Last modified on 7 April 2015, at 19:12

User talk:Mhmrodrigues


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mhmrodrigues!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 20:23, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


Ediciones incorrectas y masivas relativas al Casal d'Aragó / Casa de AragónEdit

Hola Mhmrodrigues. He tenido que arreglar los errores que cometiste eliminando Casal d'Aragó de todos los artículos y sustituyéndolo por una categoría llamada Casa de Barcelona. Como las fuentes secundarias fiables es lo que tenemos que seguir, te pongo la cita:

"La documentación medieval de cualquier procedencia habla tan sólo de la Casa de Aragón" [...]

Alberto Montaner Frutos, El señal del rey de Aragón: Historia y significado, Zaragoza, Institución «Fernando el Católico», 1995, pp. 27-28.

Esta obra, además, se puede consultar en línea, con lo que no tendrás ningún problema para comprobar la veracidad de la información:

Así pues, queda claro que House of Barcelona / Casa de Barcelona / Casal de Barcelona es una denominación impropia para referirse a la Casa Real de Aragón. En todo caso, Casa de Barcelona es admisible para denominar a la dinastía condal, pero no a la real, puesto que no hay ningún documento medieval, de cualquier lugar, que la utilice. Es ahistórica, siendo Casal d'Aragó (en catalán), y Casa de Aragón en castellano, la única denominación existente, ya sea en documentación catalana o de cualquier otro tipo, hasta que modernamente se produjo esa denominación, poco rigurosa. De hecho, quien creó la categoría trabajó en la wikipedia en catalán sobre ese tema y llegó a la misma conclusión: que la única denominación histórica era Casal d'Aragó (en catalán), para el linaje de los Aragón, que comienza con Ramiro I y se extiende hasta Fernando II, el Católico. Por ello, no vuelvas a eliminar la denominación correcta de los artículos con la categoría Casal d'Aragó, ni te inventes denominaciones inexistentes como House of Barcelona in Catalonia (¿?) u otras similares. Todo tiene que hacerse con conocimiento de las fuentes fiables expertas en la materia. Me ha costado mucho tiempo arreglar lo que estropeaste, por lo que si quieres poner cambios discutibles, te ruego que lo consultes antes. Gracias por tu comprensión. Escarlati (talk) 00:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

No hace falta que te disculpes, al contrario, gracias a tí por tu trabajo, amabilidad y comprensión. Lo que ocurre es que todos los reyes de Aragón desde Alfonso II son Rey de Aragón y Conde de Barcelona. Pero el título real siempre precede al condal, por lo que la denominación correcta (e histórica, como muestra la fuente fiable que te mostré), es Casa de Aragón. Ramón Berenguer IV de Barcelona, contrae matrimonio con la reina Petronila I de Aragón, pero era ella quien transmitía la Casa Real, pues la barcelonesa era condal. Si bien es cierto que Ramiro I pertenece a la línea de la dinastía Jimena de Navarra, con el se considera inaugurada la Casa Real de Aragón, como puedes comprobar en trabajo experto en genealogía. Más información sobre la Casa puedes ver aquí.
Se puede dejar Dinastía Jiménez, en Ramiro I de Aragón, pero el último miembro de la Casa Real de Aragón es, al menos, Fernando II de Aragón, llamado el Católico, quien casa con Isabel de Castilla, los reyes Católicos; aunque el linaje familiar continúa en nobles de esta dinastía hasta al menos el siglo XVIII. Y es que, como dice el miembro de la Real Academia Española de la Historia José Ángel Sesma Muñoz:

El breve reinado de Fernando I no supuso de ninguna manera una nueva etapa para la Corona, ni siquiera se puede hablar de un cambio de dinastía. La Casa Real de Aragón seguirá en el trono, al menos durante el siglo XV.

J. A. Sesma Muñoz, El Interregno (1410-1412), 2011, pág. 224.
Estoy de acuerdo la Casa de Aragón enlaza con tres dinastías: Jiménez, Barcelona y Trastámara; de hecho, una opción sería llamarlas Casa de Aragón (dinastía Jiménez), Casa de Aragón (dinastía Barcelona) y Casa de Aragón (dinastía Trastámara), pero el problema es que serían nombres inventados por nosotros y en wikimedia no se puede hacer investigación original. Ahora estoy trabajando en mejorar lo que puedo en esa categoría.
Muchos saludos y encantado de conocerle. Escarlati (talk) 16:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mariano IVdiArborea.jpgEdit

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mariano IVdiArborea.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 08:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Categoria incorrecta em File:José Malhoa 1.jpgEdit

Olá, Mhmrodrigues.

Não entendo a reversão que fez à minha correcção da categoria em File:José Malhoa 1.jpg. Inúmeras fontes secundárias identificam esta obra de José Malhoa enquanto um retrato da Rainha D. Leonor (1458-1525), esposa de D. João II; para invocar algumas, cito o website do próprio Museu José Malhoa ("Em 1926, correspondendo a sugestão de Montês, Malhoa oferece “Ao Povo das Caldas” o óleo “Rainha D. Leonor”, obra que estará na génese da instituição."), e no MatrizNet (catálogo colectivo on-line dos Museus tutelados pelo Ministério da Cultura, através do Instituto dos Museus e da Conservação) existem pelo menos dois estudos de José Malhoa para o mesmo quadro (aqui e aqui), onde igualmente consta identificada como a Rainha D. Leonor.

Por último, e atendendo agora somente às características formais do quadro, note-se que o escudo de Portugal que aparece acima da rainha corresponde ao da Casa Real de Avis -- o escudo de armas real de Portugal, com as pontas da cruz de Avis (verdes) intercaladas aos castelos na bordadura -- e não ao vigente no tempo de Leonor Teles de Menezes. RickMorais (talk) 01:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Ora essa, obrigado eu! Saudações. RickMorais (talk) 23:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

RE:Mais ficheiros na Categoria: The Portuguese Genealogy (Genealogia dos Reis de Portugal) (1530-1534) - BL Add MS 12531Edit

Viva!

Antes de mais, peço imensa desculpa por tardar tanto em responder; ultimamente não tenho tido o tempo que gostaria para estar activo aqui no Commons. Ainda falta, de facto, fazer o upload das iluminuras de várias personalidades nessa genealogia, e eu ficaria contente se também realizasse tarefa, porquanto só a poderei levar a cabo quando me encontrar um pouco mais folgado no que toca a tempo.

Não sei se percebi a questão que me colocou: como transferir as imagens do visualizador online da British Library, é isso? Eu tenho feito zoom máximo nas imagens e tirado várias screencaptures que depois monto numa única imagem de grandes dimensões com o MS Paint. Não sei se haverá uma maneira mais fácil de fazê-lo, simultaneamente mantendo a alta resolução das imagens.

Saudações, RickMorais (talk) 22:29, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ponç III d'Empúries.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ponç III d'Empúries.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 01:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Photos of 3D objects are copyrighted. See Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet. --Martin H. (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Coin Ponç Hug IV.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Coin Ponç Hug IV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

HiEdit

Hi. Please stop adding Bagrationi dynasty category because they are already there with their respective subcategories. Thanks. Jaqeli 22:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

WelfenEdit

Sämtliche Artikel über Mitglieder der Welfenfamilie waren bereits durch vorhandene Unterkategorien in Category:House of Welf eingeordnet. Das ganze Kategoriensystem war durchdacht und es hat eine Menge Arbeit gemacht, Ordnung in die Welfenartikel zu bekommen. Siehe hierzu bitte auch Category_talk:House_of_Welf. Mache deine Änderungen bitte alle wieder rückgängig, ich habe wenig Lust über 100 Artikel von Hand zu revertieren. Bitte in Zukunft erst einmal die vorhanden Kategorien anschauen, bevor du solch umfangreichen Änderungen vornimmst. Ggfs. so etwas auf der Disk ansprechen. Tönjes (talk) 10:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

??? Tönjes (talk) 13:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:House_of_DejanovićEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:House_of_Dejanović has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Zoupan (talk) 10:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

ucivo.wz.cz/panovnici2.htmlEdit

Hi, i cant find any <1923 publication. The images are very similar, it looks like the same artist created them the same time. Including the drawings of Havel. This means the date of creation is >1990. What evidence do you have for publication <1923? --Martin H. (talk) 23:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

..or, considering your last edit [1], what evidence do we have that the creator died >70 years ago? Most likely, as argued above, the work is from the 1990s and artist who created the drawing is still alive. --Martin H. (talk) 23:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Art from artanas.netEdit

Hi again, you uploaded files like File:Vasilii II.jpg. You argue, that the creator of that work died more then 70 years ago and that therefore the file is in the public domain. Thats untrue, the artist (http://artanas.net/PROFILE.HTM) is alive, the work is in copyright. Do you have other uploads from this artist? You should nominate such file for deletion using {{copyvio}}. --Martin H. (talk) 23:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Recent artistic portraits of historic people by Irena BierwiaczonekEdit

And again, you did upload very recently created portraits by polish painter Irena Bierwiaczonek-Polak such as File:Przemko II of Glogow.jpg. Bierwiaczonek died in 2009, so the date at mentioned upload is wrong obviously. However, the file is not public domain because contrary to your statement the artist is not dead for 70 years. The work is in copyright untill January 1 2080, untill this date the upload here is a {{copyvio}}. --Martin H. (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


One file from that set is File:Rudolph of Zagan.jpg. You did upload another set with files such as File:RudolfZagan.jpg. We see that the file is from the same artist. The artist is not "unknown" as you claim, the artist is not dead for >70 years as you claim but is known and died 2009. The upload is a clear copyright infringement.
Oh man, there is a lot of work to do here! You uploaded a lot of very recent artworks that you falsely labled as old public domain works. There also is a lot photos of 3D objects - statues, coins, seals - in violation of the photographers copyright. --Martin H. (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Also

This file are credited to Bierwiaczonek at your own source (!!) - the artist is not unknown as you claim and thats not old paintings as you think. There is no way keeping this file without the copyright holders written permission for publication under a free license. See Commons:Licensing and Commons:Project scope#Must be freely licensed or public domain. --Martin H. (talk) 23:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Boleslaus II.jpgEdit

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Boleslaus II.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:House_of_ArianitiEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:House_of_Arianiti has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Zoupan (talk) 21:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:House_of_TopiaEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:House_of_Topia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Zoupan (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Princes_of_KastriotiEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Princes_of_Kastrioti has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Zoupan (talk) 09:32, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Deleted contentEdit

Afrikaans | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | +/−


Hello Mhmrodrigues,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Maria Theresa I of Austria.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Return to the user page of "Mhmrodrigues".