Jaligniacus

Thank you for nice word :) and for you too all the best in new year

--Steifer 19:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I think,later, but I make and another heraldry-graphic (drown, helmet etc) and write to polish wiki too. Sorry for my english, polish and german I speak better :)

--Steifer 01:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Medaglia commemorativa operazioni di pace.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Medaglia commemorativa operazioni di pace.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 12:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

File tagging File:Operation_licorne_insigne.gif

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Operation_licorne_insigne.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Operation_licorne_insigne.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

ChristianBier (talk) 05:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Blason Mgr Luc Ravel.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:59, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Jaligniacus!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Balzac d'entraigues.gif was uncategorized on 11 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Remplacement de fichiers

Si les fichiers en double ne peut pas être supprimé, ne devrions-nous simplement rediriger vers la catégorie? Je comprends que vous n'aimez pas le fait que j'ai enlevé votre version des armoires cisterciens. D'autre part, avoir plusieurs versions de la même perdrait beaucoup d'espace.

Je propose de faire une version pour les dessins des projet blasons, il existe déjà une version française du modèle de cardinal. Adelbrecht (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Ce n'est pas une question d'aimer ou de ne pas aimer. Nombre d'utilisateurs se servent de cette page et n'utilisent pas vos modèles, même si, pour ma part, je les trouve en général assez jolis. De plus, il n'est pas question d'espace sur wikipedia, on a toute la place nécessaire.

Donc, créez vos modèles et ajoutez-les si vous voulez, mais laissez ceux des autres en place.

PS. Votre dessin pour l'Institut du Christ-Roi n'est pas exact. Je suis bien placé pour le savoir car j'ai été consulté en 1992 lors de la création de ce blason.

Mangouste35 (talk) 12:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Vous avez été consulté? Si c'est vrai, merveilleux! Je suppose que je sais que mon erreur. C'est semé de fleur de lys florencé, probablement. J'ai vu les deux versions étant utilisé par l'institut, il était donc un peu difficile de savoir lequel est le bon design.

Je me suis basée sur cette conception, mais alors celui-ci est la bonne version.

Merci beaucoup pour les conseils. Adelbrecht (talk) 15:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Vous avez raison, plusieurs versions ont eu (ou ont eu) cours. À l'origine, c'était le semé de fleurs-de-lis fleuries florentines. On ne sait pas trop ce qu'il en est aujourd'hui... Mangouste35 (talk) 16:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

(Permanent) Deacon coat of arms

Coat of Arms of a permament deacon

I have stumbled upon this picture. Is this a different coat of arms for permament deacons, or is this a mistake? Adelbrecht (talk) 17:12, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Nothing was defined for deacons' coat of arms. It's only a suggestion by any specialists of heraldry. But it's clearly in the mind of the traditionnal ecclesiastical galero. So it seems so much better than a birretta which is only a choral dress.

Above all, on the picture you show, I don't understand the meaning of the priestly stole...Mangouste35 (talk) 14:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Ah, there was nothing defined. The biretta is not only the choral dress of priests, but also for daily wear, although it's mostly worn by traditionalist priests nowadays.. For permanent deacons, I guess it's the same in dioceses were they aren't forbidden to wear cassocks or collars.

Yes, the priestly stole is very strange too. A deacons stole in the Roman rite goes across the chest, not over both shoulders. This design of the coat of arms seems more likely, and it is sourced.

Yet, the artist of the first strange coat of arms seems to have drawn quite a lot of ecclesiastical heraldry, which do not seem to break any rules. Adelbrecht (talk) 09:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

There was nothing defined because permanent deacons were not existing before 1972. And permanent deacons, according to the canon 288 of 1983's code of canon law, are not concerner by can. 284 about clerical dressing. So I can't easily imagine a deacon with a biretta out of litugical worships. Even for priests, biretta was usually weared outside only on their own parish'es territory.

Never a biretta was seen as an external ornament a coat-of-arms, except maybe a doctoral biretta for any lawyers. Same for the stole or a chalice... However, they can appear on the shield.

So, according to me, it's in the mind of ecclesiastical heraldry to have a galero upon the scude like other physical persons, and to make a difference with a "simple" priest, this hat might be without tassels. Mangouste35 (talk) 11:13, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

RE: De gustibus et coloribus...

J'ai changé la couleur des lignes (ils étaient noirs ), et pas la coloration normale. Ces erreurs sont probablement faites par PioM. Les petites vignettes rendre la couleur plus foncée (causés par les lignes noires), mais il est plus une illusion. Voyez en élargissant le fichier, par exemple. Si vous pouvez spécifier une teinte, je peux le changer. Adelbrecht (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Le problème se posera à nouveau lorsque de plus grandes formes des armoires sont montrés. Je vais rendre la couleur plus foncée, mais une teinte spécifique serait utile. Adelbrecht (talk) 18:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:JeanXXIII fanon.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JeanXXIII fanon.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JeanXXIII fanon.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:NATO Kosovo non-article 5.gif

File:NATO Kosovo non-article 5.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Flor!an (talk) 08:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:NATO Kosovo.gif

File:NATO Kosovo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Flor!an (talk) 09:29, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

un gif d'aumonier militaire protestant ?

Cher Mangouste35 (si vous me permettez le terme) Bonjour,<bɾ>Je constate que vous mäîtrisez bien, bien mieux que moi la création d'images, merci pour celles que vous avez réalisé (comme celles des foureaux d'épaule)ǃ Pourriez-vous ajouter le badge pour la version protestante qui manque, je ne sais pas à qui mais bon ? <bɾ>Bien cordialement Garitan (talk) 09:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Bron blason.gif

File:Bron blason.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.238.80.85 16:10, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Bron blason.jpg

File:Bron blason.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.238.80.85 16:11, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Metalindustrien (talk) 10:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Grenade bois de cerf.gif

File:Grenade bois de cerf.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Loick7695 (talk) 13:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Benoit xvi octobre 2008.jpg

File:Benoit xvi octobre 2008.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Uploader is not the photographer; see ticket:2022051210004593 and http://u.afp.com/w2d9 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ankry (talk) 21:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)