Last modified on 11 January 2008, at 10:52

User talk:Magnus Manske/Archive 1

  • Discussion
Return to the user page of "Magnus Manske/Archive 1".
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Willkommen

Hallo Magnus, denkst Du bitte beim Hochladen fremder Bilder dran, immer einen Link zum Original-Uploader/-Author zu machen in der Form

made by [[:de:Benutzer:XYZ|XYZ]], first uploaded in de.wikipedia at yyyy.mm.dd

oder im konkreten Fall

made by [[:User:Lumbar|Carsten Niehaus]].

Danke und gute Grüße von :Bdk: 20:21, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Kannst Du nochmal kurz hier gucken, mach mir ja schon fast Sorgen wg. deiner br-Anmerkung ;-) --:Bdk: 21:44, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Meyers Konversationslexikon

Please use {{PD-Meyers}} when uploading images from Meyers Konversationslexikon. Den fjättrade ankan 21:41, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Reichstag

I'm sorry, by mistake I've overwritten your Image:Berlin Reichstag.jpg photo with my picture. Can you re-upload please ? Wojsyl 22:32, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

I pushed the button "Zurücksetzen" (or in english "revert") at the line of the middle image. thereby the overwriting is repaired ;-) You can do this also by yourself if you recognize your mistake. greetings. --BLueFiSH ?! 23:15, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Move-to-commons assistant feedback

I just tried your move-to-commons assistant on en:Image:HankoPanorama360.jpg, and it produced the following result:

Description

Summary

Hanko, Finland. A 360° panoramic photo shot from the water tower by J-E Nyström (Janke). Stitched in hugin by Ilmari Karonen.

Licensing

  • 15:54, 6 March 2006 Ilmari Karonen 10513x1040 (3159945 bytes) (re-encode in nonprogressive format; easier on the image server?)
  • 15:46, 6 March 2006 Ilmari Karonen 10513x1040 (2995218 bytes) (scroll a bit so the sun is dead center)
  • 15:28, 6 March 2006 Ilmari Karonen 10513x1040 (2995349 bytes) (<a href="/wiki/Hanko%2C_Finland" title="Hanko, Finland">Hanko, Finland</a>. A 360° panoramic photo shot from the water tower by J-E Nyström (<a href="/wiki/User:Janke" title="User:Janke">User:Janke</a>). Stitched in <a href="/wiki/Hugin_%28software%29" title="Hugin (software)">hugin (software)</a> by <a href="/wiki/User:Ilmari_Karonen" title="User:Ilmari Karonen">User:Ilmari Karonen</a>.)
Date Commons upload time 2006-04-22 13:06:26
Source Originally from en.wikipedia; description page is (was) here
Author Users Ilmari Karonen, Ilmari Karonen, Ilmari Karonen on en.wikipedia
Permission
(Reusing this file)

{{cc-by-sa-2.5}} (License tag untranscluded to avoid categorizing your talk page. —Ilmari Karonen)

That's pretty nice, but I'm sure you can see a few minor issues that could be fixed:

  • The fact that it didn't pick up Janke as an author is excusable, since that would pretty much require strong AI, but the fact that it listed me three times is simply a bug.
Fixed.
  • The redlinks in the description should be fixed. Probably the best and easiest solution would be to turn all links in the description into interwiki links. (This probably should apply to userpage links too, since we have no actual guarantee that User:Example on Commons is the same person as en:User:Example.)
Done.
  • The wikilinks in the upload summaries are rendered as HTML source code.
I only get them as HTML source. I've added a regexp trying to compensate for this now.
  • The "Commons upload time" isn't. Presumably you should just put "~~~~~" there instead of the time the script was called.
Done.
  • Also, the WikiSense checkbox doesn't seem to be working. There exist both Category:Hanko and Category:Panoramic which this image clearly belongs to, but there are no category tags in the output even though I'm sure I checked the box.
I have tried it with several images, and on some of them, WikiSense works, on some, it does not. Clearly an issue with WikiSense.

