User talk:Rainer Lippert/1

This is the talk of de:User:Rainer Lippert! Please avoid English comments here because of certain language problems, so only write your comments down in German! -- Diese Seite bitte nur in DEUTSCH benutzen!

Image Tagging Image:Romker Wasserfall.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Romker Wasserfall.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 22:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Romker Wasserfall.jpg

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. --Rüdiger Wölk 22:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Der Bildeinsteller hat die Lizenzangabe inzwischen nachgeholt. Wieso sprichst Du ihn eigentlich auf englisch an? Du bist doch offensichtlich auch der deutschen Sprache mächtig. --Schubbay 17:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:AA,_Mundl.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AA,_Mundl.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rory096 04:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Siehe Diskussion hier. Viele Grüße -- Rainer Lippert 10:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC).

Image Tagging Image:Teufelshf6hle-1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Teufelshf6hle-1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Oxam Hartog 23:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Kann gelöscht werden. Gruß

Image Tagging Image:AA,_Oberrang,_17._Reihe-1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AA,_Oberrang,_17._Reihe-1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. odder 15:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Harreshausen,_Schöne_Eiche.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Harreshausen,_Schöne_Eiche.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. cohesion 21:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Schenklengsfelder_Linde,_5.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Schenklengsfelder_Linde,_5.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 13:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Hätt' ich nicht gedacht,

dass ich dir das sagen muss, aber bei der Kontrolle der neuen Bildern ist mir Image:Michaelseiche bei Albertshausen, 5.jpg aufgefallen. Ich möchte dich bitten die Bildbeschreibungen in Zukunft auf Englisch zu verfassen. Danke, ^{__ ABF __} 20:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Wenn ich es könnte, würde ich es machen. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Rainer Lippert (talk • contribs)

Oh... naja.. das ist schlecht, denn so können es über 70% der Commons nutzer nicht lesen. Ich werds mal bei Gelegenheit alles Übersetzen. ^{__ ABF __} 20:34, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Das sind die Tücken des Projekts, was sich Wikipedia nennt. -- Rainer Lippert 20:37, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Just fly and go the right way In this Image you can see me! Thanks for your Vote (support) at my stopped RFA. Even if it is stopped, it was a nice experience for me and I learned from it. Perhaps I´ll try it again in a few month, and I would be happy if you would give your vote (best a support;)) again. Thank you again, __ ABF __ 12:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Kapellenkreuzweg, historische Zeichnung.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kapellenkreuzweg, historische Zeichnung.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 21:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Nicht wiederhergestellt, Quelle fehlt. Kannst du den Autor benennen? Dann würd ich es wiederherstellen. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 15:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Reither_Eiche_2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Reither_Eiche_2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jusjih 01:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Wiederhergestellt. IMHO fehlte nur die Lizenz und es ist eines von deinen eigenen. Einfach hinzufügen, sonst isses aber in ner Woche wieder weg ;) ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 15:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Kapellenkreuzweg,_historische_Zeichnung.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kapellenkreuzweg,_historische_Zeichnung.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 11:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Nicht wiederhergestellt, Quelle fehlt. Kannst du den Autor benennen? Dann würd ich es wiederherstellen. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 15:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Der Autor bin ich. Oder was meinst du? Das Bild ist Älter als 100 Jahre. —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Rainer Lippert (talk • contribs)

Äh, so alt bist du? ;) Ne, aber du musst trotzdem den Autor benennen... Ich stells dir mal wieder her, ich denke mal irgendwie bekommst du dass schon hin ;) ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 16:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Ich habe mich eben gut gehalten ;-) Der Zeichner des Bildes ist unbekannt. Da aber das Erstellungsdatum bekannt ist, dürfte es doch keine Lizenzrechtliche Probleme geben, da inzwischen schon über 200 Jahre alt? -- Rainer Lippert 16:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC) (PS: ich hasse Commons ;-()

(Block log) ABF blocked Rainer Lippert (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (Hates Commons) ;) :P Kleiner Scherz am Rande. Ich hab die Beschreibung gefixt und ich hoffe, dir gefällt das Angebot auf meiner Disk. Grüße, ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 16:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Ich weiß zwar nicht, was du mir hier sagen willst, aber deine Angebot auf deiner Seite geht in Ordnung, danke. Gruß -- Rainer Lippert 16:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Siebenstämmige Buche bei Diebach, 1.jpg

---

Hallo Rainer Lippert/1!

Vielen Dank für das Hochladen von Dateien auf Wikimedia Commons. Bitte denke daran, dass die Bilder und Mediendateien auf Commons für Nutzer von allen Wikimedia-Projekten nützlich sein sollen. Dies ist nur möglich, wenn die Bilder auch von anderen gefunden werden können.

Um dies zu ermöglichen, sollen Bilder sollten in das Kategoriesystem eingeordnet sein. Deshalb sollten die Bilder in eine passende Kategorie eingeordnet sein, zusätzlich ist es möglich, die Bilder auf Galerieseiten einzubinden. Um gute Kategorien zu finden, bietet das Tool CommonSense Hilfe.

Eine Übersicht über alle von dir hochgeladenen Dateien findest du hier.

Wichtig ist, dass Bilder an irgendeiner Stelle eingeordnet werden. Es gibt eine große Anzahl von Bildern, die noch unsortiert sind. Hilf mit, diese Anzahl nicht weiter wachsen zu lassen!

Vielen Dank. GeorgHH • talk   09:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Hallo GeorgHH, danke für den Hinweis. Ich lade die nächste Zeit noch etwa 100 Bilder vom gleichen Thema hoch, dann stecke ich diese alle indie entsprechende kat. Ich "drücke" mich noch ein wenig vor dieser, mir schwer fallenden Arbeit. Viele Grüße -- Rainer Lippert 09:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Ja, da hast du recht, teilweise ist das nicht so einfach. Um einzelne Bilder nachträglich zu kategorisieren kannst du ja mal CommonSense ausprobieren, ein Programm zum auffinden geeigneter Kategorien. Einen schönen Rest-Sonntag noch --GeorgHH • talk   14:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Kurze Frage

Hallo Moros, du hast heute bei vielen Bilder von mir die Kategorien bearbeitet. War das per Bot? Ich werde demnächst noch weitere etwa 100 Baumbilder hochladen. Diese wollte ich allesamt in eine Kategorie stecken. "Naturdenkmal im Landkreis Bad Kissingen". Da ich mit Commons allerdings auf "Kriegsfuß" stehe, habe ich das noch nicht gemacht. Spricht etwas gegen die von mir gewünschte kat? Gruß -- Rainer Lippert 20:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deine Bäume habe ich im Zuge einer Ortskategorisierung für ganz Franken gemacht. Ich habe also nicht nur den Landkreis Bad Kissingen bearbeitet. Wenn Bäume Naturdenkmäler sind, spricht nichts dagegen, dass du eine Kategorie "Naturdenkmal im Landkreis Bad Kissingen" anlegst. Die Ortskategorie sollte jedoch bestehen bleiben, weil sie ja auch ein Wahrzeichen der jeweiligen Gemeinde sind (P.S. Die Kategorisierung erfolgte "per Hand"). --Moros 09:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. Kanonkas_(talk) 20:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, Rainer kann kein Englisch. abf /talk to me/ 20:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons hat einen bestimmten Rahmen

---

Danke für deine Beiträge. Dein Bild oder anderer Inhalt wurde kürzlich aufgrund unserer Richtlinien entfernt, weil es nicht in den Projektrahmen fällt. Bitte schaue dir unseren Projektrahmen an, kurz: Commons ist eine Sammlung von Mediendateien, einschließlich Fotos, Diagrammen, Animationen, Musik, gesprochenen Textes und Videos. Wikimedia Commons enthält keine Textartikel, wie Lexikoneinträge, Lehrbücher, Nachrichten, Wortdefinitionen und so weiter. Jede dieser Arten von Inhalten hat ein eigenes Project: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary und Wikiquote.

Wenn der Inhalt in den Rahmen eines dieser anderen Projekte zu passen scheint, kannst du in Erwägung ziehen, dort beizutragen. Wenn du denkst, das Löschen war ein Fehler, weil der Inhalt tatsächlich in den Projektrahmen passt, kannst du sie bei den Commons:Wiederherstellungswünschen anfechten, indem du sagst, warum es in den Rahmen passt, um anderen die Bewertung der Situation zu vereinfachen. Vielen Dank für dein Verständnis.abf /talk to me/ 20:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Hallo, was wurde denn von mir gelöscht? Alles, was ich in letzter Zeit hoch geladen habe, wird auch benötigt. Viele Grüße -- Rainer Lippert 20:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Quelle und Lizenz zu Image:Hohenpeißenberg - Zeichnungen.jpg

Diese Datei könnte gelöscht werden.

Vielen Dank, dass du Image:Hohenpeißenberg - Zeichnungen.jpg hochgeladen hast. Leider gibt die Beschreibungsseite nicht an, wer den Inhalt erstellt hat, daher ist der Urheberrechts-Status unklar. Falls du den Inhalt selbst erstellt hast, vermerke dies bitte auf der Beschreibungsseite (siehe Lizenzbausteine weiter unten). Falls der Inhalt nicht von dir selbst stammt, musst du begründen, warum er auf den Commons verwendet werden darf, und angeben, woher die Datei stammt, z. B. mit einem Link zur Ursprungsseite und zu den Nutzungsbedingungen dort. Falls es sich um eine Bearbeitung handelt, musst du die Namen und eine Lizenz der ursprünglichen Autoren mit angeben.

Falls das Medium nicht mit einem Lizenzbaustein ausgezeichnet ist, musst du unbedingt einen hinzufügen. Wenn du das Bild, die Audiodatei oder das Video selbst erstellt hast, kannst du den Baustein {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} für die Creative Commons Lizenz oder {{PD-self}} für Gemeinfreiheit setzen. Siehe Commons:Lizenzvorlagen für die komplette Liste der nutzbaren Lizenzen und den dazugehörigen Lizenzbausteinen.

Bitte beachte, dass alle Bilder ohne Quellen- und/oder Lizenzangaben spätestens eine Woche nach dem Hochladen gelöscht werden. Dies kannst du auf der Seite Richtlinien zum Löschen nachlesen. Falls du noch andere Dateien hochgeladen hast, überprüfe bitte auch, ob dort Quellen- und Urheberinformationen angegeben sind. Du kannst alle von dir hochgeladenen Bilder mit dem Galerie-Tool ansehen.

Solltest du Fragen hierzu haben, stelle sie bitte im deutschsprachigen Forum oder dem mehrsprachigen Help desk. Für schnellere Antworten empfiehlt sich der Live-Chat-Raum #wikimedia-commons im IRC (Direktzugriff)!

Vielen Dank. ← Körnerbrötchen » ✉ 14:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Hallo, bestehen noch Urheberrechte, wenn das Bild älter als 100 Jahre ist? Viele Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 18:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Das kann schon durchaus sein, denn laut genauer Urheberrechtslage muss der Autor mindestens 70 Jahre tot sein. Da wir bei deinem Upload aber weder einen Autoren, noch eine Quelle haben, kann ich das aber auch nur schwer nachprüfen. Die Regelung wie bei der deutschen Wikipedia - nämlich, dass Bilder, die älter als 100 Jahre sind, aber keinen Autoren aufweisen, akzeptiert werden - entspricht nicht der genauen gesetzlichen Regelung und ist auf Wikimedia Commons nicht lauter. Grüße, ← Körnerbrötchen » ✉ 21:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Please link images

---

Hello Rainer Lippert/1!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 13:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Tilia Identifizierung

[Google-Übersetzung aus dem Englischen!] Hallo Rainer - Sie hochgeladen haben viele Fotos von berühmten Linde in Deutschland:

• Dorflinde in Engenthal 1 2
• Dorflinde in Singenrain 1 2 (Tilia cordata)
• Dorflinde in Waizenbach 1 2 (Tilia platyphyllos)
• Ententeichlinde bei Aschach 1 2
• Kapellenlinde bei Hammelburg 1 2 (Tilia platyphyllos)
• Linde am Geilesberg bei Hammelburg 1 2 (Tilia platyphyllos)
• Linde bei Frankenbrunn 1 2 3 4 5
• Linde am Kloster Altstadt 1 2 (Tilia platyphyllos)
• Linde in Arnshausen 1 2 (Tilia platyphyllos)
• Linde in Nüdlingen 1 2 (Tilia platyphyllos)
• Linde in der Kannstraße bei Haard 1 2
• Tanzlinde Sachsenbrunn 1 2 3 4 5 6 (Tilia platyphyllos)

Sie wissen, sind sie Tilia cordata (Winter-Linde) oder Tilia platyphyllos (Sommer-Linde)?

Danke! - MPF (talk) 11:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Hallo MPF, bei den Linden, wo es mir bekannt ist, habe ich es dahinter geschrieben. Danke für die ganzen Kategorisierungen! Viele Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 19:00, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Danke schön! - MPF (talk) 02:06, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Diese Datei könnte gelöscht werden.

Vielen Dank, dass du File:Kasberger_Linde,_Aufnahme_von_1900.jpg hochgeladen hast. Leider gibt die Beschreibungsseite nicht an, wer den Inhalt erstellt hat, daher ist der Urheberrechts-Status unklar. Falls du den Inhalt selbst erstellt hast, vermerke dies bitte auf der Beschreibungsseite (siehe Lizenzbausteine weiter unten). Falls der Inhalt nicht von dir selbst stammt, musst du begründen, warum er auf den Commons verwendet werden darf, und angeben, woher die Datei stammt, z. B. mit einem Link zur Ursprungsseite und zu den Nutzungsbedingungen dort. Falls es sich um eine Bearbeitung handelt, musst du die Namen und eine Lizenz der ursprünglichen Autoren mit angeben. Falls das Medium nicht mit einem Lizenzbaustein ausgezeichnet ist, musst du unbedingt einen hinzufügen. Wenn du das Bild, die Audiodatei oder das Video selbst erstellt hast, kannst du den Baustein {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} für die Creative Commons Lizenz oder {{PD-self}} für Gemeinfreiheit setzen. Siehe Commons:Lizenzvorlagen für die komplette Liste der nutzbaren Lizenzen und den dazugehörigen Lizenzbausteinen. Bitte beachte, dass alle Bilder ohne Quellen- und/oder Lizenzangaben spätestens eine Woche nach dem Hochladen gelöscht werden. Dies kannst du auf der Seite Richtlinien zum Löschen nachlesen. Falls du noch andere Dateien hochgeladen hast, überprüfe bitte auch, ob dort Quellen- und Urheberinformationen angegeben sind. Du kannst alle von dir hochgeladenen Bilder mit dem Galerie-Tool ansehen. Solltest du Fragen hierzu haben, stelle sie bitte im deutschsprachigen Forum oder dem mehrsprachigen Help desk. Für schnellere Antworten empfiehlt sich der Live-Chat-Raum #wikimedia-commons im IRC (Direktzugriff)! Vielen Dank.

abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 11:18, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Fernmeldeturm Heckenbach-Schöneberg, 2.jpg

Hallo, kannst Du Dir bitte mal anschauen, was da passiert ist? Irgendwie fehlt bei diesem Bild so ziemlich alles. Danke. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 01:53, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

FPC English

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Wasserschloss Mespelbrunn, 6 edit01.jpg, was nominated on the w:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at w:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! IdLoveOne (talk) 14:36, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files

---

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Schutzeiche bei Nüdlingen, 1.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Saibo (Δ) 01:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

• Ich kann mich dem nur anschließen, mit der Bitte, überschriebene Fotos doch bitte wieder zusätzlich hochzuladen. Du hast so viele tolle und interessante Aufnahmen von den jeweiligen Bäumen gemacht, dass sich das bestimmt lohnt - wie etwa bei diesem Beispiel: File:Kapellenlinde bei Hammelburg, 1.jpg. Außerdem vermeidest Du so Irritationen bei den Datumsangaben! Gruß -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 20:54, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Birne Sömmersdorf, 2.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Schloss_Moyland,_6.jpg

File:Schloss_Moyland,_6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Schloss_Moyland.jpg

File:Schloss_Moyland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:32, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Schloss_Moyland,_5.jpg

File:Schloss_Moyland,_5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Schloss_Moyland,_3.jpg

File:Schloss_Moyland,_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dorflinde Haselbach, 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dorflinde Haselbach, 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

-mattbuck (Talk) 20:05, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Lembeck, 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Lembeck, 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.

Kurz gesagt: Du kannst nichts damit machen, es verringert aber unseren Wartungsaufwand und zeigt, dass Dir vertraut wird keine URVs hochzuladen und nicht herumzuvandalieren. Viel Spaß auf Commons noch!

Übrigens: Wenn Du Dir {{autotranslate|base=Welcome}} auf Deine Seite setzt, hast Du immer gleich eine kompakte Anleitung für Commons in der Hand. -- RE rillke questions? 11:12, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Rennrodelbahn Oberhof

Hallo!

Ich habe, gemäß der Kategoriebezeichnungsrichtlinien von Commons, "Category:Rennrodelbahn Oberhof" nach "Category:Oberhof bobsleigh, luge, and skeleton track" verschoben. Kategorienamen müssen hier - im Gegensatz zur deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, in English sein. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 10:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Aschaffenburger Schloss, edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aschaffenburger Schloss, edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Glückwunsch zum nächsten FP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:38, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bildeiche bei Albertshausen-2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bildeiche bei Albertshausen-2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 12:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Weide Euerbach, 1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Weide Euerbach, 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 3 July 2013 (UTC) JKadavoor Jee 17:47, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Inselbergschanze-1.jpg

Inselbergschanze

Inselbergschanze

Hallo Manuguf, darf ich Fragen, warum ich revidiert wurde? Ich finde das aktuelle Bild etwas besser und auch größer. Und zwei Bilder im Artikel mit dem gleichen Objekt macht wenig Sinn. Viele Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 18:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour. Les deux photos ont leur raison d'être. Écraser une photo avec une autre revient à la supprimer, ce que tu ne peut pas valablement faire, car tu l'as offerte à tous et que chacun peut la re-utiliser. Commons est une base de donnée de photos que tout le monde peut utiliser, et pas seulement les divers projets de Wikimedia. Tu peux charger la nouvelle photo avec un nouveau nom, et modifier les pages sur les projets Wikimedia où la première est présente. Cordialement, ----MGuf (d) 19:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, so ganz verstehe ich es zwar nicht, da das alte Bild ja auch von mir stammt, aber ok. Zumindest hätte man auch den Artikel anpassen müssen, wo das Bild verwendet wird. Denn da hat die Beschreibung nicht mehr gepasst, nach dem Revert. Ich habe es jetzt neu hochgeladen. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 20:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Parfait, merci. ----MGuf (d) 20:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biertor in Cham, 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Naturschutzgebiet Sodenberg-Gans

Hallo, hab dort deine Adonisröschen bei denen es dabeistand einsortiert. Hast du die anderen (zB. File:Adonisröschen, 4.jpg) auch in diesem Gebiet fotografiert? Holger1959 (talk) 09:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Holger, ja, ist auch von dort. Danke und Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 16:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Werneck, 3.jpeg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Werneck, 3.jpeg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Mein Glückwunsch zum nächsten FP. Gruß, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:26, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Rainer,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Aschaffenburger Schloss, edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as the English Wikipedia's Picture of the Day on July 17, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-07-17. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Urlaub 2014 2657.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Urlaub 2014 2657.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:49, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Burg Gößweinstein, 7.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Burg Gößweinstein, 7.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:20, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Burg Gößweinstein, 7.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Burg Gößweinstein, 7.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:37, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Eber-was?

Dieses Bild ist nicht, wie die Beschreibung sagt, von der Ruine Eberstein aus gemacht worden, da es die Wasserkuppe von Westen zeigt (Pferdskopf rechts davor) und nicht von Norden. Die (glaubhaften) Geodaten legen eine Verwechslung mit dem Ebersberg nahe. Ich erlaube mir mal, das in der Beschreibung zu korrigieren. --Kreuzschnabel 20:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Das fiel mir vorhin im Artikel de:Wasserkuppe auch auf. Die Aufnahmen entstanden wohl auch nicht auf dem Berg oder direkt bei der Ruine, sondern unterhalb beim Gasthof Zur Eberburg. --Milseburg (talk) 21:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Bäume

Ich habe von Dir unter Monumentale Bäume zwei Seiten zu Bäumen im Eichsfeld gefunden: beim Gut Hessel (Wiesenfeld) und bei Rothenbach (Gerbershausen). Eventuell schreibe ich mal einen Artikel über das Gut Hessel und habe da noch gar keine Bilder. Wäre es möglich jeweils 2-3 Bilder (einschl. der umgebenden Landschaft) hier hochzuladen? Vielen Dank schon mal im Voraus, auch wenn es nicht klappen sollte.--79.214er (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, ich sehe leider erst jetzt die Nachricht. Ich bin nicht oft hier. Mit den Bildern ist kein Problem, kannst du gerne verwenden. Wenn es also mit dem Artikel soweit ist, einfach auf meiner Benutzerseite in de.Wikipedia (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Rainer_Lippert) nochmal Bescheid geben. Ich kann dann hier ein paar Bilder hochladen. Viele Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Rainer, zie muss kaufen Lumix 20 mm fur Panasonic GM1- ich haben, und ist besten. Mfg. --Mile (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Mile, ich habe am Anfang das 20 mm gehabt, aber wieder verkauft. Es war in meinen Augen nicht besser als das 12-32 mm bei gleicher Brennweite. Ich hatte auch schon das 19 mm von Sigma, war aber auch nicht besser als der Standardzoom. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 19:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kurhaus Bad Liebenzell, Test.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ausflug 2017 4780 DxO.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ausflug 2017 4780 DxO.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

  — Jeff G. ツ 14:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Rainer, schaust Du bitte mal? Die Beschreibung ist verwurstet and das Foto hat keine Lizenz. Versehentlicher upload oder hat unsere geliebte Software wieder gepennt? --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 22:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Linde in der Kannstraße bei Haard.jpg

File:Linde in der Kannstraße bei Haard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Dorflinde in Schondra.jpg

File:Dorflinde in Schondra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Datei:Temperaturreihe Deutschland, Abweichung.PNG

Hallo Rainer, weißt du noch woher du die Daten für diese Graphik bezogen hast und auf welchen Zeitraum sie sich beziehen? Die beiden Angaben sollten unbedingt in die Beschreibung hinein. Danke: 78.34.124.12 10:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Alte Höhle und Prinzenhöhle

Hallo Rainer Lippert, bin ein bisschen mit Höhlen in Hemer und Umgebung beschäftigt. Dabei ist mir heute aufgefallen, dass ein von dir hochgeladenes altes Bild die Prinzenhöhle beschreibt, der Dateiname jedoch File:Alte Höhle, Hemer.jpg ist. Kannst Du bitte mal schauen, ob wir nicht den Dateinamen ändern müssen? Es könnte natürlich auch die "Alte Höhle" sein die auf dem Bild gezeigt wird, dann wäre die Beschreibung und die Kategorisierung zu ändern, auch bei den anderen Bildern. Sonnige Grüße --Asio 16:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)