User talk:Manfred Kuzel/Archive/2017

Infobox
de Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache. en-0 This person does not understand English (or understands it with considerable difficulties). fr-0 Cet utilisateur ne comprend pas le français (ou le comprend avec très grande difficulté).

Quality images candidates

Hallo Manfred,
Wie ich sehe, nominierst du seit einiger Zeit bei Quality images candidates täglich fünf Kandidatenbilder. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob dir das bewusst ist, aber allgemein gilt hier die Regel, dass man so viele Bilder bewerten soll, wie man nominiert. Der Grund hierfür sollte relativ einleuchtend sein, schließlich würde die Seite nicht funktionieren, wenn jeder nur Bilder abladen, aber keine Bewertungen abgeben würde. Vor diesem Hintergrund möchte ich dich ermutigen, in Zukunft die Zahl deiner Nominierungen besser mit der Zahl deiner Bewertungen in Einklang zu bringen.
Mir ist bewusst, dass hier eventuell eine Sprachbarriere besteht, allerdings sprechen viele (mindestens ein Drittel, wenn nicht noch mehr) der regulären QIC-Teilnehmer Deutsch, sodass du dich zunächst auf deren Bilder konzentieren könntest.
Viele Grüße und ein schönes Restwochenende, --DXR (talk) 09:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Hallo DXR, danke für den Hinweis, den ich auch von anderer Seite bereits erhalten habe. Warum ich mich nicht an Bewertungen beteiligen kann, ist leicht erklärt. "Good quality" einzutippen ist natürlich kein Problem, wenn es aber in der Folge zu einer Diskussion kommt, weil jemand nicht meiner Meinung ist, dann bin ich dieser nicht gewachsen, weil ich kein Engisch spreche. Wenn hier Englischkenntnisse wichtiger sind als fotografisches Können, dann muß ich wohl oder übel auf weitere Nominierungen verzichten. Herzliche Grüße und einen schönen Sonntagnachmittag--M@nfred (talk) 10:37, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Manfred, wie gesagt, glaube ich nicht, dass Englischkenntnisse hier ein großes Problem sein müssen. Ich kann nachvollziehen, dass es sicherlich schwierig ist, wenn die meisten Bewertungen auf Englisch geschrieben werden und man die Sprache nicht versteht, dennoch gibt es täglich mindestens 50 Nominierungen von deutschsprachigen Benutzern (eher mehr), die sicherlich auch auf Deutsch reagieren könnten, falls notwendig. Eventuell müsste man sich auf diese Nominierungen konzentrieren. Zudem bleibt beim größten Teil der positiven Bewertungen dieses Urteil unangefochten, sodass auch diese eine Möglichkeit wären, sich einzubringen. Natürlich ist es dir überlassen, ob es für dich sinnvoll ist, diesen etwas komplizierteren Weg zu gehen. --DXR (talk) 17:23, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Und wie erkenne ich einen deutschsprachigen Benutzer, wenn die Bildbeschreibung nicht in Deutsch abgefasst ist, DXR? Aber ich will meinen guten Willen zeigen und es einmal versuchen. Ob's lang gut geht, wage ich allerdings zu bezweifeln. Schönen Wochenbeginn und lG--M@nfred (talk) 03:42, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Das erkennt man am leichtesten mithilfe der Infoboxen, die die meisten Benutzer auf ihrer Seite haben. Hier sind unter anderem die gesprochenen Sprachen zu finden. Rechts findest du ein Beispiel. In deinem Fall könntest du beispielsweise en-0 setzen, sodass andere Benutzer sehen, dass es nicht hilfreich ist, mit dir auf Englisch zu diskutieren. --DXR (talk) 10:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 04:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Sprache in QI

Hallo Manfred, ich finde, dass kein Englisch sprechen zu können ist eine genauso große oder kleine Hürde wenn es darum geht Bilder für QI zu nominieren. Wenn du ein Bild prüfst, und du bist der Meinung, dass es QI ist, reicht dann ein "Ok". Erledigt. Ich würde einfach mit Bildern anfangen, die klare QIs sind, einige Benutzer bringen regelmäßig gute Qualität. Sollte es zu einer Diskussion kommen, kannst du dann in worst case mit Hilfe von Google Translate kommunizieren oder direkt auf Deutsch. Es gibt einige, die an der Stelle aushelfen werden. Warum probierst du es nicht einfach und schauen wir wie es so läuft? Grüsse, Poco² 19:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Das mache ich doch schon seit einigen Tagen, lieber Poc.LG--M@nfred (talk) 04:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 04:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Dateibeschreibung

Hallo, Ich finde es gut , dass du diese kleinen Gebäude für WP photographierst und dokumentierst. Deine Bilder werden im Laufe der Zeit zusehend besser, was uns allen passiert. QI Richtlinien sehen aber vor, dass die Dateibeschreibung klar ist - Für uns ist Kellergasse kein Begriff (und ich lebe in einer Weinregion). Um so weniger für Leute aus Überall in der Welt. Wir sind hier auf Wikimedia Commons. In diesem Fall würde ich wenigstens eine Verbindung zur deutschen WP erwarten, wenn nicht eine Erklärung in der Dateibeschreibung, wenigstens auf Deutsch, falls es dir nicht auf Englisch gelingt. LG--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Wolfgang, ich habe leider nicht die geringste Ahnung, wie ich eine derartige "klare Dateibeschreibung" formulieren soll (nicht einmal auf Deutsch und schon gar nicht auf Englisch). Würde ich ein Bauwerk in Wien als "Objekt in der Kärntnerstraße in Wien" beschreiben, würde das wohl genügen. Und da frage ich mich schon, worin der Unterschied zwischen "Kärntnerstraße in Wien" und "Kellergasse in Irgendwo" liegt. LG--M@nfred (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Hallo, es ist ganz einfach: man möchte von der Dateibeschreibung verstehen was im Bild steht. Das es ein Gebäude ist versteht sich von selbst, also was für ein Gebäude z. B eine Antoniuskirche, erbaut im 17. Jahrhundert, vom Architekt Baumeister etc. in der Kärntnerstraße. Noch besser eine spezifische Verbindung zum WP Artikel wie zB in deinem Fall, ich wiederhole Verbindung. Also in deinem Fall:" ehemaliges Weinkellergebäude erbaut im 19. Jahrhundert, unter Denkmalschutz in der Kellergasse in Kärnten oder Niederösterreich oder wo auch immer. Sehr einfach aber klar. Servus --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

So einfach ist das leider nicht, wie Du Dir das vorstellst, lieber Wolfgang. Bei diesen Objekten ist weder der Erbauer noch das Baujahr und meistens nicht einmal der ursprüngliche Verwendungszweck bekannt. So ist es meistens auch nicht mehr feststellbar, ob dem vorhandenen Gewölbe ursprünglich ein Presshaus vorgelagert war und der Keller der Erzeugung oder nur der Lagerung gedient hat. Unter Denkmalschutz stehen auch nur die wenigsten Objekte, wie etwa in der Kellergasse "Zipf" in Mailberg. Und auch ein Querverweis wäre nur zu einer vorhandenen Liste von Kellergassen möglich, weil es nur für einige wenige Kellergassen einen eigenen WP-Artikel gibt. Wie Du siehst ist das weder einfach noch klar. Schönen Tag und lG--M@nfred (talk) 04:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 12:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Gettsdorf Kellergasse Hutwinger Feld 1.jpg

Hallo Manfred, öffne das Bild mal in IrfanView, gehe unter Bild/Farben ändern (Shift-G) und stell das Gamma auf 0.20. Da kannst du dann die seltsamen Streifen im Himmel erkennen. Woher das kommt, kann ich nicht sagen, ich vermute aber, das ist durch die Umwandlung von NEF in JPG entstanden oder nachträgliche JPG-Bearbeitung (kenne ja deinen Workflow nicht). --Magnus (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Danke für den Tip Magnus. Da es kein NEF-Format hatte, kann es auch nicht durch die Umwandlung entstanden sein. Ich habe jedenfalls eine mit IrfanView bearbeitete Version hochgeladen und ersuche Dich um Begutachtung. LG--M@nfred (talk) 10:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 07:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Streifen

Hallo Manfred,

ich wollte nur sagen, dass meine Kommentare zum verschmutzten Sensor nur eine Vermutung sind, die das Vorhandensein der Streifen erklären könnten. Ich hatte nämlich selbst das Problem. Wenn Dich das Thema interessiert, dann könntest Du eine helle, gleichmässige Fläche mit einer möglichst kleinen Blende (11, 16, 22) fotografieren. Es kostet ja nur ein paar Minuten, das auszuprobieren. Je kleiner die Blende, desto deutlicher würde das Problem auftreten. Wenn Du jedoch nichts siehst, dann vergiss, was ich zum Sensor gesagt habe, dann müssen wir das Problem woanders suchen.

Ich hoffe nur, dass Du Dich wegen des Themas nicht ärgerst, denn das wäre schade.

Viele Grüsse aus dem Baskenland,

--Basotxerri (talk) 15:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Kein Problem Basotxerri, ich bin für jeden Hinweis dankbar und inzwischen auch schon etwas klüger geworden, was die Ursache betreffen könnte. Das jpeg-Original habe ich mit "Photoimpact XL" bearbeitet. Nun habe ich es mit "IrfanView" versucht und eine neue Version hochgeladen. Ich glaube, daß die Streifen jetzt weg sind. Es dürfte also an der Bearbeitungssoftware gelegen haben.

Liebe Grüße aus dem niederösterreichischen Weinviertel von --M@nfred (talk) 16:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 07:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krems - Steinertor (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:46, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pellendorf - Schloss.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think the sides are leaning in a little bit. Perspective correction?--Peulle 15:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC) ? I think perspective is OK. --Manfred Kuzel 08:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Maybe you're right - the bell tower on the right side would be warped if you overcorrected.--Peulle 13:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großrußbach - Schloss.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Kellergassen in Weitersfeld

Kellergassen in Weitersfeld has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:44, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Herzi Pinki, ich habe leider nicht die geringste Ahnung, was ich mit dieser Info machen soll.--M@nfred (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

du gehst auf die (oben verlinkte) Antragsseite und gibst dort deinen Senf ab. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:00, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Herzi Pinki, ich weiß leider nicht, welchen Senf ich abgeben soll. Senf verwende ich ausschließlich für Frankfurter und/oder Debreziner und ich habe nicht die geringste Ahnung, wo, ob und welche Auswirkungen die Löschung dieser Kategorie hat.--M@nfred (talk) 18:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Wenn du wirklich Interesse an Antworten hast, dann werde ich mich bemühen. Wenn du nur so tust, dann lass es besser. Ich kann sehr lange & geduldig erklären und gehe immer von AGF aus, aber bei dir und jetzt da wieder habe ich den Eindruck, es ist vergebliche Liebesmüh. So, es handelt sich nicht um eine Kategorie, sondern um eine Seite (Galerie), die du angelegt hast. Welche Auswirkung hat die Anlage der Seite? Was ist die von dir dahinter beabsichtigte Wirkung? Wenn du das weißt, dann kannst du auch abschätzen, welche Auswirkung die Löschung hat. Unter Senf verstehe ich kurz folgendes: Du bist gebeten, zu meinem Vorschlag der Löschung der Seite deine Stellungnahme abzugeben. Als Autor der Seite. Du musst aber nicht. Ich habe meinen Antrag extra für dich auch in Deutsch abgegeben, du kannst natürlich auch in Deutsch deine Stellungnahme abgeben. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:25, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Dann bemühe Dich endlich! Du weißt seit Jahren, daß ich mit den Kategorien nicht zurecht komme und der einzige Kommentar, der Dir dazu einfällt, ist (in der deutschen Übersetzung, damit es auch ein Depp versteht) "So Unsinn". Bei mir hast Du jedenfalls weder lange noch geduldig erklärt, sondern mich ausschließlich korrigiert und kritisiert, wobei Du teilweise auch für mich völlig unverständliche Ausdrücke wie "ich habe es gefixt" oder auch hier "AGF" verwendest. Warum ich hier etwas angelegt habe, hängt vermutlich damit zusammen, daß beim Hochladen einer oder mehrerer Fotos eine Systemmeldung erschienen ist, daß irgendwas fehlt.--M@nfred (talk) 05:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Gut ok, angekommen. Kommst du mit den Kategorien nicht zurecht, weil ich es schlecht erkläre, weil die Beschreibung nicht ausreichend ist (wo?) oder warum? Wenn du die Kategorisierung verstehen willst, dann erneuere ich mein Angebot, dass wir uns zu dem Thema zusammensetzen und ich dir den Umgang mit Kategorien zeige und deine Fragen zu beantworten versuche. Du kannst aber auch gerne hier deine konkreten Fragen stellen.

