User talk:My-wiki-photos/Archive 2

Nove kategorije po državama

Kada praviš nove kategorije kao npr. Category:Logos of television broadcasting companies of Bosnia and Herzegovina, obrati pažnju da je potrebno da budu unificirane sa već postojećim kategorijama po državama za istu temu, u ovom slučaju Category:Television logos by country. --Smooth_O (talk) 07:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

ok, thanks! Ako te dobro razumijem, to znači da nisam trebao da kreiram kategorije sa takvim imenima, nego da za te kategorije koristim imena koja su u skladu sa imenima već postojećih parent kategorija iste tematike. Ispravi me ako griješim. Isto tako, molim te pogledaj i ovo. Generalno mislim da bi u imenima kategorija trebalo da bude "buildings" umjesto "building", jer jedna kompanija generalno može da ima više od jedne zgrade. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Company_buildings_in_Sarajevo My-wiki-photos (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Tako je, bitno je da je unificirano. Što se tiče zgrada energoinvesta premjestiću ja da bude sa "buildings", ali unutar nje svaka zgrada može imati svoju kategoriju, kao npr. zgrada energoinvesta na Pofalićima i sl. Jedna jako bitna stvar što se tiče zgrada je da nema slobode panorame u BiH, tako da novije zgrade ne bi se smjele postavljati ovdje, vidi Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Bosnia_and_Herzegovina. Ove slike zgrada (elektroprivreda na socijalnom, šoping centri i sl.) će vremenom biti izbrisani. Vidi detaljnije: Category:Bosnia and Herzegovina FOP cases/deleted, pr. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alta Shopping Sarajevo outside.jpg. --Smooth_O (talk) 12:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Na tom linku jasno piše "only allowed provided they are not used for gaining economic profit". Wikimedia je non-profit, i ja kao autor takvih slika postavljajući ih na Wikimedia ne ostvarujem nikakav profit. S druge strane, većinu takvih slika nisam ni snimio s namjerom da isključivo slikam takav objekt, nego se on zatekao u pozadini drugog objekta, npr. tramvaja, koji je u centru zanimanja takve slike. Isto tako, vidim da Google Street View nema nikakvih problema sa slikama na kojima se vide takvi objekti. Sumnjam da Google ima dozvolu svih arhitekata čije se zgrade vide na Google slikama, tako da je i taj zakon po meni besmislen. Evo primjer Google slike My-wiki-photos (talk) 18:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Da budem jasniji, Google nije snimao svoje slike za Street View, ali se takvih slika na nivou ulice koje su snimali drugi može naći na njihovom sajtu. Svako može otići na Google i dodati sliku na njihov Street View, jer Google to nije zabranio. Naravno, na svakoj uličnoj slici će se vidjeti zgrade, a ulice su javna površina na kojoj snimanje ne može biti zabranjeno. Postoji jako mnogo sajtova sa takvim slikama, tako da stvarno ne vidim koja je svrha zakona koji se ne može forsirati. Slobodu interneta sigurno ne mogu zabraniti. My-wiki-photos (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Pročitao sam neke stvari, pa da zaključim ... Wikimedia is a digital media repository, and as such, my opinion is that the Wikimedia licensing process should not go beyond the media itself, i.e. photographs. If Wikimedia goes beyond that trying to enforce third party copyright infringement (architects), then the following two statements are mutually exclusive, and Wikimedia is in conflict with itself. I don't think third party should be Wikimedia's responsibility. 1) Article 52 of the 2010 law on copyright and related rights states that reproductions of copyrighted works (including buildings) "permanently located in squares, parks, streets or other places accessible by the public" are only allowed "provided they are not used for gaining economic profit ". 2) Acceptable licenses: Commercial use of the work must be allowed. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses My-wiki-photos (talk) 20:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Ja te samo informišem da se ne iznenadiš ako ti koja slika bude izbrisana od strane administratora. --Smooth_O (talk) 07:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

ok, thanks! My-wiki-photos (talk) 17:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sarajevo Railway-Station 2011-09-24 (2).jpg

And also:

• File:Sarajevo Railway-Station 2011-09-24.jpg
• File:Sarajevo Railway-Station 2011-10-01.JPG

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 16:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Please read the law: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=5932 There is nothing suggesting that such images may not be freely published as long as they are not used for gaining economic advantage. It is solely up to the users of the image to see that they do not infringe on additional copyright and ask for consent for using the image for commercial purposes. My-wiki-photos (talk) 19:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikimedia should reconsider its Licensing Policy as the current one gives rise to its own demise. My-wiki-photos (talk) 03:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Samo kratko - da ti uštedim vrijeme: vodiš unaprijed izgubljeni rat - prije nekog vremena su izbrisane sve slike koje se tiču tog nekog zakona. Pomoći nema.--Ma▀▄Ga 17:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Ma, ne vodim nikakav rat. Wikimedia treba da bude u skladu sa zakonima, ali mislim da je ovakav model pogrešan. Vjerujem da postoji drugačiji model koji bi bio povoljniji da se izbjegnu ovakve stvari. Zakoni se stalno mijenjaju. Što bi se npr. desilo kad bi sve zemlje na svijetu uvele zabranu slobode panorame. Da li bi Wikimedia u takvom slučaju izbrisala sve postojeće slike koje bi došle u sukob sa novim zakonima?! Ili, recimo, neka zemlja uvede novi zakon kojim skine zabranu slobode panorame. Što će se onda desiti sa slikama koje su već izbrisane po starom zakonu?! Retorička pitanja. Mišljenja sam da je ovakav model sistemska greška na kojoj Wikimedia počiva, i da fotografi imaju mnogo preča posla nego da ganjaju nekakve dozvole za fotografije od kojih nemaju nikakve finansijske koristi. To ganjanje dozvola treba da bude na onima koji hoće da ostvare finansijsku dobit. Elem, hvala na javljanju, ali o ovome se i nema mnogo pričati. My-wiki-photos (talk) 17:29, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Cavtat ili Kotor

[1] Iako je suradnik ovdje naveo blizinu Cavtata, moje skromno znanje njemačkoga prema ovome kaže da je u pitanju Kotor. Imaš možda više saznanja o ovome? Sve najbolje u novoj godini.--Ma▀▄Ga 18:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Sve najbolje u 2017, također. To je putovanje vojne komande u Kotor, 12. februara 1916. Do krajnje željezničke stanice Zelenike su putovali vlakom, a onda su od Zelenike do Kotora putovali brodom. Fotografija je nastala negdje na putu do Zelenike. Može biti da je u blizini Cavtata, ili Ragusa Vecchia (Stari Dubrovnik) kako se tada zvalo to mjesto. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 21:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

JŽ class 740

Vidim da si postavio svakakvih slika, imaš li slučajno u arhivu sliku JŽ serije 740, a da se može postaviti ovdje?--Ma▀▄Ga 11:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Nažalost, nemam svoju sliku, ali mogu upitati neke ljude da li imaju svoje slike od 740 iz Banovića koji bi bili voljni postaviti sliku na Wikimedia. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 05:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@MaGa: Postoje slike od serije 740 na Wikimedia. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 23:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

• 
  740-107
• 
  740-108
• 
  740-108
• 
  740-108

Kreirao sam kategoriju JŽ 740 --My-wiki-photos (talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Nemam riječi. Veliko hvala!--Ma▀▄Ga 07:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear My-wiki-photos,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Find a GO Transit Locomotive

You seem to be a great photographer for GO Transit trains. If you can, could you possibly go back to the GO Transit lines and try to take a picture of locomotive #647? Reason why is because that locomotive is extremely unique: it is currently an MPI MP54AC, and the only MP54AC in service. It looks like this: https://www.wabtec.com/products/5103/mp54-ac-commuter-locomotive

Let me know if you are able to do that. If you can do that. If not, I will search for someone else. Thank you.

--Davidng913 (talk) 14:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! I really have no idea where to catch #647. If it runs on the Kitchener line, I could try to catch it. Let me know if you have any idea of its whereabouts. Anyway, I will be aware of it, and if I ever take a shot of #647, I will certainly let you know. My-wiki-photos (talk) 16:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your welcome! If I find out where it is, I'll let you know. More MP54ACs are on the way, so hang tight. Davidng913 (talk) 23:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Tramvaji u Sarajevu po broju

Pošto su se slike tramvaja u Sarajevu počele gomilati, ovo je najbolje rješenje da se kategoriše po broju tramvaja, tako da svaki tramvaj ima svoju kategoriju. Primjer: Category:Sarajevo tram 503. --Smooth O (talk) 08:43, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

OK. Hvala. Radićemo tako. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 17:43, 2 August 2017 (UTC)