Last modified on 23 November 2014, at 05:14

User talk:Nightflyer

  • Discussion
Return to the user page of "Nightflyer".

Contact: de:Benutzer:Nightflyer

Image:Hochbruecke_Brunsbuettel_1_IMG_1173.jpgEdit

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 20:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, done --Nightflyer 20:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Praesident_Freiherr_von_Maltzahn,_IMG_0814.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Praesident_Freiherr_von_Maltzahn,_IMG_0814.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jusjih 12:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, done. --Nightflyer 19:54, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Featured_picture_candidates#Adding_a_new_nominationEdit

Hi, I have created Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Kronenkranich IMG 1123.jpg for you, using use the macro at Commons:Featured_picture_candidates#Adding_a_new_nomination. The bird is nice, though I think the background might count against it. Good luck. Regards, Ben Aveling 22:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kronenkranich IMG 1123.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kronenkranich IMG 1123.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Image Tagging Image:Wenzel_Hablik_Entwurf_Empfangsraum_Nordischer_Kurier.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wenzel_Hablik_Entwurf_Empfangsraum_Nordischer_Kurier.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 19:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


Image:Stamps_of_Germany_(BRD),_Olympiade_1972,_Ausgabe_1969,_10_Pf.jpgEdit

Image deletion warning Image:Stamps_of_Germany_(BRD),_Olympiade_1972,_Ausgabe_1969,_10_Pf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nightflyer 21:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Stamps_of_Germany_(BRD),_Olympiade_1972,_Ausgabe_1969,_10_Pf.jpgEdit

Image deletion warning Image:Stamps_of_Germany_(BRD),_Olympiade_1972,_Ausgabe_1969,_10_Pf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nightflyer 21:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

BriefmarkenEdit

Hallo Nightflyer, hab gesehen, dass du auch Briefmarken hochlädst. Ich habe vor einiger Zeit eine kleine feine Vorlage dafür entwickelt, die zusätzlich zur Infovorlage (die bei deinen Marken leider fehlt) eingesetzt werden soll und schon eine gute Verbreitung gefunden hat. Die Vorlage findest du samt Anleitung unter {{Philately}}. Wenn du Fragen hast, meld dich einfach. Ich habe übrigens vor, Ende Februar ein Briefmarken bzw. Philatelie-Projekt hier auf Commons zu starten. ChristianBier 21:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

DankeEdit

Vielen Dank für Ihre Arbeit auf das Hochladen von Bildern für Gedenkmünzen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland auf Wiki Commons, kann ich jetzt diese Bilder für Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Germany). -- Kevin Hipwell

StampsEdit

Restored. Please see this message and point me to other stamps I mis-deleted. Thanks in advance, odder 09:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Right; restored. odder 09:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Nightflyer!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 21:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

StampsEdit

Why are you uploading duplicate copies of the same stamps?? --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 08:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

??? Please give a link. Greetings --Nightflyer (talk) 08:15, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3243 II.jpg and File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3244 I.jpg --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 08:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Look at de:Briefmarken-Jahrgang 1990 der Deutschen Post der DDR. There are MiNr: 3302 and 3306 and so on. It is not the same, some is bigger. Greetings. --Nightflyer (talk) 08:28, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Or look at en:Postage stamp separation and begin to counting the small holes ;-) Greetings --Nightflyer (talk) 08:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC) (I have removed your tags)


File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1569.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1569.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--VernoWhitney (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

DDREdit

Bitte beim hochladen nur die Unterkategorie (das Jahr des Erscheinens) und nicht auch die Überkategorie anführen! Gruß--Reinhardhauke 21:46, 8. Nov. 2010 (CET)

Dann hab ich bisher ca. 1.600 DDR-Briefmarken falsch hochgeladen :-) Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Ja, denn die Überkategorie steht ja jeweils in der Unterkategorie unten angeführt. Deshalb hat diese Überkategorie auch 1804 files. Wenn jede Briefmarke eindeutig einem Jahr zuzuordnen ist, dürfte die Category:Stamps of the German Democratic Republic nur die Unterkategorie Category:Stamps of the German Democratic Republic by year haben und diese wiederum nur die Unterkategorien wie 1949 und andere Jahre.--Reinhardhauke (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Dann mach mal alles wech. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Guten Morgen, da kann man doch bestimmt auch in den Commons einen Bot für beauftragen, oder? Gruß kandschwar (talk) 04:43, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

InfoEdit

Hallo Nightflyer, nur so zur Info fürs nächste Mal: ein einmal gestellter Löschantrag (sofern kein offensichtlicher Vandalismus) sollte von dem die Löschdiskussion abschließenden admin von der Bildseite entfernt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Man lernt immer dazu. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 23:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Itzehoe Probstenhaus IMG 2287.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Sorry, corrected. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Itzehoe Probstenhaus IMG 2285.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Sorry, corrected. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1602.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:55, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Nightflyer, wenn du mal wieder ein Bild falsch benamst hast, gib mir ein kurzen Input auf meiner Disk, ich kann es mit einem Klick umbennen (verschieben), der Umweg über "Bad Name" ist dann nicht notwändig. Bin jetzt allerdings für ca. 'ne Woche nicht da, falls du kurzfristig darauf zurückkommen möchtest ;-). Gruß und schönen Abend NobbiP talk 19:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2830.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright
File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2830.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jappalang (talk) 08:30, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Stamps_of_Germany_(DDR)_1983,_MiNr_2830.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stamps_of_Germany_(DDR)_1983,_MiNr_2830.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jappalang (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Pariser_Platz_Berlin_im_Juni_2005.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pariser_Platz_Berlin_im_Juni_2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MGA73 (talk) 13:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1976, MiNr 2136.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finishedEdit

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Nightflyer,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Frage nach den NutzungsrechtenEdit

Sehr geehrter "nightflyer",

aktuell wird die Frage nach den Nutzungsrechten an folgendem Bild diskutiert: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Deutsche_Gedenkmuenzen_-_Waehrungsunion_IMG_2613.jpg. Missverständnisse werden am Besten in direktem Dialog vermieden oder ausgeräumt. Sollten Sie Rechte an dem genannten Bild geltend machen, bitte ich um eine direkte Kontaktierung unter ansgar.heveling@bundestag.de.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Das Team Heveling

Hi! Genau wie drüben bei de:Benutzer:Horst Frank und den anderen bin ich so frei, etwas zum Kontext zu liefern (natürlich kann, will und werde ich keine Rechtsberatung liefern, hierzu sollte man einen auf Urheberrecht spezialisierten Anwalt fragen). Ansgar Heveling ist Bundestagsabgeordneter und Mitglied der de:Enquete-Kommission Internet und digitale Gesellschaft. Er ist Jurist und wird in der Presse Urheberrechtsexperte seiner Fraktion genannt. Als MdB hat er einige Zeit einen Newsletter herausgegeben, der auch mäßig bebildert war. Seit gestern ist der Newsletter nicht mehr online auf seiner Webseite, genug Leute dürften sich Kopien davon gemacht haben. Ein Teil der Bilder stammt aus Wikimedia Commons. Sofern es sich um unter CC-by-sa oder CC-by freigegebene Bilder handelt, wurden die Lizenzbestimmungen nicht eingehalten. Es greift also der Punkt "Termination" der Lizenz, die den Verlust der Nutzungserlaubnis durch den Urheberrechtsverletzer beinhaltet. Wer unerlaubt urheberrechtlich geschützte Werke verwendet, kann vom Rechteinhaber gezwungen werden, Schadensersatz zu leisten und es kann auf Unterlassung bestanden werden (da die Gefahr der Wiederholung gegeben ist). Schadensersatz bemisst sich nach der de:Lizenzanalogie, hierzu gibt es Tabellen für übliche Nutzungsarten. Außerdem hat der Rechteinhaber eine Reihe von Auskunftsrechten gegenüber dem Verletzer. Natürlich kann einem Verletzer auch noch nachträglich ein Nutzungsrecht außerhalb der CC-Lizenz durch den Rechteinhaber eingeräumt werden. Ob Ansgar Heveling via Email an ansgar.heveling@bundestag.de erreichbar ist, kann ich nicht beurteilen, eine Email an ihn vor einigen Tagen blieb bisher unbeantwortet. Alvar Freude, der mit Heveling in der Enquete sitzt hat in seinem Blog auf den Sachverhalt hingewiesen und ordnet die Sache auch noch politisch ein. Bei Rückfragen stehe ich natürlich auch zur Verfügung. -- Mathias Schindler (talk) 18:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
(ebenfalls crosspost) ::.oO Fast könnte ich mich schlapplachen, dass ausgerechnet Alvar Freude sich neuerdings für Urheberrechte und die korrekte Kennzeichnung von Commons-Material einsetzt. Aber naja, für eine Kampagne als glorreicher Robin Hood des Internets ist ihm eben alles willkommen.
Zur Frage nach den Urheberrechten an obigem Bild meine Einschätzung: Ich halte das als reine 2D-Repro für nicht geschützt. --Martina talk 20:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Darf ich fragen, wer mit wem über mein Foto diskutiert? Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Nightflyer. Wurde deine Frage dazu inzwischen beantwortet? Ansonsten kann ich versuchen dir zu erklären, weshalb du diese Einträge auf deiner Benutzerseite bekommen hast. Viele Grüße --Michael (talk)
Danke für den Hinweis, ich bin informiert. Das nächste Mal wähle ich die Piraten... Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Naja, ob das die Lösung aller Probleme ist, weiß ich nicht, aber Herr Heveling ist laut seinen Bundestagsreden davon überzeugt, dass Abmahnungen ein gutes Mittel sind, um den Rechteverletzer vor einem Strafverfahren zu schützen. Ich mutmaße mal, dass Herr Heveling bei der Verwendung deines Bildes im Newsletter ein Rechteverletzer ist. Also ist er dir doch sicherlich dankbar, wenn du ihn abmahnst und nicht vor Gericht ziehst... Im Zweifelsfall immer einen Rechtsanwalt hinzuziehen, der macht die Rechtsberatung. Vorsorglich: Dieser Eintrag gibt nur meine persönliche Meinung wieder und stellt keine Rechtsberatung dar. Viele Grüße --Michael (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1569.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1569.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Liliana-60 (talk) 21:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Cover Austria 1938-650px.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cover Austria 1938-650px.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rd232 (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, ich weiss nicht einmal mehr, was ich an dem Bild bearbeitet hab :-( Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Workwearstore engelbert strauss.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Workwearstore engelbert strauss.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Workwearstore engelbert strauss.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 10:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Horst (Holstein), Germany - Schandpfahl 2.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Horst (Holstein), Germany - Schandpfahl 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 10:54, 18 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Nightflyer,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 00:24, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit

Can you please explain the reasons for reverting me? odder (talk) 21:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

I will try, my english is very poor.
Have a look of *.png-Versions. The sign monuments looks cut from below. I try to have look at older versions. --Nightflyer (talk) 21:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
The original has the same error. Sorry. --Nightflyer (talk) 21:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Wikimedia Germany will print a calendar and a poster with the logo, and that does not look good. Nightflyer (talk) 22:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
We are aware of how the logo looks like; I was overseeing the printing of last years' calendars, and they look just fine. odder (talk) 07:40, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Brasaocpe15.jpgEdit

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Brasaocpe15.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 06:16, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!Edit

Kitten-stare.jpg

Na, Alter, alles klar?

Schlesinger (talk) 14:18, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Burenziegen als Landschaftspfleger in Kremperheide DSC01761.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:05, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Done. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Mönkloh, Kunst im öffentlichen Raum, Signatur Leonardo Rossi NIK 2281.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mönkloh, Kunst im öffentlichen Raum, Signatur Leonardo Rossi NIK 2281.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:3 OSS STAMPS.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:3 OSS STAMPS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wikiEdit

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Deutsches Reich - Feldpost.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Deutsches Reich - Feldpost.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:59, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Deutsches Reich - Lochung.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Deutsches Reich - Lochung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 23:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Nightflyer,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1980, MiNr 620.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright
File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1980, MiNr 620.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 21:53, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine Mitarbeit am freien Wissen der Welt! Russland ist damit natürlich ein leuchtendes Vorbild. Eine Information vorher wäre besser gewesen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1965, MiNr 1140.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1965, MiNr 1140.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 22:36, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

QINominatorEdit

Hallo Nightflyer, kannste mal einen screenshot machen vom edit window auf der QI kandidatenliste? Und zwar nachdem du mit dem QINominator vorher ein paar bilder markiert hast. --Dschwen (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Dschwen, hat sich erledigt. Nicht durch meine bescheidenen Englischkenntnisse, sondern durch probieren. Das Gadget sollte eine bebilderte Anleitung erhalten, damit dummys wie ich nicht verzweifeln :-) Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:14, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kaaks, Ortsteil Eversdorf, Fischbauchbrücke über die Bekau NIK 3300.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaaks, Ortsteil Eversdorf, Fischbauchbrücke über die Bekau NIK 3300.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Kaaks, Ortsteil Eversdorf, Fischbauchbrücke über die Bekau NIK 3300.JPGEdit

Servus Nightflyer,
obiges Bild ist wirklich sehr schön und die kleine Pegellatte am Ufer gefällt mir besonders gut. Einzig störend ist, dass offensichtlich beim review für's Qualityimage übersehen wurde, dass das Bild 1,5° nach links kippt. Ist es OK wenn ich eine geradegestellte Version hochlade? LG --P e z i (talk) 20:37, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Mach es einfach, zurücksetzen kann man ja immer :-) Gruss --Nightflyer (talk)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Archäologisch-Ökologisches Zentrum Albersdorf IMG 0070.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archäologisch-Ökologisches Zentrum Albersdorf IMG 0070.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Störfähre Else NIK 0685.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Störfähre Else NIK 0685.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Itzehoe, Germany - theater itzehoe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Itzehoe, Germany - theater itzehoe.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Itzehoe, Gasexplosion am 10 März 2014 NIK 4659.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Itzehoe, Gasexplosion am 10 März 2014 NIK 4659.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schwebefähre Rendsburg NIK 2853.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwebefähre Rendsburg NIK 2853.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Brunsbüttel, Fähre Breslau NIK 0862.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunsbüttel, Fähre Breslau NIK 0862.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Burg, Fähre über den Nord-Ostsee-Kanal NIK 0327.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg, Fähre über den Nord-Ostsee-Kanal NIK 0327.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

DankeschönEdit

Schunkelhaus

--Anika (talk) 07:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

War das in dieser Form ein Versehen? Keine Kategorien mehr? Keine Beschreibung? Kein WP in Seifhennersdorf? *schnief*
Falls es einen anderen Zweck hat: der blöde Gullideckel kann schon auch noch weg (oder heb dir das für WLM auf *gg*) --Anika (talk) 21:48, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Geduld. Hier läuft der commonist, und der überschreibt einfach alles :-) Ich reparier das schon... Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:53, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Oki Face-smile.svg Kleiner Tipp in diesem Zusammenhang: mit drei Tilden ~~~ bekommst du die Unterschrift ohne Zeitstempel (für die Autorenangabe) Anika (talk)
und mit 5 Tilden nur die Zeit: 21:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
BÄH! Ich soll doch Bapperl sammeln, also tu ich dies und warte auf Kommentare :-) Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kottmarsdorf, Windmühle im Nebel NIK 5294.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kottmarsdorf, Windmühle im Nebel NIK 5294.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Neumünster, an der Margarethenschanze NIK 5031.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Neumünster, an der Margarethenschanze NIK 5031.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Naturschutzgebiet Herrenmoor bei Kleve NIK 5745.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Naturschutzgebiet Herrenmoor bei Kleve NIK 5745.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5588.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5588.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QI etiquetteEdit

Hi. I noticed that on one day you nominated at least twelve images for QI review. This is a bit excessive, and it actually makes people less likely to review, especially if all the photos are of the same subject. Please try to restrict yourself to a maximum of 7 per day. You may find that reviewing others' images also makes people more inclined to review yours. Anyway, good luck, and happy photographing! -mattbuck (Talk) 20:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi @Mattbuck:, Sorry for my poor english, I translate it with google:

I was asked if there are more useful pictures from the meeting in Seifhennersdorf.

I understood this as an invitation to nomination.

The too many there were at one time, I have learned today.

Sorry for that :-)

Can I modify it and restart with less images or the images are now not assessable for ever?

This was the first meeting of several Wikipedias: Germany, Poland, Czech Republic and Austria. The Sorbian Wikipedia was there. It would be a shame if there was no error by my award-winning images.

It was a great meeting, few could talk directly to each other, but all had the same goal.

Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

If an image is not reviewed after about 8 days, it is just removed from the page (they usually have Category:Unassessed Quality Image candidates added). Either someone will review your photos or they won't, removing them yourself is counterproductive. You can add them for review again at a later date.
Please be aware that QI is not concerned in any way with the usefulness of an image - for that go to COM:VI. QI cares purely about technical merit. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Krempermoor, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Geesthang bei Dägeling mit Bockwischer Moor NIK 5978.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Krempermoor, Landschaftsschutzgebiet Geesthang bei Dägeling mit Bockwischer Moor NIK 5978.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5567.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5567.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Lockstedt, Naturdenkmal NIK 4974.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Lockstedt, Naturdenkmal NIK 4974.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5603.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sachsen, Obercunnersdorf NIK 5603.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Hennstedt, Naturdenkmal NIK 4979.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Hennstedt, Naturdenkmal NIK 4979.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

DankeEdit

für die Tipps zur Überprüfung der Koordinatenangaben bei meinen Ampertalfotos :-) Herzlich Grüße Frühstücksdrache (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Wilster, Naturdenkmal NIK 6516.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wilster, Naturdenkmal NIK 6516.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schleswig-Holstein, Siezbüttel, Naturdenkmal NIK 6541.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Siezbüttel, Naturdenkmal NIK 6541.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Wilster, Naturdenkmal NIK 6517.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wilster, Naturdenkmal NIK 6517.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schleswig-Holstein, Neuendorf, Naturdenkmal NIK 6017.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Neuendorf, Naturdenkmal NIK 6017.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Grab von Gustav Frenssen NIK 6720.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grab von Gustav Frenssen NIK 6720.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:WLE Jury 2014 in Hamburg NIK 7612.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:WLE Jury 2014 in Hamburg NIK 7612.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Y562y315 (talk) 10:44, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Geklärt :) --Indeedous (talk) 00:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für den NaturschutzEdit

WLE-Deutschland-2014.jpg

Hallo Nightflyer,

vor einer Woche endete der zweimonatige Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit rund 14.500 Fotos hat Deutschland einen Anteil von 20 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 15 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 729 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Einen Überblick zu den Fotos und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Gegenwärtig ist die deutsche Jury dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu geschützten Naturlandschaften und Naturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am kommenden Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg.

Der nächste Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet nun schon zum vierten Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, wo die Kulturdenkmale im Vordergrund stehen. Doch du musst mit dem Fotografieren nicht bis zum September warten. Vielleicht kannst du den Sommer nutzen um entsprechend den offiziellen Denkmallisten geeignete Motive aufzuspüren. Ebenso kannst du gerne dabei helfen, die hochgeladenen Fotos zu kategorisieren oder in Wikipedia-Artikel und Listen einzubinden.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross)

NSG KaltenbornEdit

scheint's zu geben: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Naturschutzgebiet_Kaltenbronn mit Link auf Datenbank. Schnellen Gruß --Aalfons (talk) 14:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Gefunden. Es gibt zwei Kaltenbronns: Bayern und BW. Ich hab natürlich im falschen gesucht :-( Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 14:17, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Fitzbek, Naturdenkmal NIK 6919.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Fitzbek, Naturdenkmal NIK 6919.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Warringholz, Naturdenkmal NIK 6595.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Warringholz, Naturdenkmal NIK 6595.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Wrist, Naturdenkmal NIK 7723.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wrist, Naturdenkmal NIK 7723.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schleswig-Holstein, Wrist, Naturdenkmal NIK 7727.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Wrist, Naturdenkmal NIK 7727.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Gut Springhoe, alter Grenzstein an der Landessrasse 121 NIK 8166.JPGEdit

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gut Springhoe, alter Grenzstein an der Landessrasse 121 NIK 8166.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 20:07, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Pferd mit lila Streifen.jpgEdit

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pferd mit lila Streifen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 18:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in KürzeEdit

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo Nightflyer,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Willenscharen, Naturdenkmal NIK 8334.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Willenscharen, Naturdenkmal NIK 8334.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Brokstedt, Naturdenkmal NIK 7889.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Brokstedt, Naturdenkmal NIK 7889.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

CAs File:Schleswig-Holstein, Drage, Naturdenkmal NIK 8022.JPGEdit

Ich glaube am Rahmen der weißen Tür rechts welche zu erkennen. Grüße, ireas (talk) 19:51, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Danke, ich seh aber auch mit 200% nichts. Kann allerdings auch an meinem Monitor oder an mir liegen, CAs zu beheben muss ich noch lernen :-) Vielleicht treffen wir uns ja auf der Wikicon, da kannst du mir ja ein paar Tips geben. Ich werde auf alle Fälle den Vortrag 21 besuchen. Ansonsten werde ich analog zu 2013 vermutlich überall zu finden sein, irgendetwas ist immer zu regeln :-) Gruss --~~

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Drage, Naturdenkmal NIK 8062.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Drage, Naturdenkmal NIK 8062.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Drage, Naturdenkmal NIK 8033.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Drage, Naturdenkmal NIK 8033.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Drage, Naturdenkmal NIK 8461.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Drage, Naturdenkmal NIK 8461.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Ottenbüttel, Unglück NIK 8390.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Ottenbüttel, Unglück NIK 8390.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Wiki loves Monuments hat noch nicht begonnen.jpgEdit

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wiki loves Monuments hat noch nicht begonnen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 21:32, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Ehrenhain der schleswig-holsteinischen Artillerie in Kellinghusen, Beobachtungsartilleriebataillion 61 NIK 8307.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehrenhain der schleswig-holsteinischen Artillerie in Kellinghusen, Beobachtungsartilleriebataillion 61 NIK 8307.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Ehrenhain der schleswig-holsteinischen Artillerie in Kellinghusen, Panzerartilleriebataillon 185 NIK 8312.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehrenhain der schleswig-holsteinischen Artillerie in Kellinghusen, Panzerartilleriebataillon 185 NIK 8312.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Hohenaspe, Kriegerdenkmal NIK 8746.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenaspe, Kriegerdenkmal NIK 8746.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Borsfleth NIK 3016.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borsfleth NIK 3016.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Krogaspe, alter Baum NIK 4993.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krogaspe, alter Baum NIK 4993.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Pöschendorf, Ehrenmal NIK 9743.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Pöschendorf, Ehrenmal NIK 9743.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Schleswig-Holstein, Kellinghusen Kulturdenkmal NIK 8556.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleswig-Holstein, Kellinghusen Kulturdenkmal NIK 8556.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:T%C3%B6nning_jm22056.jpgEdit

Jetzt wirst du unverschämt. "Der Uploader will nicht, das dies Bild am Wettbewerb WLM 2014 teilnimmt. Siehe Versionsgeschichte" Dann muss ich mich jetzt ehrlich entschuldigen. Ich hoffe du nimmst es an.

--Jörgens.Mi  Talk 21:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Kein Problem, alles OK. Ich bin nicht nachtragend. Das ist halt das Problem der schriftlichen Kommunikation hier, da gibt es manchmal Missverständnisse. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die DenkmaltopographieEdit

WLM-Deutschland-2014.jpg

Hallo Nightflyer,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

  • Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.
WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

File:KW-Brücke-WHV.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:KW-Brücke-WHV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 10:25, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kudensee, Gedenkstätte NIK 0759.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kudensee, Gedenkstätte NIK 0759.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.