User talk:Renardo la vulpo/Archive 4

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodrogszerdahely, blazono.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Urheberrecht bei Zeitungsartikeln?

Hallo Renardo la vulpo, deine Furcht kann ich beruhigen. Einverständnisse wurden erteilt, wären aber gar nicht notwendig, da ich zitiere. Eine bildliches Datail eines Druckwerkes wird nach geltendem Recht genauso als Zitat gewertet wie als Zitat gekenntzeichnete wiedergegebene Sätze oder Gedanken eines Druckwerkes. Grüße User:Andreas Bohnenstengel 13. Mai 2017

@Andreas Bohnenstengel: Danke! Du kannst mir übrigens solche Antworten gerne auf deiner eigenen Diskussionsseite schicken, wenn du (wie ich hier) die Vorlage {{Reply to}} einfügst. Dann bekomme ich eine Benachrichtigung, und was zusammengehört, bleibt beisammen. Grüße, -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:05, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
@Renardo la vulpo:  ;-) Grüße User:Andreas Bohnenstengel 13. Mai 2017

File:Timișoara, ortodoksa preĝejo Iosefin, 11.jpeg

 
File:Timișoara, ortodoksa preĝejo Iosefin, 11.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turbojet (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Timisoara, katedralo, 50.jpeg

 
File:Timisoara, katedralo, 50.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turbojet (talk) 12:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Timișoara, katedralo, 49.jpeg

 
File:Timișoara, katedralo, 49.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turbojet (talk) 12:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Timișoara, katedralo, 51.jpeg

 
File:Timișoara, katedralo, 51.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turbojet (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your acceptance about the Orthodox Cathedral in Timișoara. All Orthodox cathedrals in Transylvania and Banat, except for Sibiu, were built after WW1. Thank you for visiting Romania. :) --Turbojet (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
@Turbojet: Placere. Am fost în România deja mai mulți decât zece oare, pentru o cooperare științifică. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 08:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Danke...

...für deine Fotos aus Augsburg und Umgebung! --Neitram (talk) 12:37, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Berchtesgaden, Franziskanerkirche von Westen, 4.jpeg

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


File:Zuriko, Maĥmud-moskeo, 17.jpeg

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Berchtesgaden, Hanielstr 13, 1.jpeg

 
File:Berchtesgaden, Hanielstr 13, 1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:810D:31BF:F6E8:5409:1224:6D96:9780 06:52, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Sardagna, kongrescentro Panorama kaj telfera stacio, 1.jpeg

  Fatto--Arbalete (talk) 02:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

@Arbalete:   Thank you. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 19:35, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Timiŝoaro, kirko je Elija, 1.jpeg

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC)


File:Bamberg, Sankt-Getreu-Str 41, 1.jpeg

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colmar, fervoja ponto, 2.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Nice symmetry; wish the sky wasn't so bright in the background but I don't think there's much you could have done about that --Daniel Case 02:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

ILEI-Kongreso (51. - 2018 - Madrido (Hispanio)) .svg

Sed la bildo   estas cun permisilo CC-by-sa. Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 11:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Renardo la vulpo/Archive 4".