Last modified on 1 August 2013, at 15:23

User talk:Sidonius

Return to "Sidonius" page.

Image:Historische Karte CH 1315.pngEdit

Hi, I'm afraid you can not request that your permission is needed if this map is used outside Wikipedia. By uploading your map to WikiCommons you must allow anybody to use the map as they please. Please remove the sentence "bitte Nachricht an Autor bei Verwendung ausserhalb von Wikipedia". Regards, Thuresson 12:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi - this sentence does not suggest that anybody needs my permission to use it - I just want them to give me a short notice that and where they use it. In English it means: Please notify me if you use the map outside of wikipedia. I think this is not too extreme - is it?

sidonius 21:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Your mapsEdit

...are great! However, could you please also upload unlabelled versions? Removing the German text and substituting it with e.g. English text is a lot of work due to the antialiasing. It would be so much easier to produce other-language versions from plain unlabelled maps.

Hello - I will also make english versions - don't worry. I just need some time.

BTW, I'm in need of three maps; maybe you could help me out? See Talk:Swabian War, Talk:Reformation in Switzerland, and Talk:Swiss peasant war of 1653. (Good historical boundaries are e.g. on Image:Old Swiss Confederation.jpg; maybe these can be traced.) Don't know if you have the time, but it sure would be great to have maps for these articles. Editors skilled in mapmaking and knowing Swiss history are hard to find, so I thought I'd ask you. Lupo 13:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Lupo. I'm just producing a series about swiss history. It will take some time though because I also have to work. The maps will be in English and German. First I do the German versions, than the English ones. I try to make them really detailed and accurate not like the map you mention. If you wish, I can make a map series to Switzerland during the reformation. Before that I will make "Switzerland before Marignanio" and Switzerland 1530. The later map will provide a background for the religious map of Switzerland during that time.sidonius 11:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Well, still, if you could upload unlabelled versions, we could (a) share the work (I do have the necessary tools and skills to add labels! And I do know Switzerland well enough to do it right, too :-) and (b) other people could more easily create maps in still other languages. Lupo 11:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Kann mich nur dem Lob anschliessen. Grossartiger Beitrag, bringt Wikipedia qualitativ einen grossen Schritt voran. Trigaranus (talk) 16:10, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Map_Svabian_War.pngEdit

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 18:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Orgullomoore, I uploaded this file by mistake - I thought I was replacing another file. I tried to find out how one can delete an unwanted file, but could not find any hints in the help section. Can you delete it? Thank you, sidonius 18:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

de:SchwabenkriegEdit

Good work there! But, say, how about acknowledging the source on the talk page? Some parts are clearly translated or at least heavily inspired by en:Swabian War... I'm thinking about cross-translating your excellent section on "Politische Vorgeschichte", too. And where have I seen the phrase "Schliesslich war das Kaisertum Quelle aller Privilegien, Rechte und der eigentlichen Staatlichkeit aller Glieder der Eidgenossenschaft" before? I remember clearly that I had seen that (or something very very close to it) in one of my sources, but had not used it because I had no good idea how to rephrase and express it in English. :-) Lupo 10:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

You are right - I was inspired to write my article in German by you. I crosschecked the story with some books I have. I know, that the phrase you mention is from some book I read a long time ago. Since I really read tons of stuff, I cannot refind the phrase immediately. Where and how do you want to be paid tribute to? I can hardly place you in the literature section (?). I also have to write an article about the conflict between St. Gall and the Abbey of St. Gall, because I know that this conflict was also a major thing during the Vorgeschichte...but time..

sidonius 08:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Same here (read tons of books and don't know for sure where that phrase came from. I think it was Meles, or maybe the Schwabe work). As to attribution: personally, I don't care very much. It's the GFDL that insists! And the German WP takes that rather seriously; you might want to check de:Paul Kane and de:Diskussion:Paul Kane (second subtitle "Paul Kane" is the failed "featured article" candidacy, which failed mainly because of concerns of GFDL compliance). I have the impression that if one applies such strict criteria, no translation can ever become a featured article on the German WP...
I have a more relaxed approach to this: either include a simple statement and the main authors on talk, or make an edit to the article with an edit comment saying that "much of the expansion since 2006-08-24 was inspired by and partly translated from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swabian_War&oldid=69570082, main author Lupo" or some such. (Replace the version number to whatever would be appropriate.) In this way, the attribution would be in the article's edit history. (I did that when I cross-transferred some of your statements into the English version.) For me that's more than sufficient, but as the Paul Kane experience has shown, others might demand more.
And no, I certainly don't belong in the literature section of the article! :-) Lupo 08:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
I paid you credits in the discussion section of the german version. I am not concerned because of the translation, because I did not translate the article - its hardly possible to translate an English text into a decent German article in my opinion since the syntax and the ways to tell a story are much different. I copied the structure of the article and some of the pictures - one I even uploaded on the commons from the english wikipedia. By the way - you did a great job with all your articles! Chapeau. Unfortunately I don't have much support writing articles about Swiss history. For some time I have been writing about and around the main article on History of Switzerland but I only reached the reformation period...a lot of work is still to do...thank again, sidonius 09:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC) (and sorry, that I overwrote your changes in the map, but I discovered another mistake: Werdenberg was in fact an associate of the confederacy since 1493 and took part in the war on the side of the conferacy)
No problem. But please, get optipng and run your files through it to reduce their size. Command-line tool (Windows), don't know if a Linuy-version exists. Simple to use: "optipng -k SomeFile.png" copies the original to "SomeFile.png.bak" and then prodfuces a new "SomeFile.png" that is usually much smaller. Lupo 09:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the hint. I will try that. I normally just export from Illustrator using the export for web function. sidonius 14:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Calven mapEdit

Situationsplan der Schlacht an der Calven

Kannst Du diese Karte gebrauchen :-)? (Beachte die genaue Syntax des [[Image: ...]] Mark-Ups! Aber vielleicht kanntest Du das ja schon...) Lupo 13:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Super Karte - ich habe mich schon geärgert, weil die einzige Dufourkarte der Gegend, die ich privat besitze genau den Vinschgau nicht zeigt. Was meinst du genau mit der Syntax? Ich verstehe deinen Hinweis da nicht ganz... Gruss, sidonius 18:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
[[Image:Karte Calven.jpg|thumb=Karte Calven thumb.png|Bildlegende]]. Die kleine Version, die hier auf der Seite gezeigt wird, ist Image:Karte Calven thumb.png; wenn Du draufklickst, wird aber die grosse Version Image:Karte Calven.jpg angezeigt. Eine Skalierung des grossen PNGs auf meinem Computer ergab einen Thumbnail mit unlesbarem Text. Also habe ich noch einen extra Thumbnail aus dem Originalfile (SVG für Text; mit PNG Hintergrund) generiert, bei dem, dank der viel besseren Skalierung von SVG-Textes, die Beschriftung tatsächlich einigermassen lesbar bleibt. Im Nachhinein habe ich dann festgestellt, dass der von der Wiki-Software MediaWiki verwendete Thumbnail-Generator besser ist als erwartet; ein automatisch von MediaWiki generierter Thumbnail ergibt auch noch lesbaren Text, ist jedoch etwas unscharf. Mit der thumb=... Syntax kannst Du festlegen, welches Bild als Thumbnnail verwendet werden soll, und somit die automatische Generierung umgehen. Lupo 06:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Und im Übrigen habe ich das Ganze nochmals hochgeladen als Karte Calven.jpg da das JPG viel kleiner als das PNG ist (bei gleichbleibender Qualität). Lupo 07:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
nicht schlecht, das mit dem thumb. Ich habe in letzter Zeit extra immer das PNG-Format gewählt, weil mir andere User mehrmals an den Karren gefahren waren, dass das JPG-Format schlecht sei für Karten. Das Argument war, dass Linien "verschwimmen". Ich habe aber auch schon bemerkt, dass JPG's in der Regel bei besserer Qualität kleiner sind. Seit ich Optipng verwende, hat sich die Filegrösse aber wenigstens etwas redzuiert - danke auch für diesen Tip. --sidonius 18:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Das stimmt im Allgemeinen schon, insbesondere für Karten wie Image:Map Swabian War.png, wo grosse Flächen die gleiche Farbe haben. Dort wäre JPG wohl nicht angebracht, da durch die Komprimierung sichtbare Artefakte entstünden und die Qualität allgemein leiden würde. Hier aber, wo der Hintergrund erstens komplex und zweitens sowieso schon nur von minderer Qualität ist (aber immer noch gut, wenn man bedenkt, dass der Originalmassstab 1:50 000 war und das 1300 Pixel breite Bild also sowieso schon eine gewaltige Verkleinerung ist), ist JPG vertretbar. Und um einiges kleiner! Lupo 22:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
P.S.: Danke für die Reformations-Karte! Werde sie mir die nächsten Tage mal genauer anschauen. Jetzt nur eine Frage: Wann wurde die Grafschaft Greyerz zwischen Bern u. Fribourg aufgeteilt? War das nicht vor 1536? Lupo 22:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Die Grafschaft Greyerz wurde 1555 zwischen Freiburg und Bern geteilt: Hochgreyerz oder Saanen kam zu Bern und wurde zwangsweise reformiert. Dieses Gebiet war schon vor 1475 ein Zugewandter Ort der Eidgenossenschaft gewesen, d.h. die Talschaft stand im Bund mit Bern und Freiburg, gehörte aber gleichzeitig zur Grafschaft Greyerz. Niedergreyerz kam zu Freiburg und blieb katholisch. Die Grafen von Greyerz waren den Herzögen von Savoyen lehenspflichtig. 1536 kam es deswegen zum Konflikt mit Bern, das die Lehenshoheit über die Besitzungen der Grafen beanspruchte. Schliesslich musste Bern aber auf Intervention Freiburgs sich auf die Lehenshoheit über die waadtländischen Besitzungen der Grafen begnügen, insb. Aubonne. Nur Oron blieb bei Greyerz. Sobald ich Zeit habe, werde ich auch noch die zweite Karte mit der Gegenreformation übersetzen. Ich muss dort aber noch ein paar Korrekturen vornehmen. sidonius 20:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Historische Karte CH 1536 E.pngEdit

Wouldn't it be better to use a map of 1564? With 1536, we have a rather volatile state and make it look at if it was lasting. The Chablais was returned to Savoy in 1564, and the County of Gruyère ceased to exist in 1555... Anyway, here are some comments:

  1. I'd include a note (1536 - 1564) at the Chablais.
  2. "Countship of Gruyère" should probably be "County of Gruyère" and could also do with a note ("until 1555").
  3. I'd also highlight the outer boundaries of the Confederacy, of the Three Leagues, and of the Seven Zenden. That would make it clearer that e.g. the "Margraviate of Baden" did not belong to the Confederacy.
  4. "G.H." at Blenio ("Gemeine Herrschaft?") should be "Condominium".
  5. I'd add Müstair to the map.
  6. I'd explain the sign for monastery/convent/abbey in the legend. (I see that it is explained... Lupo 13:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC))
  7. Schaffhausen became protestant in 1529; I'd add a red circle with that year.
  8. The political and confessional situation in the Reiat region east of Schaffhausen is complicated. AFAIK, the city of Schaffhausen and the families Imthurn and Fulach, both citizens of Schaffhausen, held the lower judicial rights, while the Grundherrschaft belonged to St. Blasien. Thayngen is considered to have joined the Confederacy as a subject of Schaffhausen in 1501. (See the very brief summary at [1].) This is consistent with the Swiss' general attitude, who often considered to own a territory when they had acquired the lower justice; and certainly a defendable point of view given the events of the storm of Thayngen in the Swabian war. Thayngen became protestant together with Schaffhausen. In the neighbouring village of Barzheim, the reeve at Thayngen held the lower justice since the 15th century; but Schaffhausen acquired the high justice only in 1723. See [2]. In any case, Barzheim also became protestant during the reformation. Dörflingen (south of Thayngen, then belonging to Zürich) became protestant in 1535 [3]. I think the "bulge" at Schaffhausen should extend more eastward (for the territory of the confederacy), and should also be colored orange for protestantism. North of Thayngen (Bibern, Hofen, Lohn, Altdorf, Stetten, Büttenhard) the same split of low and high justice developed; this area was bought in 1723 by Schaffhausen, until then it belonged to Further Austria. Confessionally, I only know that Lohn belonged until 1574 to the convent of Paradies (on the Rhine, near Diessenhofen), from then on to Schaffhausen (and presumably protestant from then on) [4].
  9. Typo in the legend: "catholic majority"

Again, thanks a lot for this great map! Lupo 10:20, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the extensive notes. I originally chose 1536 only because it marks the moment of Berne conquering the west and spreading reform there. I wanted to show the biggest extent of the spread of the reform in contrast to the other map - the effects of the counter reform. It will be translated during the next one or two weeks, because I am very busy taking an exam right now. I will try to make something with your suggestions. I quite impressed on your knowledge about the Schaffhausen-Area - I hope to find a solution there as well. Thank you, sidonius 20:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
new version is uploaded - i found some other mistakes. Hope the borders are now clearer...sidonius 21:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. You're right about the Chablais, it was 1567 for the Bernese part and 1569 for the part of the Seven Zenden. However, the green borders are next to invisible at thumbnail size. Maybe generate an extra thumbnail with extra thick borders? On SH, I had thought of something like en:Image:SH_ca_1536.png... (Tell me when you don't need that sketch anymore, I'll then delete it again.) At the county of Gruyère, since you now show the split, I think we could even mention "1555 to Fribourg (catholic)" and "1555 to Berne (protestant)", with "catholic" and "protestant" on a new line. "Langental" should be "Langenthal". Morbegno (in the Valtellina) is mentioned (why?), but has no circle... If you have an SVG file, I could try to make those modifications myself (using Inkscape). What fonts do you use? It's a great and beautifully detailed map. I also like the counter-reformation map. Lupo 07:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Buchberg (north-east of Eglisau, still on the right side of the Rhine) also is a split jurisdiction case; 1520 SH acquired the lower justice, and 1656 the high justice.[5] Appears to have remained catholic, though.[6] Lupo 10:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
the problem is in fact that very often maps showing the territory of a canton show territories as part of the canton, as soon as the lower justice was aquired. As soon as you draw a map showing the entire Confederacy, you face the problem, that it is nearly impossible to show these conflicts unless the map becomes unreadable for non-experts. A good example is the Thurgau: in some parts Zurich or citizens of Zurich held the low justice - even though they belong to the condominium of the Thurgau. This is why I don't want to start making exeptions for Schaffhausen. In this case it was a useful information, because of the religion. In the next file showing the confessions of the 18th century Schaffhausen will include all the territories in the Klettgau and Hegau, where the city aquired the High Jurisdiction. I will try the thumbnail-thing. I did not want to make the bounderies bright red, because the main information of the map is the religions - maybe I try another attempt there. It is always a split of interests between design, colours and readability...thanks for your work, sidonius 13:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Template:Attribution sidoniusEdit

Hi. There are some discussions about the above template. Due to this I was wondering if it would be a major problem to change it into something like the below. /Lokal_Profil 11:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

The copyright holder, Marco Zanoli, would be delighted if you could send him a short notice and a specimen copy, if you use his work outside of wikipedia. Please attribute the copyright holder properly!
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

thank you for pointing this out to me. I will do as you told me tomorrow. sidonius 22:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
The wordig that you used shouldn't cause any problems. The reason why I sugested the above change is that it contains the "normal" cc-by template making the license easier to establish. Also it's best if the template is substed (by writing {{subst:TemplateName}}. This ensures that a change of you're template doesn't change the license on images where it has already been applied. If you've got any questions just ask =) /Lokal_Profil 23:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:HPETAIN.JPGEdit

Image deletion warning Image:HPETAIN.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 02:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Zuerich1705.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Zuerich1705.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 15:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bild Zwingli Asper.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 20:11, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Map of Swiss LanguagesEdit

Hi sir, I am from Chinese Wikipedia and interested in the Image Map Languages CH.png created by you. I am wondering if I can help translate it to Chinese and upload to the commons. I guess by the time you see this message I've already done the job. If you think it's inappropriate, feel free to delete it. Thanks! 06:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Hallo, I can send you a blank version via email or upload it to the commons if you want. sidonius (talk) 08:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Predigerkirche 19Jh.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

How easy would it be...Edit

re: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Alamannien.svg

  1. ... to get a blank or English version of this beautiful piece of work by you? See Upper Burgundy {used!) and Duke of Burgundy and possibly... List of rulers of Provence for likely destinations. Any maps showing the later in better scaling and resolution? That one (Image:Map Provence 1184.jpg) cuts off too much surrounding terrain to be sure where it is centered, or the territory located.

  1. Is there any push to link such images to a blank, if the later exists? Seems like would be an excellent idea.

  2. Is the push here for svg files because the file format supports layering allowing such as the annotations here to be stripped off for another language. My son, who does this kind of graphics stuff just pointed out most browsers need plugins to give full svg support... hence there is a fundamental incompatibility, one would think. // FrankB 21:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I hope this map out of a series I did in German and English is to your liking: File:Map Kingdom Arelat EN.png. Greetings sidonius (talk) 20:57, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:Abbeys in the Canton of ZürichEdit

Hallo Sidonius,

Nicht alle Klöster sind gleichzeitig Abteien, deswegen muss ich ein paar aus der Kategorie rauswerfen. Vielleicht ist es besser stattdessen eine Kategorie Monasteries in the Canton of Zürich anzulegen, weil die Kategorie Abbeys in Switzerland aufgrund der überschaubaren Zahl von Abteien in der Schweiz wohl ausreichen dürfte. Gruss, --Kurpfalzbilder.de (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Sidonius!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token f30338d83869a5788300350d4298b160Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Hallo,

ich bin auf Ihre Seite gestoßen und wollte Sie kurz informieren, dass ich einige Karten (Burgunderkriege) für die Uni verwenden möchte. Ich bin Studentin der Geschichte in Mainz und halte nächste Woche einen Vortrag über die Schweizergarde des Papstes (ein Punkt darin werden die Burgunderkriege sein). Vielen Dank....ihre Seite ist der Knaller. Da ich allgemein ein großer Fan von Karten bin, sind Ihre Beiträge eine wahre Fundgrube. Viele Grüße nach Zürich, S. Ruhland

Besten Dank und viel Vergnügen. Wenn ich mehr Zeit hätte, dann könnte ich noch viel mehr Karten machen...sidonius (talk) 07:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

NoteEdit

Hello. I just wanted to inform you that I have given you Autopatrolled rights. This does not affect your editing, but makes it easier for users watching Special:RecentChanges to find unhelpful edits. Regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 13:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks.--sidonius (talk) 21:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Watermark removalEdit

Hi Sidonius, today I've removed visible watermarks from all of your maps (uploading at this moment). Per your request, I was careful to ensure that credits were preserved in image metadata for all affected images.

For JPEGs, the EXIF metadata can contain copyright information, and this field is shown by almost all editing and viewing tools. I took all your JPEGs that formerly had credit lines in the image and used EXIFtool like this to add EXIF metadata crediting you: "exiftool(-k).exe" -copyright="Marco Zanoli, de.wikipedia.org, CC-BY-SA 3.0" *.jpg

For PNGs, EXIFtool supports adding both author and copyright metadata - these are not stored in EXIF format but in PNG TextualData tags. Not all tools support this type of PNG metadata, but it can be read with EXIFtool and is present. I used the command line: "exiftool(-k).exe" -copyright="Marco Zanoli, de.wikipedia.org, CC-BY-SA 3.0" -author="Marco Zanoli, de.wikipedia.org" *.png

(I also used PNGcrush with the -brute flag on all your PNGs to minimize the file size without any loss of image data.)

For SVGs, Inkscape has explicit support for document metadata. See File->Document Metadata, enter "Marco Zanoli, de.wikipedia.org" for Creator, and on the License tab select "CC Attribution-ShareAlike". I've done this for all your SVG uploads that formerly had a credit line in the image. This adds near the beginning of the file <dc:creator> and <cc:license > tags containing your information.

Please let me know if you have any questions - although watermarks are not permitted, I do want to ensure that you receive credit for your consistently amazing work. Thank you! Dcoetzee (talk) 04:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

looks like I have to adapt to that policy even though I still do not understand why a map should be less usable if the author's name on it - it used to be like that vor several hundred years and nobody complained. I tried several command-line tools for png-files and found out that only jpg's allow to edit exif-data successfully. Unfortunately, the preview quality of jpg-files is awful. I also abandoned uploading svg-files because its just to much work to convert my illustrator files to svg. I will experiment with exiftool again and see whether it is usable on windows. Thank you for your work, sidonius (talk) 11:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
SVGs are best if they're possible as they're considerably easier for others to edit - Illustrator does have an option to export as SVG, but this might introduce problems with the image. Can you talk about your experiences and problems with converting to SVG some more? Also if you can e-mail me one of your .ai files at dc@moonflare.com I'd like to see what I can do with respect to automated conversion. Thanks! Dcoetzee (talk) 00:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

LicensingEdit

I have downloaded a map from Wikipedia http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_Burgundian_Kingdom_EN.png which I would like to use in a book. But I don't what to do about the rights. I'm not used to work with this sort of things, and I'm afraid to do somme ting wrong. Please can you hejlp me.

I can't finde your e-mail address så I can contact you, mine is lusodana@gmail.com

--Lusodana (talk) 07:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

FeaturedEdit

In case you didn't know. ;) -- IdLoveOne (talk) 00:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Wappen Baden AG.svgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Baden AG.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Perhelion (talk) 15:21, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Leuggern.svgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Leuggern.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Perhelion (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Karikatur Denkerclub.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karikatur Denkerclub.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AFBorchert (talk) 14:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Karte Stadtstaat Bern 18 Jh.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karte Stadtstaat Bern 18 Jh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Perhelion (talk) 20:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

"Alpes Graiae" in File:Römische Provinzen im Alpenraum ca 150 n Chr.pngEdit

Tolle Arbeit und vielen Dank fuer die genannte Karte! Hat sich moeglicherweise trotzdem ein Schreibfehler eingeschlichen: es sollte wohl "Alpes Graiae" anstatt "Alpes Gaiae" heissen. Great work and many thanks for this map! Still, there is probably a typo: it should be "Alpes Graiae" instead of "Alpes Gaiae". --86.56.9.21 07:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Hello Sidonius, I really appreciated the map you posted on the Wiki. I was wandering if you have an english-explained copy of the same map. Primo Cavaliere (talk) 15:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)