User talk:Serdechny/Archive2010

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Погрузка_десантников_в_самолет_(Днепр-67).jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago14 comments4 people in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Погрузка_десантников_в_самолет_(Днепр-67).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Погрузка_десантников_в_самолет_(Днепр-67).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Trycatch (talk) 09:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Кто автор этой фотографии? Т.к. фотография создана в 1967 году, ясно, что автором не можете являться вы, как это сейчас указано в описании. Trycatch (talk) 09:50, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Та же самая проблема у файлов
- File:Десантники готовятся к погрузке (Днепр-67).jpg
- File:Боец-десантник (Днепр-67).jpg
- File:Десантник, участник учений Днепр-67.jpg
- File:Прохождение бронетранспортеров (Днепр-67).jpg
- File:Прохождение ГАЗ-66 с десантом (Днепр-67).jpg
- File:Радист на учениях Щит-83.jpg
- File:Дежурный по роте в ружпарке (Щит-83).jpg
- File:Десантники идут к самолетам (Щит-83).jpg
- File:Десантирование многокупольной системы (Щит-83).jpg
- File:Прохождение ракетных комплексов (Днепр-67).jpg
-- на них также установлен шаблон {{нет источника}}. Кто реальный автор этих фотографий? есть ли у вас разрешение от него? Trycatch (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Да, есть :) -- George Serdechny 16:51, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Do not remove tags. Geagea (talk) 16:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Это ещё с какого перепуга? Do not post tags. -- George Serdechny 17:07, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

You uploaded part of the photos to the ru.wikiedia. You claimed there that the photos are from some archiv. You must clear who is the auther otherwiae the photos will deleted. By the way Flickr representative is irrelevant see Flickr washing. Geagea (talk) 17:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

1) This very case has nothing to deal with Flickr washing (please, read it carefully) ; 2) "You must clear" — who said? ; 3) If you want be User:Trycatch's barrister, please provide us with appropriate confirmation (preferably by OTRS) ; 4) As I see, you like formalism. Me too. But all of your messages have the same lack of reasoning. Be more formal ; 5) Wud ya pliz yuz kommn English, otherwiae your further edits and messages will be considered as groundless flood. -- George Serdechny 05:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Если у вас действительно есть разрешение от настоящего автора, то вам следует предоставить доказательства наличия у вас этого разрешения в COM:OTRS. В противном случае файлы будут удалены. Да, удалять предупреждающие шаблоны бессмысленно -- это вам не поможет никаким образом сохранить файлы при отсутствии разрешения. Trycatch (talk) 18:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

А кто спрашивает? -- George Serdechny 05:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Так этот вопрос уже, вроде бы, решили в Википедии? Судя по странице обсуждения участника, у меня сложилось впечатление, что к фотографиям больше претензий нет, так что я везде расставила flickr review passed. -- deerstop. 23:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Хмм, как будто, нет. На всех фотографиях, перечисленных тут (ссылка не прямая, последний раздел с заголовком "Файлы"), по-прежнему расставлены шаблоны No permission, т.е. проблема не решена. Да и в случае ее решения участник вряд ли стал бы заниматься странными действиями по переносу фотографий на Викисклад через Flickr, до крайности напоминающими flickrwashing. Trycatch (talk) 23:56, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

чит. Flickr washing. -- George Serdechny 05:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Так, здесь все понятно, номинировал файлы на удаление. Trycatch (talk) 07:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Боец-десантник (Днепр-67).jpg and other files from Fliker account "George Serdechny"

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello SerdechnyG,

thos photos did not pass review because tha maximum size of the photos in tha fliker account are smaller then the version that you uploaded to Commons. If the Fliker account is your account and you hold the rights of this photos then sign them as {{own}} in the source parameter. Geagea (talk) 11:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Maximum allowable file-size in Flickr is 10 MB. -- SerdechnyG (talk) 16:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Trycatch (talk) 07:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Scientific report by Sebastian Neurauter.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)