User talk:Morio/2010-2014

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Michael Schumacher 2006 Germany.jpg

BotMultichillT 20:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. The image was originally uploaded to the German Wikipedia as PD, And, I only uploaded a copy to Commons. Therefore, I doubt I have a right to change its license.--Morio (talk) 07:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Alain Prost 2000 France.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alain Prost 2000 France.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Alain Prost 2000 France.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

----Motopark (talk) 03:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Neel Jani 2006.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Neel Jani 2006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Neel Jani 2006.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Stifle (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Mercedes GP

Many thanks for expanding the Mercedes GP page.--Midgrid (talk) 15:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the opportunity to do it.--Morio (talk) 13:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Hungarian GP 2003?

Found this, pics info says its from 2001, but it looks like 2003, the album date is also a just few days after 2003 Hungarian GP, so is it? --Sporti (talk) 13:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it is the 2003 Hungarian GP. thanks,--Morio (talk) 13:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Started uploading, but putting them only in Category:2003 Hungarian Grand Prix for now and driver(s) need to be identified in some pics. --Sporti (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

OK, I can help to add category.--Morio (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Is this Formula 3000 and should i upload it too (around 5 pics) and also of a Porsches race? --Sporti (talk) 15:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

I think this F3000 photo (No.1 car is Björn Wirdheim) and another (Vitantonio Liuzzi) is good for upload. And, I don't have a opinion about Porsche race.--Morio (talk) 15:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

I've uploaded all i think are good enough, BTW how about this oldtimer [1] [2] [3]? The sign on the back says it's from 1929. --Sporti (talk) 10:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Then, I don't know the name of the car, but I think the pictures are not suitable to be used in Wikipedia (they seems to be souvenir photos...).--Morio (talk) 12:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Actually Picasa looks practicly unexplored - [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. --Sporti (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

• [9], [17] and [18] are copyrighted images.
• There are already (selected) images of [10] in wikicommons (See Category:Marc Gené).
• The [11] has a North American Eagle image, a land speed record car which wikicommons does not have any image yet. I think it should be added into wikicommons but I don't know about other pictures.
• The [12] has some Surtees TS9 images ([14], [15], [16] and [17] are good to see the character of the car, I think), and March 761 images ([18] and [19] are good).
• I think the [13], [14], [15], and [16] pictures are not necessary to be uploaded because there are already similar pictures.--Morio (talk) 06:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

OK those are on aswell, but look at thus guy's whole collection, many many more racing cars and motorcycles doing promotional runs. And just upload good pics if you want. --Sporti (talk) 12:10, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Patroller

I have given you the Patroller permission. I have seen hundreds of your edits with no problems. You work a lot in categorization, always accurate. In other words, there's no reason for anyone to look over your edits. We would appreciate if you would mark other good edits that you see as patrolled so that someone else doesn't have to sift through them. Royalbroil 18:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Jaime_Alguersuari_2009_Japan_1st_Qualify.jpg

Hi Morio. The pilot in this photo is Sébastien Buemi (#12 in 2009), not Jaime Alguersuari (#11). You can also see the Swiss flag and "S.BUEMI" writen next to the cockpit.--Darz Mol (talk) 16:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your point. It is obviously a mistake! I replaced the picture with similar one of Alguersuari. It is interesting that Buemi used another helmet during the Qualify session though... thanks,--Morio (talk) 16:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Permission to use your photo

Hi Morio, I would like to use your photo of Shinjuku at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Skyscrapers_of_Shinjuku_2009_January.jpg in a textbook. Please email me soon at mcispl@yahoo.com so I can give you more details. Thank you!

Thank you for your comment. All my images are GFDL therefore you can use its without my permission. See also User_talk:Morio#Permission_to_use_image. thanks,--Morio (talk) 10:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Just à thank

Bonjour Morio, I just want, from France, to thank you for all your pictures. Due to User:Spurzem and you, I have a huge panorama of motorsports from the 60's to today, and it's great!!! cobra bubbles (talk) 16:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Olá, cobra bubbles. Thank you for your kind comment. It's my pleasure if you think it helpful. thanks,--Morio (talk) 20:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Using your F1 images

Hi,

At nowf1.com i'm using your F1 driver images from wikipedia. Do have a look at nowf1.com -> F1 2010 -> Drivers. Or for example http://nowf1.com/index.php/gp2010/drivers/542?alias=schumacher . I have tried to ensure that the attribution is accurate. Please do let me know if you see any issues or concerns.

Regards, Shivram

Hi, Shivram. Thank you for informing me:-) Everything is OK. Good luck!--Morio (talk) 13:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Help needed with categorizing some racing images

I uploaded several images from the 2009 SCCA National Runoffs; they can be found at Category:Sports Car Club of America. I don't understand Formula racing. Would you please make sure that these images are placed in the right spot under Category:Formula racing? Royalbroil 01:17, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment and contributions of precious images. I found the event (Category:2009 SCCA National Championship Runoffs) was held with various races in mixed-categories. Therefore, I could not place the images under "Category:Formula racing" but added suitable categories for them. thanks,--Morio (talk) 13:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Well done - creating a new category for the event was right on target. You're right, the car were in different classes. I meant categorize each image individually. I uploaded the winner in each class even though I photographed most of the field. These pictures were taken in the final day in an event which took 3 or 4 days. Royalbroil 05:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Alain Prost 2000 France.jpg

File:Alain Prost 2000 France.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Martin H. (talk) 12:34, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

RA301 and RA302

Hi Morio,

I would like to use the pictures of RA301 and RA302 F1 cars in a textbook. However, the editor needs a higher-resolution picture in black and white. Would it be possible to obtain a higher resolution of those picutres? Thank you very much for your pictures.

Thank you for your request. I uploaded the original images of the RA301 and RA302 below;

• File:Honda RA301 1968 Mexico Honda Collection Hall.jpg
• File:Honda RA302 left Honda Collection Hall.jpg
• File:Honda RA302 front view Honda Collection Hall.jpg

You can download the images from "File history" and edit them freely for your book. thanks,--Morio (talk) 10:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Crop an image

Hello! Can you crop this image so only Ceresolis Toledo is visable, please? It would be good to have it in the WTCC article on the Swedish Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. - (t) Green Yoshi (c) 14:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your request:-) I added a cropped version and an image of another angle of the Toledo Cupra WTCC. thanks,--Morio (talk) 17:24, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much! - (t) Green Yoshi (c) 18:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

WTCC cars

Hello again and thanks for the Toledo! I wonder if you have any images of any of these WTCC cars:

• Ford Focus (used in 2005)
• Ford Focus ST170 (used in 2005)
• Honda Civic Type-R (used at Monza in 2005)
• Peugeot 407 (used in 2005 and 2006)
• Toyota Altezza (used in Macau in 2005)
• Toyota Corolla T-Sport (used at Brno in 2006 and Valencia in 2007)
• Volvo S60 Flexifuel (used at Anderstorp in 2007. I was there, but I took no images.)

It can be hard to find these, because most of these cars were only used in some races.

- (t) Green Yoshi (c) 10:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

And, Alfa Romeo 156 GTA in 2005-2006... I never even saw those cars unfortunately. I has taken WTCC pictures only when I went to circuits to watch the races.
I think there is no WTCC car in Japan (though Yokohama seems to own an ex-works BMW 320si), therefore, I seem not to have an opportunity to see them in exhibition neither for the time being.--Morio (talk) 13:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok, but thanks for the Toledo once again! - (t) Green Yoshi (c) 17:36, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Images of japanese and samurai items

Can you explain why you are removing images from the categories they are in and putting them in different categories? Do you have any knowledge of the subject? What is this category you made "Nanbandō" there is no such word, it is two words "Nanban" meaning foreign etc and "dō" meaning chest armor, also the category "Tōseigusoku", there is no such word, it is "Tōsei" modern and "gusoku" meaning armor. Please explain what it is that you are doing.samuraiantiqueworld.com (talk) 16:34, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

• • Hello, were are you getting your information from? you made a category "Menbō" go do a search under "Menbō" and see what you find, and then search under "menpo" and see what you find, you are not naming the categories properly. Did you do any research before you started naming categories? You need to go back and rename all the improperly named categories or if you do not have any knowledge of samurai armor then ask someone who does have some knowledge. Badly named categories and removing images from well known names into obscure named categories will make it hard for people to find images. Please let me know what your are thinking.samuraiantiqueworld.com (talk) 16:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. "Tōseigusoku" (ja:当世具足 "'Gusoku' of current era") is a type of Japanese armour which developed in Sengoku and Azuchi-momoyama period. I made this category because most of famous Japanese armours is classified into this kind. And, I think these armors should be distinguished from other former armours because of its importance (the people at that time gave the name for the armour because of same reason). "Nanbandō" (ja:南蛮胴) is a type of dō of "Tōseigusoku". As shown in the name of Nanban, it has Nanban-style. I distinguished because this was also important as an example of Nanban culture (this type of armour is used as an example of Nanban culture in history textbooks of elementary school in Japan).--Morio (talk) 17:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

"面頬" has two kinds of pronunciations, one is "めんぼお"/"めんぼう" (menbō) and another is "めんぽお"/"めんぽう" (menpō). Both are correct according to Japanese dictionaries.--Morio (talk) 17:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

• • • Hello, you made a category "Jinbaori" well that fine, but you removed the category "clothing of Japan" from my image, why did you do that...Jinbaori is also "clothing of Japan" and you did not add "clothing of Japan" to the category "Jinbaori" You are making it harder for people to find images when you do not add the proper categories to new categories. Is English your first language? Because this statement is wrong "English: Jinbaori is a tipe of haori, one of the Japanese short coats with sleeves, which a high-ranking samurai can wear over his armor. It is "type" not "tipe" Also your text is in the present tense "which a high-ranking samurai can wear over his armor" The proper text would be something like this...." The jinbaori is a type of sleeveless war coat designed to be worn over the armor of the samurai" Were did you read that the jinbaori was worn by high-ranking samurai only, and that is is a form of haori? You need to look for references before making statements, do a google book search first before making categories so you can find the correct name and the most popular usage, not an unknown name. You need to rename all the categories that you miss named, "guskou" means armor and is always used seperate from any other word, such as "kusari" meaning chain and "gusoku" meaning armor, not "kusarigusoku". Do you see what I mean?samuraiantiqueworld.com (talk) 17:34, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
    • It is not about what a dictionary a "Japanese Dictionary" says, it is how the word is used in whe world of samurai armor...go do a search for BOTH words and you will see... "I think these armors should be distinguished from other former armours because of its importance (the people at that time gave the name for the armour because of same reason)" If you want to make a category then go ahead but stop removing the images from commonly known categories, the AVERAGE person looking for an image will not know were to find it. "this type of armour is used as an example of Nanban culture in history textbooks of elementary school in Japan" This is not Japan, and most people are not EXPERTS in Japanese armor..ARE YOU?? You need to rename the categories you made with the proper names and stop removing the images from the commonly known names, just add your category if you think it nees another castegory. If you do not rename the categories with the proper spelling I will ask for them to be deleted as improperly named categories...No one who knows anything about samurai armor uses the word "Menbo" and "gusoku" is always separated from other words, A "nanban dō is a type of chest armor, a "nanban dō gusoku" is a armor which uses a nanban dō, the words are always separate as they each have an individual meaningsamuraiantiqueworld.com (talk) 17:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not become too hot. I deleted categories of the files only to avoid overflow of upper categories (Category:Jinbaori is under Category:Haori which is under Category:Traditional clothes of Japan which is under Category:Clothing of Japan, therefore I think this edit does not cause problem). And, English is NOT my first language therefore I often make a mistake in writing. I appreciate you if you would correct it. About the names of the category "Tōseigusoku", please correct the name or let me know it if there is an appropriate name. thanks,--Morio (talk) 18:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

• • Hello, I am sorry if I seem hot but I have had some problem lately with some images being removed from categories. Making Sub categories is a good idea, I like the idea of Tōseigusoku etc..but the images of armor should still be left in the "Armour of Japan" category as many people do not have a good understanding of samurai armor and need a general category to look at....at least for now.. I think that removing images from the category "Samurai" is a good idea after giving it some thought as long as there are clearly understood sub categories...I am glad to have some help and would appreciate some help from someone who is interested in the subject.

• I hope you do not mind that I redirected "menbō" to "menpo" as that is really way more used, understood, and searched for. As for "Tōseigusoku"..."Tōsei gusoku" would be the correct way to spell it. It should really be redirected as Tōsei gusoku is only known by people with some kind of knowledge and they would be spelling it that way. I have made categories "suneate, haidate, manchira, manju no wa, nodowa,dou" and I redirected dō to "dou" ..both terms are used but "dou" is used more then "dō" in recent times.

• • I am trying to make sure that these images are easy for people to find when searching online..example...Moving images of "Jinbaori" into "jinbaori" is good, but many people have never seen a "jinbaori" so they would not know what to search for and they do not know "haori" either..The same for "jingasa" and some other items that the average person would not have seen before. If you are going to remove all the pictures into "jingasa" or "jinbaori" then those categories should be under "category:samurai" and "category:Armour of Japan" as well as any other category that might make it easier to find such as "category:clothing of Japan" I hope you understand!!samuraiantiqueworld.com (talk) 10:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
• I also made a category "sode(armour)" and redirected "sode(armor)" into itsamuraiantiqueworld.com (talk) 10:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments. I think it is no problem if you change the category names to more appropriate names. But I worry your idea of the commons category is different from Wikimedia's category policy. Please refer to m:Help:Categories#Category considerations
If you see categories of the Commons (ex. Category:Buildings, Category:Sports, Category:Clothing, etc.), you would find that the Commons categories are basically operated by this policy. Therefore, even if I do not edit the categories of your files, I think someone would edit them sooner or later.
I can understand there is some truth in what you say on categories of each file, but, if all contributors upload files by the same idea as you, the upper categories should overflow with thousands of files (the Commons policy is worrying about it). Thank you for your attention to this matter.--Morio (talk) 14:35, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

• I agree with you and of course eventually things in the "samurai" "Armour of Japan" categories will have suitable sub categories and the sub categories will be linked together in a manner which would allow people to find related images easily. I think that the "Samurai" category can be removed from the armor images and I added the "armor of Japan" category to the "Samurai" category and vice versa so anyone looking at these categories will be able to find related images. I also made new categories for the Japanese Weapons which had no category "Kusarigama, manriki, chigriki, jutte etc" and those images can be removed from the "samurai" category also. as long as the sub galleries are linked to the related galleries "samurai" "weapons of Japan" and "Armour of Japan" in a way that makes it easy for people to find the images I am ok with taking the images from categories and putting them all in sub categories. Maybe a new sub category is needed "Gusoku (suit of Japanese armour}" for the full suits of armor? To make them easy to find, or something similar..samuraiantiqueworld.com (talk) 15:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for categorization F1 images that I uploaded. I did not download everything from there, that there was not a lot of similar pictures F1 2011 cars --Sasha Krotov (talk) 19:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

It's my pleasure:-) --Morio (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Sendai earthquake

Just a question from France : Are you ok after this huge earthquake? cobra bubbles (talk) 09:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your kind comment;-)　I live in Tokyo, and, fortunately, there is no serious problem for me, my family and friends. I turned round east of Tokyo on these two days, and I saw the road maintenance people, policemen, firemen and emergency medical people, railway people (they restored the very complex railway system only at half a day!) and retail store people have been doing very good working. Then, I do not feel the anxiety in the restoration of Tokyo.
Now, I am worrying about the Japanese Tōhoku region (especially Miyagi and Iwate) very much...--Morio (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

I just see your last pictures in your gallery, what a mess... Keep on going...cobra bubbles (talk) 10:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

File:F1 2011 AUS - 5.jpg

You added an earthquake category to this image of a race car. I suppose that this was an error? Rmhermen (talk) 04:18, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. It is intentional but I should have explained it. I added the category because the car have a message in Japanese ("我々の祈り、日本に届きますように", May our prayers reach the people in Japan) from Sauber team to victims of the earthquake. thanks,--Morio (talk) 11:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Chandhok/Valsecchi

Hi Morio, thanks for your images from the Malaysian Grand Prix. Just a small correction: Davide Valsecchi was Team Lotus' third driver during practice, not Karun Chandhok.--Midgrid (talk) 13:33, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. I misunderstood it and re-uploaded the files with correct name.--Morio (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Kirill Ladygin

Hello, Morio! I must say that you are a really good photographer. Did you take any photos of Kirill Ladygin or his car in 2008 or 2009? - (t) Green Yoshi (c) 19:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your requests. I uploaded his cars in 2008 and 2009:

• File:Kirill Ladygin 2008 WTCC Race of Japan (Qualify).jpg
• File:Kirill Ladygin 2009 WTCC Race of Japan (Free Practice).jpg
• File:Kirill Ladygin 2009 WTCC Race of Japan (Free Practice) 2.jpg

and, I didn't take a photo of himself. thanks,--Morio (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much! They are excelent! This is probably not the last time I ask you for a photo! - (t) Green Yoshi (c) 18:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Schumacher and Di Resta image

Your image of Michael Schumacher and Paul di Resta was absolutely perfect for a blog post I did here. Many thanks! - User:MotorsportPete93 on en.Wikipedia // 86.134.77.168 18:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

File:Rubens Barrichello 2010 Malaysia.jpg is on this week on main page of Estonian Wikipedia in "Did you know ...?". Thank you for picture! Taivo (talk) 22:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your choice! In active F1 drivers, he is my favorite:-) thanks,--Morio (talk) 16:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Jacques Villeneuve

Hello. I am not sure why you deleted all the interwiki links here. I'm sorry if I have missed some logical explanation. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. The interwiki links in the "category" (Category:Jacques_Villeneuve) were linked to "pages" in other projects (such as en:Jacques_Villeneuve). Therefore, I deleted them. The page (Jacques_Villeneuve) already has interwiki links to the pages in other projects. I think the edit might have been too strict... thanks,--Morio (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough. Personally, most interwikis in Commons categories point to Wikipedia articles - I think common practice shows that people generally believe that to be more helpful than linking to Wikipedia categories. Users generally want to learn more about the subject. It is technically not wrong to replace the interwiki links with links to Wikipedia categories instead (depending on the subject and whether it is sufficiently important to have its own Wikipedia categories). But you are correct - I think it's a little strict to delete them entirely. Best regards, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding. I don't persist in my opinion and I know there is also much truth in what you write (If thinking about convenience, your way is correct). Therefore, I keep current status of the category. thanks,--Morio (talk) 17:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Torii

Hi, I've found that you categorised Saga-Toriimoto as Category:Wooden torii for no reasons. Just being a vermilion torii doesn't mean that it is made of wood. Please be careful, and keep out of the field if you don't have enough evidence. Regards., --トトト (talk) 14:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Colin Turkington

Hello again, Morio! Did you take any photos of Colin Turkington driving his BMW at Suzuka? If you have done so, can you upload one, please? What would be great. - Green Yoshi (^t_c) 16:24, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your request. I uploaded his car in Suzuka:

• File:Colin Turkington 2011 WTCC Race of Japan (Qualify) front.jpg
• File:Colin Turkington 2011 WTCC Race of Japan (Qualify) side.jpg

thanks,--Morio (talk) 15:28, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much! They are, as usual, absolutely fantastic. - Green Yoshi (^t_c) 16:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Charles Ng and Fabio Fabiani

Hi, again! I hope you are not tired of me, but this time I need photos of Charles Ng and Fabio Fabiani for Wikipedia, if you got any, please. Inside and/or outside the car. Thanks in advance, Green Yoshi (^t_c) 15:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

The request is welcome. I uploaded their cars:

• File:Charles Ng 2011 WTCC Race of Japan (Practice 2).jpg
• File:Fabio Fabiani 2011 WTCC Race of Japan (Practice 1).jpg

thanks,--Morio (talk) 15:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Once again, thank you very much. I will soon use them. I found Ng in this photo. Is it possible to crop it, please? I don't want to do it by myself, because I think you want your name as the uploader. - Sincerelly, Green Yoshi (^t_c) 17:09, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I was absent for a while, will check the image and try to upload it. thanks--Morio (talk) 12:31, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:Yas_Marina_Hotel

Yas Marina Hotel has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

84.61.131.15 22:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Sports car images

Thank you for all of your help with categorizing motorsports images. I noticed that your category improvement to File:DSR24MatCutterRoadAmerica2009SCCANationalRunoffs.jpg. There are a lot of images in Category:SCCA National Championship Runoffs that I didn't know where to categorize. I'm not very well-versed in sports car racing and the letter abbreviations don't mean much to me except if the announcer explains their meaning. Would you look through the images that I took at the Sunday events in 2009, 2010, and 2011 to give appropriate categories? I probably have images in more racing classes that what I uploaded here. Now that I've gone through the entire 3-year schedule, I probably have almost all classes photographed [20]. Thanks! Royalbroil 14:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment and request. I looked through the images in Category:SCCA National Championship Runoffs and categorized them as much as I could. The images are very interesting! thanks, --Morio (talk) 19:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Great job, as usual! Thanks for doing it and I appreciate the compliment. I really enjoy taking racing photographs. Royalbroil 22:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Yamaha files

For the future: if a file has OTRS Permission then it isn't copivio. Hope you'll be more careful. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 19:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

I am so sorry not to check the OTRS permission. I will be more careful. thanks, --Morio (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Permission to use in iPhone puzzle game

Hi Morio,

I would like to kindly ask you for your permission to use some of your pics in my slider-puzzle game for the iPhone. I would credit you, a link to your page could also be provided. Is it possible? Thanks for amazing photos!

Good luck! Oleg

Thank you for your kind comment. Of course, it's no problem. You can use them without my permission. Good luck! --Morio (talk) 00:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Your Shinjuku photo

Dear Morio,

I thought you might like to know that I've used one of your photos on my website:

http://www.unmissablejapan.com/volcanoes/mount-fuji

I've acknowledged it by making it link back to the original page on Wikimedia.

It's a great photo - thanks very much for making it available under Creative Commons,

cheers,

Mike

Tall ships by type

I stumbled upon Category:Tall ships by type and wonder whether it should be put in use or deleted. Now it has two subcategories, neither of which is about tall ships in the sense of Category:Tall ships. Please comment at Category talk:Tall ships. --LPfi (talk) 11:49, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. It seems to be OK to remove the category. I made it to categorize the categories such as Category:Caravel (ship), etc (originally categorized to Category:Tall ships). But, they have been already more suitably categorised. --Morio (talk) 13:03, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Concept Cars

Nice template, very convenient and useful. mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 23:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Straight-two_motorcycle_engines

Straight-two motorcycle engines has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 19:55, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Usage of Your Photos

Hi Morio, I would like to use some of your motorsport photo for my new website. Any issues you can contact me on mark-ashleyparry@hotmail.co.uk

Thanks F1season

Thank you for informing me:-) Of course, there is no problem at all to use my pictures for your website (Basically, it is not necessary to put my name in the case of my pictures). Good luck!--Morio (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:2012 Summer Olympics athletes by country

2012 Summer Olympics athletes by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Badzil (talk) 11:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Elizabeth II by year categories

I have emptied Category:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom (unidentified year) by moving files into specific categories. As the category is now empty, I have asked for its deletion. I have also asked for the deletion of Category:Princess Elizabeth of York in 1933, which is also empty. If you disagree with the deletion, you have my permission to remove the speedy delete tags. DrKiernan (talk) 20:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

== The Tireless Contributor Barnstar ==

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your efforts in categorizing the files of the Porsche Rennsport Reunion IV. Thank you!--FAEP (talk) 13:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! --Morio (talk) 13:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Ayrton Senna

Hello, please see this. I don't know why you removed the AS category, but even if the model of the car is not the same he drove, the set is all about Ayrton Senna, notice the number 42 and the name on the car.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 12:31, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment (You are right). It may be not suitable edit though I removed the category because I thought it was confusing. Therefore, it is OK to revert my edit. But, I think it is better to put a comment that Senna did not drive the car (Van Diemen RF84). thanks,--Morio (talk) 12:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

It is, but IMO it should say something such as "AS did not drove a Van Diemen RF84 as the one in the museum, but rather a Van Diemen RF81" or something to the effect. I leave that to you, since you certainly are much more knowledgeable than me on that matter, I only say RF81 because I've seen this being sold. Cheers, -- Darwin ^Ahoy! 12:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

That's OK. Possibly, it is enough if the chassis type is written. thanks,--Morio (talk) 13:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Kamui Kobayashi

Hi Morio. Thanks for your recent photos from the Japanese Grand Prix (and the WTCC and WEC races at Suzuka). Did you by any chance take a picture of Kamui Kobayashi at this event? It would be nice to have a photo of him driving the most successful race of his F1 career.--Midgrid (talk) 16:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your request. I uploaded some pictures of Kamui Kobayashi. thanks,--Morio (talk) 17:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Yasser Arafat.jpg

Hello Morio!

From where do you know that this image of Arafat is a wax figure? Do you know where it is displayed? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. I don't know where it is, but it seems to be a wax figure.--Morio (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

By now, it is pure speculation. We cannot put categories only because of speculation. Can you find out where this alleged wax figure is located. If it is really a way figure, we must delete it. As such we need to clearify this issue. --High Contrast (talk) 17:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

OK, I reverted my previous edit. Thank you for your comment.--Morio (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem. As I mentioned above: evidence for the wax-figure-remark would be appreciated. Anyway, tThank you for your support! Regards, High Contrast (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Definitely a wax sculpture, from Madame Tussaud's. See here, here, or simply Google Arafat + wax. Cheers to all. mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 08:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Organizing

Your tables at the top of category pages are very useful additions. Great work. mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 22:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!--Morio (talk) 10:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

F1 2013 images

Hi, I found some free images - Category:Formula One Jerez test, 5-8 February 2013. --Sasha Krotov (talk) 20:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your support! I will add categories.--Morio (talk) 21:14, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

• Do you have photo of unique Williams front disks? --Sasha Krotov (talk) 23:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. I have some pictures of them at Catalonia (but all unintentionally taken). The front wheels will be used in the Grands Prix in this season, therefore I will (re)take them in another opportunity. thanks,--Morio (talk) 00:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

I added an image. File:Williams FW35 front wheel 2013 Malaysia.jpg --Morio (talk) 17:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

File:GSR ProjectMirai BMW 2012 Super GT Sugo free practice.jpg

File:GSR ProjectMirai BMW 2012 Super GT Sugo free practice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 09:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters

Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Pitlane02 _talk 10:42, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Collections_of_the_Science_Museum_(London)

Collections of the Science Museum (London) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 23:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Puffing_Billy_in_the_Science_Museum_(London)

Puffing Billy in the Science Museum (London) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 23:19, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Template:PeopleYearbyCountry

Hello, people have been messing with this template. As a result it no longer works properly. As you are the creator could you give it a look? I am illiterate in Javascript so I prefer not to add to the confusion in trying to fix it. - Olybrius (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. I fixed the template a bit, and added a reference of it.--Morio (talk) 16:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Wernher von Braun

Dear Morio! Some days ago subcategories by date for Wernher von Braun were created by you. Honestly, I don't consider this an improvement. So far, all images in this category were sorted by date using sortkeys giving a good overview over his life. I do agree, splitting into date subcategories is necessary for persons with hundrets of images, but in this case with only around 110 it does more harm than good. I am aware that there are ways of displaying all images of subcategories using software from the toolserver but most user don't know that. I'm in favour of restoring the former situation. Kind regards --WvB77 (talk) 23:34, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. I think your suggestion is reasonable, but instead of doing so, I tried to arrange the gallery of the page "Wernher von Braun". Probably, this way is more convenient, and giving a good overview would be not spoiled too much even if not very good. thanks,--Morio (talk) 10:55, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Dear Morio, thanks for updating the gallery. I agree with you, the gallery might be the better place for displaying the images although it will require a bit more work when uploading new images. Regards --WvB77 (talk) 23:20, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Changing username - RU

I want to usurp Morio at ruwiki. --Morio (talk) 06:10, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Changing username - DA

I want to usurp Morio at dawiki. --Morio (talk) 06:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Changing username - DE

I want to usurp Morio at dewiki. --Morio (talk) 06:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:17th January 2011 in Switzerland etc.

Hi Morio, referring p.e. Category:17th January 2011 in Switzerland please take notice of User talk:Abderitestatos Months in Switzerland (started that kind of categories by Abderitestatos) as imho there is no 'consense' to establish those categories. Please use that thread to share your reasons to continue, so you don't agree and plan to continue. Thx and regards, Roland 12:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. I didn't know the argument (though should have expected). I only edited the categories which had already existed, I don't have an opinion on the point whether they are required.--Morio (talk) 03:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, Morio, moved your opinion to User talk:Abderitestatos. Best regards, Roland 17:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Categorization Barnstar
	Thank you so much for creating the comprehensive and very useful categorization structure within Category:Automobiles in the Autostadt. Please accept this barnstar as a small token of my appreciation. Thanks again for all your hard work: editors like you are what makes Wikimedia Commons such a great resource! Michael Barera (talk) 23:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!--Morio (talk) 03:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:Infineon Raceway

Category:Infineon Raceway has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Dough4872 04:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Shouldn't this have been made into Category redirect since this is the old name for the NASCAR track? It's wasn't incorrectly named - it's a prior name and some people may be looking for it under that name. Royalbroil 12:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thank you very much for your work on categorisation of Sherman modifications and museum military vehicles et cetera! Although I've already harvested most of these berries on my dacha, the strawberry season is not yet over. ;-) Ain92 (talk) 15:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

• However, I draw your attention that the word self-propelled is written with a hyphen (1, 2). Also I think we need some help of competent authority if this categories should be named as at the … museum or in the … museum. Ain92 (talk) 15:13, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you for the bowl and attention! You are right. I also noticed that the category names of museums lack the consistency between "... at (the) ..." and "... in (the) ..." as you noted. I don't have a view about it whether which is right (or better). And, the argument and conclusion about the point are welcome for me. For the time being, I'm basically using the wordings which are used in each other original categories of the museums. I basically think that it is not difficult to make the files move to the correctly-renamed-categories (with "Cat-a-lot" tool) if the files have been categorized already. And, I will correct the names of "self-propelled artillery" categories. thanks,--Morio (talk) 15:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
  • I started a topic on the en-wiki Language Reference Desk. Ain92 (talk) 17:42, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you again. I read the topic and the latest reply by Itsmejudith. I will follow the topic.--Morio (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Horizontal_inscribed_boards_in_the_Forbidden_City

Horizontal inscribed boards in the Forbidden City has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Gisling (talk) 10:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

{{YMDcat}}

Could you please go look at the comments here: Template talk:YMDcat. Thanks. Evrik (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Language templates with no text displayed

Hi Morio. Please remove your template from this maintenance category. --Leyo 00:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Wolseley automobiles

Hi, Would you mind very much if I reverted all your work on this category? Eddaido (talk) 07:28, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. It is OK to revert it, but I think it is better to leave the category and files as they are, to keep consistency with other automobile categories.--Morio (talk) 10:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry I did not mark this page and had not realised that you had responded. This is something I feel quite strongly about. Two questions: Where do I learn more about Commons' preferred cataloguing practices and then where is the best place for us (and others?) to discuss this matter. I can easily make a long cascade of categories coming right down to a category into which I am the only thing able to fit. Maybe that's a poor description. What are your thoughts? Eddaido (talk) 10:44, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. Please refer to Commons:Categories, I think it is helpful for you. Then, Wolseley Motors produced several types of vehicle (not only automobile). I made the Category:Wolseley automobiles and moved related categories to it. It is to handle the Wolseley automobile related media and other makers' automobile media equally (under Category:Automobiles by brand), and to care about Commons:Categories#Find an appropriate category.--Morio (talk) 13:36, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I'm puzzled by "Wolseley Motors produced several types of vehicle (not only automobile)". What was it they made beside cars? Eddaido (talk) 01:34, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I think they also have produced trucks, though their chassis may be same as their automobiles. --Morio (talk) 12:56, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

As I remember it around 1924 they'd have done anything to sell something - see the Japanese truck which if the date is correct was made about the time of the total financial collapse but aside from this new-to-me photo (above) I know nothing of real trucks. That truck's radiator could not have been used on a car, could it? Certainly they did make aero engines. The suggestion has been made that you had not completed your planned amendments to the categories of Wolseley vehicles.

Can we re-open the discussion with you explaining what is needed to be done to complete your re-arrangement? Regards, Eddaido (talk) 09:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Off-road racing status

I am dissatisfied with this structure and I want to discuss some changes to give a basic organization. First, is rallying considered off-road racing? I usually thought of it as primarily on-road with a little off-road. Also, I think it should be broken down into its specific genres - desert, short-course, stadium and I suspect there are more. Perhaps hill and rock climbing are more genres. Then each genre should be subdivided by race tracks aka racing circuits, drivers, sanctioning body (mainly short-course), and a few major advertisers (Red Bull, Monster). I saw this change and I don't agree that short-course racing is rallying. Perhaps you felt it was the closest option but I disagree. To start, would you please suggest the basic genres of off-road racing and let's go from there. Royalbroil 12:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. I reconsidered it and think your idea is right. I will correct the edits and care about the difference between "rally" and "off roading".--Morio (talk) 13:36, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Are you knowledgeable in off-road racing? Do you have an opinion on how to better organize this structure? Royalbroil 15:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

I have very few knowledge in off-road racing though I watch daily digests of the Dakar Rally every year. For now, I think it is enough if the files are categorized for every event because the files about off-road racing are not very huge yet.

Then, I think that the following matter can be considered as a standard of classification though there may be a defect:

• Location (country or continent) *I worry this categorization is slightly troublesome for off-road racing because there are cross-country events.
• Time ("by year" category) *When the number of files/categories is very huge
• Venue (or "Type of venue")

• Cross-country (rally raid races)
• Stadium and short-course (the events in which the venues have fixed) *I don't know whether these will be correctly distinguishable.

• Event (or "Type of event")
• Vehicle

• "by event" or "by type of vehicle"

• People

• Drivers and riders

• Other things; "advertisements" (major ads such as Monster and Red Bull) etc.

I hope this helps. --Morio (talk) 16:07, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Improvement in the image quality: File:A Justica Alfredo Ceschiatti Brasilia Brasil.jpg

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Works of Brasilia

Hello. Can you improve the quality of this image? File:A Justica Alfredo Ceschiatti Brasilia Brasil.jpg. I named as FPC and it looks a bit of low quality. Look. Thanks. ArionEstar (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but I think it's not fixable. ArionEstar (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your recommendation of my picture and the request. Regrettably, I think it is difficult to improve it. The original resolution of the picture was 1712 x 2288 pixels, and I slightly cropped it (to 1672 x 2268). Therefore, I cannot upload its higher resolution version. And, it is also difficult for me to improve other parts...--Morio (talk) 19:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

"At the museum"/"in the museum"

Hello. Please take more care while unnecessary renaming categories, and check w:Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Language/2013_July_14#.22At_the_museum.22_or_.22in_the_museum.22.3F. For example, tanks stored outside a museum aren't in the museum, but only at the museum. Ain92 (talk) 12:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Pennant numbers

Wondering why you did a lot of work on the pennant numbers. Did I add a wrong category? --Stunteltje (talk) 20:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. You did not add a wrong category. I made two edits.

• I included the category "Ships by pennant number" into the template "Category definition: Ships by pennant number". It made it unnecessary to add the category "Ships by pennant number" to each category. Then, I think we will be able to save effort for another edit of "Ships with pennant number X" categories.
• I made the "Ships with pennant number X" categories to come under "Number X on vehicles" categories.

--Morio (talk) 03:22, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

It makes my work on categorisation easier, thanks. --Stunteltje (talk) 08:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Japanese art collections

I'm guessing you know what you're doing, but just in case: you seem to be reversing a set of category changes that were made a while back, e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Art_of_Japan_in_the_Crow_Collection_of_Asian_Art&diff=57935346&oldid=56519638. - Jmabel ! talk 18:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. I don't have a intention to revert it, but it may be slightly complicated.

• I classified the categories under the Category:Japanese art collections according to the country where a collection exists.
  As a result, the Category:Japanese art collections of the Category:Art of Japan in the Crow Collection of Asian Art was replaced by the Category:Collections of art of Japan in the United States (which I created).
• And, I added the Category:Collections of art of Japan by museum to the Category:Art of Japan in the Crow Collection of Asian Art.

As a result of these edits, the Category:Collections of art of Japan by museum has been returned. Then, I would like you to consider it as that it was "added" rather than "reverted".--Morio (talk) 09:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Fine with me, just wanted to make sure you were aware of this. - Jmabel ! talk 17:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Tower Bridge

Hi, The template "TowerBridgeYear" used in the Categories "Category:Tower Bridge in xxxx" is putting the categories in "Category:xxxx in the City of London" this should be changed to "Category:xxxx in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets", I do not think I have sufficient rights to edit the template and don't know how to, can you make this change as I believe you are responsible for creating this template, if not can you tell me where to ask to implement this change? Categories affected: Category:Tower Bridge in 2010 Category:Tower Bridge in 2011 Category:Tower Bridge in 2012 Category:Tower Bridge in 2013. Oxyman (talk) 17:28, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the request. I corrected the template.--Morio (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the modification, best Oxyman (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:John_Button_(rallycross_driver)

Category:John_Button_(rallycross_driver) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

about 2014 CP+ Photo..

I'm so appreciate to your 2014 CP+ Photo. It's really helpful all Digital camera page! Thank you, Morio :D --Ewigkeits (talk) 08:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Koenigsegg at Geneva Motor Show 2014

Hello there Morio. I’m afraid I have to disagree with you regarding your categorizing of Koenigsegg at Geneva Motor Show 2014. The nanoFLOWCELL Quant e-Sportlimousine is not a Koenigsegg vehicle. It is a wide spread misunderstanding that the preceding NLV Quant of 2009 was a Koenigsegg vehicle, but it was actually a cooperation between the Swedish super car maker and the Dutch company NLV Solar. That cooperation is now history and the new Quant e-Sportlimousine is a product of nanoFLOWCELL, based in Lichtenstein. The connecting link between NLV Solar and nanoFLOWCELL is their common owner, Nunzio La Vecchia. I have therefore moved the two Quant vehicles to new categories. Kind regards - Herranderssvensson (talk) 19:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for comment. I misunderstood it! Thank you for corrections.--Morio (talk) 10:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Départ Nîmes

Hallo Morio, I tried to identify two racecars that you added to Category:Unidentified racing automobiles and Category:1932 Grand Prix of Nîmes. I suppose that this picture was not shot at the 1932 event, but at a much earlier race. I justify that with the 1932 1932 G. P. stats which show that Nrs. 10 ("Mlle Helle-Nice", obviously a pseudonym) and 12 (Louis Trintignant) were Bugatti Type 35C racers. The pictured cars not only look much older (my guess: around 1920); they are definitely not of the same type and also definitely no Bugattis.--Chief tin cloud (talk) 11:56, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Deletion request for Category:Packard hood ornaments (Swan)

Hallo Morio, I requested deletion for this category because Packard did never use a swan as a motive. The figure shows a cormorant. I already installed a new Category:Packard hood ornaments (Cormorant) that contains all pictures that were categorized here, before.--Chief tin cloud (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for comment and edit. I requested to delete it.--Morio (talk) 16:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm glad you agree. Thank you.--Chief tin cloud (talk) 16:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Juan Manuel Fangio Puerto Madero plate.jpg

File:Juan Manuel Fangio Puerto Madero plate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected: three files in the middle of nomination. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:MDcat

Hi, your recent changes in that template are creating a lot of entries in the non-existent and non-sense category Category:Days in. Can you please check and fix this. Thx a lot. --JuTa 19:08, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Aahh, I see. I seems you allready fixed it. I'm going to o a null-edit to every entry. Help would be appreciated. regards. --JuTa 19:12, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment and attention to the template. I saw the same thing with you and tried to fix the Template:MDcat and Template:YMDcat. Maybe you have seen the templates or category during my editing because I spent long time to find the reason why the category is not working. Then, the "MDcat" template had used the Template:Date to change the names of months (ex. "12" to "December"), and the "Date" template have been changed to disabled in link in past few days or weeks. It seems to be a reason though I don't know the "Date" template itself is the problem. --Morio (talk) 12:47, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Wolseley automobiles

Hi. I expect you won't have seen it but I need to re-open our discussion about categorising Wolseley automobiles. There is a suggestion that you did not finish what you wanted to do and I am asking now if you would please just tell me what you need to do in order to complete your planned changes. Regards, Eddaido (talk) 23:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for comment. I already have categorized the Category:Wolseley automobiles. So, I think I already finished what I wanted.--Morio (talk) 14:09, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Well, I think your idea of splitting sub-categories into these categories ► 1890s Wolseley automobiles‎ ► 1900s Wolseley automobiles‎ ► 1910s Wolseley automobiles‎ ► 1920s Wolseley automobiles‎ ► 1930s Wolseley automobiles‎ ► 1940s Wolseley automobiles‎ (why stop at the 1940's?) brings real confusion. You can look up cars of the 1930s etc elsewhere and, if you want to, work your way back to Wolseley.

How do you see the categorisation being used? Eddaido (talk) 03:28, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Error in Template YMDcat

Hi! I've seen your recent changes in the template YMDcat - on a lot of category pages, for example Category:2014-06-23. The fragment [[Category:| 2014]] is part of this template. Please fix it. Thank you. --XRay ^talk 08:01, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Just an additional hint. I'm using the german language: "Juni", not "June". May be you are using special month names in the template. ;-) --XRay ^talk 08:07, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Done. I avoid to use the Template:Date.--Morio (talk) 13:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! --XRay ^talk 17:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

PD-USGov-NASA-AP

Hey Morio, can you explain this edit to {{PD-USGov-NASA-AP}}? It somewhat broke the display on description pages, adding the text "ISS" below the template, since the category was removed. See, for example, File:ISS-39 Aurora Australis with SpaceX CRS-3 Dragon.jpg. — Huntster (t @ c) 12:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for comment. I moved the pictures taken from the ISS from Category:ISS Crew Earth Observations to Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station. Because I thought that the pictures of "astronauts seeing the earth" and the "photographs of the earth (taken from ISS)" (astronauts' activities) are better to be separated. So, it was necessary to change the template {{PD-USGov-NASA-AP}}. And, I fixed the error of my edit on the template. I hope the template work correctly now.--Morio (talk) 13:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response and fix, looks good now. — Huntster (t @ c) 02:27, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Commercial use of images

Hi Morio,

You have taken some awesome images, please can I use your images for a commercial project ?

Thanks in Advance

Regards Paul

Thank you for query and considering to use my pictures. All of my pictures are under creative commons license and you can use them without my permission even if it is for commercial use.--Morio (talk) 15:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Template:Indy500year

Would it be possible to modify Template:Indy500year so that there is some control over whether it sorts into Category:May XXXX in the United States or Category:May XXXX in Indiana? The latter has been created for some recent years, and it would be very good to be able to sort into the proper category. Unfortunately, I don't know enough template syntax to do the modifications myself. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for request. I fixed the template. When you or someone create a "May XXXX in Indiana" category, the "XXXX Indianapolis 500" category may NOT be updated right away. In such a case, you can update the category with editing the "XXXX Indianapolis 500" category and clicking 'Save page' without an edit.--Morio (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Wow, that looks great - the ifexist call is a far more elegant solution than I knew existed. Thanks a lot! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:57, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Caravel Espirito Santo Brazil.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Caravel Espirito Santo Brazil.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Caravel Espirito Santo Brazil.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:10, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Red Bull Volkswagen Touareg Brazil 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Red Bull Volkswagen Touareg Brazil 2.jpg

--  Gazebo (talk) 09:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Red Bull Volkswagen New Beetle Brazil 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Red Bull Volkswagen New Beetle Brazil 2.jpg
• File:Red Bull Volkswagen New Beetle Brazil 3.jpg

--  Gazebo (talk) 09:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:Dmitry_Medvedev_with_people

Dmitry Medvedev with people has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

101.222.227.194 10:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Quick question about Austro-Daimler Bergmeister categories

Morio,

You're much more knowledgeable about European automobiles than I am, and I'm wondering about Category:Austro-Daimler Bergmeister and Category:Austro-Daimler ADR Bergmeister. Should they be merged? Or should one be a subcategory of the other? They were previously unrelated, although I have added {{Cat see also}} for now, as they do appear to be (at the least) closely related to each other. Thanks in advance for any guidance you can provide. Take care!

Michael Barera (talk) 20:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for comment. Sorry but I think it was my mistake. If the category Category:Austro-Daimler ADR Bergmeister is existed, the Category:Austro-Daimler Bergmeister which I created is unnecessary. I will merge them.

Category:2014 Australian Grand Prix

Hi! I think category 2014 V8 Supercars at the F1 Australian Grand Prix‎ should be moved to 2014 MSS Security V8 Supercars Challenge, [21]. What you think? I think also photos with Porsche Carrera cars should be included in own categegory round Australian Carrera Cup Championship. I see also some photos with other racing cars, what is this? Parade or other series? I want add some photos for Polish version article pl:Formuła 1 - Grand Prix Australii 2014 because there are now voting for good article. Please answer me on my discussion page. Eurohunter (talk) 15:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your prepesitions are true. It would be also possible you add more acurate desriptions of pictures? It would be help me added good photos for good sections in article. Eurohunter (talk) 17:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Yo can say me when this pictures was make? These was after practics, qualification, race or different times/days? Eurohunter (talk) 19:32, 15 November 2014 (UTC)