Soft redirect page

Swastyka jest symbolem wyklętym edit

Niezależnie od tego kto jej używa, naraża się albo na sąd albo na samosąd. Posłuchaj człowieka, którego imiona od pierwszego do czwartego brzmią: odpowiedzialność. Przedstawiam świat taki jaki jest. Bardzo proszę o niestosowanie ataków osobistych. Jeśli usunięty zostanie ten szablon, będziemy odpowiedzialni za zwiększenie pacjentów w szpitalach. Inni użytkownicy swastyki są całkowicie nieistotni. Kiedy się pali, najważniejsze jest zgasić pożar i ratować ludzi. Wszystko, prócz tego jest nieistotne. --Starscream (talk) 13:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token f23a6ff3a606b2e0ab547119281a8cc3 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Freeway_speed_limits_europe.png edit

Hello, i just wonder: Why did you reverted your own edit? To my knowledge a speed limit of 140 km/h in Poland is incorrect. Anyway i just uploaded a new version of the picture.--KaterBegemot (talk) 19:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Stieg.jpg edit

Hello, Where is the file on the English Wikipedia? I couldn't find it. The source website is now down. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:09, 25 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given edit

 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 09:53, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: WLZ edit

Zdjęcia wgrywałem do kategorii, które mają numer zabytku. W takim wypadku, zgodnie z informacjami podanymi tutaj, szablon {{Zabytek}} nie jest konieczny (Jeśli kategoria zabytku posiada szablon {{Zabytek}}, informacja ta jest niepotrzebna w opisie zdjęcia). --Witia (talk) 19:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

No problem :) --Witia (talk) 20:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ad:File:A120, Poznań, kamienica przy ul. Wrocławskiej 10 (3). Ysbail.jpg: Historia wersji edit

Ad:File:A120, Poznań, kamienica przy ul. Wrocławskiej 10 (3). Ysbail.jpg: Historia wersji

Cześć. Nie wiem czy używasz jakiegoś bota, czy co, ale przynajmniej w części wypadków trochę się spóźniłeś ;-). Pozdrawiam, Nux (talk··dyskusja) 20:25, 23 September 2012 (UTC).Reply

PS: To znaczy nie ze złośliwości piszę czy coś, tylko to taka sugestia, żebyś sobie gdzieś tam cache/stronę odświeżył zanim będziesz przerabiać następne.

Nawiasem mówiąc na podstawie czego robisz? Numeru zabytku, czy jakoś z wyszukanej w tekście nazwy gminy? --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 20:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Admin could be blind? edit

Maybe he could, but you also could've logged in, couldn't you? odder (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Awersowy en face.jpg edit

 
File:Awersowy en face.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Яй (talk) 07:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply