User talk:MathKnight/Archive 1

Welcome to the Commons, MathKnight/Archive 1!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Jkelly 23:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Watermarking

Hi. Thank you for your contributions, but watermarked images are strongly discouraged. All images uploaded need to be under a free license, which allows for modification, rendering the goal of watermarking pointless. If you do not want to release your images under such a license, please don't upload them here. Thanks for understanding. Jkelly 23:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

The image with the watermarking was taken by my friend, which allowed to release it under GFDL. The orginal picture he gave included the watermarking and I just didn't removed it. MathKnight 16:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

New Signature

MathKnight 19:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:PragueCathedral02.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:PragueCathedral02.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yuval Y • Chat • 02:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I created this image, for some reason it didn't uploaded the license, i'll add it now. MathKnight 14:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, but pay attention - I am an administrator here, and I use to write hebrew since some of the hebrew speaking users just don't know english very well, and writing in hebrew is easyer for me too. Yuval Y • Chat • 19:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Figures from Cathedral of Chartres.jpg

אל תשתמש ב-{{PD}} אלא ברישיון מדוייק יותר. תודה.

Yuval Y • Chat • 02:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Grader01.jpg

טיפלתי במופעים של התמונה בוויקיפדיה, ומחקתי את התמונה לפי בקשתך. בפעם הבאה, פשוט תשתמש ב-{{bad name|Correct name}}.

Yuval Y • Chat • 02:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

OK. MathKnight 14:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ihud-Mafdal shelet02.jpg

היי, מחקתי את התמונה הזו שלך מכיוון שהמקור של הסריקה מוגן בזכויות יוצרים. Yonatan ^talk 09:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Coastal Road Massacre

Hello. We would like to publish this image of "The charred remains of an Israeli bus, attacked by Palestinian terrorists in 1978 Coastal Road Massacre" in a Sociology textbook. Would you please contact me at jillenge@yahoo.com for details? I would like to obtain your permission to publish this photo. Thank you. -Jill

You have my premission to publish the photo with proper attribution. More details on the e-mail I sent you. MathKnight 19:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Cathedral of Toledo's Commons entry

you put a language link in this article's common's entry. but you linked the actual article. Articles have language links to other articles (only). Categories have language links to other categories (only). Projects have language links to other projects (only). and Commons have language links to other commons (only). articles dont link to projects, nor categories to commons. what you did is link a common to an article. the "Cathedral of Toledo" article itself already has a language link to hebrew. in fact, the article has language links to about 6 other languages, and none of these show up on Commons' entry. you should remove that language link, or i'll do it later on, soon as i figure out how Common's works. i'm the user Ivansevil in regular Wikipedia if you want to reply, or i'll just come back to see what you think. 65.16.160.82 17:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't see a problem linking category on Commons to an article in Wikipedia (naturally, I would link to the Hebrew one since I am an Israeli). In WikiCommons there is a mixture between "articles" and categories as they serve the same purposes and both require links to articles in the Wikipedias. MathKnight 20:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Gothic-Cologne-cathedral002.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gothic-Cologne-cathedral002.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. It was ommited by accident. It is GFDL, of course, as all the pictures are in WikiCommons. MathKnight 19:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Barracuda laban.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Barracuda laban.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 78.48.241.117 12:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Source was given, it was taken by en:User:Laban712 from the English Wikipedia, and was deleted there after being uploaded to WikiCommons. MathKnight 17:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

כינוי בתבניות התמונות

הי מת', מה שלומך בוויקישיתוף? במקרה שמתי לב לזה ולא יכולתי שלא להעיר. הביטוי "יהודי ישראלי גותי" וההקשר הסתמי שבו הוא מופיע בשם היוצר של תבניות התמונות לא מחמיא לא לעם ישראל, לא עם היהודי ולא לעם הגותי. בוויקיפדיה העברית למדנו להכיר אותך כחובב גותיקה מושבע הידוע כ"אביר הגותי" אבל אני חושב שגוי כלשהו שייתקל בכיתוב הזה לא ממש יידע מה לחשוב לעצמו. בברכה, ידידך מוויקיפדיה העברית, Sambach 21:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, I will change that. MathKnight Gothic Israeli Jew 19:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

מחיקת תמונה

מת'נייט שלום, מחקתי את התמונה שלך של הר אביטל בשלג בפברואר האחרון (2008) כי בתמונה זו מצוי מתקן צהל"י וכידוע לך, פרסום מתקנים צה"ליים באינטרנט מהווה סיכון בטחוני. מחקתי את התמונה הזו מעוד סיבה, כי ההר שמצוי בתמונה הוא הר אביטל ולא הר בנטל . שלך, און. 18:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I almost sure this is Bental mountain and the outpost taken is an "an-open-for-tourist" outpost of mount Bental. Anyway, the picture still exists on the server (Image:SnowGolan (6).JPG) so I replaced it with an image in which the outpost is deleted. MathKnight 19:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:SnowGolan (6).JPG

תהיתי למה רצית למחוק את התמונה, אבל לאחר שקראתי את הדף שלך הבנתי שכעת העלמת את המתקן ומחקתי את התמונה המקורית

Yuval Y § Chat § 21:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

תודה. MathKnight 11:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

The Purple Star

		The Purple Star
		For enriching the commons with over 500 images! Gridge 18:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC).

Thank you! :-) MathKnight 09:29, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome, and keep up the good work. Gridge 11:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CAT-D10N-pic001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Ianare 04:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D9R-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good details, interesting object --Mbdortmund 17:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:NotreDame-Laon-north001.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Triceratops_and_Oxalis_(1).JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Triceratops_and_Oxalis_(1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 22:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Triceratops-and-Oxalis_(1a).jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Triceratops-and-Oxalis_(1a).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 22:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

the rest of the story

I wrote at english wikipedia a few months back that I was having a difficult time (possibly due to age and to cultural images) imagining a gothic jew. To be honest, within a few hours of authoring that (which if I remember correctly was on one of the first truly warm days here this season) I actually had an idea of what this might look like -- an image pulled from the cultural soup which the future has become. The Satanic priest in my favorite episode of Metalocalypse, Dethreligon where Murderface spends the eleven non-musical minutes of that particular animated episode "trying on" different religions. This analysis of modern practice of religion is right up there with the Lucy Daughter of the Devil episode (also eleven well spent minutes) in which Jesus and the Devil compare Burning Man with the temptations that the devil has access to.

If you get a chance to see these episodes; both of these episodes stand out from their different seasons to me as being among the best of the lot of them and I think that if viewed individually (if that is the option or choice) that there is not much that needs to be explained about the characters and the situations other than a modern rendering of a Jesus story (pronounced in that series "DJ Hey Zeus") and the life and lifestyle of a metal band.

When I was a child, the FCC had rules against making toys out of television characters. I confess that now, I would love to have a action figure collection including the five-seater motorcycle that they drew for Dethklok. <rant>Jesus also has some toys -- I am so not interested in those; I could write perhaps a masters thesis on how not interested I am in the Lucy Daughter of the Devil toys and the wrongness of using profiles to "market" technology when a simple "yes" or "no" would be more specific to the person being targeted.</rant> -- carol (talk) 21:14, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I don't know the TV show you are talking about, so it doesn't say a lot me. My Gothicness has nothing to do with Satanism or Paganism, but with art (Gothic architecture, Gothic ficition, God, Angels and Death etc) and philosophy. My look is pretty ordinary since I don't have the time or the will to invest in "Vampiric" fashion. By manifesting Gothic with art and philosopy I am Gothic, and yet a "Masorti" Jew. Thanks of the interest, MathKnight 18:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Chartres

Hi MathKnight, I have made a suggestion at the talk page to move this gallery page to Chartres Cathedral as the associated category moved as well (which was, however, not my doing). I would appreciate your opinion and will not do anything without consensus. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Crazyhouse-chess01.png

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Crazyhouse-chess01.png has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Yuval Y § Chat § 21:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

כיוון שחשפת שהתמונה במקורה היא צילום מסך של מערכת ההפעלה חלונות, הרי שהיא מוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ולא תוכל להתייחס אליה כאל צילום מסך של תוכנה חופשית. לפיכך, אין מקומה של התמונה בוויקישיתוף, וגם אם תעלה אותה בוויקיפדיה, הרי שתצטרך להתיחס לכך שזהו צילום מסך כאמור.

Yuval Y § Chat § 21:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

The picture was created by me based on the free Chess template in Wikipedia. It has no trace for Windows components what-so-ever. Of course, it was edited via a graphic software, but I am sure they have no rights on my works that I do using the software. I think it is free enough and I don't have to draw it by hand pixel after pixel in order to make it free. MathKnight 20:57, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

יובל דיבר על הגרסה שנמחקה לפני שהעלת את התמונה התקינה, שים לב לתאריך בחתימה שלו וליומן המחיקות של הקובץ. Hidro (talk) 01:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

לא שמתי לב לתאריך, טעות שלי. תודה על ההבהרה MathKnight 17:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yaen002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Distracting dark part at lower left. - Till.niermann 05:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC) I cropped the image. Please reconsider. MathKnight 17:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC) I think now it's OK, although the image would be better without the shadow at the lower left. But - you can't pin down the critters... - Till.niermann 18:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

D9

20070430-Garten-hornisse2.jpg

Enough information added?
--D-Kuru (talk) 22:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes. MathKnight 17:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Vitus Cathedral, Prague (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I would limit the scope to "(exterior)" in order to leave room for an "(interior)" scope, like for other cathedrals. I think the picture is ok, and more illustrative than this other view or than any available front view of the facade. --Eusebius (talk) 12:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Looks ok to me. --Eusebius (talk) 17:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 21:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Sidney

Please have a look at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:SaintMarys CathedralSydney.jpg. I do not understand what is going on with that beautiful cathedral view. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:SaintMarys CathedralSydney.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:SaintMarys CathedralSydney.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 22:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

• Some editor on the english wiki has complained about part of this photo being fake and that it should not be used. I have to admit that the left hand side of the pano has been copied and pasted from the right hand side. If you think it is appropriate I will crop off the fake additions from the original image and re upload over the top off this one. If you don't want me to crop would it still be advisable to use the image in the other foreign wikis. How many foreign wikis have you inserted this photo in. Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 02:47, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caterpillar D10.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment As you mention Israel in the description, geocoding should be complete. Lycaon (talk) 22:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

  I added, though it is of little importance. MathKnight 15:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. All fine for me now. Lycaon (talk) 17:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 17:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

latuff categories

Hi MathKnight,
Of course no doubt some (maybe most) latuff images belong to categories Antisemitism, Racism, and Fascism. The question is, if they should be added to the gallery. I do not think so and I'd like to explain you why:
Although most Commons readers are enough educated and are enough intelligent to take latuff images for what they really are - hate, blunt, one sided propaganda, there are still some readers, who do not know history, and believe latuff images to be educational, peaceful and so on. That's why the less people to see the images the less harm they do. I hope you'd agree that the less categories the gallery has, the less people will see hateful propaganda. Isn't this what we really want now? That's why I stopped arguing about keeping my images, that I created to fight latuff caricatures. The thing is that my images were linked to latuff gallery and I suddenly realized that it is not what I want to do.Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 20:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi MathKnight. For the same reasons as outlined here, I would ask that you consider removing the image from your signature. Regards. Adambro (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

OK. MathKnight 18:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Adambro (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

File:D9 and nagmachon01.jpg

File:D9 and nagmachon01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Liftarn (talk) 22:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Armored-excavator01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Armored-excavator01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Yuval Y § Chat § 22:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I sent the following premisssion to OTRS: Premission for File:Armored-excavator01.jpg from GrimReaper, received by Fresh private message, for request to release the image under GFDL:

אין בעיה, כל עוד יש קרדיט. אם אתה רוצה תמונה באיכות גדולה יותר ואז קרופ של הבאגר זה גם אפשרי.

Translation from Hebrew: "No problem. As long there is credit. If you want a bigger quality and then a crop of the bagger it is also possible".

MathKnight 13:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Chartres cathedral

Hi there. I'll be in Chartres tomorrow and I'll have the occasion to take pictures of the cathedral (it was kind of unplanned...). Do you have something in particular you want me to shoot, if I can? Replies not fast enough will not be taken into account ;-) --Eusebius (talk) 17:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I would like you to take a picture of the three rose windows (west, south and north) from the inside, an overview of the cathedral, north facade, west facade, flying buttresses of the nave, flying butresses of the choir and apse, pictures of the interior - nave, choir, crossing and stained glass windows. And again, thank you very much! MathKnight 19:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't promise anything, should be snowing tomorrow! --Eusebius (talk) 22:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, :-( . In our place there is barely rain this year and the last two months were mainly sunny. Weather has gone insane this year. MathKnight 18:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Bad weather, no much light, very dark cathedral, in restoration: scaffoldings everywhere, one rose window hidden. I'm afraid I don't have anything good. I was not able to access the triforium, the roofs nor the towers. I have picture of some windows (not all of them, but some), the flying buttresses I could see from the ground. No general view of the nave (scaffoldings in the choir :-(), no good shot of the facade (no good angle). I'll put my uploads here, you may want to put the page on your watchlist. It usually takes me some time to process a shooting session, so be patient! I haven't had a look at the existing pictures about the cathedral, but I'm pretty sure mine will not be better. --Eusebius (talk) 18:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank for the effort and for updating me that this beautiful cathedral is with scaffolds. I'll keep an eye on the page you gave me. Thank you. MathKnight 18:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

File:SecondIntifada001.jpg

File:SecondIntifada001.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

-Hidro (talk) 21:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not recreate deleted content

 

---

Your image or other content, Image:SecondIntifada001.jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

Yuval Y § Chat § 22:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

I didn't recreate it after it was deleted today. I created it long time ago with all images taken from WikiCommons, I didn't know Arafat's pic was copyvio. MathKnight 16:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

File:ANDROS-sap1.jpg

What's going on with the colours in this photograph? Adambro (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I did auto-levels with Photoshop due to bed lighting, so they might be some misplaced shadows and bright parts. MathKnight 18:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

There's clearly more than that, look at the picture at full size. Looks like auto-levels have been applied selectively, only on shadows and bright parts. The limit between the corrected and the non-corrected areas makes ugly things. --Eusebius (talk) 18:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm no expert on editing images but perhaps if you have the original and uploaded that someone might be able to improve things. Adambro (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't have the orginal :-( MathKnight 19:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RaphanusRaphanistrum001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a deeper plane of focus might have been nicer, the detail on the petals is beautiful in this image though. -- carol 21:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chotmit003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Have you done a clone work on the image? The tree branch on the left hand side seems to be hanging in the sky.Thank you--Mbz1 00:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC) * I did not retouched the image. I put it as it is. --MathKnight 10:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC) really good details on the main object, the background is not perfect, did you try a tighter crop? --Mbdortmund 10:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC) * Support A nice one.--Mbz1 12:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alcea setosa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 21:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 08:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)