User talk:MGA73/Archive 57

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Leoboudv in topic 16 accounts

Thank You

Dear Michael,

Thanks for marking the remaining Barry Marsh images.

Regarding Category:Files from 149271704@N02 Flickr stream this flickr account appear to be own work with camera metadata from three Samsung, Apple and Sony cameras by Ted Potters Since it is your country, you can decide if 2D graffito art is allowed in the second image below:

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)



Fourthly, these 90 images in Category:Files from 192387570@N06 Flickr stream are own work by Anthony Shaw I passed so many images by this person who today licenses his images as ARR. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


Finally, these 42 images from Category:Files from 196143283@N07 Flickr stream most likely own work from Uniao Brasil Rondonia Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Leoboudv! Ted Potters is Dutch not Danish :-) I think most of it is okay (FOP). --MGA73 (talk) 08:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Oops! My mistake. I always thought you were Dutch until I carefully reread your wikicommons page. Well...as they say you learn a new thing every day! Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
He he Leoboudv! Yeah sometimes you gets a surprise. I learned using a bot by a Dutch user. Multichill :-) --MGA73 (talk) 09:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  • FOUR Comments:





Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: It is nice that Special:WantedCategories is now updated. The most wanted category is Category:Files from 83211576@N03 Flickr stream with 632 files.
I will mark the categories you checked but I'm busy today so do not know how many I will do today. --MGA73 (talk) 09:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment: I'm about to sign off soon...but just do it at your own pace. The category was originally 95,000+ images and you reduced it to just over 10,000+ images. If you reduce it to 500-1,000 images, it may be good enough. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: Still work to be done. But now below 8k. --MGA73 (talk) 16:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bilderbogen in Neuruppin.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bilderbogen in Neuruppin.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 14:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Bilderbogen in Neuruppin.jpg

 
File:Bilderbogen in Neuruppin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 16:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

5 accounts

These images in Category:Files from 36232856@N03 Flickr stream are Public Domain since they come from a US Embassy titled US Embassy Brasilia Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


Secondly, images in Category:Files from 189067902@N03 Flickr stream appear to be own work from Shane Morigeau Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


Thirdly, images in Category:Files from 47873224@N06 Flickr stream are PD since they come from US Embassy The Hague


Fourthly, images in Category:Files from 88133570@N00 Flickr stream are most likely own work since they were all taken by a Nikon D5100 camera by Marc Wathieu who today licenses his images as ARR.


Finally, images in Category:Files from 42541928@N03 Flickr stream are clearly own work from Sebrae-SP a Brazillian government department. Sebrae " is an autonomous Brazilian social service, an integral part of System S that aims to assist the development of micro and small businesses, stimulating entrepreneurship in the country" according to Google translate. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

New Column

Leoboudv it is not good that new files show up in the category. Uploader should get a notice. --MGA73 (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)



The 19 images in Category:Files from 127297238@N06 Flickr stream is most likely own work by San Leandro Privacy with its large number of Photo Albums



  • The 31 images in Category:Files from 123738801@N03 Flickr stream are almost certainly own work since they come from Ministerio de Cultura y Patrimonio del Ecuador whose flickr profile translates as "The Ministry of Culture and Heritage of Ecuador exercises the leadership of the National Culture System to strengthen National identity and Interculturality; protect and promote the diversity of cultural expressions; encourage free artistic creation and the production, dissemination, distribution and enjoyment of cultural goods and services; and safeguarding social memory and cultural heritage, guaranteeing the full exercise of cultural rights based on the decolonization of knowledge and power; and a new relationship between human beings and nature, contributing to the materialization of Good Living."


Finally, the 11 images in Category:Files from 42687493@N06 Flickr stream are PD since they come from the US Department of the Interior Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)



16 accounts

These PDM accounts are own work images.


I ordered a review on 1 of the images and the flickrbot passed the image: File:Oficina de Música IMG 20220526 161611 (53568428068).jpg


  • The 20+ images in Category:Files from 147565992@N07 Flickr stream credit a photographer named Joel Vargas in the camera metadata but belongs in the official flickr photostream of someone named Gabriel Souza with 73,000+ images. According to Portugese wikipedia, Gabriel Souza, as Google translate says "is a Brazilian veterinarian and politician, affiliated with the Brazilian Democratic Movement (MDB). He currently serves as vice-governor of Rio Grande do Sul" state of Brazil. So, he is a major politician.















The uploader, A1Cafel is also very trustworthy and there can be no question of any copy vio. Maybe this will reduce this PDM Category a bit lower. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: All categories passed. Except the last one (Category:Files from 141455566@N02 Flickr stream). There are only 2 files in that and you nominated one for deletion. What about the other? Do you think that is okay or did you just not notice that file?

Also im thinking of putting all the red categories in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review. Then they are easy to find. And they can be added to Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - ok if they look okay or Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - not ok if they are likely problematic. It should be easy to change category with HotCat once they are checked. (I did not create the 2 mentioned categories yet) --MGA73 (talk) 14:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

I have now created some categories. I hope it will make it easier to check. --MGA73 (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@MGA73: : I will nominate the second image for deletion as a copyvio. Right now, my real work is very slow so I have a bit of time for Commons projects. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC) The second LTTE image I tagged as a copyvio was deleted. It was initially deleted and then recreated with the same title sadly.

  •   Comment: Observations on some PDM images that are likely own work.


This image even says 'public domain': File:MO Auditors - 34 Claire McCaskill (1999-2007) (53189869375).jpg








So, I ordered a new review on one of the 21 images here: File:Isla Minima.jpg and the flickr review bot passed it. They are likely own work.


  • These 16 images from Russia in Category:Files from 25554263@N04 Flickr stream are most likely own work. The uploader is quite OK and while the flickr source Andrey Korchagin has some 'model photos' on his profile--which were licensed correctly as ARR, his photostream flickr account shows normal Russian buildings. Unless there are sculptures which Commons cannot keep, this flickr account is likely own work

I did order a new review on a correct PDM license on File:Znamemsky Orthodox Church, Dubrovitsy, Moscow region (3020249348).jpg in this category and the flickrbot passed the image.










I ordered a new review of one of his images here: File:Lisbon (52910073581).jpg and the flickrbot passed it. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)









  • The images in Category:Files from 196214338@N03 Flickr stream can be divided into high and low resolution images. The high resolution images were all taken by a Canon EOS 7D Camera and the low resolution images have no camera metadata--perhaps they were scanned. But all images show scenes in Brazil. So, the images are quite consistent overall from the account of Imagens de Rondônia in the state of Rondônia, Brazil.


I had ordered a review for one of these images in March 2024 here: File:Kasper Asgreen (2022).jpg and the flickrbot passed the image.









The question marks are:

Four of the images say the author is "Bridget Nelson" and I don't know if she scanned an image by J. Dobbs. Dobbs today licenses his images as ARR. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

I reviewed some of the categories (from top to Максим Барбухин). Will take some more tomorrow. --MGA73 (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: I passed those that were okay. But I parked the tricky ones in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - not ok. --MGA73 (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "MGA73/Archive 57".