа отнесены к Сочи, а Никольская улица в Петергофе по-прежнему числится Международной - и в вашем списке, кстати, тоже). Но это уже не моё дело, для меня главное, чтобы в Википедии всё было в порядке.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Дальше надо сделать следующее.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

3. Я бы выкинул вообще все памятники археологии. За редчайшими исключениями типа Танаиса всё равно непрофессионал не сможет отличить охраняемый курган от обычного холма, фотографий будет мало, достоверность надо будет проверять, процент их среди памятников небольшой, и списки только лишний раз будут привлекать кладоискателей к тому, к чему их привлекать совсем не нужно. Это не принципиально, можно и с ними провести, но без них проще.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

4. Договориться о категоризации культурного наследия России на Коммонз. Сейчас тут полный бардак, найти ничего невозможно.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

5. Найти фотографии уже имеющихся памятников и вставить их в списки, сделав там для этого специальное поле. Заодно фотографии пометить шаблоном. На самом деле за пределами крупных городов это работа довольно небольшая, и часть её я тоже могу сделать. Параллельно с этим надо вычитывать базу, убирая дубли, исправляя явную чушь, добавляя координаты из картинок.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

6. База очень большая, как Вы знаете, и одному человеку её не вычитать (если мы включаем также памятники на местной охране). Несколько предожений Вам уже, как я видел, поступило, а остальных (особенно по большим городам, где сосредоточено большинство памятников) надо искать целевым образом. Один способ - по проектам в Википедии, только не так, как Вы это сейчас делали, в стиле "Кто не спрятался - я не виновата, нет интереса - не участвуем", а так, чтобы был результат. То есть идёте в проект, скажем, Пермь, смотрите, кто из участников активен, оставляете сообщение на его/её СО, спрашиваете, кому, по его мнению, работа по вычитке базы была бы интересна, связываетесь с тем, на кого он/а укажет и т.д. Кроме того, в любом случае будет очень много работы по Москве и миллионникам. Тут, наверное, надо сходить поговорить в Архнадзор в Москве, думаю, они и сами заинтересуются, и по субъектам РФ подскажут. Если ничего не получится, скажите мне, я попробую запустить свои связи. Но этим надо заниматься сейчас, а не в августе. Я буду в Москве на НГ и смогу что-то сделать, но в мае мои возможности сделать что-то к сентябрю уже будут существенно ограничены. Списками тоже надо заниматься прямо сейчас. То есть, например, если Вы сюда сегодня выложите список, например, по Архангельской области, я им завтра могу заняться.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

7. Думаю, про координаты и карты со слоями на этой стадии надо забыть, у нас реально нет на это ресурсов. Если министерство культуры готово платить деньги за добавление координат в базу, тогда можно будет разговаривать, а так - максимум Москва, Питер и ещё пара крупных городов. Списки, конечно, надо структурировать - наверное, на данной стадии надо пользоваться здравым смыслом, если по субъекту РФ длиннее 200 позиций - разбивать на районы и т.д., как у голландцев.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Спасибо за сообщение. Ряд из этих идей уже был на примете - хорошо, когда они подтверждаются и со стороны! В частности, над категоризацией (и рядом прочих, встречающихся и в других странах, проблем) идёт достаточно активная работа, возглавляемая Павлом Каганером (он описывал идеи по работе здесь, но обсуждать их, думаю, можно не только там), и даже multchill столь быстр и грустен в своём ответе в рассылке в том числе потому, что мы уже мучали его вопросами по инструменту для большей автоматизации категоризации; надеюсь, он действительно будет таки доделан, и Ваше письмо в рассылке тому определённо очень помогает; спасибо ещё раз!

Хотя загрузка файлов закончилась, конкурс всё же продолжается, и по-прежнему требует отвлечения ресурсов, и поэтому у меня нет полной уверенности в том, что мы можем позволить себе начать работу по подготовке к следующему году уже прямо сейчас, за исключением того, что я действительно держу на примете всех участников, которые стали высказывать интерес к обработке базы уже после старта конкурса, и имею планы по контрольной проверке базы МинКульта в самом Министерстве. Вероятно, небольшая отсрочка начала работ до реального финала конкурса позволит нам сократить количество необходимых дел - например, по моим сведениям, в следующем году проблемы несвободы панорамы для зданий определённо не должно существовать. Надеюсь, что за столь малый срок высказанное желание соучаствовать не пропадёт (мы не будем затягивать ни до мая, ни даже до Нового года); действительно, было бы замечательно реализовать конкурс в своём полном объёме. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 18:16, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Хорошо, месяц большой роли тут не играет, а шаблоны мне сейчас всё равно придётся ставить (не только на питерские файлы, а вообще на все) в связи с моей основной деятельностью в английской Википедии, потом проще будет по ним вытащить имеющиеся изображения. Что касается категоризации, я, как уже написал, на ru.wikimedia в обсуждениях принимать участия не буду, с другой стороны, мне вообще непонятно, почему вопрос, касающийся исключительно Wikimedia Commons, вообще должен обсуждаться на стороннем сайте. Павел, сколько я помню, всегда был сторонником того, что дела Википедии должны обсуждаться в Википедии.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Вдогонку - от калужских помещиков. Я, как подписался, в течение октября разверну на commons уже вычитанную базу по Калужской области (≈2400 записей). Пока проверено только камерально - с живыми калужскими хранителями смогу состыковаться только ... не знаю когда. По замечаниям ymblanter:

"Координационные списки" могут жить и вне всяких конкурсов.
Только федеральными объектами ограничиваться нельзя - присвоение уровней защиты лишено всякой логики и не отражает реального расклада дел.
Полагаю, не следует вырезать из списков ни археологию, ни несвободную скульптуру. Если "курган" окажется "просто холмом" - пусть живёт, пейзажные фото тоже пригодятся. COM:FOP - в базе совсем мало построек и памятников советской эпохи, чтобы это было проблемой внутри кампании WLM. Много в базе братских могил, но я не рассчитываю всерьёз, что их будут активно фотографировать и загружать. Большинство из них - в непроходимых, обезлюдевших местах, куда только отъявленные следопыты ходят. Что касается опасений про новый заход черных копателей - простите, "всё украли до нас". И места расселения древних (в полосе двух километров от берегов Оки и Угры), и места боёв известны и без commons.
Простановка координат при наличии достаточного разрешения google maps и векторных карт с актуальными адресами оказалась совсем не сложным и не времязатратным делом. Скажем, город Калугу (>500 записей) оказалось реальным оцифровать за два вечера. Заодно и отмечал явно утраченные объекты. Если нет общедоступных спутниковых фото - то координаты можно срисовать только при выезде на место - а оно, повторюсь, в безлюдных болотах. p.s. При оцифровке есть другая проблема - см. Commons_talk:Geocoding#Changes_in_google_maps
Не следует вырезать и явно утраченные памятники - но можно и нужно их помечать. Чтоб хоть масштаб потерь был виден. NVO (talk)

Списки, естественно, могут жить и без конкурсов. Просто сейчас они почему-то живут на сайте WM.RU, что вообще не есть проект фонда Викимедиа. Собственно, отчасти конкурс и не удалось провести нормально из-за того, что всё унесли туда. Списки должны лежать либо тут, либо на мете, либо в русской Википедии. В последнем случае я не смогу их редактировать, но это моя личная проблема. Несвободную скульптуру и архитектуру вырезать не обязательно, но надо пометить (например, фоном и вставив что-нибудь в графу "изображение") так, чтобы было понятно, что загружать на коммонз нельзя. Сейчас были загружены несвободные изображения по Петербургу, и довольно много, насколько я видел, придётся вычищать - и вряд ли загрузившие их потенциальные новые юзеры воспримут это с пониманием. (Надо бы их, кстати, унести в русскую Википедию и загрузить там под КДИ). Утраченные я и не предлагалд вырезать, конечно, надо помечать. (Вот дубли неплохо бы убрать - например, см. эту ветку целиком, или хотя бы пометить как дубли). С координатами, к сожалению, мой опыт - а он у меня довольно большой и распространяется на несколько десятков субъектов РФ - не такой оптимистичный. Я вчера проставил координаты у трёх церквей, ушло на это минут двадцать. Четвёртая вообще не знаю где. Но, повторюсь, это непринципиально.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

PS Может, это обсуждение и то, что мы у Вас ведем, вытащить куда-нибудь? в отдельное место?--Ymblanter (talk) 09:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Да, по Калужской же свод памятников целиком вышел, вроде достаточно актуальный. Когда будут списки, могу запросить, что изменилось с момента выхода, у меня есть у кого.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Тему вынесут, но раз это всё говорилось на моей странице, то я отмечу, что соревнование было проведено исключительно благодаря WMRU, при полном отсутствии интереса сообщества, именно как проект WMRU, и говорить при этом, что оно не было проведено "нормально" из-за того, что делалось на сайте WMRU, представляется мне весьма сильной некорректностью. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 16:44, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

У меня, как Вы понимаете, есть, что ответить, особенно про отсутствие интереса сообщества (мы как раз в этой теме наблюдаем полное отсутствие интереса сообщества), но, мне кажется, это обсуждение не имеет отношения к теме, поэтому на данном этапе лучше его не развивать. Вряд ли моё мнение о Wikimedia Russia кому-то тут интересно и для кого-то будет неожиданностью.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Коллеги, а давайте эту тему перенесём в какое-нибудь более общее место: Commons_talk:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011_in_Russia или создадим специальную страницу на wmru:? У меня тоже есть много идей и соображений, но хотелось бы вести это обсуждение белее системно. --Kaganer (talk) 11:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

wmru: меня категорически не устраивает, на коммонз - либо, действительно, Commons_talk:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011_in_Russia, либо создать Commons:Project:Russia. Дело срочное, а то я сейчас начал категоризировать по районам, сразу возникли проблемы.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

"при полном отсутствии интереса сообщества" - замечательно. Внутренний междусобойчик какого-то там чептера, практически не засвеченный на commons, пролетел мимо "сообщества". А потом "вдруг" оказалось, что страна вычеркнута из WLM, потому как это - именно соревнование между чептерами. Ну вот и соревнуйтесь, к чему тут "отсутствие интереса"? Каждый сам за себя. NVO (talk) 17:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

О конкурсе говорили на форумах, была попытка провести опрос для определения ряда положений. Реакции были - "у нас это все равно невозможно, так как несвобода панорамы", "а зачем конкурс, неужто запрещают просто так фотографировать", и было их, быть может, около пятьи. Баннер конкурса и массовые загрузки фотографий позволили обнаружить таки заинтересованных участников, но чтобы появился баннер, было необходимо принять решение о проведении, призах, найти партнёров, сделать базу, сайт, переводы и таки запустить конкурс. Страна могла бы быть вычеркнута из WLM, если бы не было принято делать всё силами нескольких человек в том объёме, в котором могли его сделать несколько человек. Хорошо, что теперь сообщество замечает мероприятие и готово работать с ним. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 17:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Давайте прекратим это обсуждение как неконструктивное. Лично я согласен с NVO, а к консенсусу по этому вопросу нам приходить незачем. Главное - работу сделать. Что, всё-таки, с переносом обсуждения?--Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Павел, я так вижу, не против переноса, Commons_talk:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011_in_Russia существует. Нужны какие-то действия wmru для переноса? Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 18:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Да нет, зачем. Если все согласны, я сейчас и перенесу.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Commons_talk:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011_in_Russia#Общее обсуждение 1--Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

User:РобоСтася edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Мои поздравления! Теперь со статусом :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

УРААААА! :) Спасибо! Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 17:49, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

OTRS edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago11 comments5 people in discussion

Добрый день, Анастасия! Могли бы Вы проверить разрешение вот на этот файл. --Laim (talk) 08:59, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Добрый день! Лично выдавала: все файлы из галерей football.ua переданы под cc-by-sa 3.0 сайтовладельцем. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 09:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Там в галереи есть много файлов с пометкой Getty Images, неужели и их можно загружать? Laim (talk) 09:48, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

В разрешении было сказано "все фотоизображения, размещенные в фотогалереях на сайте football.ua". Считается, что ответственность за такую передачу лежит на предоставителе разрешения, так как он расписался в том, что является владельцем исключительных прав (в наши задачи не входит получение копий договоров о покупке одной организацией у другой материалов, а если был акт купли-продажи без соответствующих ограничений в договоре, то покупатель может переуступать права). В переписке я подчёркивала данный момент, разрешение было всё же предоставлено. Если пометка getty images стоит на фотоизображениях из фотогалерей, мы вольны их использовать. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 10:07, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Спасибо Анастасия, а можете проверить Ticket #2010101210006666? Laim (talk) 11:54, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Там всё вообще чисто, прозрачно и замечательно. Можно использовать. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 11:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Класс :), а какую лицензию использовать? Laim (talk) 12:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

cc-by-sa 3.0+GFDL 1.2 на выбор. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 12:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Здравствуйте! Не могли бы вы прокомментировать данную номинацию на удаление? Вроде как претензия звучит логично, у сайта Football.ua не может быть эксклюзивных прав на изображение, тем более что там и копирайт стоит. --Clarus The Dogcow (talk) 00:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Просьба прокомментировать здесь.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Вы писали, что «велика проблема несвободы панорамы в России». Вот нескольких месяцев объяснений хватило, чтобы получить лицензию от одного архитектора. Надеюсь, в новом году с новыми объяснениями будут и другие лицензии от архитекторов. На мой взгляд, это лучший способ, который почему-то не популярен.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

Dear Lvova,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 23:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Though the collection of images for the contest has been completed (as we informed you previously), the organizers of the contest "Wikipedia loves Petersburg" are glad to update you on the current course of events.

Our jury is working hard; on November, 1 it will declare the winners and the recipients of special prizes. We ask those of you who have not yet set up an e-mail address to do it at user preferences page so that the jury could contact the participants of the contest and to hand out the awards. The winners of the European-wide Wiki Loves Monuments competition will be announced later, in mid-November.

Already on November 2 in St. Petersburg, the Art-hotel "Rachmaninov", located on 5, Kazanskaya St., will open an exhibition of works by the participants of the contest. We inform you about the opening time via the website http://wikilovesmonuments.ru/

If you have any questions or need help with Wikimedia Commons, you can contact user kaganer. You can ask any questions about the contest by sending an e-mail to info wikimedia.ru

Thank you again for your participation!.

Размещено автоматически; РобоСтася (talk) 12:41, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Though the collection of images for the contest has been completed (as we informed you previously), the organizers of the contest "Wikipedia loves Petersburg" are glad to update you on the current course of events.

Our jury is working hard; on November, 1 it will declare the winners and the recipients of special prizes. We ask those of you who have not yet set up an e-mail address to do it at user preferences page so that the jury could contact the participants of the contest and to hand out the awards. The winners of the European-wide Wiki Loves Monuments competition will be announced later, in mid-November.

Already on November 2 in St. Petersburg, the Art-hotel "Rachmaninov", located on 5, Kazanskaya St., will open an exhibition of works by the participants of the contest. We inform you about the opening time via the website http://wikilovesmonuments.ru/

If you have any questions or need help with Wikimedia Commons, you can contact user kaganer. You can ask any questions about the contest by sending an e-mail to info wikimedia.ru

Thank you again for your participation!.

Вы в следующий раз всё-таки мне покажите английский текст перед рассылкой.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:32, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Хорошо, буду знать, что могу Вас по этому вопросу тревожить. В целом же можно откорректировать и сейчас - Template:WLM2011-RU-Stage1/en. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 13:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Так уже ведь всё разослали? Или ещё нет?--Ymblanter (talk) 13:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Так вроде ж включённая страница... Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 13:41, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
А, понял. Сейчас сделаю.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Lvova!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image:Wiki loves peterburg 2011 exibition.jpg was uncategorized on 31 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Oleg Kvasha.JPG was uncategorized on 12 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

"Wikipedia loves Petersburg" contest results are summed up edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

On November, 1 the winners of the contest "Wiki Loves Monuments" were announced.

It was difficult to select the winners. More than 450 users participated in the contest, having uploaded more than 4400 photographs. The Organizing Committee thanks everybody who took part, tried their hands, and agreed to make their work available to the whole world. There is fascinating work ahead of Wikipedia users: To employ the images to illustrate the articles in Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia which is available in 270 languages.

Do not get upset if you have not won. Look into Wikipedia articles - you may soon find your work there, to help people to visualise the buildings you have taken photographs of. Besides, we will contact you to hand you in a souvenir to recognize your particiation. We hope you will accept this sign of our gratitude.

If you have a chance, you can visit the exhibition of photographs, which has been organized in Saint Petersburg and shows some of the photographs submitted to the contest.

We hope you will participate in the future competitions planned by Wikimedia RU and thank you for your contribution.

You can ask any questions about the contest by sending an e-mail to info wikimedia.ru.

Sincerely,
In the name of the Organizing Committee,
Lvova Anastasia.

Размещено автоматически ботом РобоСтася (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Координаты по Тюмени edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Совсем забыл: я не смог проставить координаты по Вашим фотографиям по улице Челюскинцев, так как не смог определить номера домов по доступным мне материалам (спутниковые снимки не совпадают с картами и фотографиями). Дело, разумеется, не срочное, и можно их хоть вообще не проставлять, но, боюсь, кроме Вас этого никто не сделает. По моему опыту, через год уже не очень хорошо вспоминается, откуда снято. Набережную Туры я потом посмотрю, с ней вроде пока проблем не было. По Дзержинского, Хохрякова и Советской всё в порядке. Представительство ЯНАО в принципе находится под угрозой из-за свободы панорамы. Если Вы абсолютно уверены, что до конца года её введут, можно, естественно, пока не трогать, но в перспективе, если не введут, наверное, придётся переносить в русский раздел. Я сам выносить тут не буду, но желающие найдутся.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Да! Я хотела поблагодарить за помощь :) А номера домов же были разобраны в тот же день, просто ближе к вечеру - Category:Chelyuskintsev Street (Tyumen). Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 21:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Я знаю. Просто я по номерам домов (которые вы нашли) не могу по гугловским снимкам найти координаты: не понимаю, какие здания со снимка Вы снимали. Квартал локализуется легко, сторона улицы тоже, а вот индивидуальные дома - нет. Именно те четыре дома по Челюскинцев, с остальными всё вроде в порядке.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Если совсем точно, проблема с домами 3, 5, 9, 13, а 1 я просто не смотрел.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Поставила координаты по картам Яндекса - пока что только в категории зданий. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 21:31, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Хорошо, спасибо, я завтра переставлю в фотографии. Мне кажется, Вы имели в виду не {{Location}}, a {{Object location}}, судя потому что координаты попадают почти на крыши, но Вам виднее.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Я потому и проставила только в категории, так как не очень разобралась... Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 21:57, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Первый показывает, откуда Вы снимали, второй - что Вы снимали. Я обычно ставлю первый, если могу точно идентифицировать точку съёмки, и второй - если только объект. В Ваших фотографиях я могу, естественно, только поставить координаты объекта - я же не знаю, с каких точек Вы снимали. Но в большинстве случаев точки как раз мало кому нужны.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

По поводу OTRS тикета от автора сайта zonawar.ru edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Простите, что переношу сюда дискуссию - но тут более удобно. Особо интересует тот тикет - ибо, насколько я помню, там было таки напрямую письма от правообладателя с текстом что типа де он автором фотки и является и что разрешает использование фотографии на условиях лицензии CC-BY-SA (и с приведением гиперссылки на условия оной на самом сайте CreativeCommons). Эмм....разве такого не достаточно в целом для валидного разрешения?
C уважением, --RussianTrooper (talk) 03:43, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ничего, что сюда; понимаете, я специально дала ссылку на форум насчёт того, почему желательно полное разрешение. Собственно, ладно, пусть неполное, но я написала zonawar письмо с уточнением - спасибо, мол, но скажите, пожалуйста, согласны ли Вы с несколькими дополнительными условиями, специфичными для Википедии; и ответа не было. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 05:26, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Зато был ответ мне. Я порекомендовал автору направить Вам полную версию формы разрешения. Но видимо, то ли проблемы в реале то ли еще что ..... ибо этого так и не сделано. Впрочем- может все таки можно на данный момент засчитать тикет? Ибо - в принципе насколько я помню текст письма там явно содержаться оба необходимых с точки зрения ГК РФ пункта для того, чтобы считать это надлежаще выраженным акцептом на лицензирование фотографии на определенных условиях, а именно

а) указание того, что автор письма является автором фото
б) указание на условия лицензии (СС-BY-SA), выложенные на сайте CreativeCommons (то есть ссылка на существенные условия договора)
Просто фотка достаточно качественная- а ИжМаш как-то видимо не очень спешит с вообще подтверждением ОТРС, хотя и дали первоначальное согласие.
К тому же, тут на ВикиСкладе есть и куда более спорные случаи, когда тем не менее, разрешение считалось валидным (например - вот такое http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Адмирал_Кузнецов_2010.jpg ) о.О --RussianTrooper (talk) 15:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Мы посоветовались и решили принять тикет. PS: А пример с Адмиралом Кузнецовым - это как раз из серии "как делать не надо" :) rubin16 (talk) 19:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
2011110310001701, на всякий случай. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 19:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Просьба об удалении edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

По ошибке загрузил файл, на который еще пока (уже долго, к сожалению) ожидаю присыла подтверждения от автора в ОТРС с разрешением. Пока что подвтерждения свободной лицензии нету и просьба картинку удалить
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ak-103ee1.jpg

Заранее благодарен --RussianTrooper (talk) 13:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

be-x-old:Удзельнік:РобоСтася edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Прывітаньне. Странно всё-таки, что эта статья была помечена некатегоризированной. Робот думал над статьёй более 15-ти минут? ;) --Renessaince (talk) 12:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Да, между началом сбора информации и установкой шаблона проходит примерно такое время по текущему алгоритму. Рады бы усовершенствовать, но не хватает программистов. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 12:23, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

GLAM/Derby edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Я посмотрел некоторые страницы GLAM/Derby и не смог разобраться, вот прошу помощи. Зачем это? Маленький музей в маленьком городе получил несколько статей о своих экспонатах, как я вижу по вашей статье; а в чём состояло взаимодействие с музеем? Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Несколько статей" - это сотен пять, на семидесяти языках... Посмотрите, пожалуйста, статью ru:QRpedia; музей получил также подписи к экспонатам. А еще у него резко возросла посещаемость сайта и известность в целом. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 19:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

А в чём состояло участие музея? Почему выбран именно он? Зачем им подписи на разных языках, если посетители приходят только на одном языке? Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Уточняю реплику. Маленький музей в Англии получил несколько статей о своих экспонатах на русском языке. Просто я перевожу на местные реалии — для музея в России пять статей на французском и шведском языках бесполезны.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:49, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

На русском языке они получили статьи обо всех своих экспонатах так, что каждый из экспонатов, у которого есть QR-код, может быть прочтён на русском языке - всего более ста; русские их посещают регулярно. Кроме того, они получили много посещений сайта из России и стали известнее в России, чем были. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 05:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Категория "Музей и художественная галерея Дерби" содержит 26 статей об экспонатах. Получается, эксперимент доказал, что люди не хотят смотреть на фотографии экспонатов, а предпочитают ехать в Дерби и смотреть на оригиналы?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 08:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Извините, оба эти утверждения не выдерживают никакой логики. Вы можете ознакомиться со списком написанных мной статей, опубликованным на странице того проекта, оценить, почему ряд из них не находится в этой категории, услышать про посещаемость сайта музея, услышать, что в музее и ранее были русские, для которых музеем был создан подобный сервис.

И, на всякий случай: я сейчас говорю о музее в Дерби, а не о музеях в России, тем более, что утверждение, что музеям России бесполезны статьи на французском и шведском, требует отдельного обоснования, если не считать идеи, согласно которой музею при существовании этих статей придётся дать возможность пользоваться удобным сервисом, а не заказывать неизвестного качества экскурсию так, как это удобнее музею. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 09:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Простите, в чем нарушение авторского права на изображение твита ? edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

--Negve (talk) 22:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Я дала ссылку на правила. Свободные скриншоты - это скриншоты свободного ПО, причем такие, на которых не видно несвободных лицензионно картинок и текстов; по всем признакам то, что Вы сделали, делать нельзя. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 05:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

[[:File:Angry Birds toys.jpg]] edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

[[:File:Angry Birds toys.jpg]] has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jean-Fred (talk) 21:59, 25 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Митинг_Гостиный_двор_5_декабря_2011.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Митинг_Гостиный_двор_5_декабря_2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MaxBioHazard (talk) 14:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Митинг_Гостиный_двор_СПб_7_дек_2011.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Митинг_Гостиный_двор_СПб_7_дек_2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MaxBioHazard (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Митинг_Гостиный_двор_СПб_автобус_№5.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Митинг_Гостиный_двор_СПб_автобус_№5.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MaxBioHazard (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Митинг_Гостиный_двор_СПб_7_декабря_2011.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Митинг_Гостиный_двор_СПб_7_декабря_2011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MaxBioHazard (talk) 14:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Веторный вариант File:Edinaya Rossiya poster v2.gif edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

На http://vodkalondon.com/lj/er_poster_fullcolor_v2.pdf OTRS распространяется? --M5 (talk) 08:21, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

~~Формально говоря, нет~~, так как разрешение дано на http://redstarcreative.livejournal.com/79315.html + прилагаемую копию в gif. С автором можно списаться, попросив его выслать мне в ответ это уточнение, или можно отрисовать вектор самостоятельно. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 08:25, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Хотя стоп. Разрешение - ссылка на пост, в посте - картинки. Надо с кем-то ещё посоветоваться, я не уверена :( Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 08:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Barrikadnaya columns.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 06:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

OTRS permission edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I'm trying to check this permission for this image from a russian website, since it seems to me there it is written All rights reserved on the site. But if it's a valid license there it is some other photos in the gallery that Commons could use, do you mind to check the ticket? Thank you in advance Lobo (howl?) 00:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello! In the case with this file everything's allright. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 04:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

And for the rest of images from the same gallery? Could we upload them too? Lobo (howl?) 15:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Could we upload the entire gallery or not? Forgive me of my nuisance. Lobo (howl?) 00:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

We have permission on all galleries, but I saw one case with the gallery of Getty Images which is copyrighted. Site's author assures us that we can use the permission but on Commons it is challenged. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 15:14, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help, then I'm going to upload the rest of that gallery. Lobo (howl?) 15:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Вопросы о повторном использовании фотографий с ВикиСклада edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Собственно - вопрос такой, нормально ли будет использовать в коммерческих целях фотографии, чей правовой статус отмечен как "Общественное достояние в США- работа американского федерального правительства" (например те же фото от НАСА и тому подобные), используя ч.4 ст.1256 ГК РФ ("правило более короткого срока") и на этом основании сделав обоснованное предположение о их нахождении в общественном достоянии? Или же таки юзать, но уже с полным осознанием того, что мы таки будем "пиратить", и надеятся, что исков или не будет, или же суд не примет такой иск (ненадлежащий истец)?--RussianTrooper (talk) 05:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Все материалы Викисклада можно уверенно использовать в коммерческих целях (кроме логотипов проектов Фонда Викимедиа, которые хранятся здесь на особых условиях). Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 05:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:The children - victims of adult vices (bahus).jpg

And also:

Sorry :( russavia (talk) 01:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ваш доклад по GLAM edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

В конце доклада по GLAM вы предложили слушателям вопрос: как мы можем сотрудничать с музеями. Вы могли заметить, что я касаюсь этой тематики. 1, 2, 3 Я не могу говорить «от имени википедии», однако вот мои мысли с позиции фотографа. Вы и сами точно заметили, что для «экскурсовода» остро стоит вопрос, что музеи получат в ответ.
1) Музеи ждут ответа в числах. Рассуждения про популярность без численных оценок не встретят понимания. Например, обсуждая вопросы о законности или незаконности билетов на фотосъёмку, музейные сотрудники аргументируют своё мнение годовым доходом от продажи таких билетов. Утеря дохода для них имеет значение, а незаконные ограничения на фотосъёмку не имеют значения.
2) Музеи находятся на таком же технологическом уровне, что и большинство русских участников викисклада. Предлагая такие съёмки, как конкурсные съёмки прошлого года, мы услышим, что такие снимки под силу и самому музею. Другим аргументом музейной стороны будет политика издателей: обычно издатели присылают своих фотографов для специальной съёмки на слайды среднего формата, на полнокадровые цифровые камеры.
3) Съёмки предметов в экспозиции не требуют какого-то сотрудничества, однако по опыту знаю, что такие съёмки редко бывают удачными. А съёмка экспонатов вне экспозиции — это технологическая проблема: надо привлекать хранителей, организовывать площадку для съёмок. Всё это отнимает у музеев главный ресурс: рабочее время. Рабочего времени у сотрудников очень мало. — Этот вопрос пропадает, если предмет выставлен без витрины.
4) Некоторые музейные сотрудники чувствительны к конкуренции. Если появится посторонний человек, который захочет писать статьи про экспонаты, такие сотрудники увидят в нём соперника. Вики-статьи будут восприняты как упрёк в бездействии. Более того, такие сотрудники сравнивают свой «многолетний подвиг» с волонтёрской статьёй и воспринимают действия волонтёра как несерьёзные. Тут какие-то цеховые стереотипы, о них статья [3].
5) В музеях очень сильна бюрократическая сторона. Одно и то же предложение от частного посетителя воспринимается иначе, чем от организации с бланком. Мне кажется, причина в том, что частное лицо тут выступает как «сумасброд», на которого трудно рассчитывать, а организация выглядит как «надёжный партнёр», который обеспечит свои обязательства.
6) Музеи практически никогда не являются правообладателями. Проблема известная, решения не требует из-за ничтожной коммерческой деятельности музеев и из-за общего спокойного отношения к такой коммерческой деятельности.
Мне кажется, что начинать работу с музеями надо с обобщения уже полученных результатов, затем считать форму и размер выгоды для музеев, а затем предлагать конкретные формальные условия, которые будут более выгодны музеям, чем внешним волонтёрам. Лишённые идеологического места, российские музеи свыклись с ощущением «маленькой лошадки», которой «живётся несладко», и поэтому относятся ко всему с подозрением: не будет ли в результате ещё менее «сладко»...--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
- Спасибо! Я прочла Ваше сообщения, но пока не знаю, что ответить, к сожалению. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 20:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
  - Может быть, мои слова и незачем обсуждать --PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

«Грубые ошибки менеджмента» edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

В прошлом году WM RU собиралась отправить по областным правительствам запрос о перечнях памятников. Был ли отправлен какой-нибудь запрос? Удалось ли получить какой-нибудь ответ? Если не удалось, могу что-нибудь подсказать.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Вы предлагаете помощь, начав с грубости? Вы относитесь к людям, которые словом "халва" доказывают существование халвы? Можно ли полюбопытствовать, где WM RU объявляло о своих подобных планах? Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 16:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Вероятно, имелось в виду это, плюс реплика выше.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ок, так хоть понятно, что имеется в виду. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 20:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Август 2011 года был совсем недавно, и для меня было в новинку узнать, что вы позабыли тогдашнюю свою реплику. Простите за то, что я не сделал ссылку туда. А где вы увидели грубость? Тут в заголовке? Поправил заголовок!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

GLAM edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

У меня есть снимки, сделанные на одной выставке. Подобные действия имеют какое-то отношение к GLAM? Съёмка шла витрина за витриной, медленно и печально, с подбором естественного освещения и вспышки, с треножника. Вот образец. Спасибо за пояснение!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Долго думала. Институционально, конечно, это не GLAM, но идейно - вполне :) Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 18:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Череп горгонопса.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Череп горгонопса.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Череп горгонопса.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mithril (talk) 00:35, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Обратите внимание: номинация Europeana GLAM edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

большое спасибо!! Я очень рад с выдвижением. --MarisaLR (talk) 18:56, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Yutong ZK6119HA.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Yutong ZK6119HA.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

188.104.114.179 19:36, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

«Вы только путаете Leningradartist, смешивая разные вещи» edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Вы находите, что творческие произведения фотографов, права архитекторов и права скульпторов охраняются по-разному? Я рассуждаю так. Если воспроизведение нарушает права скульпторов и архитекторов, тогда оно должно обсуждаться по отдельности, а в общем списке не годится (такая сложилась традиция). Почему же надо делать иначе, если воспроизведение нарушает права фотографов?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:34, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Не видела традиции. Если Вы правы, то будет по-Вашему, но правы ли Вы - я смогу судить по реакции знакомых с "традициями" прочих участников. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 14:44, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Mary Robinette Kowal signature (Mary).JPG edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:55, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Mary Robinette Kowal signature (Mary Robinette Kowal).JPG edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:55, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Разрешение edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Здравствуйте Lvova по моей просьбе Тина Митусова отправила разрешение на свои фотографии. Письмо она отправила два раза на этот адрес permissions-commons@wikimedia.org пожалуйста проверьте почту.

Разрешение она дала на следующие фотографии.

Barnstar edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For all the images you've contributed of places and things in Russia, and your images documenting Wikipedia-related events and people. INeverCry 23:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank YOU! ^_^ Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 22:50, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Chelomey MGTU.JPG edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Chelomey MGTU.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 10:26, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Elektrozavodskaya st.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Elektrozavodskaya st.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 10:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Statue of Lermontov in Moscow zoom.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Statue of Lermontov in Moscow zoom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ymblanter (talk) 11:32, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Statue of Lermontov in Moscow.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Statue of Lermontov in Moscow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ymblanter (talk) 11:33, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

From Buenos Aires edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Lvova!

How are you?

I would like to ask you a favor. Could you please delete File:WikiWomenCamp day 2 043.jpg, File:WikiWomenCamp day 2 025.jpg, File:WikiWomenCamp day 1 038.jpg and all photos where I could be alone?

Group photos it is okay for me, buat I dont like to be alone in a picture, please, I dont feel confortable, thank you.

Did you enjoy your time at Buenos Aires? Could yo visit the city? Could you take photos of the city?

It was very nice to meet you. I like you. Hugs, --Jalu (talk) 01:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh, sorry: I asked about photos at the first day, when you weren't. I'll do a request.

Of course I have a lot of BA photos but haven't time yet to edit them before uploading. Hope there will be some QI, so I don't rush :) Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 07:37, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, thank you very much. If you see me in a photo with other people it is okey, but I don t want photos of myself alone, thanks. I love your photos, congratulations. --Jalu (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Leningradartist edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый день, Анастасия. У меня следующий вопрос к Вам. По итогам этого обсуждения все файлы с Commons были удалены. Есть ли техническая возможность их также списком (например, с помощью бота) загрузить в рувики? У всех фото остаётся прежний источник происхождения и прежнее описание. Шаблон ОДИ также совершенно одинаков - речь идёт об умерших художниках (за исключением нескольких ныне здравствующих), назначение - иллюстрация статей о художниках. Как мне кажется, это было бы в интересах проекта. Поскольку на перезагрузку вручную ни времени, да и желания нет. С уважением, -- Leningradartist (talk) 09:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Может быть, Commonist? Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 11:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Удаление застарелого шаблона о переименовании категорий edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Почти три года назад была заведена тема Commons:Categories for discussion/2009/10/Category:AMX-32 tanks и расставлены шаблоны во всех подобных случаях. Только в середине февраля этого года обсуждение было закрыто, но десятки шаблонов всё ещё висят. Даже если ваша ботоводская квалификация не позволяет решить эту проблему, то не будете ли вы так любезны привлечь кого-нибудь ещё для этой цели? Ain92 (talk) 15:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Эта задача как раз довольно лёгкая. Десятки шаблонов висят потому, что их не надо использовать с subst. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 15:55, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

A cookie for you! edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Спасибо за оперативную ботоводческую помощь! Ain92 (talk) 16:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

RE: edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you! I love it!

--Jalu (talk) 16:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Some OTRS items. edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you pls. add the license as stated in the OTRS tickets to these images:

Thx in advance. --Ju Ta 07:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Better source request for File:Alexander Kerensky in 1917.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading File:Alexander Kerensky in 1917.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 21:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:ComCom unconference meetup at Wikimania 2012.JPG edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ComCom unconference meetup at Wikimania 2012.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Daniel Message 19:57, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Mastodonsaurus old.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Mastodonsaurus old.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 04:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

This structure edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This, Category:Цәкәара, contains a ww2 memorial, which i have categorized under Category:World War II memorials in Georgia, but i think it would be nice to have more info on both. Does the memorial have an article on the georgian or russian WP's? sad to see an eternal flame not maintained. (i do not read or write in georgian or russian)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi! This memorial is on the Abkhazia side, so I don't know how to find information about it, sorry. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 16:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Номер OTRS edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Вы поставили шаблон на рабочую пользовательскую категорию. Не лучше ли ставить его тут или там?--Переславская неделя (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Я ткнула шаблон в первое попавшееся под руку место, в котором он мог быть увиден заинтересованными лицами - я совсем не в курсе того, как организованы работы по заливке. В первую очередь этот шаблон надо бы теперь размещать на страницу каждого из загруженных файлов. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 16:15, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Логика ясна, переставляю шаблон на страницу лицензии.--Переславская неделя (talk) 18:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I just noticed this photo: File:GLAM_Night_Out,_Викимания_2012_02.JPG I really like it -- I didn't have a good photo of myself from that event. Many thanks for uploading that -- I hope you enjoyed the event! -Pete F (talk) 00:17, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I glad to hear that my presence was helpful ;) Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 13:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, very much -- I just added this photo to my web site: http://wikistrategies.net/speaking/ . Thanks again! -Pete F (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

