User talk:Poco a poco/2017-01

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anfiteatro,_El_Jem,_Túnez,_2016-09-04,_DD_35-37_HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 35-37 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I'd remove the person in the left door --Llez 21:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la República, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Haghpat, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Adranik, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 41-43 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darband, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Complejo Amir Chakmaq, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jabalieh, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín de Dolat-Abad, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín del Príncipe, Mahan, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín de Dolat-Abad, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortaleza de Bam, Irán, 2016-09-23, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the bird (see annotation) --Llez 09:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)  Question If you can tell that's a bird, why should it be removed? -- Ikan Kekek 14:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Good question, I would remove it if it were bigger and blurry, but cannot tell why in this case it is really a problem to be fixed Poco a poco 16:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Don't worry, was just a proposition --Llez 19:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciudadela de Meybod, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 09:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Sarkis, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks to me as if it's leaning back as it goes up. Do you see that? -- Ikan Kekek 11:27, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Not really Poco a poco 17:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Let's get a second (or is that third?) opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 22:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Third opinion: It is slightly CW rotated. -- Slaunger 18:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)  Tilted Poco a poco 17:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Ok now. -- Slaunger 22:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 64-66 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reloj de Braila, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Kretzulescu, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 94-96 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Comment There is quite a bit of camera shake on this long exposure. Charlesjsharp 16:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ateneo Rumano, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 made in a city I knew very well --Michielverbeek 22:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 85-87 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Dambovita, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento en el parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 79-81 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 05:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento en el parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia católica, Galati, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bazaar de Vakil, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa histórica de Boroujerdi, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortaleza de Bam, Irán, 2016-09-23, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit more sky than necessary but good quality. -- Renardo la vulpo 23:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Torre Milad, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 70.jpg

And also:

• File:Torre Milad, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 71.jpg

Yours sincerely, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Jameh Mosque of Isfahan pic

Hi, Diego, and Happy New Year!

File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 26.jpg has a lot of wow (I actually said "WOOOOOOOOW!" out loud when I opened the picture). If you have the chance, I'd like to ask you to make some edits before I nominate it at FPC. I think some of the highlights might be better dialed back a little. I'm not sure anything is quite blown, but there are places that look at least nearly blown and very glary to my eyes, and the place where it bothers me some is the inscription at the center of the bottom of the picture frame.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Ikan, thank you for your message. I just uploaded a new version with a highlights reduction and improvements in the symmetry/crop. All the best for the new year! :) Poco² 16:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. Subtle difference to my eyes, but I think that did improve the picture, and the inscription is legible. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:41, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica de Nuestra Señora de Licheń, Stary Licheń, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 36-38 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colegio Minus, Poznan, Polonia, 2014-09-18, DD 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta Dorada, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica de Nuestra Señora de Licheń, Stary Licheń, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 54-56 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciudadela de Meybod, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mansión Masoudieh, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok 4 me Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 02:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín de Fin, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Brickwork is a bit noisy, but resolution is high, I suppose the shadows have been lifted quite a bit... --Slaunger 23:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Concertgebouw, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos, 2016-05-30, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bazaar de Vakil, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Template

Diego Delso  (1974–)
	Alternative names	Poco a poco
	Description	Spanish free-license photographer and Wikimedian
	Date of birth	19 May 1974
	Location of birth	Alicante, Spain
	Authority file	: Q28147777

creator QS:P170,Q28147777

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergkarman (talk • contribs) 15:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Sergkarman: where exactly am I supposed to use the template in the file description pages? Thank youe and regards, Poco² 21:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

• In author section i think. But this template already "pic up" all your photos: Special:WhatLinksHere/Creator:Diego_Delso. I change one of your last photo to show how i see the use of this template: File:Plaza de la República, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 115-116 HDR.jpg Sergkarman (talk) 23:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Monasterio de Tatev, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 89-91 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio de Tatev, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 89-91 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abyaneh, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat extreme perspective, but alltogether ok. --Smial 11:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darband, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 17:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortaleza de Bam, Irán, 2016-09-23, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image. Unfortunately, there are no coordinates. --Adamdaley 10:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction - see the building on the left --Halavar 17:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC) Please, allow me 2 days to fix it Poco a poco 09:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC) Sorry, I forgot to mention that I uploaded a new version Poco a poco 22:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)  Support Sorry for the delay. Thanks for the fixed version - it's good now. QI for me --Halavar 18:39, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Translation needed

Hola Diego, ¿cómo va todo? En mis ratos libres estoy desarrollando un proyecto para subir imágenes de Guregipuzkoa, pero quería hacerlo bien. ¿Sabrías, por un casual, cómo traducir 'NEGATIVO EN BLANCO Y NEGRO. GELATINO BROMURO. PLACA DE VIDRIO'? Gracias --Discasto _talk 23:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Hola Discasto, quieres que traduzca del español ¿a qué idioma? ¿al euskera? ¿alemán? ¿boarisch? Poco² 20:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Hola Diego, con el inglés me es suficiente :-) --Discasto _talk 21:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Discasto: Buf, ok, lo intento: black and white negative. Dry plate. Glass plate. Saludos! --Poco² 18:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Perdona, no había visto esto. ¡¡¡Muchas gracias!!! --Discasto _talk 18:53, 26 January 2017 (UTC) PS: me ha sugerido Laura que me registre en es:Wikipedia:Conocidos personales. No sé si te importaría indicar que me conoces personalmente. No conozco en persona a tanta gente y, sobre todo, la mayor parte no está en Conocidos personales

Hecho, acabo de confirmarte :) Poco² 19:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Túnel natural, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2016-04-03, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Cat: Inmages of Spain? --Ermell 08:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC) You don't miss anything! :) fixed now Poco a poco 09:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antiguas barracas de prisioneros, campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:59, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Schwangau desde Neuschwanstein, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 39-43 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sala de Conciertos, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 07-09 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:04, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Brandeburgo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 22-27 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de los Shirvanshah, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-28, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:25, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 21:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Hazrat Ali, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 23:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Mahoma, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica de Nuestra Señora de Licheń, Stary Licheń, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Slight blurring at the top of the tower but for the overall situation it is very good --EoRdE6 18:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

New

Hello, I wanna to nominate one of my new photos, so if you can help me to choose any one? this or this or no one? thanks--Alaa Najjar :)..! 15:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi User:علاء نجار, I understand that you want to nominate them to QI. Well, I think that none of them has a chance to become QI. The shadows and background are disturbing and you where definitely too close to the subject what cause depth of field problems. Sorry. Poco² 18:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks --Alaa Najjar :)..! 17:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Arpa, Jermuk, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sandro Halank 22:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vehículo abandonado, Kurtan, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 21:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinfonía de las Piedras, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la República, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 115-116 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't like all the ghosts or the unsharp flag, but I totally understand the choice you made, which enabled you to take a good, sharp photo of the building (and also pretty good stars). -- Ikan Kekek 23:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lori Berd, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 66-68 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de la Doncella, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Uoaei1 09:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 122.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán de Ollagüe, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 72.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Superb! --Ermell 22:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje cerca de San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 130-136 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tremendous panorama. -- Ikan Kekek 20:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piedras Rojas, salar de Aguas Calientes, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 73.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Another good FP nom. -- Ikan Kekek 20:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán San Pedro, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 20:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Piedras Rojas, salar de Aguas Calientes, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 69.JPG

Hi Diego! Could you explain what the first sentence of the description means? I don't understand how "high puna of northern Chilean Andes" connects with the first part of the sencence. Also I would like to point out that in English description you use "Aguas Calientes salt flat" in the 1st sentence and "Aguas Calientes salt lake" in the 2nd, but "salt flat" and "salt lake" are different things. --jdx ^Re: 22:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi User:Jdx, ok, what I meant is Puna as a region (see the link to Wikipedia), some regions of Puna are higher than andere. Regarding "salt lake" and "salt flat" you are totally right, I improved the description and speak now only about salt lake. I understand it like this that the salt lake contains water vs the salt flat that doesn't. Thank you! Poco² 12:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanario de San Lucas, Toconao, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Pujsa, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 84.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Scotch Mist 19:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán Licancabur, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Scotch Mist 19:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Iquique, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent, and in my opinion, featurable. -- Ikan Kekek 20:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 20:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estacionamiento de motocicletas, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 14:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificios en Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molino en las cercanías de Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurante de pollos asados, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shirpala, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Biblioteca Central de la Universidad de Bucarest, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 97-99 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Biblioteca Central de la Universidad de Bucarest, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 97-99 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 21-23 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Malek, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Teherán desde la Torre Milad, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Hasht Behesht, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 75-77 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo zoroastrista, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Right side of the building lenas little bit to the right. --Halavar 12:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Almost edit conflict... Are these spots in the sky birds? But looks more like dust spots to me. Can you check it? -- DerFussi 15:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)  Support Thanks. Good now. QI for me hope that for DerFussi too --Halavar 20:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Saadi, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Malek, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 20-22 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Roque, Loscos, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruta de las Caras, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 78-80 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 23:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuévalos, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-07, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some CAs, at least on the Christ statue, could you please remove them? --Basotxerri 19:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC)  Done although I considered that to be negligible Poco a poco 20:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Perhaps you're right because of the enormous resolution. Thanks! Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en Segura de los Baños, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudilla, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia nueva de San Martín de Tours, Belchite, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 112-114 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan el Real, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-08, DD 13-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ¡Impresionante! Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan el Real, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-08, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All this series is impressive. In this case, I think this slight purple fringing on the window is neglectable. --Basotxerri 19:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)  CA removed Poco a poco 20:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan el Real, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-08, DD 25-27 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 18:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pueblo viejo de Belchite, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 109-111 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pudelek 10:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gascueña, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Zafra, Campillo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 35-40 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Zafra, Campillo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:48, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan el Real, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-08, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:48, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan el Real, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-08, DD 07-09 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This image is very, very good, too, but could you remove the CAs on the windows, please? --Basotxerri 19:32, 19 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 20:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Cvmontuy 13:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sala de Conciertos, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sala de Conciertos, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amayas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Roof lines had probably been a little sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Badules, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:17, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Albaráñez, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:49, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allueva, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:49, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Castillo de Zafra, Campillo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 41-46 PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castillo de Zafra, Campillo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 41-46 PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Torres de Berrellén, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-06, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Bárboles, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-06, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:34, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Pinseque, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-06, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:33, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Plou, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan el Real, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-08, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan el Real, Calatayud, España, 2017-01-08, DD 16-18 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent photo, but prompted by Basotxerri's comments above, I looked for CA, and the light in the window seems quite bluish-purple to me. There's also purple light on the pews on the right side, but perhaps that light shined through stained glass. -- Ikan Kekek 20:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 21:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC) Please check: I think you uploaded the same photo again, not the edited version, as the two photos look totally identical. -- Ikan Kekek 21:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC) They are indeed different, I also applied a tilt of 0,1 degrees. Furthermore if they where identical they couldn't have different sizes Poco a poco 10:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC) I wasn't sure how seriously to take that difference, as the images are both 6,596 × 4,965. I do see the slight tilt, now that you mention it. The differences in color are very subtle, and the light in the window and on the pews still has a clear violet tint to me. I'll defer to you and assume that's how it really looked, but if it wasn't, feel free to make appropriate edits. -- Ikan Kekek 22:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CAs on the both sides of the image: purple on the left, green and purple on the right. --Halavar 12:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Still I see red/pink CAs on the column on the right --Halavar 11:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 22:46, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 00:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Zafra, Campillo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Concepción, Gualda, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan Bautista, Herrera de los Navarros, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Santa Cruz, Plou, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Zafra, Campillo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 41-46 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Right side is almost completely blurred. I think it would be good to crop image and cut off that part. --Halavar 23:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)< Comment Sorry, but it's still blurred. --Halavar 22:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC) This image has 100 MPx, do you expect it to be as sharp as a 10 MPx image? That would be unfair. There has been some discussion about this image here. Poco a poco 21:18, 20 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Yes, this version is much better. Thanks for that. But before I give a promotion, please fix that white part in the top left corner. --Halavar 00:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Thanks for the note,  fixed now Poco a poco 20:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now. Great shot BTW:) --Halavar 20:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia nueva de San Martín de Tours, Belchite, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 115-117 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is a QI for me -- Achim Raschka 11:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 11:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Bartolomé, Bardallur, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-06, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Castillo, Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casas colgadas, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 127-129 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Impressive shot - acceptable sky, IMO, given the light conditions. I have a couple of concerns, please see annotations.--Peulle 23:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Yep.--Peulle 23:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palacio Hasht Behesht, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 75-77 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio Hasht Behesht, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 75-77 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shirpala, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panadería en Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An excellent composition from a bakery in Iran. However at the left the bread blurs a lot and person at the right is not really sharp. I think it is good enough for Q1, but my support is weak. --Michielverbeek 15:27, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Teherán desde la Torre Milad, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Fátima bint Musa, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Sanahin, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 47-49 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:28, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Noravank, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the building leans slightly to the right, but good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Sevanavank, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la República, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 10:10, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinfonía de las Piedras, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive view, but what's causing the "x" in the sky on the upper left? There are two interlocking lines, one white and one medium-tone blue. -- Ikan Kekek 10:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)  Done but cannot tell 100% what it was, maybe dust + flare Poco a poco 20:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 21:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darband, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa histórica de Tabatabaeis, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bazaar de Vakil, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:28, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortaleza de Bam, Irán, 2016-09-23, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fernsehturm, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fernsehturm, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)