User talk:MJJR/archive 2013 (part 1)

Latest comment: 10 years ago by High Contrast in topic Quality Image Promotion



MJJR - User talk: ARCHIVE 2013 (part 1)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Halve Maan R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very well --Rjcastillo 22:46, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Koeleweimolen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 21:24, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Langerei R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 00:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Ostend Spirit R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snellegem Kerk R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Iifar 18:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bocht van Ter Doest R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Railway Check Shoe R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Old Fortress R13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 17:58, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Old Fortress R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs sharpening, probably promotable once done. Mattbuck 19:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
  Done -- MJJR 14:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
  Comment Sky looks like plastic. Halo. -- Smial 15:49, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Good prospect and good lighting. QI for me -- Lothar Spurzem 10:52, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loodsboot Pieter Deconinck R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:44, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Place François Mitterrand R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare Lille Europe R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loodsboot Guido Gezelle R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments yes! --Ralf Roletschek 21:39, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frangokastello R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 21:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frangokastello Beach R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Makes me dream about the next hollidays. --Vassil 21:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loodsboot Pieter Deconinck R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Jardin Public R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:08, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterlelie R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knossos R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Simple and nice snapshot, nothing fancy but good enough for QI. Alvesgaspar 20:02, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gortys R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare de Pessac R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Everything OK for me. --Tuxyso 19:24, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Statue Tourny R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 15:27, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Spuikom R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 17:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sint Anna ter Muiden Kerk R02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sint Anna ter Muiden Kerk R02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Place Camille Jullian R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:49, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopper Split Barge VlaanderenVII R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koolkerke Winter R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwpoort Loodswezen R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 10:01, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelkerke Zeedijk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, i like the composition and winter light.--ArildV 23:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelkerke Zeedijk R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 23:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Marina R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very well done. Good Quality. Maybe FP imho --Rjcastillo 22:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwpoort Havenlicht West R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice.--ArildV 09:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwpoort Havenlicht West R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwpoort Port Entrance R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwpoort Havenlicht West R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopper Split Barge VlaanderenVII R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Church R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:55, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Church R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwpoort Havenlicht Oost R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Roda R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Doukades R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chania Hasan Pasha R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Doukades R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness soso, but overall good --Poco a poco 11:11, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Doukades R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damme Schellemolen R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:30, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster Rathaus R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Dalheim R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detmold Freilichtmuseum R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detmold Freilichtmuseum R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 16:47, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Venetian Shipyard R11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Venetian Shipyard R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Dalheim R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 06:25, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Paleokastritsa Beach R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 22:23, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Paleokastritsa Monastery R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:39, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Kassiopi R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Rjcastillo 02:42, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Kassiopi R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Panagia Kassopitra R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:54, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2323 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Brussels Cinquantenaire R03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brussels Cinquantenaire R03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoeke Kerk R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 20:01, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lissewege OLV Beeld R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:01, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Hoeve Pannenhof R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:24, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damme Winterlandschap R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lissewege Station R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GC Maspalomas Cactus Park R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:03, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoeke Kerk R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough. --Mattbuck 23:28, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Multratug 4 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Multratug 4 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:03, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Multratug 4 R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renilde Ship Ostend R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dinant Collégiale R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anseremme Spoorbrug R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bratislava Posadkovy Klub R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dredger Pieter Hubert R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture --Alex.vasenin 13:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelkerke Casino R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 22:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nile Litter R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Useful. --JLPC 18:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pier Blankenberge R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pier Blankenberge R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 23:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Sasplein R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Selbymay 20:36, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
The right building is tilted Poco a poco 20:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
  Done You are right. Tilt corrected. Thanks. -- MJJR 21:54, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Steenstraat R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice photo, but IMHO the tower at the left side is slightly unsharp - not enough for decline. You could do some additional global sharpening. --Tuxyso 21:38, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, but why is the color of the sky near the ground slightly brown. Is it brown sand from the desert? --Tuxyso 21:40, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Peperstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Qualitiy Arcalino 20:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Goudenhandrei R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Poco a poco 22:32, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Steenstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 08:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pier Blankenberge R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grenspaal Nr273 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA on the top, rather unexciting. Mattbuck 22:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
I don't see any CA... For the rest, the lighting conditions that day were not the best indeed. -- MJJR 20:47, 5 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment a bit (minimum) CA (see note), otherwise OK for me --Rjcastillo 13:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Train Station R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:29, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Train Station R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:32, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Train Station R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Tuxyso 12:40, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Train Station R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective correction is necessary (see note). --Tuxyso 12:42, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
  Comment No perspective correction needed, as the building is constructed that way (inspired by the antique Egyptian buildings with slightly tapering walls). All the other verticals in the picture are right. -- MJJR 16:59, 25 March 2013 (UTC)   Support --Iifar 17:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Train Station R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 03:54, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor New Mosque R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Temple Square R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Train Station R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor New Corniche R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 09:43, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Train Station R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Sharia al-Mahatta R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! --NorbertNagel 22:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Train Station R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nile Sloops R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Rjcastillo 20:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nile Luxor R17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Maritim Jolie Ville Hotel R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor R11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Rjcastillo 03:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Korte Zilverstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support OK. --A.Savin 09:33, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Amarco II R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Golden Boat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems good --Nino Verde 09:09, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nile Luxor R19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me, and risky for the camera! --Kadellar 20:13, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Pottenmakersstraat R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Poitevinstraat R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Ezelpoort straat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Koningin Elisabethlaan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelburg Abdij R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 21:17, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelburg Groenmarkt R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Composition is a bit unorganized. Have you space left at the left side to get the full street name? Nonetheless it is a QI. --Tuxyso 21:26, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I have a less cropped version, but with quite a lot of perspective distortion in the upper left corner. -- MJJR 20:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelburg Singelstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful.--ArildV 09:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelburg Singelstraat R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelburg Abdij R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMHO it needs marginal perspective correction at the right (look at the white windows) --Tuxyso 21:37, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
  Done Marginal perspective correction done -- MJJR 20:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Better. IMHO QI now. --Tuxyso 06:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelburg Dam R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelburg Balans 13-13A R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Zwijnstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support good quality --A.Savin 21:37, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Katelijnestraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good. --A.Savin 21:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Noordstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Artoisstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Visspaanstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Sint-Jan-in-de-Meers R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and a good documentary photo. --Tuxyso 22:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Koolbrandersstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, without any doubts. --Tuxyso 22:37, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Zonnekemeers R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:00, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Gapaardstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:40, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Eiland R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Ganzenstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 07:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Begijnenvest R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Verversdijk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. -- Christian Ferrer 05:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Leffingestraat R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Spiegelrei R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Rjcastillo 23:36, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Genthof R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:58, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostburg Langestraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Lejeunelaan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Iifar 20:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bray-Dunes Rue de l'Ancienne Gare R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Christian Ferrer 16:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bray-Dunes Monument Division Janssen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Salvialaan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Christian Ferrer 18:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Hoge Duinenlaan 5 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good QI -- Arcalino 16:57, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Hoge Duinenlaan 3 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Familiestraat 1 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 06:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Bauwenslaan 2 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 17:20, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Zouavenlaan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Wilde Rozenvoetpad R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Pierre Sorellaan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support nice --A.Savin 10:58, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Zeedijk R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:23, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde Familiestraat 3 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 09:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Directiegebouw Vloot R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Larkspur R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westdiep Pilot Boat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Albert I Promenade R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality--Arcalino 13:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Monolithos R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 21:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Lindos Panagia Church R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Haneburger 10:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Kolymbia Beach R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Lindos R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 06:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Kolymbia Harbour R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 06:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunkerque Leughenaer R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 23:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Filerimos R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 04:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Lindos Acropolis R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Lindos Street R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Mekhanik Kottsov R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Lindos Beach R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Rjcastillo 01:30, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Lindos Castle R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Eleousa R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 00:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Lindos R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Eleousa R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Eleousa R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Eleousa Church R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Eleousa R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Dirtsc 21:29, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Agios Nikolaos Foundoukli R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 18:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Cape Vagia R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Eleousa R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 17:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Lindos Castle R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--ArildV 21:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Lindos Castle R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 05:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Kolymbia R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 05:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Cape Vagia R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition.--ArildV 09:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwpoort Kattesas R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me--Lmbuga 21:51, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwpoort IJzer R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me--Lmbuga 21:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwpoort IJzer R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:52, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwpoort Marina R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:36, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blankenberge Havengeul R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Dampoort R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uitkerke Sint-Jobskapel R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me--Lmbuga 23:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uitkerke Sint-Jobskapel R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 23:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor El Madina El Monawara R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like it and QI for me in spite of little areas overexposed and a bit of noise in shadows--Lmbuga 11:59, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Kleine Hoedenmakersstraat R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me, but the shadow areas and the sky are a bit noisy--Lmbuga 23:40, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Hoedenmakersstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Center lines are a bit tilted CW IMO. Other lines needs perspective correction.--Lmbuga 11:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
  Done Fixed as far as possible; not all lens distortions can be fully rectified -- MJJR 13:58, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
I konw. Nothing is perfect, but much better now. Good quality--Lmbuga 19:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Noord-Gistelhof R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:58, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Eleousa R12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Siana Church R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 05:51, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Averbode Kerkhof R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zichem Watermolen R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 00:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lissewege Ter Doest R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lissewege Pastorietuin R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TGV Atlantique Rame 361 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 17:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Carmersbrug R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support It's alright, definately! --High Contrast 23:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "MJJR/archive 2013 (part 1)".