Anyway, thanks for the useful tool, and hope this helps make it even better. —Ilmari Karonen 11:36, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Also, the upload button should explicitly set the destination filename, the way the "upload a new version of this file" link on image description pages does. —Ilmari Karonen 11:48, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Why? It gets set when you specify your local file anyway.
I have just used your (great) tool for en:Image:1stWorld.JPG. This is {{GFDL-self}} & {{cc-by-2.5}} but your script only took {{GFDL-self}}. It should search for all licence templates to work with multilicensing.
Done.
Another issue is that it took {{GFDL-self}} as a license, but of course that was not my image, so it should change {{GFDL-self}}s to some kind of {{GFDL-by}}.
It should be clear through the upload history.
I agree with the date issue discussed before of better ~~~~~. It'd give an unified date format too. What is this data inteded for? Image log already has it on each page.
The field seems to be required by the template.
Platonides 21:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
--Magnus Manske 09:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Löschantrag: Image:Jooss Table verte.jpg

Hallo Magnus, ich habe einen LA auf Image:Jooss Table verte.jpg gestellt, weil das Bild nicht alt genug ist. Gruß, --Flominator 17:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Move-to-commons assistant

A bit of criticism:

In my opinion you are doing a big mistake allowing people to move graphics on commons not logged in. Why:

  • We have problems on pl.wiki that few users move articles with non-ortographic or stupid names. They do it because they dont know polish. We can try to talk with them on commons, but how to contact someone who is using your bot via www?
  • imagine vandals making mass uploads with stupid names, etc.

I think that you should reprogram your bot that it will need username and password and upload as this user adding info that it was made via www interface.

And please place a large banner:

Do not move pictures with names in languages that you do not understand!

And it would be nice if you place smaller info, that pl.wiki doesn't want non-polish speaking users to move our graphics!

--WarX 13:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

OK thanks :) It's very good. You have something broken on this page, couse [edit] links don't work :(


Image Tagging Image:Archie Shepp6.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Archie Shepp6.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 04:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Dein Tool ...

Hallo Magnus, guckst Du mal bitte hier vorbei und schaust, inwiefern Du Dein Tool anpassen kannst, so dass unnötige und verwirrende Infos weggelassen werden und evtl. die Versionsgeschichte mit Link zum Originalbild inkl. Datum des Erstuploads geschickter platziert werden kann? Danke --Überraschungsbilder 07:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Entschuldige Magnus, wenn ich erneut nerve, aber Dein Angebot führt in erheblichem Umfang zum Verlust wichtiger Angaben, bitte reduziere das "automatische" Ausfüllen auf wirklich sicher zu übernehmende Infos und lass ggf. unsichere Felder einfach frei. Mit dem Hinterherräumen kommt doch niemand mehr nach und die Originalbilder werden schneller gelöscht, als man gucken kann :-( Ich weiß, dass du Dein Tool in guter Absicht zur Verfügung stellst, aber m.E. schadet es mehr als es nützt (die meisten Leute schalten leider zu oft das Mitdenken ab, wenn sie ein vermeintlich zuverlässiges "Tool" zur Verfügung gestellt bekommen ...) Du kannst doch nicht allen ernstes in die Quellenzeile eine Angabe reinpacken "from de.wikipedia" (sinngemäß) und dadurch dem übertragenden Hochlader vorgaukeln, das wäre ok. Einzig korrekt wäre dort die Übernahme der Originalangabe "selbst fotografiert" (als Beispiel) - und genau die fällt dabei einfach unter den Tisch (ich möchte nicht wissen, wieviele Löschanträge diese Bilder irgendwann mal kassieren, weil schlicht und einfach die Basisinfos fehlen). Auch das Ersetzen der Originaldatumsangaben (der Aufnahme) durch das Datum des ersten Hochladens auf de.wikipedia ist sinnfrei, denn diese Angabe ist idealerweise bereits in der notwendigen Kopie der alten Hochladezeile als History-Nachweis enthalten - und das Originaldatum fällt bei Dir ebenfalls unter den Tisch.
Bitte nimm die Kritik nicht persönlich, ich bin nur (ebenso wie einige andere Nutzer) das ständige Hinterherräumen [1] bei großen Mengen auf den ersten Blick optisch zwar "toller" aber auf den zweiten Blick schlecht bis ungenügend übertragener Bilder leid. Grüße --Überraschungsbilder 00:05, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Book cover - Shibari, the Art of Japanese Bondage.jpg

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by adding a suitable copyright tag. --Jnn 11:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Bildtankstelle

Hallo Magnus, zweiter Punkt, anderes Thema. Bzgl. Deiner Uploads der ganzen Fotos von bildtankstelle.de wäre es einerseits toll, wenn Du grundsätzlich nicht die veraltete Vorlage PD (ruhig mal anklicken *g*) nehmen würdest und andererseits, wenn Du erläutern würdest, inwiefern die Bilder hier überhaupt genutzt werden können. Aus den Nutzungsbedingungen und den Lizenzrichtlinien, die beide auf deren Homepage über die Startseite zu erreichen sind, geht nämlich hervor, dass eine Nutzung in Datenbanken und eine gezielte Weiterverbreitung der Dateien nicht von der Freigabe abgedeckt sind: Ausgeschlossen ist eine Nutzung in Bilddatenbanken, Bildkatalogen und die Bereitstellung von Bildern zum Download oder zum Verkauf. (...) Nutzen Sie ein Bild für den Multimedia-Bereich (z.B. auf Websites, CD-ROMS etc.), darf das Bild ausschließlich so eingearbeitet werden, dass es offensichtlich nicht dafür bestimmt ist, heruntergeladen oder kopiert zu werden.

Auch folgender Passus (Copyrightnennungspflicht) ist nicht kompatibel mit public domain: Ein Bild darf nur unter Hinweis auf "Copyright www.Bildtankstelle.de" eingesetzt werden. Besonders schön auch: Ist ein Impressum oder ähnliches vorhanden, muss die Pro-Future.biz GmbH als Urheber der verwendeten Bilder dort genannt werden.

Bitte kläre das, bevor Du weitere Bilder von bildtankstelle.de überträgst. M.E. müssen die Bilder wohl wieder gelöscht werden. Nix für ungut. Viele Grüße --Überraschungsbilder 07:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Moving files to commons.

Hi I see you've made a bot to transfer files to commons.

There are two problems I found:

  1. Encoding of letters is buggy (looks like your changing it to ISO or something and then sending it as is - which renders like this: "Wzór mojego pomysłu")
  2. Acordning to Template:Information - the Permission field should be a 'brief' explanation of the licence. You could make an array that would connect some standard text to a tag you've found. The licence tags should be below the Information template. Alternatively in the Information template you could add the tags in a form like this: {{cc-by-sa}}.

Additionaly on pl.wiki we have a pretty common standard of having two sections "== Opis ==" and "== Licencja ==". The first one means "Description" and the second one means "Licencing" (usually tags only). I belive the bot should take this into consideration.

Regards, Nux talk | didn't answer? drop a note 21:57, 25 June 2006 (UTC).

Category:Cities in Germany

Bitte beim hochladen keine Bilder direkt in die o.a. Kategorie laden!

  • Bitte sortiert die Bilder direkt in den entsprechenden Bundesländern und nicht hier in die Hauptkategorie ein.
  • Ortskategorien (Städte und Gemeinden) heißen "Ort, Germany" und sollten sich neben dem Bundesland auch hier bzw. in Category:Villages in Germany befinden.
  • Artikel zu Orten sollten in die Kategorie des Ortes oder zumindest ins Bundesland einsortiert werden und nicht mehr direkt nach hier, damit auch Bilder ohne Artikel gefunden werden können.

Auch ansonsten passt bei den Kategorien einiges nicht. -- Rüdiger Wölk 21:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Bitte die Ortsbilder in die Ortsketagien einordnen. Bitte auch nicht nach Villages in Germany oder in die Bundesländer. -- Rüdiger Wölk 21:52, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

CommonSense

Bitte schau nach, ob die vorgeschlagenen Kategorien tatsächlich zum Gegenstand des Bildes passen, bevor Du sie auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite einfügst. Bitte schau auch nach, ob sie Unterkategorien enthalten, die besser zu dem Bild passen. Wenn man das ausschließlich einen bot machen lässte, dann führt es in allen bereichen zu falsch sortierten Bildern, so etwas bringt nur unnötigen Arbeitsaufwand. -- Rüdiger Wölk 22:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Noch ein Beispiel: Image:EggerateherHof2.jpg

Am besten aufgehoben ist das Bild unter Erkelenz, Germany. Ist da aber nicht eingeordnet. -- Rüdiger Wölk 22:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

uploads zu Commons

Hallo, bei der Serie 'Landw Gerät 1.JPG' von de:Wiki fehlt eine Beschreibung um was für ein Gerät es sich handelt. Auch finde ich die Beschreibungen auf Commons nicht schön. Es handelt sich hier um folgende Bilder: Image:Landw Gerät 2.JPG, Image:Landw Gerät 2.JPG, Image:Landw Gerät 3.JPG, Image:Landw Gerät 4.JPG, Image:Landw Gerät 5.JPG, Image:Lanz 45PS 1940 1.JPG, Image:Lanz 45PS 1940 2.JPG usw. Bitte bereinige die Beschreibungen auf Commons. --gildemax 14:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Zu deiner Antwort: Ich würde nie etwas übertragen von dem ich nicht weis um was es sich handelt. Solche Bilder sind auf Commons unbrauchbar. Siehe auch Commons:Projektrahmen. --gildemax 18:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:MedievalTimesEingang.JPG

Um was handelt es sich bitte hier ? Bitte bereinige bzw. ergänze die Beschreibung aller von Dir hochgeladenen Bilder. Wenn man nicht weis um was es sich handelt, so ist das Bild nicht zu gebrauchen ! --gildemax 14:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Zu deiner Antwort: Ich würde nie etwas übertragen von dem ich nicht weis um was es sich handelt. Solche Bilder sind auf Commons unbrauchbar. Siehe auch Commons:Projektrahmen. --gildemax 18:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:SchreibmaschineAEG Mignon.JPG

I notised strange categories in this image. Also file hisory had licence tag, and its expanded, so there is orphan ')' in last line. Maybe it is better put file history inside <nowiki>-tags --Tomia 19:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Da schein auch einiges mit den Kategorien in die Hose gegangen zu sein. Rail transport ??? Bitte prüfe das doch einmal! -- Rüdiger Wölk 22:38, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Freyburgjahn.jpg

Bitte bringe das mit den Kategoriezuordnung durch Deinen Bot erst in Ordnung, bevor der wieder benutzt wird. Dieses Bild ist ein Beispiel, wie die Kategoriezuordnung nicht sein sollte. Ohne sinn und Verstand. Das bringt so nichts. -- Rüdiger Wölk 22:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Template:WLE

Brain-cerebellum.png

PushForCommons also acts as an augmented gallery. Ah. Then I apologise for managing to be wrong, rash and a dick in a single revert. I'll try to use mine --->
as well. --pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Category:(year)

Hello. Can you please change the bot to use "(year) births" and "(year) deaths" categories? Example: Image:David Wilkie.jpg "Category:1785 births" "Category:1841 deaths", not "Category:1785" "Category:1841". "Category:(year)" should be date of image. Thank you. -- Infrogmation 03:29, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. I replied to your message on my talk page. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 14:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Edit bot MM

Hallo Magnus, habe seit längerer Zeit wieder auf User:Orgullobot/Welcome log/past geschaut. Jetzt mit Deinem Tool ist sehr sehr einfach und schnell Bilder zu markieren und den Uploader zu benachrichten. Gute Arbeit ! --gildemax 13:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Import des Wikipedia Dumps zum Offlinelesen schlägt fehl

Hallo, ich versuche einfach mal mein Glück und frage hier nach :). Ich habe leider zu Hause kein Internet und wollte deshalb Wikipedia offline installieren. Leider schlägt dies fehl mit der Fehlermeldung: "WikiRevision given a null title in import." Alle meine Fragen diesbezüglich blieben unbeantwortet. Siehe hier, oder hier. Auch alle Fragen zum gleichen Thema, die ich per Google finden konnte, hatten keine Antworten hier.

Kann mir hier jemand weiterhelfen? Ich weis mir echt keinen Rat und finde im Netz nichts, was mir weiterhelfen koennte. Vielen Dank im Voraus!!!

Hi! Also, ich weiss damit auf Anhieb auch nichts anzufangen. Probier am Besten mal mediawiki-l@wikimedia.org, das ist die offizielle mailingliste für MediaWiki-Entwicklung und -Probleme. Da findest Du auch Brion (brion [at] pobox.com), der die entsprechende Fehlermeldung eingebaut hat (und daher wissen sollte, was zu tun ist). Schneller ist vielleicht sogar #mediawiki auf freenode. --Magnus Manske 13:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Antwort :) Da ich wie gesagt kein Internet zu Hause habe und am Wochenende viel Zeit hatte hab ich mir die Scripte mal genauer angeschaut. Schuld ist die Methode in spezialImport.php. Dort wird bei einem NULL-Titel eine Exception geworfen. Anscheinend war das in alten Versionen nicht der Fall. Ich habe die Zeile dann so angepasst, dass auch bei einer NULL-Referenz, die Variable eben mit NULL gesetzt wird. Nach der Änderung lief das Script wie gewünscht durch, und statt einem Abbruch kam dann die Meldung "Get bogus revision with null title" (<- sinngemäß) und das Script lief weiter. Anscheinend gab es also eine Änderung, die einen Import des Wiki-Dumps unmöglich macht. Seltsam ist nur, dass ich in der XML-DAtei keine Revision mit NULL-Titel gefunden habe ... aber egal. Was mich auch wundert ist, dass das Script bei mir sehr langsam Arbeitet. Im Schnitt 1,5 Seiten pro Sekunde. In allen Beispielen, die ich gefunden habe sieht man immer 40 Seiten - 60 Seiten pro Sekunde. Vielleicht gab es also noch weitere Änderungen ... ? Ich werde versuchen die von Dir angesprochnenen Personen zu kontaktieren. Nochmals Danke für Deine Antwort!

Fünfter Satz des Deutschen Requiems

Hallo Magnus, danke für Deine Infos zur Herkunft der Aufnahmen.

Sehr schade ist, dass der fünfte Satz "Denn wir haben hier keine bleibende Statt" kurz nach dem ersten "Hölle, wo ist dein Sieg?" abbricht. Ein Vergleich mit den von Dir aufgeführten WayBack-Links zeigt, dass Du nur die knapp die halbe Datei hochgeladen hast. Eigentlich müsste sie 11 MByte groß sein, sie hat aber nur fünf.

Hast Du noch irgendwo das Original?--Johannes Rohr 05:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

PS: Habe jetzt alle Copyright-Hinweise entfernt, Infoboxen eingefügt und unter Ein deutsches Requiem eine Gallerie angelegt. --Johannes Rohr 07:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

No license template

Hi! When going through Category:Images with unknown source as of 4 July 2006, I noticed that you had marked images as not having license but you hand't notified the uploader. Notifying the uploader is very important, so I have retagged them with a new date. -Samulili 14:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Redundante Kategorie?

Hallo Magnus, du hast die Kategorien Category:Carl Phillipe Emanuel Bach und Category:Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach angelegt. Handelt es sich evtl. um die selbe Person? In der Beschreibung zur Kategorie Carl Phillipe Emanuel Bach ist der Name anders geschrieben als im Kategorienamen, nämlich wie im Titel der Kategorie Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach. Kannst du das bitte prüfen, danke.


Image Tagging Image:Hippokrates of Chios.png

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hippokrates of Chios.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jkelly 23:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

imagereview.php

Could you please change the Reviewed by to Reviewed with ? It's me who is reviewing it, not the machine... Platonides 21:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Richard_Dedekind.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Richard_Dedekind.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — Timichal 16:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Commons helper - "other versions"

Hi, somehow the nowiki-tag in other versions is placed wrong. It is all around that part where it should be only around the user comments.

--32X 10:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske)

Thank you for creating such very useful bot, but I have suggestions about layout of description page it adds to images.

current layout (sample)

Description
  • 22:01, 18 kwi 2006 Ss181292 764x764 (25012 bajtów) (Wersja z dodanymi cieniami... chyba troszkę ładniejsza i lepiej pokazuje możliwości SVG. Jak się komuś niepodoba, niech revertuje.)
  • 17:23, 21 mar 2006 WarX 750x750 (2256 bajtów) ({{GFDL}})
Date Commons upload by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) 11:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Source Originally from pl.wikipedia; description page is (was) here
Author Users Ss181292, WarX on pl.wikipedia
Permission
(Reusing this file)
GNU head Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.

Creative Commons license
Creative Commons Attribution Creative Commons Share Alike
If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.

The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.


català | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | فارسی | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | occitan | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | +/−

Licensing update unknown

my proposition

proposition starts here
Description

no original description

Date 21 Mar 2006 (first version), 18 Apr 2006 (last version)
Source pl.wikipedia; original description page is (was) here
Author Users Ss181292, WarX on pl.wikipedia (Commons upload by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) 11:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC))
Permission
(Reusing this file)

GFDL

original upload log
  • 22:01, 18 kwi 2006 Ss181292 764x764 (25012 bajtów) (Wersja z dodanymi cieniami... chyba troszkę ładniejsza i lepiej pokazuje możliwości SVG. Jak się komuś niepodoba, niech revertuje.)
  • 17:23, 21 mar 2006 WarX 750x750 (2256 bajtów) ({{GFDL}})

==Licensing==


GNU head Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.

Creative Commons license
Creative Commons Attribution Creative Commons Share Alike
If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.

The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.


català | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | فارسی | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | occitan | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | +/−

Licensing update unknown
proposition ends here

best regards, Ss181292 09:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good, but shouldn't the date be given as "yyyy-mm-dd"? --87.234.93.109 10:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Proposition given here is OK :) But IMO template {{GFDL-self}} should be converted to {{GFDL}} or {{GFDL-user-w}}. I think date format should be "dd mmm yyyy" (for example "21 Mar 2006") because it is free of ambiguities. Ss181292 11:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:B_Gelasius_II.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:B_Gelasius_II.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — Timichal 13:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

CommonsHelper

I often get CommonsHelper telling me "This image has no verificable good license" when it's perfectly valid. I have encountered it with PD-art, PD-self and PD-author tags. // Liftarn

Thanks, what about {{CopyrightedFreeUse-Link}}? I don't know if that's valid or not. // Liftarn

And, {{attribution}} seems to be considered an invalid license as well. // Liftarn

On Uploading Bildtankstelle Images

They are very beautiful photos, I know. But please understand, non-categorized images are useless in Commons. "Unknown Flowers" only confuse the Category:Flowers. Please consider it . --Horcha 13:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

In Category:Bildtankstelle, there is a list of photos of flowers from a CD collection. I can't read in Deutsh, please could you check the http://www.bildtankstelle.de/lightboxphoto/index.php?pageId=118&start=0 Licence], please before I categorize these flowers.. Thx--Patricia.fidi 22:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

CommonsHelper

Hello, i would like to know if its possible to update the template license mapping from Wikipedia.fr to Commons. We are moving a lot of images, what why, it will be fine.


  • Domaine public NARA → PD-USGov-NARA
  • Domaine public gouvernement USA → PD-USGov
  • Domaine public USA → PD-US
  • Domaine public NSA → PD-USGov-NSA
  • Domaine public NASA → PD-USGov-NASA

Thanks a lot. ~ bayo or talk 18:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

à propos de l'image d'une "borie" en Dordogne

Bonjour,

Une petite précision : le bâtiment ainsi dénommé est en fait une cabane de jardin ou de parc, en maçonnerie liée au mortier et avec une toiture de tuiles sur charpente (alors qu'il est d'usage dans le Sud-Ouest de réserver le terme "borie" aux anciennes fermes ou métairies agricoles et, chez certains auteurs, aux cabanes en pierre sans mortier dotées d'une voûte encorbellée ou clavée en pierre sèche, ce dernier emploi d'ailleurs contesté, le nom de la cabane en pierre sèche en Dordogne étant "chabano" ou "chebano").

I'd like to point out that the small contraption you call "borie" is in fact a garden or park facility, built in mortared stone masonry and covered in tiles (on a wooden structure). It is customary in South-Western France to reserve the word "borie" for old agricultural farms or, at least in some circles, for dry stone huts with a corbelled or keystone stone roof, although the latter sense is questionable as the real name of the drystone hut in the Dordogne department is "chabano" or "chebano". Cordialement, --Erussal 13:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

commons helper: de -> commons

Hallo, seit der geänderten Abbildung der Versionsgeschichte nutze ich dein Werkzeug gern, allerdings ist mir gerade beim Verschieben von de.WP etwas aufgefallen:

  • Wenn Bilder ohne Infobox sind, wird das Feld description vollständig ausgefüllt.
  • Mit einer Infobox wird aus
== Beschreibung, Quelle ==
{{Information
|Description=Bildbeschreibung, die hier nicht interessiert

Folgendes:

{{Information
|Description=''no original description''

Bitte pass das noch an, ggf. sogar mit

|Description=
{{de|Bildbeschreibung, die hier nicht interessiert}}

Gruß, 32X 15:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Ich hatte dir zwar schon bei mir ein Beispiel (de:Bild:13Touriheck.jpg) gegeben, melde mich hier jetzt allerdings nochmals, weil mir noch etwas aufgefallen ist: {{GFDL-self}} sollte automatisch in {{GFDL-user-XX|USERNAME}} geändert werden. Vorhandene Tags listet die Category:License tags attribution auf. --32X 15:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Ich muß mal wieder nerven. Oben genanntes Problem (no original description) tauchte erneut auf, dafür wurde {{Bild-GFDL}} fälschlicherweise zu {{GFDL-user-de|USERNAME}} geändert: de:Bild:Wartburg_1.3_Tourist_S_Genex.jpg.
Die Nacharbeit stört mich zwar nicht, aber andere Leute könnten von der Benutzung dieses großartigen Werkzeugs dadurch abgeschreckt werden. Gruß, 32X 12:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Maria Flachsbarth.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Maria Flachsbarth.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Torsten Bätge 12:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Karl_Wilhelm_Feuerbach.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Karl_Wilhelm_Feuerbach.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — Timichal 13:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Free fi.wikipedia license to CommonsHelper

Hi! CommonsHelper doesn't seem to recognize fi:Template:Vapaa and fi:Template:Vapaa/NimiMainittava as a free licenses. Ojn Commons, these correspond to {{Copyrighted free use}} and {{Attribution}} respectively. I'd appreciate it if you could add these licenses to CommonsHelper. Thanks for your time and thanks for the tools you have made. Samulili 20:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for making CommonsHelper understand the Finnish information template (fi:Template:Tiedoston tiedot), too. It seems to me that CH doesn't understand that "Kuvaus"-field equals the description field. Samulili 19:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Alexander Langmuir (large).jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Alexander Langmuir (large).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot :) ~ bayo or talk 22:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Roger W Sperry.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Roger W Sperry.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Georg Philipp Telemann - Hanaque.ogg

LA gestellt, s.a. de:Wikipedia Diskussion:Musikrechte#Bearbeitung --Phrood 22:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

CommonsHelper (fr → commons)

Hello, now french image page use a lot of template that are not license template.

Exemple of all template in a page, and in bold, template that are not license.

  • Template:!
  • Template:CC-BY-SA-2.5
  • Template:Documentation modèle
  • Template:Méta bandeau licence
  • Template:Pour Commons
  • Template:Purger le cache

If CommonsHelper can remove them from the license set, it will be very nice. Thanks a lot. ~ bayo or talk 10:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Willis Rodney Whitney (left) and Guglielmo Marconi (right) (1917).jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Willis Rodney Whitney (left) and Guglielmo Marconi (right) (1917).jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. G.dallorto 22:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Commons dupes

Hallo! Commons dupes bietet ja die Option, ein doppeltes Bild zu löschen. Das geht natürlich nur, wenn das Bild vorher entlinkt wurde. Mittlerweile ist es wohl möglich, dass Bilder über Orgullobot global ausgetauscht werden können. Wäre es bei "Commons dupes" möglich, in das Feld, in dem aufgelistet wird, wo das Bild genutzt wird, einen Link hinzuzufügen, der folgendes auf User:Orgullobot/commands hinzufügen würde: {{universal replace|Foo.jpg|Bar.jpg}}? (siehe auch hier). --Matt314 21:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Der Eintrag auf die Seite wird korrekt eingetragen. --Matt314 17:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Would it be possible to add checkboxes, so that you can select all the images that have to be replaced, and in the end a button "Replace all selected images using Orgullobot" or whatever? -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Besides technical issues, that would give non-sysops write access to the protected bot job queue (alas, limited). Sorry, not gonna happen soon. --Magnus Manske 13:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Commonshelper-Fehler

Hallo Magnus! Danke erstmal für deinen tollen Helferlein. Commonshelper produziert regelmäßig folgenden Fehler: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:%C3%96vre_dividal_anjajohka.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=4469458 Kann man das ggf. reparieren? Darüber hinaus wäre es hilfreich, wenn der „Upload at commons“-Button kein Button, sondern Text wäre, so dass man mittels Strg + Klick mehrere Instanzen öffnen kann und so sich mehrfaches Laden erspart (und dem Server auch). Grüße, --Polarlys 00:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Anton Pannekoek.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Anton Pannekoek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alex Spade 16:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Flommons

Hi, Magnus. I saw Yann's addition of a link to Yann's Flommons page to Yann's User page here, liked what I saw, and decided to try the same thing myself. However, I am having a problem with doing that, in that for two of my images, http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4a/AABarnstar.png/240px-AABarnstar.png and http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1f/Purple_Star.png/240px-Purple_Star.png , I get broken image links instead of the images, and further research shows that the text behind the broken image links is "Bad title" and "The requested page title was invalid, empty, or an incorrectly linked inter-language or inter-wiki title. It may contain one or more characters which cannot be used in titles." Perhaps there are no 240px thumbnails because the source images are only 111px wide? If so, the tool should be fixed or the database should be populated with 240px thumbnails of smaller images for Flommons use. Any advice you could offer would be helpful. Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Strange. I looked at your flommons-page and got two broken preview images, a bug I then fixed. The links were and are OK, as far as I can tell. If they are still broken for you, please give me a link to the flommons-page where they are broken, so I can reproduce your error. --Magnus Manske 15:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the bug, but the firewall I'm behind at present won't let me view my flommons page at present. :(   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 11:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Category:Convent Steinfeld

Hi, In regards to this convent/monastery in Germany - where is it? There are a number of places called "Steinfeld" in Germany (see here), and to create the category, it might be handy to link it to the Landkreis or city it is in. Thanks. Deadstar 12:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Martinů Copyright

Dear Magnus, can You please answer my question regarding the copyright issue of the Bohuslav Martinů (d. 1959) works You downloaded here? Details available at the Category:Bohuslav Martinů. Thanks. -- Okino 01:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Fragariachileo.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fragariachileo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. |EPO| 14:37, 19 April 2007 (UTC)