User talk:MilHistExp/Archive 1

Please use edit summaries

You are doing some good category work. But you do not use the edit summary feature. That makes it impossible to see what you did without clicking on the edit diff. Short summaries like "changes cat", "sorting key" or just "key" are enough and better then nothing. Read: Help:Edit summary Thanks! --GPSLeo (talk) 17:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Tank you for this advice. I will take care in future category work. regards --MilHistExp (talk) 17:46, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

how to mark wrong categories for deletion

You removed the content of some categories and wrote "is wrong and might be deleted". There is a better and faster way to mark them for deletion. That is described at COM:CSD. Just add {{SD|G1}} for "accidental creation" as reason, {{SD|C2}} for "Improperly named category" or {{SD|C3}} for "Unuseful empty category". Thanks! --GPSLeo (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings

---

Hello. This is a reminder for you that it is important to address the identified issues instead of simply removing legitimate warnings and notices from your talk page. Removing messages does not remove them from the talk page's history. You are encouraged instead to archive past discussions according to our community guidelines. You can have this done automatically for you -- simply place {{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}} or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and then old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.

--VLu (talk) 14:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

переименования файлов

Не надо выставлять на переименование файлы с фамилиями, вы лепите совершенно дикие ошибки! Если фамилию Брюммер я написал как Brummer - то я наверняка имел к этому основания! Вы же зачем-то совершенно безосновательно от балды его обозвали как Bryummer - это что за чушь?! Откуда такое?! И подобный случай не один, прекращайте заниматься отсебятиной. Все-так для начала спросите загрузившего почему он файл назвал именно так и никак иначе. --Netelo (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Ответ просто

Вы эксперт на руcскoм, я на ангийском. Кроме того, сушетвуют правила русского - английсского романизатций. Я транскрибировал на основе этих правил. Фамилия на русском языке = «Брюммер»

• б = b
• р = r
• ю = yu
• м =m
• е = е или (specila provisions) = уе

Следуед:

English: Eduard Vladimirovich Bryummer

или на основе (Bielefeld) русского немецкого/словаря, cт. XI

Deutsch: Eduard Alexander von Brümmer

Мне всо равно. 80 % русских / ангийских транскрибциах дикий. Я бы годов помогать, если желаемый!? C yважениен --MilHistExp (talk) 12:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

• Это фамилия немецкого происхождения и она на немецком языке всегда пишется как Brummer. То же самое касается и многих других ваших диких переименований. Дандевиль например - француз, и его фамилия пишется по-французски, а не то что вам в голову взбрело. Не надо отсебятины, действуйте согласно источникам, а не так как вам кажется. Вот если вы специались в английском - то и занимайтесь английским, не надо заниматься тем, в чём вы некомпетентны. --Netelo (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
• MilHistExp, judging by your clumsy attempts to communicate in Russian and English, I can hardly believe you speak them at the "advanced" level, as you claim on your user page. And it would be all the more strange to assume that you can be an expert on linguistic issues. It is much more likely that your account will be indefinitely blocked soon for mass destructive edits. --VLu (talk) 22:07, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
• Sehr geehrter User:Vlu, Ihre Sorge bezüglich meiner geistigen Fähigkeiten ist rührend; aber Gott sei Dank unbegründet. Zumindest hat mir eine Hochschule Ihres schönen Landes einen akademischen Grad zuerkannt. Worum geht es nun wirklich. Gefreut hätte ich mich ehrlich, wenn Sie sich zum Sachverhalt Transkriptionsregel Russisch/Englisch zur Sache geäußert hätten. Ist meine Übersetzung richtig, dann verstehe ich die Aufregung nicht. Oder ist sie falsch, dann hätten Sie mir das einfach mitteilen können. Vielleich nutzen Sie, oder ich, unterschiedliche Regeln. Das weiß ich leider nicht. Mein Vorschlag, die gröbsten Fehler zu korrigieren, gilt übrigens nach wie vor. Sollte meine Hilfe jedoch unerwünscht sein, kann ich gerne verzichten. Ich verdiene meine Brötchen ganz gut auch ohne Wikipedia. Mit vorzüglicher Hochachtung --MilHistExp (talk) 16:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Warning

Hi, please read COM:Categories before creating any further categories in future. You have produced lots of mess, this will not be tolerated. --A.Savin 15:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Categories should be properly named (in English without obvious linguistic faults), and categories on persons are to be created with given name first. That's only some of the mess you created, and you are creating batches of new categories. This requires much more responsibility. Better to leave it as it is. Please STOP. --A.Savin 16:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

 Info Since you have ignored the warnings and continued creating wrong categories e.g. "[[:Category:Mikhayl Dimityevich Gortsakov", I have blocked you for 1 month from editing in categories' namespace. --A.Savin 19:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

You are continuing creating improperly named categories. This is your final warning, next time there will be a full block. Just STOP. Thanks. --A.Savin 12:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

A.Savin 13:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Tyops

Heh. :) —Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Kategorie Löschungen

Hallo könntest du bitte die Kategorei-Löschungen unterlassen, und biherige Schäden rückgänig machen. Aufräumen ist ok wenn eine Kategorie schon über eine andere Unterkategorie enthalten ist. File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-712-0474-03A, Oberleutnant Bruno Kikillus Recolored.jpg ist in Category:Bruno Kikillus welche Wiederum Category:First lieutenants of the Heer (Wehrmacht) enthält. Also kann die aus dem Bild raus. Das gilt aber für Category:People with binoculars nicht. muss also drin bleiben. Grüße --Jahobr (talk) 16:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Ja, mache ich doch gerne.LG MilHistExp (talk) 16:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AUniform_tunic_of_WW2_German_Wehrmacht_front_gendarm%2C_gorget_%28Feldgendarmerie%29%2C_hand_grenade%2C_etc._Lofoten_Krigsminnemuseum_%28WW2_Memorial_Museum%29_Svolv%C3%A6r%2C_Norway_2019-05-08_DSC00056.jpg&type=revision&diff=446677365&oldid=415228546 hier zum beispiel: Was soll das? kann raus Category:Military police of Germany, ok; aber warum Category:Stielhandgranate oder Category:Military uniforms in museums löschen? --Jahobr (talk) 16:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Military police of Germany ist ein sehr gutes Beispiel. Es geht hier durcheinander wie Kraut und Rüben. Hier wird Feldgendarmerie Wehrmacht mit Feldjäger Bundeswehr und Re-enactment wild durcheinandergewirbelt. Da sollte man schon aus historischer Sicht klar trennen. Oder wie ist Deine Meinung. --MilHistExp (talk) 09:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

please stop to empty a category

Can you please explain this? It is not allowed to empty a category, just like that. Clearly, you are a new wikipedian , so please always consult someone before you re-organise categories and structures, without consent. Can you please undo your actions? You shall be blocked, if you delete work of others, without good reasons. KR, --Carolus (talk) 03:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked before, i see. So, no time to waste.--Carolus (talk) 03:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

please stop to empty a category

Can you please explain this? It is not allowed to empty a category, just like that. Clearly, you are a new wikipedian , so please always consult someone before you re-organise categories and structures, without consent. Can you please undo your actions? You shall be blocked, if you delete work of others, without good reasons. KR, --Carolus (talk) 03:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked before, i see. So, no time to waste.--Carolus (talk) 03:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

переименования файлов

Вы опять взялись делать запросы на переименования файлов, вы их делаете абсолютно неправильно. Будете продолжать - буду подавать запрос к администраторам о наложении на вас запрета выставлять файлы к переимнованию. --Netelo (talk) 17:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

A.Savin 14:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

As per User_talk:MilHistExp/Archive_1#Warning. As it seems, nothing has changed since then. I repeat: categories on persons are created with given name first ("Michael Jackson" and not "Jackson, Michael"). And you are obliged to use the correct names; "Volkhovsky" is not the same as "Volkhonsky". Should you continue same careless editing after the block, the next block will be indef. Thanks --A.Savin 14:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked Indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

A.Savin 19:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)