По разрешениям через OTRS edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Просто странно, почему такие ригористические требования пошли. Когда я запрашиваю разрешение на использование чего-либо под свободной лицензией у авторов я прямо указываю на условия этой лицензии - в виде ссылки на сайт CreativeCommons, где это черным по белому указано, включая возможное коммерческое использование при соблюдении условий лицензии.
Просто немного странно, потому как например при выборе автором лицензии при загрузке своих работ на сайту вроде Flickr там даже толком условия лицензии не показываются, но такое лицензирование считается для целей викисклада действительным, а вот прямое разрешение авторов по е-мейл почему то нет. Почему так?
PS - Я про OTRS запросы недавно мною отправленные с адреса unatco2005@mail.ru

С уважением и жду ответа Михаил

--RussianTrooper (talk) 23:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ссылка на лицензию и ссылка на лицензию плюс частичное введение в заблуждение - очень разные случаи. Кроме того, лицензирование при публикации и перелицензирование с использованием юридических механизмов - тоже несколько разные уровни серьёзности. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 05:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Смею не согласится. Ибо и там и там есть согласие правообладателя на публикацию под условиями определенной лицензии. Даже более того - в случае с OTRS на руках у администрации Викисклада остается переписка и формальное письменное согласие (акцепт, то бишь), а вот случаес с Flickr - лицензии могут быть заменены там как индивидуально для каждого файла, так и целиком с профиля ДЛЯ ВСЕХ ФАЙЛОВ. Доказательств, что лицензия ВООБЩЕ БЫЛА потом может просто не остаться, даже если на момент переноса на Викисклад фото было лицензировано под свободной лицензией. Так что я просто не вижу смысла людей, и так пошедших на встречу и давших разрешение на публикацию под свободной лицензией мучать ригористической формой этой. В ссылке условия лицензии изложены более чем подробно и полно, а ответы от правообладателей вполне сойдут за годный акцепт.
И еще - зачем мне то слать требование уточнить что-либо? Эту просьбу надо слать правообладателям, давшим разрешение, не так ли? Тем более, их адреса я там приложил )

С уваженим, и жду ответа
Михаил

--RussianTrooper (talk) 23:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Михаил, ещё раз уверяю Вас, что ежели правообладатель пишет нам "разрешаю публиковать под свободной лицензией cc-by-sa 3.0 при условии некоммерческого использования" - мы не принимаем разрешение. Механизм подтверждения лицензии фликра на Викискладе существует, Вы, видимо, просто не сталкивались. Механизм OTRS является юридическим, и слово "мучать" тут - ну простите, а уж как люди у нотариусов мучаются, бедные, давайте и это отменим, пожали друг другу руки - и все. И если Вам неинтересно получение данного разрешения, поверьте, что агенты совершенно не заинтересованы сильнее Вас. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 06:19, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

user:Kagon edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Анастасия, Can you look at contributions and deleted contributions of user:Kagon. All his uploads were deleted and he is trying to add {{РазрешениеOTRS|2012073110011484}} to deleted pages. If you consider OTRS valid than images should be restored. --Jarekt (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

This ticket is valid for all images from sites http://vlasova.ru/, http://balaganlimited.ru/ and http://shinshilli.ru/ Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 14:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC) P.S. I'm not a sysop here, so sorry, deleted contributions are not for me.Reply

I restored most of them. What do you think about File:Наталия Власова.jpg. Would this one also fall under {{permissionOTRS|2012073110011484}}? By the way your suggestion to user:Kagon to use {{разрешение OTRS|2012073110011484}} was kind of confusing since that template does not exist on Commons. --Jarekt (talk) 15:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I cannot see this file. And there is a redirect to the template, so I don't see a problem, it's a part of our standart reply. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 07:26, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry, I thought you were an admin here. The deleted file had the text you can see below, and it shows this photo. As I said I do not know if it falls under {{permissionOTRS|2012073110011484}}. I guess {{Разрешение OTRS}} works fine, and as you said it is a redirect. The problem was that user:Kagon used {{РазрешениеOTRS}} which do not exist on Commons, so admins deleting user:Kagon files did not see {{разрешениеOTRS|2012073110011484}} templates he carefully added. --Jarekt (talk) 12:15, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Don't know why he did so. And he reupload the file as ru:Файл:Наталия Власова.jpg; I'll ask him now what is it. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 12:54, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

And yes, Наталия Власова is the subject of http://vlasova.ru/ site. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 12:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I restored the File:Наталия Власова.jpg and added NowCommons to ru:Файл:Наталия Власова.jpg. --Jarekt (talk) 13:54, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

{{copyvio|1=http://www.moskva.fm/artist/%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0/about}} =={{int:filedesc}}== {{Information |description={{ru|1=Певица Наталия Власова}} |date=2012-07-23 |source={{own}} |author=[[User:Kagon|Kagon]] |permission= |other_versions= |other_fields= }} =={{int:license-header}}== {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} [[Category:Uploaded with UploadWizard]] {{Uncategorized|year=2012|month=July|day=23}}

Разрешение edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Здравствуйте Lvova по моей просьбе Олег Шеин отправил разрешение на следующие фотографии пожалуйста проверьте и вставьте нужный шаблон.

Умар, я на то письмо ответила в ту же минуту, с Вами в копии. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 12:51, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Теперь понял сделаю сам. Спасибо большое. -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

user:Alexander Aster edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, It seems another new Russian user needs some help, and although he communicates in English, he does not seem to understand what is happening and why. So may be some help in Russian would be the most helpful. See File:Художница Мишина Наталья Викторовна.jpg or here. --Jarekt (talk) 03:28, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I began to speak with him, hope everything will be allright soon. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 15:00, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Let me know if you need help undeleting anything. --Jarekt (talk) 02:17, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

user:N-mar edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

Анастасия, по моей просьбе автор файлов file:Администрация НАО.jpg и file:Здание почты.jpg направил Вам по электронной почте своё разрешение. Получили ли Вы его? И ещё, неужели по файлу Памятник экипажу буксирного парохода «Комсомолец».jpg нужно получать разрешение скульптора? Я даже не представляю где его искать и жив ли он. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N-mar (talk • contribs)

Да, я получила письма и отправила ответы с указаниями номеров; Вы их не получили? По поводу памятника - увы, да: Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Russia. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 12:12, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Нет писем не было, может быть вы их Пестову отправили? По поводу скульптора, следуя этой логике нужно на каждое здание получать разрешение у архитектора. Так можно зайти далеко....

Да, именно так - если архитектор или скульптор умер менее 70 лет назад или вовсе жив, нужно получать разрешение у него или его наследников. Дура лекс, мне тоже не нравится; впрочем, для зданий шанс, что это изменится в ближайшем будущем, выше.

Страницы файлов отредактированы. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 13:25, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Анастасия, а что делать если скульптора нет, и его следы потеряны? ru 23:02, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Что значит - нет? Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 04:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Он давно уехал из города, и никто не знает где он и жив ли ещё N-mar^ru 11:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Понимаете, с юридической точки зрения это не очень серьёзно. Я не вполне знакома с порядком розыска человека в такой ситуации, поэтому помочь не могу, но то, что это не будет считаться оправданием - очевидно. Разве что могу подсказать перезагрузить файл в тот языковой раздел того проекта, для которого файл загружался; локальные правила бывают помягче. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 07:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Не понял, в какой языковой раздел? Что-то существует на русском языке?N-mar^ru 18:06, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

http://ru.wikipedia.org/ Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 14:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Анастасия, но у меня же статья написана именно в этом разделе Википедии. Файлы же загружаются на Викисклад, или я чего-то не понимаю?N-mar^ru 21:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Файлы можно загружать как на Викисклад, так и в Википедию, при этом на Викисклад можно загружать только лицензионно свободные, а в Википедию при соблюдении ряда условий можно загружать и несвободные файлы. На Викискладе данный файл считается несвободным, хоть Вы и являетесь его автором, а в Википедии на русском языке принято чуть более спокойно относиться к этому вопросу. Подробности оформления, впрочем, лучше уточнить на форуме авторского права. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 19:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ticket: 2009110510080617 edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Анастасия, Can you help me with this one? File:Olympia club.jpg is missing a license, Is there any indication of license in this OTRS? --Jarekt (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

There isn't any. I'll ask them. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 19:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Спасибо Вам ! edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Дорогая Анастасия Львова ! Хочу выразить невыразимое... Спасибо Вам за Ваш редкий дар - быть замечательным человеком ! С почтением,--Alexander Aster (talk) 13:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Yaroslav Rakitskiy3.JPG edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Анастасия, Can you help me with this image as well, it has no license, it is scheduled for deletion, and has dozens of OTRS emails in Russian ... --Jarekt (talk) 12:56, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

This image may be used under GFDL 1.2+ cc-by-sa 3.0 Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 13:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, fixed now. --Jarekt (talk) 13:37, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re:WLM@SPb edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

And where did you wrote that in this revision? odder (talk) 21:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please, say me, how did you understand 'not all the time, but it's our limits'. It's became interesting. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 04:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wonderful edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Congratulations! I saw you here:

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:The_Impact_Of_Wikipedia.webm

and I love it, you look beautiful!

--Jalu (talk) 02:31, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you =) Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 11:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

WLM exhibition tour organizing edit

Hi Lvova,

very glad that You would like to host the WLM world exhibition in St Petersburg in Russia. I checked the hotel on the web and saw that they do have exhibitions in their corridors. But would they be willing to show the exhibition in their lobby too? It might be more accessible to the public.

The exhibition is staying in Gouda in the Netherland first and come in February to you. It will arrive around the 10th and You would have to forward it to Panama on our expenses not later than the end of February. If You are ready for it, please let me know: Barbara.Fischer@wikimedia.de

Просьба о массовой загрузке edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Не могли бы вы с помощью Panoramio Picker загрузить фотографии c этой страницы и фотки со 2-й по 9-ю из Сада Победы в Челябинске? Заранее спасибо. Ain92 (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Простите, а что такое Panoramio Picker?.. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 06:45, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Я так понимаю, что это бот на Питоне: [4]. Ain92 (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Поняла :) Могу, сейчас разберусь и сделаю. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 06:37, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Прошу прощения, сделала так: Commons:Batch uploading/Garden of the Victory in Chelyabinsk Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 07:05, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Разрешение edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Здравствуйте Lvova по моей просьбе Салман Д с 519-06s@mail.ru этого почтового адреса отправил разрешение на все свои фотографии которые находятся по этой ссылке. Проверьте пожалуйста почту. -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 19:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Также написал User talk:Ahonc с просьбой помочь. -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 20:57, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Тикет 2012121010002371; поблагодарите автора, пожалуйста. Я не могу понять, сделал ли что-нибудь Ahonc, и боюсь всех запутать, дублируя благодарности. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 06:35, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Спасибо все сделал. -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 00:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Felicidad edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Feliz Naidad y Próspero Año Nuevo 2013!! --MarisaLR (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

File:Astrophytum asterias 'superkabuto'-1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Astrophytum asterias 'superkabuto'-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Thiotrix (talk) 08:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Новый шаблон источника edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Здравствуйте.

Не могли бы вы проверить созданный мной {{Olive-Drab.com Military Photo}} и заменить ботом все файлы отсюда на мой источник?

Заранее спасибо. Ain92 (talk) 09:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

OTRS help in Russian is needed edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Анастасия, I thought you might be able to help with Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Verify_tickets_in_Russian_language. Greetings. --Jarekt (talk) 19:44, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Kurchatov-profile.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Kurchatov-profile.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Clarissy. 18:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Kurchatov.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Kurchatov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Clarissy. 19:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Tselikov MGTU.JPG edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Tselikov MGTU.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Clarissy. 19:25, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 086.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:A Man Without A Country.png edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:A Man Without A Country.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

PICAWN (talk) 19:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:A Man Without A Country.png edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:A Man Without A Country.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

KTo288 (talk) 20:47, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:VeraMuhina.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:VeraMuhina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Clarissy. 07:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

ваши массовые категории edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Если вы десятками или сотнями решили создавать категории улиц Москвы (или Спб), то мне не понятно, что вам мешает класть их сразу во все нужные категории. В частности, к вашему сведению, каждая категория улицы должна содержать и категорию района, в котором эта улица расположена (будь то через отдельную категорию, как в Москве, или через "streets...by district" как в Спб). Вот, к примеру, Category:Bolshaya naberezhnaya street. От этой категории в её нынешней форме, толку - ноль. Вы вроде бы не новичок и это должны знать. Не создавайте трудностей другим участникам. Работы по наведению порядка в категориях здесь и без того по горло. --A.Savin 20:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC) ЗЫ: Кстати, если что, то аргумент типа "я-де в географии Москвы не силён" несостоятелен: уже давно бОльшая часть улиц Мск+Спб имеет в русской википедии собственные ~~недостабы~~ статьи, где всё чёрным по белому написано, а те что не имеют - есть в шаблонах по районам. --A.Savin 20:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Не надо додумывать неправильных аргументов. Правильные аргументы - а) скажем нет самому лучшему максимализму, 2) я делаю по образцу, который увидела, в) я лишь категоризую собственные фотографии, а не сижу в головой в категориях как таковых, и их про Москву вовсе не сотни, хотя спасибо за комплимент, г) волонтёрский проект - волонтёрский; если Вы хотите делать что-то - Вы можете, это не мой выбор и уж явно не созданная трудность (извините, что существую и работаю, но я продолжу). Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 22:02, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Собственно, наивно было бы от вас чего-либо другого ожидать, как не отговорок в стиле "скажите спасибо что я вообще мои гениальные фотографии сюда гружу, а всю грязную работу это быдло за меня сделает, никуда не денется". --A.Savin 22:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Считаете работу грязной, но делаете? Соболезную. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 23:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Location? edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Lvova - do you have a location for File:Sorbus aucuparia - flower.JPG, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

This file was moved from ruwiki, it's author - Borealis55; I cannot know location, sorry. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 18:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Нужна помощь ботовода edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Приветствую. Больше недели не пашет Cropbot, автор не отвечает. Заранее спасибо. Ain92 (talk) 10:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Мне лестно, что Вы обращаетесь ко мне с такими запросами, но я, увы, не могу оправдать - слишком сложная для меня задача. Ботовод ботоводу рознь ;( Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 12:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Здравствуйте ещё раз. Полгода прошло, а я тут недавно заметил, что файл из заливки Бундесархива 2008 года был до сегодняшнего дня де-факто некатегоризирован. Нельзя ли выявить подобные (не имеющие никаких категорий, кроме скрытых) файлы из той заливки? Такая задача вам по плечу? Ain92 (talk) 18:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Заграевский, Сергей Вольфгангович edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Lova, remember me from Buenos Aires?

How are you?

These articles are fake en russian Wikipedia:

Заграевский, Сергей Вольфгангович
Кавельмахер, Вольфганг Вольфгангович
Заграевская, Инна Михайловна

The references are not reliable. For example, you can see that all the references come from the personal web of Заграевский, Сергей Вольфгангович. If not, the references are in web sites where everyone can edit his own name. There is a Library but the founder of the library is the same Zagraevsky. I know because he is in all wikis y all languajes and I've made a research of all the references. Those books don't exist. For example, you have in german many books but all of them were printed with information from Wikipedia in German: diff. All books are from source Wikipedia

--Jalu (talk) 22:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Of course I remember, dear :) I'm fine, and you?..

I started a discussion in ruwiki about these articles; thank you for the message! Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 09:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry but the notion that all the references come from Zagrayevski's personal Web site is simply wrong. There are a dozen references in the RuWiki article to well-established and respectable mass-media outlets such as Ogoniok, Moskovskij Komsomolets, Moskovskaya Pravda, Nezavisimaya Gazeta etc. highlighting his paiting career and later art entrepreneurship projects such as artist's trade union and ranking project. His art has been also presented at Moscow Manege, which is one of the most prestigious exhibition sites in Russia, as well as Central Artists' House in Moscow. So he is rather established artist and art entrepreneur, definitely not a "fake". --Deinocheirus (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Просьба касательно системы OTRS edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Здравствуйте...

Извините, что прошу, но не могли бы Вы проверить, поступили ли письма с разрешениями от авторов с почтовых ящиков ookamirei@mail.ru и sagcss@yandex.ru (я также отправлял копии этих писем с разрешениями от авторов (авторы присылали копии письма в ОТРС также мне на ящик) со своего ящика - confrontation-game@narod.ru) ? По последнему адресу нужно удостоверится в получении письма, чтобы начать загружать фотки

С большим уважением и заранее спасибо за Ваше внимание --RussianTrooper (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Надеюсь, другие агенты уже отозвались. Если нет - дайте знать, я буду оживать и работать. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 18:31, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Belarus for targets whose architects/ designers are still alive or it is less than 50 years since their death. Thus even excellent photos like this which might violate copyright laws, could be deleted from Commons. Kindly note, however, that citation use might still be allowed. In such a case this (these) photo(s) should be - without delay - saved to and used from national wikipedia (as they are likely to be deleted in Commons). BR, Paju (talk) 23:07, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ivankovskoye Highway edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Приветствую! Стася, все фото -это не Иваньковское шоссе, это, увы, ещё Волоколамка. Шоссе начинается за угловой башней усадьбы. --kosun (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

P.S. Как будет по-английски Красногорский проезд :-)?--kosun (talk) 15:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Я б сказала Krasnogorsky passage. Мой навигатор мне соврал, извиняюсь как не местная :( Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 18:33, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Cow in BGarden.JPG

Yours sincerely, ghouston (talk) 06:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Bulgakov monument in Kiev.JPG edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bulgakov monument in Kiev.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 215.JPG edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 215.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 16:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Editor @ ar.wiki edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:18, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Проект колористического паспорта. 1996-1997 гг..jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Уважаемая Анастасия! На странице Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard моя просьба помочь с восстановлением изображения. Что я могу (или должен) сделать? Заранее благодарен Висарик (talk) 07:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement edit

File source is not properly indicated: File:John Bruton4.jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:John Bruton4.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:John Bruton4.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Commons bot inactivity edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! Your bot User:РобоСтася has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag_3 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. --Dschwen (talk) 19:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Metoposaurus after Flerov.jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Metoposaurus after Flerov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 07:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Помогите разобраться edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

17 апреля 2013, 20:29 Белгородским театром кукол было получено {|разрешение OTRS|2013041610004738} за подписью Линар Халитов. Сегодня участник Juggler2005 заявил о его подложности. Можете мне помочь и проверить: существует ли такое разрешение? И второй вопрос. Это нормальная практика на ВикиСкладе ставить вопрос об удалении файла за то, что «Шаблон OTRS-разрешения добавлен самим загрузившим участником?» С уважением, Лобачев Владимир (talk) 05:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Вопрос разрешился на Commons:Форум#Удаление файлов с разрешением OTRS. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Andrey Korzun (talk) 10:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Bairov desc.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Denis diderot desc.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Denis diderot desc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:BAfanasjevskiy busts.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tagon.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:12, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Memorial to Lev Tolstoi in Moscow (Nikitskaya) 2 - hdr.jpg

And also:

File:Memorial to Lev Tolstoi in Moscow (Nikitskaya) 2 filtered.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:AKunanbaevMonumentinMoscow.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Lenin timiryazevskaya.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lenin timiryazevskaya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Stebut lenin.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Idw/layout Affected:

File:To defenders of Moscow(1).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Stebut.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Surikov na Prechistenke.JPG

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun ([[User talk:Andrey Korzun|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:47, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Zhukovskiy-fas.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun ([[User talk:Andrey Korzun|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:08, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Barrikadnaya exit2.jpg

And also:

File:Ulitsa 1905 Goda 1905.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun ([[User talk:Andrey Korzun|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Commons bot inactivity edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 4 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards --Steinsplitter ([[User talk:Steinsplitter|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Buhvostov Sculpture.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Def2010 ([[User talk:Def2010|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:10, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Borovik.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Dogad75 ([[User talk:Dogad75|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Castillo blanco ([[User talk:Castillo blanco|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 097.JPG

And also:

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 098.JPG

Yours sincerely, Well-Informed Optimist ([[User talk:Well-Informed Optimist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 178.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, kyykaarme ([[User talk:Kyykaarme|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Riga (13.08.2011) 176.JPG

Yours sincerely, kyykaarme ([[User talk:Kyykaarme|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Медаль «40 лет Победы в Великой Отечественной войне 1941—1945 гг.» edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Анастасия, большое спасибо за такую качественную фотографию этой медали! Очень удачный ракурс! Таких хороших фоток этой медали я ещё не встречал. --Историк2010 ([[User talk:Историк2010|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Помощь в поиске по шаблонам OTRS edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Привет, Стася! Обращаюсь как к волонтёру OTRS за помощью.

Я потихоньку пишу статьи об аэропортах и авиакомпаниях и для них часто нужны изображения. В процессе работы я обнаружил, что многие авиафотографы дали разрешение на свои фотографии с определённых сайтов (например airliners.net или jetphotos.net) и для них есть специальный шаблон. Примеры файлов с такими шаблонами: 1, 2

Я в процессе работы с уже загруженными файлами открываю для себя новые имена и выписываю их. Например, случайно обнаружил фотографа UR-SDV у которого на airliners.net нашлись файлы для нескольких статей которые я писал (пример). Однако, эффективность такого случайного поиска низкая, поэтому вопрос: можно ли как-то найти все такие разрешения, чтобы выявить пользователей с указанных сайтов, чьи фотографии можно загружать на викисклад? --DS28 ([[User talk:DS28|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Sound Logo project edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wikimedia Sound Logo project

The Wikimedia Sound Logo project

Hello, the Wikimedia sound logo project is in an early development phase -- this stage is for asking all kinds of questions, developing and fielding ideas, finding themes and shaping the direction of the project. Here is a link to the meta page for the project: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Sound_Logo

Your input is welcome. Thank you.

VGrigas (WMF) ([[User talk:VGrigas (WMF)|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

WinXXX edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

w:ru:Служебная:Вклад/83.7.23.9 100% без патрулирования, пожалуйста, патрулируйте. В русской Википедии меня блокирует фильтр редактирования. 83.7.23.9 16:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Template:Autotranslate edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Milne monument.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Xunks ([[User talk:Xunks|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic