User talk:Pleclown/Archive 3

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Ralf Roletschek in topic Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaeger-LeCoultre Polo Masters 2013 - 31082013 - Final match Poloyou vs Lynx Energy 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Vincent Bartin et Macao 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaeger-LeCoultre Polo Masters 2013 - 25082013 - Match Poloyou vs Lynx Energy 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 17:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaeger-LeCoultre Polo Masters 2013 - 31082013 - Final match Poloyou vs Lynx Energy 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualiy.--ArildV 09:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Vincent Bartin et Macao 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4ème manche du championnat suisse de Pony games 2013 - 25082013 - Laconnex 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Vincent Bartin et Macao 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-CAB - 20131130 - Arnaud Mignardi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-CAB - 20131130 - Ballon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - William Funnell et Billy Congo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bit of R/C CA needing fixing (see text on right). Mattbuck 22:16, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  Done Pleclown 17:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 21:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-CAB - 20131130 - Lucas Amorosino 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Dan Braid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Ballon flottant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, and a nice action shot. --Baresi franco 21:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Vincent Bartin et Macao 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments isn't it a bit underexposed ? I find the "white" a bit too "grey".--Jebulon 20:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
  Comment Is it better ? Pleclown 18:49, 14 April 2014 (UTC) C'est mieux, oui. Merci.--Jebulon 13:54, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Maul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:15,17 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Jonathan Mills.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-CAB - 20131130 - Benjamin Urdapilleta 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy, and greenish, IMO. Improvable before the fall back in Pro D2...--Jebulon 15:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
  Comment I've tried something. And I sure hope they stay in Top 14 :) Pleclown 18:44, 14 April 2014 (UTC) Un peu mieux... Malgré la descente probable. On va se croiser...:)--Jebulon 13:58, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Je ne suis pas supporter, juste photographe. Mais des matchs de Top 14, c'est mieux que des matchs de ProD2. Pleclown 17:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Melée ouverte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:47, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:USO-CAB - 20131130 - Lucas Amorosino 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:USO-CAB - 20131130 - Lucas Amorosino 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Plaquage 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality given conditions (fast sport, floodlights). White balance could be a tad warmer. --Jastrow 13:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Tom Brady.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Ruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bit noisy but still ok --Poco a poco 18:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-CAB - 20131130 - Ruck 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-CAB - 20131130 - Préparation melée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:36, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-CAB - 20131130 - Maul Oyonnax.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:36, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-AB - 20131221 - Aviron bayonnais après le match.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-AB - 20131221 - Damian Browne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support OK, despite the noise --A.Savin 14:17, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Plaquage 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great rugby photo!--ArildV 18:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Scott Newlands et Agustin Figuerola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok imo.--ArildV 18:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-AB - 20131221 - Maul 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Ballon flottant.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:USO-Sale Sharks - 20131205 - Ballon flottant.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality images?

Hello. I have uploaded a few images as IQ candidates just to see what the QI standards are (I need to get better!) and have noticed that a number of Commoners are uploading dozens of images and promoting each other's images. The quality of some images promoted is poor. You have, I notice, many images of the Longines event promoted. How is this acceptable within Commons QI guidelines? Are all of them Commons 'most valuable images'? I don't think so, with the rider's face obscured in many. You have some super QI promotions, but also quite a number that I cannot understand why they have been promoted. I also have noticed that you promote many of MattBuck's quite ordinary images. I have just looked at his most recent QI candidates and Declined most of them. I see that you are a Commons Administrator and I wonder if there is any monitoring of the promotion process? I have posted a similar request on Poco a Poco's page (he promotes your images) --Charles (talk) 09:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

You seem to confuse COM:FP and COM:QI... Please read those pages carefully, and reconsider your votes on mattbuck's images on COM:QIC.
For your information, I may have voted differently on two of your pictures currently proposed on the COM:QIC page, but your messages on my and Poco a poco's talk pages, and the retaliation votes on mattbuck's images are not really enticing me to hit the discuss button on your nominations.
Pleclown (talk) 12:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Revenge declines, if that is what those are, are never acceptable (and this does include reviewing only the one person's photos). Judge a photo by that photo's merits, not by your personal feelings about the author. I am aware that I tend to generate friction at QI - I tend to review the photos that no one else seems willing to review. That usually means the easy promotions are gone, and what's left are iffy ones and clear declines. Then, add on that I have quite high standards about what I expect from a photo, and yes, most of the images I review will end up being declined. This is not a commentary on the author - I rarely even look at the author, though I have over time learnt to recognise various people's styles - it is a commentary on the photo exclusively.
Regarding the other points raised, you seem to be mistaking the goals of the various image promotion pages. COM:VI is for valuable images - ones which are rare, unusual, etc. I do not believe there is much worry about photographic quality at that project. COM:FP is concerned with value, photographic quality, and also a "wow factor" - the combination of the three can mean that some photos of low value or non-excellent quality get promoted because they fulfil the other criteria. COM:QI on the other hand is only about photographic quality - we don't care if the subject has been taken 1000000 times, so long as that particular photo is good quality. We also don't care about a "wow factor" - if your photo is boring, that's fine, so long as it's a good quality picture.
QI has generally high standards, although what people will promote varies a bit. Some people are more concerned with certain technical aspects than others - I tend to care more about overexposure, and like high-contrast pictures, which some people may see as too dark. However, while we require excellence, we do not require perfection. I would generally say that composition is one of the less important metrics to measure a photo on - if there's a shopping trolley in the background, who cares, so long as it's not distracting from the subject. I find that rotation, colour, sharpness, lighting, distortion and chromatic aberrations are significantly more important.
To give an example of a distracting background, consider File:USO-AB - 20131221 - David Roumieu.jpg. This was declined for other reasons, but I would have declined it because the guy in the background makes it look like the foreground guy has a massive tumour coming out of the back of his head. Compare with File:UK-2014-London-Blues and Royals 01.jpg. Here the background is not brilliant, but it's not overly distracting. It's good enough to not be disqualifying. If the other aspects of the photo are good, I would promote this.
I hope this gives you a bit more insight in to how the QI process works. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
The Commons guidelines states "The purpose of quality image status is to recognize that at the moment of creation, a Commoner skillfully achieved a desirable level of quality." A desirable level of quality depends on the image being taken. Mattbuck's decline of my Blue Tit image was, I believe, a revenge decline and would ask other reviewers to please form their own opinion. The guidelines also refer to 'a technically compromised shot' and my declines of Mattbuck's images are because of technical failings. The images are in focus, but otherwise I do not see them as QI. I only Declined Mattbuck's images though dozens of other Commoners non-QI images are being nodded through. No one has answered my query about a group of regular posters of QI candidates quickly promoting each other's work. --15:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC).
It is absurd to expect that we should devote our time to answer unsubstantiated allegations. You should not be able to set the agenda by throwing out unsubstantiated accusations, and expect others to spend hours defending themselves. Because you wrote a similar message to me with the same content, I will challenge you:
Please go through my quality images (preferably the first 200 alphabetically) and tell me which ones do not meet the criteria for QI!
Please go through my 200 latest reviews and tell me which of those who were incorrect!
If you manage to find any evidence for your insinuations, I will continue the discussion. Otherwise, I expect an apology--ArildV (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
If you disagree with one of my declines, then you should change the status to "discuss". It was not a revenge decline on my part, as
  1. I would not ever do such a thing;
  2. I didn't even know who you were until today
  3. My decline of your photo happened before you declined my nominations.
Oh, and as for me being "quick" to promote others photos,
  1. As anyone will tell you, I rarely if ever touch nominations that are less than 5 days old;
  2. As you found out, I have high standards, and decline way more than I promote;
  3. Again, I do not generally look at usernames when I review.
-mattbuck (Talk) 16:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

I'd like to state a couple of things here:

  • I wonder Matt's work being the last broom and cleaning up everthing nobody else did. He has been often though in this criticism but has always been fair. Regarding this images, while there are many dealing with trains, that's not important at QIC as long as they fulfill a quality standard and most of them do.
  • Charles is right, I have a lot of QIs from the Allianz Arena, that's a fascinating subject to me, that I will probably keep photographing, so maybe next time I hit the 50 QIs, so what?
  • Charles, be respectful and assume good faith! there is no deal here among us like I promote yours and you mine. I have no problem either to decline pictures of users who sometimes promote my pictures.
  • The QIC process works and is lean, and there are tools to avoid that good pictures are not promoted and bad ones are promoted. With this tool in our hands I have no concerns about any absurd accusations, because for them to be valid, everybody here would have to be bribed, and that is ridiculous. Poco2 18:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
I apologise to you all if I was not being respectful. That was never my intention. I just cannot understand why a load of poorly-composed images are approved. I was not suggesting bribery, just an attitude of you-have-approved-mine-so-I-will-approve-yours. And Poco a Poco - are you really suggesting that the QI concept wants to see 50 images of the Allianz Arena? Surely not! ArildV - I'm not going to go through all your images, and most are very good, but ask others contributing to this thread to say what they think of File:Brunna gruvor 2012b.jpg and these you promoted: File:2014 Self-portrait 1.JPG, File:Invontes (ship, 2007) 002.JPG - too much sea, not enough sky, File:Raskelf MMB 02 West Moor Road.jpg, File:London MMB Y4 Tower Bridge.jpg the side of the tourist boat detracts from the image and obscures the north-side approach. I cannot see how this snapshot would meet anyone's QI criteria. Since this image was uploaded by Mattbuck, you may understand why my objections started. --Charles (talk) 09:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
I note your apology, thank you. However, you continue to insinuate that I and others have a "you-have-approved-mine-so-I-will-approve-yours-attitude" and you continue to use a single photo (you have chosen from a category with more than 1200 images! to find 1 image, out of 1200, that might or might not be a borderline case is of course no evidence. why I ask you to check 200 images alphabetically) as an example.
I intend to make it very easy for you; a simple yes or no question. You have publicly argued that a large number of my QI do not meet the criteria; You have publicly implied that I give special treatment to a group of other users when I review images. Do you have any evidence whatsoever for your accusations or did you just make them up? Yes or no?
I have absolutely no intention whatsoever to comment on individual photos. Because I refuse to accept that you are trying to control the agenda by throwing out insinuations and accusations that you expect me to devote my time to answering. Accusations that you dont take any morally or logical responsibility for (you just throw them out, but presents no evidence).--ArildV (talk) 10:15, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
P.S Since this image was uploaded by Mattbuck, you may understand why my objections started? Not at all. I reviewed the images after you publish your accusations on my talk page.--ArildV (talk) 19:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
I am sorry you have got so cross Arild. I am very happy to withdraw any insinuation that you have given special treatment to a group of other users. This was wrong of me. I should have said that the process of promoting QI candidates appears to allow promotion of average images and devalues the notion of Quality Images as set out in the Commons QI Candidate guidelines.
You say you have absolutely no intention whatsoever to comment on individual photos, yet you demand I comment on 200 of yours. So here, reluctantly, is my opinion on the fist two rows of QI that show up when I click through from your User page - Media in category "Quality images by Arild Vågen". Naturally, these are my subjective opinions, not evidence. For evidence, you would need to seek the opinion of professional photographers.
  1. File:1962 Scania-Vabis Capitol.jpg Too much foreground. Front of vehicle is backlit.
  2. File:20 Fenchurch Street Mars 2014.jpg Image not vertical. The very dark grey sky detracts from this image.
  3. File:2014 Landsort February 2014 07.jpg Sky is nothing like as blue as the other similar images, though otherwise the best composition.
  4. File:2014 Landsort February 2014 08.jpg Tower leans to the right.
  5. File:2014 Landsort February 2014 09.jpg Too much rock, not enough lighthouse (see other images).
  6. File:9207 May 2013.jpg Nice image: subject shows well against building.
  7. File:Abbe and Madicken outside Djurgården 2011.jpg The boats do not stand out from the background.
  8. File:Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin November 2013.jpg Again, isn't a QI of a building best taken on a sunny day when the sun is shining on the building, not when it is only shining on buildings in the background?
  9. File:Adelswärdska huset september 2011a.jpg This image is far too dark and the cropping does not put the building in its context.
  10. File:Adolf Fredriks kyrka december 2012.jpg Nice time exposure image.
  11. File:Af Chapman November 2011.jpg Nice composition with sunlight on the boat's hull.
  12. File:Ahi Çelebi Camii Mars 2013 01.jpg There is no sun on the building, yet sun in the buildings in the background.
  13. File:Ahi Çelebi Camii Mars 2013 02.jpg The sales people detract from the image.
  14. File:Alexanderplatz November 2013 01.jpg Image overexposed.
--Charles (talk) 12:00, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Please excuse my boldness in reformatting your post above, I believe a numbered list is easier to read than a long list of files. Here are my thoughts on those same images:
  1. I'm not sure I'd have promoted this, but due to sharpness/detail issues rather than lighting issues.
  2. The image is vertical, but the grey tower on the right, the "Cheesegrater" as it's popularly known, is not vertical. The grey sky is unfortunate, and a bit more contrast would have been nicer, but this is not FP.
  3. I agree, the sky could be bluer, and if I'd reviewed I would have requested it be made bluer, but as is it's QI anyway.
  4. Hard to say really, there might be a slight clockwise tilt, but it's marginal, especially as the lighthouse isn't perfectly vertical anyway.
  5. I think I'd have cropped the bottom left off due to a bit of blur.
  6. Here I think a perspective/tilt correction is needed, and I think maybe more contrast.
  7. I rather agree on that one, and would further say the focus is on the background rather than the boats. I don't think I'd promote that one.
  8. The lighting is fine, in fact I'd say the background buildings are too well-lit. I think there's a bit of leaning out on the right, and maybe some CA.
  9. Brightness ok, but lacking a bit of detail I think. Sharpening might help.
  10. Not really the sort of thing I like to review. I think I'd stay neutral on this.
  11. I don't really like this one - there seems to be a bit of blur on the right, and the sky seems somewhat green.
  12. I think standing a few feet to the right would be better, to get that tree out of the direct line of the minaret, but QI IMO.
  13. The sales people are part of the image.
  14. Not QI for me - bad CA on the wire (should have been painted out anyway), feels a bit tilted, unsharp, low contrast.
So, from our little comparison, you would decline 11/14, I would decline 3/14, and would ask for corrections on about 8. I should also state that while I didn't check the promotion dates of these images, I think the standard of QIs has gone up over the past few years. There are some of my photos which I look at now and think "that got QI?" It's a bit of a product of the times - as people have easier access to better equipment, we expect better photos. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:37, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for looking through these and making them easier to read. I really don't see how the candy-floss salesmen (if that's what they are) can be part of a photo of a building. To me, this is the a really good example of where I believe some Commoners are happy to promote holiday snapshots just because they have been taken with a new digital camera. Interestingly, so far no one has reviewed on my QI candidate of Kilimanjaro: a photo taken in 2005 and which cannot now be taken using latest photo equipment as the snow has melted for ever. If the Commons community is happy for thousands of images that wouldn't pass Day 1 of a Beginners' Photo Class to be treated as QI, that's the community's decision, but it is a great shame. --Charles (talk) 09:08, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
A photo is of what it's of. If it's of candy-floss sellers, it's of candy-floss sellers. They don't detract from the image - to my mind, that would have been a strange photo if they weren't there. As for your Kilamanjaro candidate, I have not seen it, but you do seem to be misunderstanding the concept of QI - we do not care about value. It doesn't matter that your photo cannot be taken again, if you want it promoted on those grounds take it to COM:VI.
If you feel that the majority of QIs could not pass "Day 1 of a Beginners' Photo Class", then I think you are being hyperbolic and frankly insulting the people who contribute to QI. I grant you, we do get some nominations which are frankly awful, but those are far from the majority. Moreover, if you disagree with a promotion/decline, even if it's not your own nomination, you can change it to discuss! If you think a photo is not QI, say so! Maybe more people will agree with you! But by casting aspersions and generalities as you are doing, you help no one and only make us all less inclined to listen. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
You say 'we do not care about value' and that is the problem. The current QI candidate guidelines say 'Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.' i.e. you should care about value.
Secondly, you do not like my negative comments on lighting nor cluttered images: Again, the current QI candidate guidelines say 'Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed'.
Thirdly, my negative comments on unskilled composition have been reversed, yet the current QI candidate guidelines say 'at the moment of creation, a Commoner skillfully achieved a desirable level of quality.' So 'value' lighting, an uncluttered image and skill should all be considered by those promoting QI candidates.
Finally, I have declined images which do not meet the following QI guidelines: 'Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Objects in front of the subject shouldn't hide important elements and background elements shouldn't spoil the composition'; 'Centering the subject is often considered a negative practice... The main idea here is NOT to center the subject without a very good reason (such as symmetry)' --Charles (talk) 12:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Charles
I had every right to ask for proof. You had already forced me to spend days to defend myself against a false insinuation. A insinuation you completely unprovoked posted on my talk page and now admits was false.
Your photo comments show a lack of understanding of Wikimedia Commons and the project's purpose and goals. You didn't even come across as a very knowledgeable photographer. Somewhat surprising, given your very harsh and arrogant words about my pictures (holiday snapshots that wouldn't pass Day 1 of a Beginners' Photo Class).
Wikimedia Commons is not flickr. The goal is not to show off, the goal is not to find the single best image from the single best angle. We don't just want to have a single picture of a building (for example, the main facade in sunlight). We want pictures of all the details, pictures from different angles, from different seasons and so on. Your composition criticism of File:2014 Landsort February 2014 09.jpg and File:Adelswärdska huset september 2011a.jpg is thus irrelevant.
(the lighthouse image is part of my ongoing documentation of Landsort Category:Images_by_Arild_Vågen-Landsort. To dismiss it as holiday snapshots is nonsense imo!)
To criticize a single picture that focuses on the facade (Adelswärdska huset) for it does not put the building in its context is just absurd. It is not the image purpose, and there are other images that does put the building in its context! We need both, of course! And it has nothing to do with photographic quality.
Furthermore, you seem to have some original ideas that are not supported by established photographic practice. For example, that building pictures must be taken in sunlight. As an example, you use an aerial photo (technically, taken from a high building). It is a kind of photos (aerial photographs of cities) where many photographers choose a cloudy day, to avoid the extreme contrasts between e.g. a shaded street and a sunny roof.
And before you start lecturing photographers here and using arrogant and derogatory descriptions, please remember that most photographers here have a very big commitment to free knowledge and project. The important thing is to take a picture that can be used. We upload images, even though it was not perfect conditions (that does not mean that the photographer is ignorant, or the images can be dismissed as holiday snapshots!). And by the way, all 14 pictures are useful and many of them is used on Wikipedia.
Let us return to the purpose and goals of Wikimedia Commons. High technical quality makes images more useful, and usually offers higher education value (examples of relevant aspects are sharpness, level of detail, and accurate colors). It is important that we make it easier to find good pictures, and QI is one way to do it. That an image does't have a completely optimal crop is less important for the image value and usefulness, that an image was taken on a cloudy day is irrelevant.
You doesn't seems to understand that an image can be used in many ways either. File:Ahi Çelebi Camii Mars 2013 02.jpg is not just about a mosque. Its about the evening winter light in Istanbul, the salespeople who are eating and talking to each other after a long day, the mood after the tourists left the area for the day, the peaceful and quiet setting in the very center of a stressful and chaotic metropolis. A useful image in many ways.
This is my final reply. --ArildV (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Arild. I naturally disagree with your interpretation of QI guidelines. if you really do believe File:Ahi Çelebi Camii Mars 2013 02.jpg is QI and useful, then you might wish to correct the minaret's alignment with the vertical/correct for perspective. My final post to this discussion. --Charles (talk) 13:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Démonstration de polo-poney 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Finale 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Finale 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Main subject OK, nicely catched. Some chromatic noise/green CA in the background, not dramatic. --Myrabella 07:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Démonstration de polo-poney 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 12:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Finale 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 12:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Finale 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Lewis Hulbert 12:27, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Finale 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 12:27, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-AB - 20131221 - Maul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support a bit noisy but acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 04:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Ladies Charriol Cup 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:51, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Ladies Charriol Cup 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 09:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Finale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 09:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Ladies Charriol Cup 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 09:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Ladies Charriol Cup 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW Polo Masters Megève - 20140126 - Ladies Charriol Cup 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Myrabella 22:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:57, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:56, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--ArildV 12:56, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support OK --A.Savin 11:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140201 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup !

Cher Pleclown, Merci beaucoup d'avoir effacé la photo que j'avais déposé par erreur sur Commons ! Bien Cordialement. CarnavaldesFemmesEquipe (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality in a very difficult situation. I would nominate one of these to FP instead of one you nominated before with brown houses (more wow, less distracting elements). --Kadellar 16:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:13, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-FCGR - 29032014 - Melée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-FCGR - 29032014 - Melée ouverte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 07:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Romanian Football Players

Hi Pleclown,

Here is the response -

  • first row: 1. Alexandru Mateiu 2. Cristian Manea 3.Bănel Nicoliţă, 4. Bogdan Mitrea
  • second row: 1. Cristian Tănase 2. Costin Lazăr, 3. Dragoș Grigore 4. Răzvan Raţ 5. Vlad Chiricheș 6. Alexandru Chipciu
  • third row: 1. Alexandru Bourceanu 2. Alexandru Maxim 3. Valerică Găman 4. Costel Pantelimon 5. Ciprian Marica 6. Raul Rusescu

In the last picture is Bogdan Mitrea, again.

All the best, --Silenzio76 (talk) 23:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Pleclown. I have placed the images into the articles and also categorized them. If you have any other opportunity to take a photo of any Romanian sportsmen, you can always ask us on this page to identify them.Ionutzmovie (talk) 23:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Please test the new feature Special:PageMigration

As a Google Summer of Code Intern, I have been working on the Mass Migration tools project for Wikimedia. We are now ready with a minimal working product. The tool helps translators and translation administrators import the old translations into the Translate Extension.

An instance of the same has been set up on labs. You can find some useful instructions on the main page.

Please test the tool and report bugs/suggestions using the link provided on the main page itself. You can have a look at the tracking bug to check already reported bugs.

Looking forward to hearing from you! Cheers. BPositive (talk) 15:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck - 01042014 - Spitalkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berne - 31032014 - Ours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Reddish/Magenta CA within the branches on the right side. Perhaps cropping right side would be the solution, as that kind of crop also would get rid of this accessoire which cleary shows that the bear is within an enclosure. --Cccefalon 12:01, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
tried something Pleclown 17:05, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Very impressive now (and QI). --Cccefalon 06:12, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaduz - 31032014 - Rotehaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted ccw. Will be a QI afterwards. --Cccefalon 12:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
tried something Pleclown 17:05, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
While the left side is ok, the right side is considerably inclined. See my annotation which points out the problem. --Cccefalon 11:29, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
The problem is the house on the right is not level...see File:Vaduz2005.JPG for example Pleclown 11:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)   Support It should be good enough now. --Iifar 07:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcis - 20140402 - Post box in Barcis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:34, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - Carl Medjani.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good IMO. Nice eyes--Lmbuga 16:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne catégorie B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 11:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 13:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne catégorie B 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - Saphir Taider.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --JLPC 17:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne catégorie B 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne catégorie B 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcis - 20140402 - Palazzo Centis 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne catégorie B 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne catégorie B 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - Faouzi Ghoulam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - Vahid Halilodzic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Christian Ferrer 06:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:46, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:58, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie-Roumanie - 20140604 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:44, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne catégorie B 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   SupportI like,very good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:26, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - Vahid Halilodzic 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IT's good quality, but is there a reason to keep the person in the background whose face is cut in the half? I proposed a crop. --Cccefalon 04:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, I followed your advice. Pleclown 17:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne catégorie B 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 19:08, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcis - 20140402 - Palazzo Centis 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the sharpest QI ever but still OK to me --Kreuzschnabel 05:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The dark shadow is a pity but apart from that, it’s OK --Kreuzschnabel 05:38, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - Hilal Soudani.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:57, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Check translation

Hi, may you check my modifications here and accept them to be updated also in other languages? I asked to be promoted to do it in the bureaucrat page, but it tales long time and there are oppositions, so I have to ask every time I would do it. Sorry. --Ilario (talk) 00:04, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Please check because there is another duplicated variable in my opinion [1]. --Ilario (talk) 00:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you and thank you for your support. --Ilario (talk) 19:23, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Men - J. Gerard vs S. Houdet 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barça - Napoli - 20140806 - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barça - Napoli - 20140806 - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 15:28, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Men - J. Gerard vs S. Houdet 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:08, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barça - Napoli - 20140806 - Claudio Bravo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:19, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Men - J. Gerard vs S. Houdet 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. :-) --XRay 14:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne catégorie B 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 08:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 18.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 18.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Quad - D. Wagner vs D. Alcott 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - Vahid Halilodzic 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Men - J. Gerard vs S. Houdet 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support ok --A.Savin 12:19, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Ticket OTRS pour LBA

Salut Pleclown,

Je fais suite à la discussion ouverte sur le bistro au sujet de l'accord envoyé pour des images du jeu Little Big Adventure pendant les grandes vacances. Comme je le disais dans la discussion, je suis content de voir que l'email a été retrouvé. Suite à ta remarque sur la photo des membres de l'équipe, je disais que j'allais essayer de faire en sorte que la photographe d'origine envoie directement un accord pour la licence. En attendant, est-il possible que tu traites l'autorisation envoyée le 23 juillet par Didier Chanfray pour les images du jeu ? Je voudrais vraiment pouvoir les intégrer à l'article sous peu car je risque de ne plus avoir beaucoup de temps pour le faire d'ici peu. Merci beaucoup, et félicitations au passage pour ton travail de photographe sur Commons qui est reconnu à sa juste valeur par la communauté. --ΛΦΠ (talk) 21:20, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barça - Napoli - 20140806 - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI and good moment for photo -- Spurzem 18:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algérie - Arménie - 20140531 - 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could do with being sharper, but ok. --Mattbuck 21:46, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne catégorie B 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, though that first red guy looks very unhappy. --Mattbuck 21:46, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Quad - D. Wagner vs D. Alcott 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Quad - D. Wagner vs D. Alcott 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Men - J. Gerard vs S. Houdet 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Quad - D. Wagner vs D. Alcott 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barça - Napoli - 20140806 - Marc-André ter Stegen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support OK --A.Savin 14:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Photos

(je suis italien donc pardonne moi pour mon français). Salut, je suis Sergio, un administrateur sur Commons en langue italienne. Merci pour avoir téléchargé des photos du championnat français Top 14; mais comme tu peux voir ici, les categories ont une scheme précise (tournoi - match , es. 2013-14 Top 14 Brive vs Toulouse). S'il te plait rappelle-t-il la prochaine fois qui tu va télécharger des photos des matches de rugby. Merci! -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Ah, ok, you can speak English. Well, thanks for your kind reply. As you can imagine that's not a scheme decided by myself; as for the date there's a template which categorizes automatically the match by date. Plus - assuming date as a valid criterium for a category - they were written in bad format... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Quad - D. Wagner vs D. Alcott 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barça - Napoli - 20140806 - Alejandro Grimaldo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness just ok --Poco a poco 16:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barça - Napoli - 20140806 - 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok some noise but ok for night sport imo.-ArildV 14:18, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barça - Napoli - 20140806 - Salut des équipes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:50, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Men - J. Gerard vs S. Houdet 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Christian Ferrer 17:50, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Quad - D. Wagner vs D. Alcott 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barça - Napoli - 20140806 - Andres Iniesta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 16:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FIS Sommer Grand Prix 2014 - 20140809 - Young jumping.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK then. --Mattbuck 16:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren 9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FIS Sommer Grand Prix 2014 - 20140809 - Jernej Damjan 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geneva Rugby Cup - 20140808 - SF vs LOU - Digby Ioane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Quad - D. Wagner vs D. Alcott 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Quad - D. Wagner vs D. Alcott 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Christian Ferrer 17:08, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swiss Open Geneva - 20140712 - Semi final Quad - D. Wagner vs D. Alcott 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 00:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USO-SFP - 20140830 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Pleclown/Archive 3".