User talk:PereslavlFoto/QI-2011

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-kolokolna-4138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit overexposed, but i like ambience.--PetarM 17:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-kolokolna-4129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 16:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuhmar sdd 9531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The pole is disturbing, but no way to destroy it... Otherwise good. I added the picture in some categories for a better use of it.--Jebulon 14:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-trapeznaa-0772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuhmar sdd 9534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 17:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-atspz-2010jan05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, really sharp --Croucrou 11:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chkalovsky-3020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality expt some blur tree banch due to the long exposure. --Croucrou 11:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chka-28-3187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- George Chernilevsky 17:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat mass 9074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice--Holleday 14:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-veska-bricky-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 18:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorki-5469.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:17, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mu-gorki-stanok-4973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp, in focus, good quality. The bottom is a little cut off, but that's a minor concern. -- King of Hearts 06:27, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! H blinnaja 5261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. The cat looks hungry...--Jebulon 14:39, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M-danilov-pohvala-5432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 16:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-sretenia-5762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Schlaier 15:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chkalovsky-star-5889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-ohotino-korovin-6098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 17:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-palatka-east-7377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This has really nice detail. Interesting architecturally for certain. Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 08:51, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-belltower-7487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 17:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-belltower-5680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:21, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! H-lesnoi-18-3988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 16:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kruchinin-2011-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-banya-6737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Harrison49 01:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-misha-samuil-grave-6585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok.--Ankara 09:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nie-6610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rychkov-1282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe could you consider a crop at right (too much useless space IMO), but good portrait for QI.--Jebulon 10:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-misha-samuil-grave-6590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nagorie-4474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 22:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-trapeznaa-6771.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Acceptable, despite some flaws. --H005 17:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M-nikita-0120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Хорошее фото. Вариант с тёплой гаммой цветов мне тоже нравится. -- George Chernilevsky 18:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M-nikita-0120-red.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Lmbuga 07:16, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M-danilov-gate-5449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --H005 21:08, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-gorki-dom-4942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 21:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-belltower-6719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-belltower-6657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment nice, but a bit contrastless to me. I uploaded a retouched version in the file history, maybe it's better. --Carschten 13:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)  Support very good now --Carschten 14:47, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mu-gorki-korzina-0503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments for me QI in all creterias --J. Lunau 21:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-kriushkino-mark-0095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-petra-0615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments bit lacking sharpness at spire, but good for QI --Taxiarchos228 13:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! U-rostovskaa-20-1367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality Image for sure, but I think that, like in France, alas, there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. Correct me if I'm wrong...--Jebulon 23:16, 9 September 2011 (UTC) This apartment house of factory was built in 1930-s by order from factory administration, and it is impossible now to find the author. He could be a full-time architect of the factory. So I am more than sure this house is out of FOP.--PereslavlFoto 23:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC) OK. As said above, it is technically a QI to me. Let other decide about FoP in Russia.--Jebulon 14:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-belltower-6787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality in my opinion, regarding it is a night shoot.. --J. Lunau 08:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-allsaints-6744.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments + composition, colors, quality, format --CellarDoor85 18:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! H-kardovskogo-77-0393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not far from overexposition, but under the limit IMO. Good for QI--Jebulon 15:16, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-grave-solonka-9747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice DOF --Carschten 15:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gubin-grave-8970-plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-gallery-1947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-kardovskogo-fligel-2587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments How russian ! Maybe a bit soft, but QI--Jebulon 17:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)--Russian ? With so industrial-type fenster ? !--Vitold Muratov 10:55, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-sobor-podval-2443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 12:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-kardovskogo-facade-2618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMO.--ArildV 16:12, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-sobor-podval-2461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good an QI for me --Haneburger 12:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-sobor-podval-2455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition and technical well done --Haneburger 12:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-sobor-podval-2429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and QI for me --Haneburger 17:58, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-dubrovici-9001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 17:12, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iryshkov-6248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:33, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iryshkov-6273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image--Riotforlife 22:20, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! H-lesnoi-06-3955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality, but strange edge of the snow that is in contact with the green portal--Lmbuga 15:58, 6 December 2011 (UTC) Fixed.--PereslavlFoto 00:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC) Good quality to me--Lmbuga 07:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! U-rostovskaa-06-1225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-grave-nsp-9733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and interesting.--Jebulon 00:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pz-elections-2011-sc2-4388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, with the ballot boxes ! And interesting document.--Jebulon 12:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M-nikita-kolodec-9854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments maybe a bit soft, but good catching, with something funny and unusual.--Jebulon 22:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! H-konnaya-04-4463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the subject and the composition very much. First I found the electric cable at the top to disturbing but they also give an interesting frame to the picture, --Elektroschreiber 09:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-gorki-domik-0427.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The tree in the right is a bit disturbing, but doesn't actually obscure too many details of the subject. Good quality for a photo of a subject located in the shade. --Andrei Stroe 16:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gm-sobor-5547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely picture, but I think that tree is putting people off. Even without leaves it is rather distracting.Saffron Blaze 13:12, 16 December 2011 (UTC) The photo made from nearby belltower. To avoid the tree I have to buy a helicopter flight, what is impossible yet. So let's thing about technical quality of the photo.PereslavlFoto 13:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC). "Composition" is part of technical quality, and the trees are here and are part of the composition... But they are not disturbing IMO. It is a good picture, in spite of a slight overexposure at the roof of the small tower at right.--Jebulon 13:41, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pz-elections-2011-sc3-4420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful. --ArildV 17:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rybnaa-100-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Vassil 10:20, 28 December 2011 (UTC)  Question Is this a tone-mapped HDR image? If yes, it should clearly be stated in the image description. --NorbertNagel 19:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rybnaa-076-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Vassil 10:24, 28 December 2011 (UTC)  Question Is this a tone-mapped HDR image? If yes, it should clearly be stated in the image description. --NorbertNagel 19:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! H-gagarina-10-6416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 11:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pz-elections-2011-juventa-4451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great color. Jonathunder 21:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)