Last modified on 16 July 2014, at 17:03

User talk:MLWatts

Return to "MLWatts" page.

WelcomeEdit

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MLWatts!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, MLWatts!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:56, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finishedEdit

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear MLWatts,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 23:59, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Le_Grand_Rex.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Le_Grand_Rex.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Civa (talk) 16:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

picEdit

File:Airplane Barnstar Hires.png

Can you make this picture's background transparent? Thanks :) --관인생략 (talk) 04:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

InvitationEdit

Hello, Thank you for your kind words and invitation. I have seen the list of aircrafts, which have no 3view sketches, so I am not afraid to be without work. Happy New Year! Kaboldy (talk) 05:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Fiat C.R.42 Falco 3-view.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiat C.R.42 Falco 3-view.svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Fiat C.R.42 Falco profiles.png
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiat C.R.42 Falco profiles.png, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

ParallelismEdit

I see you continue drawing wonderfull 3-view aircraft svg pictures. I'm affraid that eventually we'd work on the same airvraft. To avid it, I'll send you allways the drawings I am working on. Now it is the Fw 98 Stuka, following will be the Focke-Wulf Emden Kaboldy (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

These are finished. The new ones will be: Junkers Ju-88 and Dassault Rafale. Kaboldy (talk) 15:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

The next 2 planes: Convair F-102A and North American F-100 Super Sabre Kaboldy (talk) 09:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Fokker D.VIII 3-view.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fokker D.VIII 3-view.svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

There is a curious phenomenon in the high resolution version of your Fokker D.VIII 3-view.svg. On the tail of the side-view I see a black triangel, which changes area and shape, when I try to move it with the mouse cursor. Is it similar on your screen too?Kaboldy (talk) 10:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Pardon, the rotation was a mistake...Kaboldy (talk) 12:58, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Just joined the teamEdit

Hello MLWatts,

i just joined the WikiProject Aviation on Commons. Sorry for my late response but my two little children absorb most of my time. I'm afraid this might also be my most serious problem as a member of the project: my time is very limited (at least at the moment). I try to keep on working at my drawings and i load up new or improved ones from time to time. But unfortunately it is not possible for me to work for the project on a regular basis. But if there are any questions about profiling or if there are any needs concerning drawings of certain aircraft i certainly will be trying to help.

Best regards:

B. Huber (talk) 15:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Di passaggioEdit

Ciao, ho visto che esiste una pagina sulla collaborazione col Caproni su it. Non ho avuto tempo di controllare, ma ti ricordo che deve esistere un ticket OTRS per le foto donate da Varani e non caricate da lui. Ciao, --Elitre (talk) 11:07, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Vedi anche Commons:OTRS/it. L'autorizzazione deve essere data da chi detiene i diritti attualmente. Ti faccio notare che questo è un passaggio obbligatorio e andava fatto prima di pubblicizzare la partnership o anche solo di progettarla. Ora lo sai e ti risparmierai seccature in futuro. Ciao, --Elitre (talk) 12:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Ah non ce n'è nemmeno bisogno, potete scrivere ad esempio "tutte le immagini del museo" o della collezione X, o ancora "tutte le immagini caricate dagli utenti X, Y e Z", insomma trovare la formula che più preferite, purché le immagini già caricate siano ovviamente coperte dall'autorizzazione. Ciau --Elitre (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Nessun problema, tieni sempre a mente che l'informalità per certi aspetti delicati come il copyright, semplicemente, non può esistere. A presto e buon wikilavoro, --Elitre (talk) 19:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Ri-ciao, stamattina Iolanda Pensa mi diceva che esiste una versione in inglese del tuo case study e siccome lei deve fare l'articoletto mensile per la newsletter internazionale dei GLAM, ci chiedevamo se ce la fai a scrivere due righe in inglese appunto per presentarlo, sintetizzarlo e linkarlo. Credo le occorrano entro pochi giorni. Grazie, --Elitre (talk) 13:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Avevo capito male io allora. Niente, al limite sentiti con Iolanda se c'è qualcosa che magari hai voglia di scrivere per il nuovo numero. Ciau --Elitre (talk) 10:45, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiwingsEdit

Hi MLWatts, I just came across File:WikiCommonsWings.png. Great idea for incorporation into a barnstar. Are you able to somehow incorporate the "lines" in File:Wikiwings2.png into the wings of the CommonsWings? Also, it might best be done if it was an SVG file as well do you think? I have a few people whom I wished to give some barnstars to in the near future. I think we could adopt these as COM:AVIATION barnstars of course. russavia (talk) 23:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

ThanksEdit

Hi MLWatts, I want to thank you the nice "order", you gave me. I apology for the too late response, but I wanted to do it immediately, but somebody disturbed me and later I thought, that I have already done it: I am an old man and sometimes I have troubles with my memory. Sorry. Once thank you very much Kaboldy (talk) 08:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Happy New YearEdit

Happy new year plane.svg

From: Kaboldy (talk) 09:23, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Reggiane2001 San Diego Air Space Museum 1.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Reggiane2001 San Diego Air Space Museum 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuergenKlueser (talk) 19:43, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

PropositionEdit

Hi, It's a very, very good idea! OK. Cheers Kaboldy (talk) 12:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

It worksEdit

Congratulation! Kaboldy (talk) 05:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

I think, the start was successful! Hip, hip, hurrah! Kaboldy (talk) 17:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)