Paulae

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago9 comments6 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Paulae!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image:Studentensport TU Dresden.JPG was uncategorized on 23 September 2009.
Image:Wandbrunnen Flötenspieler Südvorstadt Dresden.JPG was uncategorized on 27 September 2009.
Image:Christine Clauß 09.jpg was uncategorized on 6 October 2009.
Image:Wandbrunnen Striesen.jpg was uncategorized on 8 October 2009.
Image:Postsiedlung Strehlen 2.jpg was uncategorized on 19 October 2009.
Image:Margon-Haus.jpg was uncategorized on 19 October 2009.
Image:Hermann Kokenge.jpg was uncategorized on 19 October 2009.
Image:Nürnberger Straße 32 und 34 Dresden.JPG was uncategorized on 19 October 2009.
Image:Postsiedlung Strehlen 1.jpg was uncategorized on 19 October 2009.
Image:Margonwasser Reklame Dresden.ogg was uncategorized on 22 October 2009.
Image:Cornelia Falken Die Linke.jpg was uncategorized on 4 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I put cats to all pics I upload. They don't show up after uploading the image. I never had this problem before, but had to recat all images I uploaded today as well, because none of my cats were added to the pic. Maybe someone should fix this. --Paulae (talk) 12:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Soso, sie "shoppen" also nicht "up"? <sing>Davon geht die Welt nicht unter</sing> Wie dem auch sei, was Bots dir erzählen, kannst du meistens getrost ignorieren, zumindest kommunikationsmäßig. Genausogut kannst du dich mit der Parkuhr unterhalten. --X-Weinzar (talk) 00:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ich weiß, dass das "nur" ein Bot ist. Es ist eher für die Leute gedacht, die meine Anfragen auf diversen Seiten bezüglich des Problems lesen und sich dann nochmal auf meiner Disk umsehen. Wollt gerade behaupten, ich wäre auf der Tastatur verrutscht, aber w und p liegen ja nun wirklich weit auseinander. :-) --Paulae (talk) 12:17, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Paulae, kannst du bitte im Bild Image:Kutzbach-Bau.jpg die Kennzeichen der fotografierten Autos unkenntlich machen? 141.30.4.106 16:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Erledigt. --Paulae (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Das war bestimmt der BMW-Fahrer ;-) --X-Weinzar (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vielen Dank. Der BMW hat inzwischen den Besitzer gewechselt...217.235.98.163 22:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Stolperstein photo edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I saw that you took a lot of pictures of different Stolpersteine in Berlin. In case you are still interested in this subject: I rewrote the German article on de:Fritz Pfeffer, who got a Stolperstein in Berlin in 2007. It is located on the corner of Passauer Straße/Lietzenburger Straße. Is it possible for you to take a picture of that stone? It would be great for the article. Greetings, --Paulae (talk) 14:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Okay, on my next trip to Berlin I will take a picture. I expect to go to Berlin in August. Jdsteakley (talk) 20:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dita Parlo edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sorry for that. I was unaware that it may be under copyright in US. Best regards, Filip em (talk) 10:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pictures of AR edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! I haven't uploaded all my pictures of Alan Rickman to Commons because there is a lot of them, some of which are somewhat redundant and/or too fannish. I'm not sure it would be considered in scope to transfer them all, but I can import some more to allow more choice. Do tell me if there some you would like to see here. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for answering so quickly! I'd love to see that one on Commons, this one, this and this one. And I like the somewhat blurry version of this one too. It'd be be great to have them on Commons. --Paulae (talk) 18:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK, I'll clean the original files and upload them on Commons. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merci beaucoup! I'll try to be patient. --Paulae (talk) 18:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Ffff.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Ffff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.170.180 20:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

It's not my file. I just reverted the vandalised version of that file to the original one some months ago. ;-) --Paulae (talk) 20:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Till Demtrøder Berlinale 2008.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Till Demtrøder Berlinale 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rockfang (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Gedenktafel Markt 19 (Weimar) Lilli Palmer.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Paulae, vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Die Tafel von Lilli Palmer befindet sich im Flur des Hotels.

Könntest Du mir bitte erklären, wie ich feststellen kann, dass der Text darauf urheberrechtlich geschützt ist, oder fällt das Bild, da es im Inneren eines Gebäudes aufgenommen wurde automatisch unter die Panoramafreiheit? Müsste man dann nicht alle Fotos, die im Inneren eines Gebäudes, das öffentlich zugänglich ist (Museen, Galerien, Hausflure ect.) löschen?

