Last modified on 30 April 2014, at 16:52

User talk:RicHard-59

Return to "RicHard-59" page.
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, RicHard-59!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

sep 5th 2009:Uploaded my first image to Commons. Mistakes possible. Tarzan-Africa.gif

TUSC token 01f0c441f8a24491665fa3d8cea3286eEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token fb91ee9f996a087b5327bdb8d0f965abEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 7f9a19f75f914a48f01a75e67e973d8bEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


TUSC token b434cb1768b8bdda439518d05e5c0857Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! June 17th 2012


OngelmaEdit

Lataisitko tästä SVG-version: File:MSJ.fin.svg.png , mielellään mahdollisimman vähän png-kuvia yms. kun kerran mahdollista svg. --Olli (talk) 13:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_Den_Shī_shì_shí_shī_shǐ_.oggEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_Den_Shī_shì_shí_shī_shǐ_.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sysywjel (talk) 03:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, RicHard-59!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Synthesis_of_Heroin_from_Opium.svgEdit

Hi there

Do you mind taking a look at this image you uploaded? Did you mean calcium hydroxide or calcium carbonate at the extreme left? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 03:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Good point. I'll change that. Thanks.--RicHard-59 (talk) 17:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Now it is fixed. Any knowledge of "calcium morphenate" structure how it looks like?--RicHard-59 (talk) 18:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back. Don't know about calcium morphenate, sorry. I don't check Commons often. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I have added information to the talk page of your image since ammonium chloride does not create morphine hydrochloride. Adding ammonium chloride until the pH reaches 8-9 causes the the morphine to precipitate out of solution, which is in freebase (i.e. pure, non soluble) form. The remaining opium solution is filtered off and the relatively pure morphine is dissolved in hydrochloric acid solution to produce the water soluble salt morphine hydrochloride.
By the way, all that needs correcting is to simply remove the word 'hydrochloride' (HCl) from after the word morphine, since this step (adding hcl acid to create morphine hcl) is not essential in production. After ammonium chloride is added the morphine (pure freebase form, not hydrochloride) precipitates and can be added directly to acetic anhydride to form diacetylmorphine. D Dinneen (At Wikipedia) 9 November 2011.

Fixed. I added also possible img of calcium morphenate. Pls report if problem.--RicHard-59 (talk) 13:11, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


Good job on correcting things! Now, I don't want to be too fussy but because I really like your image, finding the way it simplifies the procedure for refining opium so well really neat - I believe there are a few more improvements that could help to make the image even more accurate. I will point these suggestions out below;

  • 1. Calcium hydroxide is an ionic compound, whereas your structure appears to show covalent bonds (there shouldn't be any lines between the calcium & OH molecules). It should look more like your structure of ammonium chloride, except of course the calcium ion should have a 2+ charge (perhaps in a blue circle to resemble the charge on ammonium). The two hydroxide molecules (OH) should each have a single - charge. This link provides a good example of how the OH's could appear - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hydroxide_lone_pairs-2D.svg, but you should probably leave out the lone pairs (the six black dots around the O) and could put the charge in a blue circle as with ammoinum chloride. Optionally, both the calcium and the two hydroxide ions can be drawn within square brackets. Also, the molecular structure of CaOH2 should have the '2' following OH written outside the brackets - as Ca(OH)2 rather than Ca(OH2) as it is currently written!
  • 2. I am not really sure what the structure of calcium morphinate should look like as there don't appear to be any examples online. However, one thing I would suggest, is that the 3-OH group (the top one) is more likely to dissociate than the 6-OH (the bottom one) because it is a phenol which is quite a bit more acidic than a standard hydroxyl group (which the bottom one is). Therefore perhaps you could consider giving the top group the negative charge instead - or even showing both groups dissociated and negatively charged, therefore having a single morphine ion bonding to a single calcium (instead of 1 Ca ion to 2 Morphinate ions as is shown currently). It might also be neater to leave out the square brackets surrounding the morphenate ion, similar to what you have done with ammonium chloride (would probably be neater!).
  • 3. Finally, to make it more obvious that morphine is in freebase form rather than a salt you could consider writing the word freebase in brackets following the word morphine, perhaps in italics (this is obviously not essential, and it may actually be neater and look more condensed without including it!).


D Dinneen 10 November 2011.

Thanks for corrections. Uploaded new img with changes.--RicHard-59 (talk) 22:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Sodium thiopental.svgEdit

Hi, "Sodium thiopental.svg" has errors in valency and charge. Please correct it (PNG version is OK) or revert your changes in all wikis - I already did it in en and pl:wikis. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 21:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Uploaded new version. Better?--RicHard-59 (talk) 22:19, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
The chemical structure is still incorrect. There should be a single bond between sulfur and carbon, not a double bond. Ed (Edgar181) 13:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Ok, it's exact look-a-like-copy of File:Tiopental.png, Ill fix the error on this one. Thanks for info.--RicHard-59 (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Funny thing. this img and this and this are also incorrect?--RicHard-59 (talk) 15:40, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Talk continues in File talk:Sodium thiopental.svg

I replied there. Ed (Edgar181) 16:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Can U help me also with Calcium morphenate-image I loaded to Fi-wiki before loading it to commons. Hard-to-find img. Check en:Talk:Calcium morphenate. --RicHard-59 (talk) 14:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
The name "calcium morphenate" generally does not refer to a single chemical compound, but rather to the complex mixture obtained by treating opium (itself a complex mixture) with calcium carbonate. I don't think it is useful to try to depict it as a chemical structure diagram. Ed (Edgar181) 16:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks--RicHard-59 (talk) 18:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

File:FI-SALLITTU.PNGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:FI-SALLITTU.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jafeluv (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Calcium_bromide.svgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calcium_bromide.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChemNerd (talk) 15:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Calcium_fluoride.svgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calcium_fluoride.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChemNerd (talk) 15:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:1-nitroaknadinine.svg is disputedEdit

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:1-nitroaknadinine.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 20:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


Looks fine now. DMacks (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Sinococuline.svg is disputedEdit

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Sinococuline.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 20:37, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


File:Tannagine.svg and File:Stephodeline.svg have the same situation. DMacks (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

They are untangled now, but those bonds should not be bold. A bold line has a specific chemical meaning, which is exactly contradictory to "at wide end of hashed wedge". These are certainly technical issues, but it's important to understand and convey them clearly (that's the whole point of having the structure diagrams). DMacks (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Pseudoakuammigine.svg is disputedEdit

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Pseudoakuammigine.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


Good job with a difficult structure! DMacks (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure File:Nepenthone.svg is disputedEdit

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Nepenthone.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


That side-chain still has weird geometry. Why is the ring->chain bond not straight to the right, the bonds at the carbonyl not 120°, and the bond-junction along the way to the benzene ring not 120°? DMacks (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Thienorphine skeletal.svg also has a bunch of weird geometries. It looks like these are all hand-drawn; you might want to "invest" in any of the free chemical-drawing software packages that are available--they standardize many structure parameters automatically. See en:Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing or de:Wikipedia:Wie erstelle ich Strukturformeln? for details. DMacks (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Thienorphine skeletal.svg geometries look fine now. Is "outlined yellow S" a standard style? DMacks (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:SAHTM-skeletal.svg is disputedEdit

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:SAHTM-skeletal.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 15:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


File:Calcium Phosphide.svgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calcium Phosphide.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 13:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Teflon structure.svgEdit

Hi RicHard-59. Please do not overwrite images created by other users, unless they contain errors or the quality (e.g. resolution) is low and you improve it without changing the layout. Further more, structural formulae are generally preferably drawn in black only. --Leyo 16:39, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token acca5491a68e39bd25d044e0de77dd54Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File source is not properly indicated: File:1860shairnet.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1860shairnet.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:1860shairnet.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 18:46, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Chatterjee-dia-sm.pngEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chatterjee-dia-sm.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chatterjee-dia-sm.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Psychonaut (talk) 17:25, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Tryptophan_biosynthesis_(en).svgEdit

Hi there

There's a typo in this image. Tryptophan is mispelled in the bottom left hand corner. Could you fix it? Thanks. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 01:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Fixed--RicHard-59 (talk) 12:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Fenfangjine G.svgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fenfangjine G.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 17:47, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Img fixed. Ok now?--RicHard-59 (talk) 19:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Popshoveit.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Popshoveit.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Popshoveit.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 22:44, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Angry Birds ToonsEdit

This logo does not seem to qualify for the "below the threshold of originality" criterion. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 12:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

  • What to do to make it so?--RicHard-59 (talk) 12:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
    • There is no way; the logo is made of characteristic elements (characteristic, not simple, font, characteristic, nie :generic" eye outlines), so any variation of the Angry Birds artwork will copy the artwork design of Rovio Entertainment, therefore it will copy the copyrighted idea. Sorry, no can do... Wojciech Pędzich Talk 12:28, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Nudity n.svgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nudity n.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

89.249.2.53 10:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Stanley postcard.jpgEdit

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stanley postcard.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Troll face.svgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Troll face.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- 李博杰  | Talk contribs 21:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Deadstar (msg) 13:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


File:Rosetta 111106.jpgEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | മലയാളം | svenska | 中文 | +/− বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Polski | Русский | Svenska | 中文 | +/−


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Rosetta 111106.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

PEGI iconsEdit

Hello. I’ve uploaded new versions for some of the annotated PEGI labels (Online n.svg, PEGI bad language.svg, PEGI Violence 2.svg) and also added the missing ones (PEGI Fear annotated.svg PEGI Sex annotated.svg PEGI Drugs annotated.svg PEGI Gambling annotated.svg PEGI Discrimination annotated.svg).

If you can, please have a look and see whether everything’s fine with the new SVG files and that they’re not being rendered incorrectly on your devices and platforms. There was a problem with background pattern not showing, but I guess that was because I clipped it to fit the box. In current files the pattern slightly exceeds the dimension of the box, but since viewers (e.g. browsers) render only anything inside the declared dimensions, it seems to not be a problem.

If you have time, could you please also answer this two questions?

  • How did you stretch the Dejavu font? — The question is mainly about vertical stretching. I tried all text-formatting options that Inkscape provides, but couldn’t match a writing in Dejavu Sans to that of your version. You can see a comparison here. The upper one is my version, with all text settings identical to the lower (your) version that was found in the old file, but still there are significant differences.
  • How did you make the background PEGI-word pattern match the original so precisely? — I used these two “scans” to match the digital copies with the originals as much as I could, and your background pattern for the repeating “PEGI” was very closely matching with those in original images in both cases.

Also, thanks for your uploads. DaemonDice (talk) 12:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

I will take a look. Thnks.
  • Sometimes I transfer text to path using "Object to Path" (shift-ctrl-C) and then text can be modified any way one wants. edit: If there is no accurate font, i take some simple font, transfer its edges to paths and use the original font as guide to make my font to match.
  • I rotated image so that text is horizontal, made texts fit and rotated back.--RicHard-59 (talk) 13:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC)