User talk:Maksimsokolov/Archive 3

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stunt cyclist at Nathan Philips Square 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, except there is a little green CA at the edge of the tall building left of center. Also, that's snow, isn't it? Maybe add a category of photos of snowy scenes. -- Ikan Kekek 09:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Thank you Ikan, your suggestions have been implemented. Maksimsokolov 13:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Rain rather than snow; I wasn't sure. Thanks! -- Ikan Kekek 20:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stunt Cyclists at Nathan Philips Square 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 21:33, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stunt cyclist at Nathan Philips Square 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This page was existed here of Maksim Sokolov.

Wrugtrab (talk) 01:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

@Wrugtrab: Thank you. But I have no idea what you mean. I am Maksim Sokolov, this has been my name form birth. The transport minister has the same name as me, but I am not him. I opened my profile myself, named myself as myself, and I have no idea why you are connecting my profile to the the Wikipedia article about the Russian transport minister. Maksim Sokolov (talk). 01:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
https://web.archive.org/web/20131202223916/http://pravo.gov.ru:8080/page.aspx?13875 is here this page. Wrugtrab (talk) 01:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
@Wrugtrab: I am sorry, I don't understand. The page you mentioned is not a Commons or Wikipedia page, and has nothing whatsoever to do with me. I hope someone will be able to understand your allegation and conclude this case. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 02:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A skater at Queen's Park in Toronto (April 30, 2022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A birch in front of Emmanuel College Windows, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protesters and skaters at Queen's Park in Toronto (April 30, 2022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geese family in Downtown Toronto (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Cute! Good quality. --Steindy 21:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geese family in Downtown Toronto 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to the birds --Michielverbeek 05:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geese family in Downtown Toronto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fragment of Robarts Research Library in early May.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ceiling of Ryerson Student Learning Centre (Version 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ceiling of Ryerson Student Learning Centre (Version 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goose family crossing a busy road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality and nice! --Aristeas 06:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A birch in front of Emmanuel College Windows, Toronto (BW).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagull taking off at Nathan Phillips Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A view from Toronto City Hall on May 21, 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Nathan Phillips Square on May 21, 2022 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Nathan Phillips Square on May 21, 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribfest in Toronto (Dundas Square, May 21, 2022) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribfest in Toronto (Dundas Square, May 21, 2022) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribfest in Toronto (Dundas Square, May 21, 2022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A dog plays in the water - Nathan Phillips Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to the dog, but IMO it's not an interesting photo for Wikipedia --Michielverbeek 07:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarko (the "Believe Guy") of Yonge-Dundas Square in Toronto (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Burlington waterfront, Ontario, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! On the Brant Street Pier, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:38, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View at the Brant Street Pier, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Burlington waterfront, Ontario, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A fisherman at lake Couchiching in Ontario, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A fisherman at lake Couchiching in Ontario, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
  Comment I didn't realize that I have nominated the same photo twice in the span of two days, both upvoted though --Maksimsokolov 04:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
  Comment No problem. Both upvoted. OK. --XRay 04:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Couchiching in Ontario, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A person named Torus at Queen Victoria statue in Toronto on Victoria Day (May 23, 2022) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishing at lake Couchiching in Ontario, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stairs to the upper level of the Nathan Phillips Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 03:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A couple walking at Nathan Phillips Square in Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A person with "Hug Me" poster was hugged by another person on Dundas Square in Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A person named Torus at Queen Victoria statue in Toronto on Victoria Day (May 23, 2022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

 
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Windows of Toronto Reference Library.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Windows of Toronto Reference Library.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Eiffel Tower in 2022 02.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eiffel Tower in 2022 02.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:South facade of Dôme des Invalides.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:South facade of Dôme des Invalides.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Louvre museum 03.jpg

 
File:Louvre museum 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Louvre museum 04.jpg

 
File:Louvre museum 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Louvre museum 06.jpg

 
File:Louvre museum 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Louvre museum 07.jpg

 
File:Louvre museum 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Louvre museum 02.jpg

 
File:Louvre museum 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Louvre museum 05.jpg

 
File:Louvre museum 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

  Happy Holidays, Maksimsokolov

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

--Aristeas (talk) 13:31, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

 
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Mural by Phlegm on 1 St. Clair Ave, Toronto.jpg

 
File:Mural by Phlegm on 1 St. Clair Ave, Toronto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays and thank you for your great photos!

  Happy Holidays, Maksim

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

Aristeas (talk) 15:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Maksimsokolov/Archive 3".