Ich habe dir bei den Kellergassen ein Muster für die Kategoriestruktur gemacht, ich habe dir Vorlagen für die Listen gemacht und ich habe darauf hingewiesen, dass dein Zugang zu dem Thema nicht den Beleganforderungen von Wikipedia entspricht, übrigens nicht als einziger, auch die Forderung nach einer präziseren Beschreibung der Objekte in manchen Qualitätsbilddiskussionen geht in diese Richtung. Ich habe eine Projektseite zu den Kellergassen eingefordert und dort Sachen zur Diskussion gestellt. Vieles hätte ich einfach machen können aber ich verstand mich hier nicht als ausführender Projektmitarbeiter. Außerdem bin ich Biertrinker. Ich habe mich aus dem Thema zurückgezogen weil ich das Gefühl hatte, du willst darüber gar nicht reden, sehe deine roten Kategorien und schweige. Ich sehe die Anmerkungen einiger auf den Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder, die in dieselbe Richtung gehen, und schweige. Ich finde dass Kategorisierung eine Grundanforderung für ein Qualitätsbild ist, aber wenn jemand ein rot kategorisiertes (= nicht einsortiertes) Bild zum Qualitätsbild erklärt, soll es so sein. Sind ja viele schöne Fotos dabei. Es gibt ein gewisses Spannungsfeld zwischen inhaltlicher (enzyklopädischer) und sozialer (lieb sein) Arbeit hier: Soll man inhaltliche Probleme nicht zur Sprache bringen, um lieb zu sein? Du hast hier explizit um Kritik gebeten, und ich meine die Kritik immer sachlich und nicht persönlich. Ich freue mich, dass du hier von mir mehr Information einforderst, weil ich mich offensichtlich darin getäuscht habe, dass du nicht darüber reden und lernen willst (selbst gegen AGF verstoßen).

Ich habe auf die von dir angelegte Galerie einen Löschantrag gestellt, weil ich der Meinung war, du wolltest eigentlich eine Kategorie anlegen (die es eh schon gegeben hat). Eine Galerie ohne ein einziges Bild kommt mir komisch vor. Und die von dir aufgrund der Anmerkungen bei den Qualitätsbildern angelegte Kategorie Category:Kellergasse Untermixnitz war ihrerseits unkategorisiert, was zwar die ursprüngliche Kategorie statt rot blau werden lässt, aber keine Einsortierung in eine übergeordnete Kategorie und damit in das ganze Geflecht von Kategorien bewirkt. Das habe ich gefixt (=ausgebessert), ich dachte, das wäre in deinem Sinn. Wenn nicht, mach es rückgängig. Der Baustein hier auf deiner Diskussionsseite wird vom Löschantragsprozess automatisch erzeugt, er bittet dich inhaltlich dazu Stellung zu beziehen. Statt dessen diskutieren wir hier soziale Aspekte. Können wir gerne tun, entspricht aber nicht der Absicht hinter dem Löschantrag. Wenn du auf der Antragsseite schreiben könntest: Ich brauche das, weil ... oder Ok, brauche das nicht, kann gelöscht werden., dann könnten wir die Diskussion hier beenden. Wenn du nicht die geringste Ahnung hast, was das eine oder andere für Auswirkungen hat, dann ist es auch gut so wie es ist, es braucht deine Stellungnahme nicht.

Mein Angebot, dir die Kategorien näher zu bringen, steht.

Was AGF betrifft siehe de:Liste von Abkürzungen (Netzjargon) und de:WP:AGF. Ich werde mich bemühen, in der Kommunikation mit dir ohne schwer verständliche Begriffe auszukommen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Es erfüllt mich mit Befriedigung, daß das bei Dir angekommen ist. Ich komme mit den Kategorien deswegen nicht zurecht, weil Du es mir nicht schlecht sondern überhaupt noch nicht erklärt hast. Und wenn Du rote Kategorien siehst und schweigst, so ist gerade das der Beweis für diese meine Feststellung. Gerne nehme ich daher zum wiederholten Mal Dein Angebot an, mir die Geheimnisse der Kategorien zu lüften, was aber wohl nur persönlich und nicht in einer nicht enden wollenden schriftlichen Diskussion möglich sein wird. Und hier wird es aufgrund der räumlichen Distanz schwierig. Und bis wir diese Schwierigkeit - hoffentlich bald - überwunden haben, bitte ich Dich, weiter zu "fixen".

Wenn Du übrigens eine Galerie ohne ein einziges Bild komisch findest, so kann ich das ganz leicht erklären: Wenn ich in einer Ortschaft zwei oder mehrere Kellergassen fotografiert habe, dann lege ich zunächst als "User:Manfred Kuzel" die Galerien an um dann als "User:Kellergassen in 2017" die Fotos hochzuladen. Zwischen dem Hochladen der Bilder der ersten Kellergasse und jenen der weiteren Kellergassen sind die Galerien der letzteren naturgemäß noch leer. Alles klar?

Und weil ich nicht die geringste Ahnung habe, welche Auswirkungen die Löschung auf sich hat, kann ich auch weder Ich brauche das, weil ... noch Ok, brauche das nicht, kann gelöscht werden. kommentieren. Keinesfalls möchte ich, daß damit hochgeladene Bilder irgendwo verschwinden, wo sie nicht mehr gefunden werden. Auch klar? In diesem Sinne lG --M@nfred (talk) 10:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Danke für die Antwort, ich bin immer davon ausgegangen, dass du Commons:Kategorien und Commons:Galerien gelesen hast und habe darauf aufbauend nur auf die Anwendung dieser Festlegungen hingewiesen. Konkrete Fragen habe ich keine in Erinnerung und Antworten à la keine Ahnung und Bahnhof helfen mir nicht, deine Bedürfnisse zu verstehen. Es ist generell auch nicht meine Aufgabe, dir das zu erklären. Du hast im Kellergassenprojekt einen diesbezüglich kompetenten Partner, der das kann. Es ist mein freiwilliges Angebot. Ich schweige bei den roten Kategorien u.A. deswegen. Du verwechselst, denke ich, Kategorien (beginnen immer mit Category:) und Galerien (=Seite = Artikel in der deutschsprachigen WP, ein Beispiel aus Commons), jedenfalls hast du auf Commons keine einzige Galerie angelegt, die überlebt hätte. Keine Angst, deine hochgeladenen Bilder verschwinden nicht, ein Kategorie ist bloß ein Verzeichnis von Bildern und kein Behälter mit dessen Verschwinden auch der Inhalt verschwindet, der Inhalt kugelt nur lose herum. Ein Bild kann in vielen Verzeichnissen sein, oder auch in keinem.

Eine Kategorie für eine Kellergasse <name der Kellergasse> im Ort <name des Ortes> der Gemeinde <name der Gemeinde> sollte genau folgenden Inhalt haben:

[[Category:Kellergassen in <name der Gemeinde>|<name der Kellergasse>]]
[[Category:<name des Ortes>]]

der zweite Teil nur falls eine solche Ortskategorie existiert. Beispiel. Die Kategorie [[Category:Kellergassen in <name der Gemeinde>]] ist einmalig je Gemeinde anzulegen und in die Gemeinde und die Kellergassen des Bezirks einzuordnen, also

[[Category:<name der Gemeinde>|!Kellergassen]]
[[Category:Kellergassen in Bezirk <name des Bezirks>|<name der Gemeinde>]]

und Beispiel, aber für die meisten Gemeinden sollte das wohl schon erledigt sein. Alle Aussagen gelten nur für Niederösterreich. Das ist allerdings meine Sicht der Dinge und sollte im Kellergassenprojekt abgestimmt und festgelegt werden.