Sicherlich ist hier die Frage, ist ein Hotel öffentlich zugänglich? Nach meiner Auffassung schon, da ja jeder die Flure eines Hotels betreten kann, selbst wenn er kein Hotelgast ist.

Für eine kleine Erklärung wäre ich Dir dankbar, um zukünftige Fehler zu vermeiden.

P.S.: Du hattest ein Stolperstein von de:Fritz Pfeffer gesucht. Hier ist er: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Stolperstein_Lietzenburger_Str_20b_(Sch%C3%B6nb)_Fritz_Pfeffer.jpg

Gruß, OTFW (talk) 09:01, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Na da ist zum Beispiel ein Briefauszug von Egon Günther dabei, der immer noch lebt. Der Text ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Das Urheberrecht verlischt 70 Jahre nach dem Tod des Urhebers. Ein Hotel ist mit Sicherheit kein im rechtlichen Sinne öffentlich zugängliches Gebäude und ein Hotelflur fällt nicht unter die Panoramafreiheit. Panoramafreiheit bedeutet grob gesagt, dass fest verankerte Dinge unter freiem Himmel von öffentlichen bzw. öffentlich zugänglichen Plätzen und Wegen aus fotografiert (und z.B. unter freier Lizenz freigegeben) werden dürfen, selbst wenn sie urheberrechtlich geschützt sind. Also Skulpturen, Hausbemalungen etc. Man müsste Bilder im Inneren z.B. von Museen, Galerien und Hausfluren natürlich löschen, wenn dort zentral ein urheberechtlich geschützter Gegenstand drauf ist. Deswegen gibt es z.B. auch keine Gemäldefotos von zeitgenössischen Künstlern unter freier Lizenz. Ich denke, ein LA auf die Plakette gab es bisher nicht, weil jeder davon ausgegangen ist, dass sich die Plakette außen am Gebäude befindet.

Für das Stolpersteinfoto kriegst du von mir im Nachhinein ein großes Dankeschön! Gruß, --Paulae (talk) 12:32, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Das edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

hört ja gar nicht mehr auf !?! ;-) Schönes Wetter! *duck* --X-Weinzar (talk) 20:37, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Och, es hat *sehr* schön geregnet. Nirgendwo ist Regen schöner als in Meißen. :-) Aber wenn der Commonist jetzt erst bis K gekommen ist, braucht der ja, bis er fertig ist, ewig. -.- --Paulae (talk) 20:49, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Stimmt, der geht ja alphabetisch vor. Etwa 2 Minuten pro Bild, wie es scheint, da kann man sich das Ende ungefähr ausrechnen. Wow... Sick! (die Aktion, du hoffentlich nicht ;-) Also ich als Schönwetterfotografierer wär nach hause, oder gar nicht erst los). In Dresden evtl., jedenfalls ist gemäß Ausspruch ja Dresden selbst bei Regen einem Wien bei Sonne vorzuziehen. --X-Weinzar (talk) 21:30, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Du hast gewonnen! edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Du bist Gewinner im Fotowettbewerb
Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Liebe_r Paulae,

Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Bild ist eines der besten hundert Fotos von Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 Deutschland!

Wir freuen uns Dir mitzuteilen, dass eines Deiner Bilder am 20. Oktober 2012 auf der WLM-Jury-Sitzung in Nürnberg als Preisträger ausgewählt wurde. Wir sind begeistert über die Qualität, die Vielfalt und die Schönheit der zahlreichen eingesendeten Fotos – vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!

Anlässlich der Preisverleihung und der Abschlussveranstaltung des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs für Deutschland lädt Dich die WMDE herzlich zur Europäischen Denkmal-Messe am 22. November 2012 in Leipzig ein (Weitere Informationen findest Du hier). Wir würden uns freuen, Dich dort begrüßen zu können und Dir Deinen Preis persönlich zu überreichen. Für einen Reisekostenzuschuss und weitere Informationen kannst du dich (bitte möglichst bald) bei community@wikimedia.de melden.

