User talk:Nefronus/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunella vulgaris TK 2021-07-12 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: Please a category with the location. --XRay 12:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Thank you, I created the category and moved the file. --Nefronus 12:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)  Comment The way you create categories, there is no benefit from these categories, as they are hardly connected. --A.Savin 13:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC) I stand corrected and will better categorize the new categories. --Nefronus 18:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cichorium intybus TK 2021-07-12 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cichorium intybus TK 2021-07-12 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirsium palustre TK 2021-07-03 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality of the flowers is good. Mildly blurred background is distracting to me. I wonder if a portrait or square crop would improve? --Tagooty 13:38, 15 July 2021 (UTC) Thank you for the review. I’d prefer not to crop, because this way it is possible to see the plant’s habitat (blurred, yet you can get the idea). It is how the plant occurs outside places (to a higher degree) altered by human activity. --Nefronus 17:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Ok. --Tagooty 08:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --- FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 20:29, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Čertovy schody TK 2021-07-23 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Čertovy schody TK 2021-07-23 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verbascum lychnitis TK 2021-07-23 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klonk silurian-devonian TK 2021-07-23 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zlatý kůň, Houbův lom TK 2021-07-23 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melica transsilvanica TK 2021-07-23 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Category with location missing. --XRay 12:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galeopsis angustifolia TK 2021-07-23 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please add a category for the location. --XRay 11:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Geo location

Hello! Your question about the location at File:Cytisus nigricans TK 2021-07-23 1.jpg: IMO a location is necessary. I don't have much knowledge of plants, but sometimes certain plants are typical of a particular place. Therefore I consider the location to be relevant. --XRay 💬 06:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, you are right. I forgot to add geolocation to that one, it is now fixed. However, I think it's not always necessary to add the category '… in …', because it's already included in the description/geolocation (especially when there are few pictures in the category). --Nefronus 08:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klonk silurian-devonian TK 2021-07-23 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cytisus nigricans TK 2021-07-23 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A good category for the location would be nice. And the geo location. --XRay 11:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC) Thank you for the reviews. Is it really necessary to add category for the location? These plants do not have a lot of images, so the category seems redundant to me. The image will by only harder to find, because it wont be listed in the basic category (otherwise it would be overcat). Also, it has GPS coordinates (edit: the other had it, I added it here). --Nefronus 21:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Stachys palustris TK 2021-07-03 1.jpg

• 
  your image
• 
  Stachys officinalis
• 
  dito
• 
  Stachys officinalis (illustration)
• 
  Stachys palustris
• 
  Stachys palustris (illustration)

Hi Nefronus/Archive 2, I suggest that the first image in the gallery above, File:Stachys palustris TK 2021-07-03 1.jpg, shows Stachys officinalis, not Stachys palustris, mostly because there seem to be rather small flowers and just very small leaves that look rather like Stachys officinalis. Stachys palustris has goot more pairs of (frequently larger) stem leaves (> 3) and has frequently somewhat larger flowers nicely motteled with white. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 13:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, thank you very much. I was mislead by the habitat, which was a wet Cirsium meadow (or its margin). I am going to suggest a name change and edit the categories. Best regards, --Nefronus 14:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilosella aurantiaca TK 2021-09-04 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 21:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viburnum opulus fruit TK 2021-09-12 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euonymus europaeus TK 2021-09-05 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Category for location missing. --XRay 05:34, 12 September 2021 (UTC)  Comment Thank you, I added it. --Nefronus 13:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colchicum autumnale TK 2021-09-25 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 18:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colchicum autumnale TK 2021-09-25 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:49, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Czech Wiki photo - poděkování a pozvánka na vernisáž

Děkujeme vám za účast v letošním ročníku Czech Wiki Photo 2021, jednalo se již o třetí ročník, který skončil s velkolepým výsledkem 395 přihlášených prací! Jsme rádi a dojati, že vnímáte potřebu obohatit projekty Wikimedia a přispět ke kvalitě fotografií na české Wikipedii! Dovolujeme si vás pozvat na vernisáž přihlášených prací do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo v letech 2020 a 2021. Akce se uskuteční 13. ledna 2022 ve Skautském institutu v Praze. Doprovodí ji další aktivity, na které vás také zveme, podrobnosti najdete na našich webových stránkách: https://www.wikimedia.cz/cs/akce/?from=2022-01-13&to=2022-01-13.

Přejeme vám veselé a zdravé Vánoce,
Natalia Szelachowska za tým Wikimedia Česká republika
--Natalia Szelachowska (WMCZ) (diskuse) 18:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Pozvánka na fotoworkshop 13. 01.

Dobrý den,

dne 13. ledna proběhne slavnostní zahájení výstavy Czech Wiki Photo a my bychom vás rádi pozvali na fotografický workshop pro účastníky soutěže Czech Wiki Photo, který se koná stejný den v 17:00 (workshop začíná ve vestibulu Skautského institutu v Praze). Budete mít příležitost seznámit se s nástroji, které potřebujete k focení pro Wikipedii, a setkat se s lidmi, kteří jsou do fotografování zapálení. Veškeré podrobnosti najdete v události: https://s.wmcr.cz/wiki-workshop.

Přejeme vám veselé a zdravé Vánoce,
Natalia Szelachowska za tým Wikimedia Česká republika
--Natalia Szelachowska (WMCZ) (diskuse) 11:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galanthus nivalis TK 2022-03-08 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:39, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salix caprea and Apis mellifera TK 2022-03-19 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulsatilla pratensis subsp. bohemica TK 2022-04-22 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Nefronus - could you add some information about where File:Blechnum spicant 6 TK 2021-07-29.jpg and File:Blechnum spicant 7 TK 2021-07-29.jpg were taken, please? It will help with adding the most precise categories. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 15:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I added the coordinates. --Nefronus 16:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Zapojte se do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2022

Vážení fotografové a fotografky,

V minulém roce jste se zúčastnili soutěže Czech Wiki Photo a letos se koná její další ročník. Až do konce října tohoto roku můžete přihlásit své nejlepší fotografie a zapojit se do soutěže o zajímavé ceny.

Letos se soutěží ve čtyřech kategoriích: Příroda; Slavné osobnosti; Společnost, kultura a události a Vytvořeno člověkem. Do každé z těchto kategorií můžete nahrát dvě fotografie, celkem tedy až 8 fotografii, které jste za uplynulý rok na území ČR pořídili. Více o soutěži se dozvíte na stránkách akce Czech Wiki Photo 2022.

Dobré světlo,

Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) (diskuse) 05:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Chlorophyll illustration

I just wanted to say I absolutely loved this image, its really great and something that conveys this simply has been needed for a while.

Well done! :-)

Why are plants green

Mplanine (talk) 21:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words! --Nefronus 17:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Zapojte se do Mikrosoutěže architektura 2023

Vážení a milí fotografové a fotografky,

protože jste se nedávno zapojili do některé z našich fotografických soutěžích, zvu vás k účasti na Mikrosoutěži architektura 2023. Tato soutěž se zaměřuje na dokumentování nenafocených staveb a jejich detailů. Fotografie můžete nahrát na Commons do 15. března 2023. Hrajeme o poukaz na foto-služby.

Více informací najdete na stránce Mikrosoutěž architektura 2023.

Díky, že fotíte!

S přáním dobrého světla,

Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) (diskuse) 16:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)