Folgende rote Kategorien habe ich gefunden, die ich dir und dem Thema zuordnen würde: Category:Eggendorf bei der Mühlbacher Straße‏‎ (x), Category:Grübern Kellergasse Kogelfeld‏‎ (x), Category:Kellergasse Mörtersdorf‏‎, Category:Grübern Kellergasse am Tiefenbach‏‎ (x), Category:Mold Kellerweg‏‎ (x), Category:Kellergasse Aschendorf/Steinfeld‏‎ (x), Category:Kellergasse Aschendorf‏‎, Category:Kellergasse Oberfladnitz, Category:Kellergasse Raffelfeld, Category:Kellergasse Starein, Category:Kellergasse Dallein‏‎. Ich schlage vor, dass du die Namen so änderst, dass sie einer einheitlichen Namenskonvention genügen, betroffen sind alle, die nicht mit Kellergasse oder Kellerweg beginnen. Wenn du mir für Vorschläge für die (x) machen könntest, kann ich die Umkategorisierung für dich vornehmen. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Ich muß diese Diskussion leider als völlig erfolglos abbrechen, weil Du Dich beharrlich weigerst, auf Deinen Diskussionspartner einzugehen. Eine Ausbildung und/oder Erklärung eines Sachverhaltes beginnt man nämlich nicht irgendwo indem man etwas annimmt oder von etwas ausgeht - wie Du es formulierst - sondern "bei Adam und Eva". So habe ich es zumindest in der Ausbildung zum Personaltrainer gelernt und auch stets sehr erfolgreich praktiziert. Du aber gehst stur einen Weg, auf dem Dir Dein Diskussionspartner nicht folgen kann. Wenn ich also oben klar und für jedermann verständlich feststelle "Gerne nehme ich daher zum wiederholten Mal Dein Angebot an, mir die Geheimnisse der Kategorien zu lüften, was aber wohl nur persönlich und nicht in einer nicht enden wollenden schriftlichen Diskussion möglich sein wird.", dann setzt Du munter diese nicht enden wollende schriftliche Diskussion fort. Wie ich das verstehen soll, weiß ich leider nicht.--M@nfred (talk) 06:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Tut mir leid, wenn du das so verstehst. Wann hast du Zeit, dass wir uns zusammensetzen? Mach einen Termin- und einen Ortsvorschlag. skype geht auch. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:36, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Ich weiß nicht, wie ich das sonst verstehen soll und die Zeit ist da - auch das habe ich oben schon erwähnt - das geringere Problem. Das Problem ist vielmehr die räumliche Distanz, wie oben festgestellt. Und da Skype sicherlich auch nicht geht, bleibt nur ein Termin, zu dem ich zufällig wieder in Wien bin oder vor oder nach einem Termin, den wir bei WMAT gemeinsam wahrnehmen. Und daher wiederhole ich meine Bitte, bis dahin weiter zu "fixen". Schönes WE und lG--M@nfred (talk) 04:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Mein Ziel ist nicht, weiter zu fixen (wenn was zufällig anfällt, dann gut), sondern dich zu ertüchtigen, das selbst zu machen. Es ist einfach bei der Menge an Fotos nicht fair, zu erwarten, dass das andere für dich erledigen. Ich bin mobil, gerne auch in deiner Nähe, wenn ich das richtig einschätze ist das gerade mal 1 Stunde mit dem Auto. Wien geht sowieso schlecht, wegen der dir leidigen Parkplatzproblematik. Wie schaut es morgen bei dir mit einer ersten Sitzung aus? Oder wie schaut deine Planung für deine Wien-Termine aus? Kannst mir gerne mail schicken. Wo ein Wille ist, ist auch ein Weg. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Morgen bin ich von den Schloßbesitzern ins Schloss Stetteldorf eingeladen und eine Planung für meine Wien-Termine gibt es nicht, weil sich diese spontan ergeben. Und eine Parkplatzproblematik gibt es sowieso nicht, es kommt nur darauf an, wo man sich trifft. Ich melde mich zu gegebener Zeit. LG--Kellergassen (talk) 07:27, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Schade, wie schaut es am Samstag, 24. 6. vormittags aus? Oder auch gerne am selben Tag abends. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:35, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Wenn ich bis Samstag wieder völlig gesund bin (ich mußte die Einladungs nach Stetteldorf sausen lassen und stattdessen eine ärztliche Wochenend-Vertretung des Hausarztes wegen einer Geschwulst mit Rotlauf in Anspruch nehmen und schlucke seither Antibiotika), habe ich die Absicht, zur Mitgliederversammlung von WMAT zu kommen. Deinem Terminvorschlag entnehme ich, daß Du das auch vor hast. Und wenn ich wieder soweit hergestellt bin und wir uns dort treffen, dann können wir spontan die Unterrichtsstunde anhängen. O.K.? LG --M@nfred (talk) 16:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Wünsche dir baldige Besserung! Ich komme nicht zur MV, treffe dich aber gerne danach im MuseumsQuartier. Spontan ist damit schwierig. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:32, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Da ich erstens noch nicht definitiv weiß (hängt von meinem Zustand ab), ob ich zur MV komme und zweitens wie lange diese dauert, kann ich auch keine verbindliche Terminvereinbarung treffen. Verschieben wir also auf eine günstigere Gelegenheit. LG--M@nfred (talk) 03:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberfellabrunn Oaraberg 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberfellabrunn Oaraberg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Gedersdorf an der Bundesstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:50, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objekt 15 in der Kellergasse Gedersdorf an der Bundesstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:50, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Nordöstliche Radialstraße Großmeiseldorf 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:46, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Maistal in Großmeiseldorf 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Markl Windigsteig 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Markl Windigsteig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:51, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objekt 59 in der Kellergasse Gedersdorf an der Bundesstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse MIstelbach Berggasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:52, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minichhofen Sitzendorfer Kellergasse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minichhofen Sitzendorfer Kellergasse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minichhofen Sitzendorfer Kellergasse 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:52, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 05:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gettsdorf Kellergasse Hutwinger Feld 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gettsdorf Kellergasse Hutwinger Feld 9 Detail a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gettsdorf Kellergasse Hutwinger Feld 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gettsdorf Kellergasse Hutwinger Feld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 12:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objekt 22 (Detail) in der Kellergasse Gedersdorf an der Bundesstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:59, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minichhofen Sitzendorfer Kellergasse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Hohenwarter Straße in Großmeiseldorf 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:10, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Frauenhofen 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Frauenhofen 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, would be better though with shadwows lightened up a bit --Poco a poco 08:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Pöverding 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but white balance might have been a bit better (more yellow I guess) --Michielverbeek 05:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Pöverding 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Lmbuga 21:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:12, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Au 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Die Schatten könnten vielleicht etwas aufgehellt werden. Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Au 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 08:33, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Fachelberg 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 08:33, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:15, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Fachelberg 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Steinbach 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 9 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Maiersch 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Maiersch 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Maiersch 5 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Maiersch a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is high enough for Q1, but contrast between sun and shadow is quiet large --Michielverbeek 07:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Steinbach 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Nonndorf 8 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Au 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could be sharper, but OK for me. --C messier 09:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:40, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Maiersch a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is high enough for Q1, but you might reduce the contrast in most of your photos --Michielverbeek 06:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Maiersch b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Difficult light, QI all things considered IMO. --Peulle 10:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Es wäre besser, wenn die Schatten hier etwas angehoben würden. Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:32, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gettsdorf Kellergasse Hutwinger Feld 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:34, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartberg Kellergasse Hintaus 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Eine bessere Komposition lässt sich hier wohl nicht erreichen. Allerdings sehe ich bei einigen Zweigen noch lila Reste von chromatischen Aberrationen, könntest Du versuchen, diese zu beseitigen? --Basotxerri 19:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC) Ich habe leider nicht die geringste Ahnung, was "chromatische Aberrationen" sind und schon gar nicht, wie man diese beseitigt. Danke jedenfalls für Deine Bemühungen.--Manfred Kuzel 05:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC). CA: schaue bitte hier: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromatische_Aberration. Ich habe es mir noch einmal angesehen, ist auch so ausreichend. OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 06:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Maiersch 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment stürzende Linien müssen noch korrigiert werden. --Carschten 14:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Ich sehe keine Linien des Objektes, die nicht senkrecht sind.--Manfred Kuzel 17:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Die Außenseiten des abgebildeteten Gebäudes kippen nach innen. --Carschten 11:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC) Neue Version hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 12:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC) Wenn du jetzt noch die weiße Ecke unten rechts wegschneidest, die von deiner Perspektivkorrektur übrig geblieben ist, gibt es ein Pro. --Carschten 09:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC) Ih hoffe, das ist nun auch behoben. Danke für Deine Geduld. MfG--Manfred Kuzel 15:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)  Support ebenfalls, kein Problem. --Carschten 21:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:48, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuehnring-Rest2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr hübsches Streiflicht. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Goldgeben 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Thomas Ledl 06:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Zissersdorf nördlich des Ortszentrums 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: M@nfred (talk) 05:00, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meiseldorfer Kellergasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenwarter Kellergasse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenwarter Kellergasse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Parallel zur Minichhofener Straße in Großmeiseldorf 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now --Poco a poco 16:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenwarter Kellergasse 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:32, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 28 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:49, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Engelsdorf 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Engelsdorf 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Kühnring 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Kühnring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Richtung Radlbrunn 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Engelsdorf 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 09:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Engelsdorf 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but I would improve the white balance (more purple, reduce green I think) --Michielverbeek 05:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Engelsdorf 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gute Qualität -- George Chernilevsky 05:09, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Engelsdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 17:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Steinbach 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object, but white balance needs to be improved (more yellow) --Michielverbeek 06:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC) „gut, jedoch sollte der Weißabgleich angepasst werden (mehr gelb)“ --Carschten 11:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC) Habe ich versucht, verfälscht jedoch die dort herrschende tatsächliche Beleuchtungssituation. --Manfred Kuzel 12:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)  Support slightly blurry, but overall ok for QI --Carschten 17:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seitzersdorf-Wolfpassing Bäckerstraße 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Zissersdorf Richtung Hausleiten 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:16, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meiseldorfer Kellergasse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 09:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:54, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Zissersdorf Richtung Hausleiten 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Zissersdorf Richtung Hausleiten 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Zissersdorf Zur Leiten 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Hühnergraben 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, --XRay 15:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Richtung Reisdorf Rückseite 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, Foregound could be better. --XRay 15:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 10:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Oberfladnitz 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 10:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Engelsdorf 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice photo but since the plants have such prominent place there should be categories for those as well. (Forsythia, Syringa vulgaris and ?) Please add. --W.carter 19:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC) Ich habe nicht die geringste Ahnung, was ich damit anfangen soll. Soweit ich das verstehe geht es dabei um Pflanzen, hier aber geht es um Gebäude!--Manfred Kuzel 06:56, 26 April 2017 (UTC) Wenn die Pflanzen in einem Foto so prominent haben, so sollten diese auch kategorisiert werden. I have added these categories for you this time. Good quality. --W.carter 09:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC) Danke, aber ich werde das auch künftig nicht machen können, weil ich von Botanik null Ahnung habe.--Manfred Kuzel 09:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenwarter Kellergasse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the most exciting motif, but the photo is good. Good quality. --W.carter 08:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenwarter Kellergasse 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 10:34, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meiseldorfer Kellergasse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Quality is OK, but what of object is it? --C messier 09:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC) Ruine eines Weinkellers.--Kellergassen 07:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC) Support I added it in the description. --C messier 11:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:37, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Wolfsgraben 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Eggendorf 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 05:26, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Untermixnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 04:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulgasse 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:07, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulgasse 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Oberretzbach Waldstraße 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Oberretzbach Waldstraße 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:07, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Oberretzbach Waldstraße 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulgasse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 17:58, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Engelsdorf 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meiseldorfer Kellergasse 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Too blueish IMHO, check the flowers. --C messier 09:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC) ???--Manfred Kuzel 09:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)  Comment I believe that the photo is too blue. In order to correct the white balance use as the reference the flowers that are too blue now. --C messier 11:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC) Ich verstehe noch immer kein Wort.--Manfred Kuzel 19:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC) de:Weißabgleich is wrong. Your photo is too blue. --C messier 10:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Neue Version hochgeladen. --Manfred Kuzel 12:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 08:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:41, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Engelsdorf 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Könnte schärfer sein, ist aber ME noch in Ordnung. Allerdings neigt die rechte Wand nach links, könntest Du bitte die Perspektive korrigieren? --Basotxerri 17:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC) Danke für den Hinweis, Perspektive korrigiert. --Manfred Kuzel 06:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC) Danke! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:43, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Eggendorf am Walde Mühlbacherstraße 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Zissersdorf nördlich des Ortszentrums 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulgasse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulgasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Imo good quality --Rabax63 17:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Starrein 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Zoppo59 19:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Starrein 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zoppo59 19:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Starrein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadows can be a problem, but the quality is good.--Famberhorst 15:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Untermixnitz 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Zoppo59 19:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Untermixnitz 9 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:26, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ich gehe davon aus, dass das wirklich so schief ist. Die Häuser scheinen darauf hinzudeuten. Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. And in german: Es ist üblich, nicht nur zu nominieren, sondern auch zu bewerten. Bewerte also bitte in etwa so viele Bilder wie du nominierst. Das ist auch im Sinne der Fairness so. Danke. --XRay 05:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unternalb Hohlweg 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Mold.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Mold Objekt19 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:51, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Mold Objekt16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Harmannsdorf 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. CRop at the left could be better and the lonely leaves at the right could be removed. (In german: Der Anschnitt an der linken Seite mit dem Tisch könnte besser sein und am rechten Rand stehen ein paar Blätter ganz allein, die entfernt werden könnten.) --XRay 05:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Kühnring 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support, OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Doppelt hält besser ;-)

Hallo Manfred war das Category:Fire stations in Sitzendorf an der Schmida bewusst oder hast da was ausprobieren wollen. lg K@rl (talk) 16:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Guten Morgen K@rl, das ist wieder so ein Schmarrn mit WikiDaheim. Ich habe 2 Fotos über WikiDaheim hochgeladen und da wurde die Kat automatisch gesetzt und damit alle einschlägigen Fotos auch beisammen bleiben, habe ich die Kat bei den anderen geändert. Langsam beginnt mir Wikipedia zu stinken, denn was da zusammengepfuscht wird, das stinkt zum Himmel. Mit diesem Chaos werden wir eher Leute zum Resignieren bringen als Neulinge dazugewinnen. Schönes WE und lG--M@nfred (talk) 05:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Bei dir hat sich das erste mangels konkreter Kategorien, korrekt in Sitzendorf an der Schmida eingeordnet, wo es aber ein unbekannter User:Лорд Бъмбъри ;-) in Feuerwehr (Sitzendorf an der Schmida) eingeordnet, die aber namentlich nicht ins System passt. Erst dann habe ich dann die beiden fire station und fire brigades aufgebaut habe. - aber das mit den neuen gebe ich dir voll recht. --K@rl (talk) 06:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Aber noch ein Bitte: machst du die anderen sechs Häuser in der Gemeinde auch ;-) --K@rl (talk) 06:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Natürlich habe ich die anderen 6 Häuser schon "im Kasten", werde aber wahrscheinlich erst morgen dazukommen, sie hochzuladen. LG--M@nfred (talk) 06:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Koordinatenanzeige Commonscat

Special:MyPage/common.js:

mw.loader.using( 'mediawiki.util' ).done(function(){

// geohack
if (mw.config.get('wgNamespaceNumber') === 14 || mw.config.get('wgNamespaceNumber') === 2 || mw.config.get('wgNamespaceNumber') === 0) { 
  var project = mw.config.get('wgDBname').replace('wiki','');
  jQuery(document).ready(function(){
    mw.util.addPortletLink('p-cactions', '//tools.wmflabs.org/osm4wiki/cgi-bin/wiki/wiki-osm.pl?project='+project+'&l=2&usecache=0&article=' + mw.config.get('wgPageName'), 'OSM (l=2, nocache)', 'OSM');
  });
  jQuery(document).ready(function(){
    mw.util.addPortletLink('p-cactions', '//tools.wmflabs.org/osm4wiki/cgi-bin/wiki/wiki-osm.pl?project='+project+'&l=2&usecache=1&article=' + mw.config.get('wgPageName'), 'OSM (l=2, cache)', 'OSM');
  });
  jQuery(document).ready(function(){
    mw.util.addPortletLink('p-cactions', '//tools.wmflabs.org/wp-world/googlmaps-proxy.php?page='+encodeURIComponent('http://tools.wmflabs.org/kmlexport/?project='+project+'&l=2&usecache=0&article=' + mw.config.get('wgPageName'))+'&output=classic', 'gMaps (l=2, nocache)', 'gMaps');
  });
  jQuery(document).ready(function(){
    mw.util.addPortletLink('p-cactions', '//tools.wmflabs.org/wp-world/googlmaps-proxy.php?page='+encodeURIComponent('http://tools.wmflabs.org/kmlexport/?project='+project+'&l=2&usecache=1&article=' + mw.config.get('wgPageName'))+'&output=classic', 'gMaps (l=2, cache)', 'gMaps');
  });
}

});

lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:12, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Da steh' ich nun, ich armer Tor - und bin so klug als wie zuvor

Guten Morgen Herzi Pinki,

die leichte Morgendämmerung von gestern ist noch tieferer Finsternis als vor unserem gestrigen Meeting gewichen.  traurig

1. Ich habe in meinen Einstellungen nun zwar Cat-a-lot aktiviert, aber das Kästchen in der rechten unteren Ecke wird nicht angezeigt.
2. Ich habe auf meine Seite Deine Vorlage kopiert, habe aber nicht die geringste Ahnung, wie und wo ich das jetzt nutzen kann (soll).

"Learning by doing" ist also offenbar voll in die Hose gegangen, weil Du Dich zwar mit dem "Learning" bemüht hast, mir aber keine Gelegenheit zum "doing" gegeben hast. Jedenfalls danke ich Dir sehr für Deine Bemühungen und den Zeitaufwand, aber ich bin offenbar für manche Dinge schlicht und einfach zu blöd. LG--M@nfred (talk) 05:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

1. versuche mal, den Browser-Cache zu leeren (Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot/de). Wie das geht ist browser-abhängig.
2. Du sollst nicht alles auf dich beziehen. Ich habe den falschen Code geliefert. Oben ausgebessert. Die Funktionen findest du (nur auf Kategorieseiten in Commons) unter dem Menüpunkt Mehr (rechts oben - hängt eventuell von deinem Skin ab, bei Vector ist das jedenfalls so).

lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Es wird schon wieder etwas heller:

1. Browser-Cache ist zwar geleert, aber das Kästchen in der rechten unteren Ecke wird noch immer nicht angezeigt.
2. Heureka, funktioniert perfekt! (Das ist schon einmal der Silberstreif am Horizont)

lG--M@nfred (talk) 06:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 08:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unternalb Hohlweg 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Mold Objekt19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Mold Objekt2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Mold Objekt8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the deep shadow on the door, but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Mold Objekt3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenwarter Kellergasse 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Kotzendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --M@nfred (talk) 07:39, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenwarter Kellergasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could there be a little tilt CW? For me all edges but one are leaning to the right side. --PtrQs 00:05, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Ich spreche kein Englisch, aber wenn ich das richtig verstehe wird hier ein nach rechts geneigtes Gebäude festgestellt und genau das ist in den alten Kellergassen oftmals der Fall (siehe Datei "Kellergasse Alberndorf Senkrecht ist nicht gleich senkrecht.jpg").--Manfred Kuzel 04:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Anlass meiner Überlegungen ist der Umstand, dass sich auf diesem Bild ALLE Gebäude bis auf eines nach rechts neigen. Wahrscheinlicher wäre, dass sich alle unterschiedlich oder zur Straße/Mitte hin neigen. Wenn Sie jedoch sicher sind, daß in dieser Kellergasse halt nun mal nur ein einziges senkrecht steht, wird dies auch so sein. --PtrQs 23:58, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Ich habe die Ausrichtung der Perspektive nach den beiden vordersten Gebäudekanten vorgenomen, weil damit die gegebene Neigung der Gebäude weniger augenfällig wird. Ich kann das aber auch ändern, was aber noch viel störender wirken wird. Faktum ist jedenfalls, daß bei diesen alten Kellergebäuden kaum irgendwo eine wirklich gerade bzw. lot- oder waagrechte Kante zu finden ist.--Manfred Kuzel 03:34, 1 June 2017 (UTC)  Support Good Quality --PtrQs 08:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Markl Windigsteig 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Goldgeben 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulgasse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulgasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:35, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Eggendorf 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Eggendorf 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Breezy and essential. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Eggendorf a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:31, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Kotzendorf 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 05:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Split Blick vom Hafen zur Stadt 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perspective issues, the image is leaning in. May be oversaturated. In german: Das Bild kippt nach innen. Bei einer derartigen Komposition würde ich auf senkrechte Linien achten. Die Farben wirken übersättigt, aber das mag auch natürlich sein. --XRay 09:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC) Perspektive korr., neue Version hochgeladen.--Manfred Kuzel 16:10, 27 May 2017 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. (In german: Danke! Es ist besser so. Die Geo-Koordinaten könntest du noch ergänzen.) --XRay 05:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Split Hafen Boller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks --Moroder 19:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Groß 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Was für Beschreibung? --A.Savin 14:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)  Done--Manfred Kuzel 07:29, 27 May 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 10:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 16:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:37, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Lehrn 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Kühnring 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Maiersch 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sehr schönes Motiv! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Eggendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Lehrn 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. Too bad the heavy shadows.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:03, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Lehrn 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you please satisfy the term 'Beschreibung/Declaration', - maybe something like 'Kellergasse in Unter-/Obergumpoldskirchn'? --PtrQs 10:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC) Was soll ich anderes schreiben als "Objekt in der Kellergasse in der Lehrn (Lehrngasse) in Hausleiten"? --Manfred Kuzel 12:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)  Support Genau das in Kurzform! Ich meine die Kurz-Beschreibung hier in der Nominierung, nicht die Beschreibung in der Bild-Datei. Ich hab's mal oben ergänzt --PtrQs 10:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unternalb Retzerstraße 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Uoaei1 08:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unternalb Retzerstraße 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unternalb Retzerstraße 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support, OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unternalb Hohlweg 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 11:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unternalb Hohlweg 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 11:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the most exciting of subjects but the quality is good. QI. --W.carter 10:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unternalb Hohlweg 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unternalb Hohlweg 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:56, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just over the line for QI. Good quality. --W.carter 10:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some softness at he edges, but main object sharp. Good quality. --W.carter 10:36, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:36, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Eggendorf 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Eggendorf 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Eggendorf 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 04:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Altenmarkt 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zlarin Kirche - Rosette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bitte schneide das Foto auf die linke Seite, damit das Objekt im Bild zentriert wird. --W.carter 09:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC) O.K., Motiv zentriert und neue Version hochgeladen.--Manfred Kuzel 14:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC) Danke sehr. Good quality. --W.carter 18:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zlarin Kirchenportal - Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bitte schneide das Foto auf die rechte Seite, damit das Objekt im Bild zentriert wird. --W.carter 09:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC) O.K., Motiv zentriert und neue Version hochgeladen.--Manfred Kuzel 14:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC) Danke sehr. Good quality. --W.carter 18:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick auf Zlarin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Die Wasserlinie ist nicht horizontal, die Bäume haben zu dunkle Schatten und es gibt zu viel uninteressantes Wasser und Himmel, das Foto muss geschnitten werden. Glaubst du, du könntest das beheben? --W.carter 09:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC) O.K., Mängel behoben und neue Version hochgeladen.--Manfred Kuzel 14:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC) Viel besser. Good quality. --W.carter 18:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zlarin Kirche - Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Es ist zu dunkel, könntest du es bitte ein bisschen heller machen? --W.carter 10:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Genügt das so? Neue Version hochgeladen.--Manfred Kuzel 11:41, 14 May 2017 (UTC) Danke. Good quality. --W.carter 21:37, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterretzbach Kellergasse Kaffeegasse 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Es braucht eine perspektivische Korrektur, bitte schau auf die kleine graue Luke. --W.carter 10:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Perspektive geändert, neue Version hochgeladen.--Manfred Kuzel 11:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC) Danke. Good quality. --W.carter 21:40, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:22, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf 2 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:56, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:57, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Eggendorf 20 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 04:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falkenstein Kellergasse Bank Presshaustür.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartberg Kellergasse Kirchenberg 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Da sind zwei Flecken im Himmel (wohl Vögel oder Insekten), könntest Du diese entfernen? --Basotxerri 17:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC) Done Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit! Es waren tatsächlich wohl Vögel und ich habe sogar noch einen dritten entdeckt und "abgeschossen".LG--Manfred Kuzel 15:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC) Danke! OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartberg Kellergasse Hintaus 7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Es braucht Perspektive Korrektur. Die senkrechten Linien auf der rechten Seite sind fast gut, aber die Mitte und die Linken lehnen sich. Kannst du das bitte beheben? --W.carter 21:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC) Done Danke für den Hinweis, neue Version hochgeladen.--Manfred Kuzel 11:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 08:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Altenmarkt 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Einige der Steine und ein bisschen von dem Gras sind überbelichtet, könnten Sie bitte beheben? --W.carter 08:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC) Done Besser so?--Manfred Kuzel 11:05, 20 May 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 08:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Altenmarkt a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Die Schatten sind zu dunkel und zerstören die Komposition, könntest du sie bitte ein wenig erhellen? --W.carter 08:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC) Done Besser so?--Manfred Kuzel 11:05, 20 May 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 08:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unternalb Retzerstraße 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Die untere Hälfte ist zu dunkel, kannst du es bitte ein wenig erhellen, ohne den Himmel zu erhellen? --W.carter 08:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC)  Comment Neue Version hochgeladen. Besser so?--Manfred Kuzel 05:55, 20 May 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 08:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 06:03, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning Kellergasse Krotenberg 20 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fair and pretty. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Split Hafen MS Antonela Detail 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice motive, well implemented. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zlarin Stamm einer Tamariske.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zlarin Stamm einer Tamariske 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zlarin - Tamariske.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Split Gedenktafel Sigmund Freud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:55, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartberg Kellergasse Kirchenberg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartberg Kellergasse Kirchenberg 11 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartberg Kellergasse Kirchenberg 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartberg Kellergasse Hintaus 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartberg Kellergasse Hintaus 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Altenmarkt 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 08:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Altenmarkt 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 08:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Altenmarkt 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. Btw, when will you start reviewing the work of other contributors here, Manfred? --Poco a poco 08:21, 13 May 2017 (UTC) Was heißt das, Poco a poco? Ich kann nicht Englisch.--Manfred Kuzel 11:20, 14 May 2017 (UTC) Sie können "Good quality" schreiben für Fotos mit guten Qualität. Es ist nicht zu schwer. -- Ikan Kekek 01:14, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Altenmarkt 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 08:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Altenmarkt 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 08:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:20, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf 1 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf 10 Detail a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf 13 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf 15 Detail a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartberg Kellergasse Kirchenberg b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In this case I think it's correct to use a high f-value. Quality is for me high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:14, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 07:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:34, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straning hl Florian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:38, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. M@nfred (talk) 05:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)