Im Namen der WLM-Deutschland-Jury --Atamari (talk) 21:21, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

DAS freut mich riesig! :-D Das war mein kleiner Traum, dass eines unter den vielen Hundert von mir vielleicht doch den Sprung unter die Hundert schafft. Am 22. wirds wohl eher schwer, ist ja ein normaler Arbeitstag. Werde ich wohl kurzfristig entscheiden müssen. Gruß, --Paulae (talk) 21:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Robert Sterl - Anton von Serre 1923.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kupferstich von Peter Isselburg: Versammlung der Fruchtbringenden Gesellschaft. Um 1622. edit

Liebe Paulae,

Sie schreiben, Sie haben diesen Kupferstich von Peter Isselburg selbst eingescannt. Wo ist dieser Stich denn verfügbar bzw. wo lagert er derzeit? Mir ist nur bekannt, dass er in J. C. Beckmanns "Historie des Fürstenthums Anhalt" Teil V. abgebildet ist, aber hierbei handelt es sich ja nicht um das Original. Ich benötige den Kupferstich in einer noch höheren Auflösung, sodass mir sehr daran gelegen ist, zu erfahren, wo man ihn heute anschauen kann.

Mit besten Grüßen,

NFG

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement edit

Du erhältst einen Orden! edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	Der Fotografenorden
	Für das Bild des Grabes von Werner Gruner auf dem Waldfriedhof Weißer Hirsch Aarp65 (talk) 13:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

My uploads edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

You may revert my uploads over someone's photos, but please do not revert my original uploads - upload "your" versions instead. Materialscientist (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Our primary purpose is serving Wikipedia projects (articles), not mass-storing images. Materialscientist (talk) 08:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You seem to forget that Nicola Perscheid has its own article and of course this article has a direct link to Commons to have a look at the photographs he took. You crop a square pic to make it an upright one. It's not the pic he as an artist made, but only a version that fits better in an infobox. It's ok to upload the cropped pic as a second one, but just don't put it over the original. Two versions and everything is fine + people wanting to use the pic in an article can choose if they want to use the original version or the cropped one. Afaik there is even a rule for that on Commons that tells people not to override an original version with an altered one. And btw no, I don't agree with your opinion that our primary purpose is to serve our own articles. Commons is a database that offers free (conc. license) pics for re-use by everyone. Otherwise we would upload all pics with an nd-license or copyrighted. And of course we have different versions of the same object and even of the same pic all over Commons. You just try to defend your wrong way of dealing with pics, which is even worse considering you're an admin. I won't discuss this any further. EOD --Paulae (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Der kleine Eisbär.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Der kleine Eisbär.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Schlosser67 (talk) 14:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Josef Miller Briefmarke.jpg

Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Eine Bitte edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, hast Du List hier Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Atelier Eberth, Berlin einen Kommentar abzugeben? Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 06:54, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Carl Roux - Georg Friedrich Creuzer.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Paulae, maybe the file should be renamed because of confusing? Description readse: Bildnis des deutschen Philologen Georg Friedrich Creuzer, Lithographie von Joseph Nikolaus Peroux nach einem Gemälde von Jakob Wilhelm Roux, so nothing to do with Karl Roux? Or am I missing somthing? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I won't rename anything, just because someone overwrote my original upload by Carl Roux with a totally different picture by someone else, claiming it was due to quality reasons. The Carl Roux one didn't even have a background, so maybe someone should take the new picture and upload it separately with all the information that was added to describe the new picture. --Paulae (talk) 18:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Maxime_Roy edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Maxime_Roy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Geo Swan (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please pay more attention before making false accusations edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I refer to your comments at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Deaths_from_drugs.png. Contrary to your accusations, I did not create the montage; see here for who created it. I only modified the latest version to replace one image after another user pointed out there was an issue with that single image. I am a volunteer trying to make things better, and routinely do so when given clear instructions; I didn't see your reply as I was not pinged. I explicitly stated in my response to you that I did not create the montage, which makes your aggressive rebuttal ("Why do such montages if you have no clue of licenses?") all the more confusing. I understand it's not your job to "fix this mess", but more detailed initial instructions and help, and less arrogance, would have been appreciated. Damien Linnane (talk) 00:29, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Lol, you arrived at this convo back then as the uploader, and now you make a fuss, because you weren't the uploader? I couldn't care less tbh, for the imagine got deleted, the disk was half a year ago, and I have no way to check if your claim is wrong or right. --Paulae (talk) 11:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC) Oh, and if you ever show up on my disk again, I will most definitely refer to your second try of uploading a montage which rightfully got another DR, and I will make fun of you, so please don't. :-D --Paulae (talk) 12:35, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Otto Meier Briefmarke.jpg

And also:

File:Ottomar Geschke Briefmarke.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 09:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic