Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rafandalucia!

Barnstar! edit

Thank you Rafandalucia for the barnstar! :) Steveoc 86 (talk) 00:51, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement edit

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement edit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open! edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement edit

Picture of the Year 2013 Results edit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Rafandalucia,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Meteorwrongs edit

Hola! Es claro que esto no es un meteorito:

¿Por que piensas que lo es? — Basilicofresco (msg) 22:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC) La persona que me lo regaló es buscador de meteoritos y me dijo que es un meteorito, es atraído cuando se acerca a un imán de neodimio. --Rafandalucia (talk) 19:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Sello de Manuel Ruiz Zorrilla, 1932.jpg edit

 
File:Sello de Manuel Ruiz Zorrilla, 1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 16:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open! edit

 

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Rafandalucia,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Sobre imágenes repetidas edit

Hola!! Perdona, pero no entiendo bien el objetivo de subir tantas imágenes iguales sobre monedas. Me gustaría saber los motivos. Me parece algo redundante. Gracias y lo siento. --Parair (talk) 16:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bueno, por lo menos podría clasificar esos archivos para que la gente pueda encontrarlos y no estén desperdigados. --Parair (talk) 09:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

El copyright de los sellos edit

Hola Rafandalucia

Veo que has estado subiendo imágenes de sellos de la II República. Sin embargo, no me queda claro el status del copyright de los mismos. Es posible que no podamos almacenarlos en Wikimedia Commons.

Por un lado, en algunos casos, indicas que son obra tuya:

cuando no creo que hayas sido tú el diseñador de estos sellos…

En otros casos, como File:Sello_II_República,_edifil_607,_1931.jpg, sí veo que se menciona a otra persona: «Engraved by Camilo Delhom (1894-1970)», que entiendo que sería el autor del diseño. En todo caso, si murió en 1970, no han pasado 80 años desde su muerte (ley de 1879 sobre el copyright) y estará protegido por copyright, por lo que no podremos usarlo hasta 2051.

¿Hay algo que se me haya pasado por alto?

Un saludo

Platonides (talk) 23:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Obra mía son las fotografías y los sellos son de mi propiedad, cuando he conocido al grabador lo he indicado, en algunos casos no se sabe quien fue el grabador. Estos sellos fueron hechos hace más de 100 años. --Rafandalucia (talk) 23:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

¡Hola!. Siempre debería intentar clasificar los ficheros cargados en una categoría más precisa. En este caso Category:Women in medicine. Antes de cargar un fichero, debería navegar por las categorías de Commons para determinar la/s más conveniente/s (o crear una nueva categoría). Gracias. Jmarchn (talk) 21:58, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Sellos de correos de la II República española, 1931-1939.jpg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sellos de correos de la II República española, 1931-1939.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

. HombreDHojalata.talk 14:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply