Last modified on 11 May 2012, at 18:06

User talk:Siegele Roland

Return to the user page of "Siegele Roland".

A D Deutsche Beiträge sind willkommen!
IRL GB English contributions are very welcome!


Image Tagging Image:ÖBB_4010_Graz.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ÖBB_4010_Graz.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 15:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Problem solved! Siegele Roland 19:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


Image:Cercanías.svgEdit

Pay attention to copyright Image:Cercanías.svg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dodo 12:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

"Public symbol"? I think Spanish laws have no such figure at all... IANAL, but Renfe is a private held company, and its logo is not very old, so it must be copyrighted. If you can read Spanish, take a look at http://www.renfe.es/aviso_legal.html:
"Tanto el diseño del Portal y sus códigos fuente, como los logos, marcas, dibujos, modelos y demás signos distintivos que aparecen en el mismo, pertenecen a Renfe-Operadora o entidades colaboradoras y están protegidos por los correspondientes derechos de propiedad intelectual e industrial."
Regards. --Dodo 12:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
"Unofficial" translation of the above text follows:
"The design of this web portal and its source code, and also the logos, trademarks, drawings, models and all the other distinctive signs which are displayed in it are owned by Renfe-Operadora or collaborating organizations, and are protected by the proper intellectual and industrial property rights."
You can also read there:
"Su uso, reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública, puesta a disposición, transformación o cualquier otra actividad similar o análoga queda totalmente prohibida, salvo que medie expresa autorización de Renfe-Operadora o que dicho uso se produzca estrictamente en los términos derivados de la contratación de los servicios ofrecidos a través del Portal."
"Unofficial" translation:
"Its use, reproduction, distribution, public communication, transferring, transformation or any other similar activity is fully forbidden, except if there is express authorization by Renfe-Operadora or if the use is related only to the derivative terms of contracting offering in this web portal."
So no luck, but you can ask permission, using the proper model.
You say that "in German Wikipedia there is a tag which says that the image is a logo of a special company, which owns the copyright - it can be used under the terms of the company", but that sounds very strange to me. Do we have that tag here, in Commons?
Regarding the other images you mention, I cannot tell you if they are right of not. Sorry. --Dodo 18:22, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


Image:BVZ.svgEdit

Image deletion warning Image:BVZ.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lokal_Profil 12:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: S-Bahn GrazEdit

Hallo!

Du hast mich leider gerade zu einer sehr schlechten Zeit angesprochen (Umzug nach London. Hab jetzt grad mal 56k....)

Also ich hab die Farbe aus Bilder von diversen Webseiten + eigenen Bilder erstellt. Noch dazu ist nicht nur die Farbe sondern auch die Form etwas anders.

z.b. zu finden in: http://www.landespressedienst.steiermark.at/cms/bilder/150809/75/600/395/ccd81eca/LH_nachverkehr2.jpg http://www.grazmobil.at/home/pages/nvk_donbosco_eroe.html

Also ich denke wir sollten es, speziell auf Grund der leicht geänderten Form behalten, bis wir denn richtigen Farb-Code bekommen.

cqixk


Image Tagging Image:EuroCity.pngEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:EuroCity.png. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. -Nard 05:32, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Metro_Warszawskie.svgEdit

Image deletion warning Image:Metro_Warszawskie.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Herr Kriss 01:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:EuroCity.pngEdit

I looked at this one again and deleted the warning. I do not oppose it any more. I added

Trademarked

This work contains material which may be subject to trademark laws in one or more jurisdictions. Before using this content, please ensure that you have the right to use it under the laws which apply in the circumstances of your intended use. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe the rights to this trademark. See our general disclaimer. The use of this file on Wikimedia Foundation projects does not imply endorsement of the trademark holder by the Foundation, nor vice versa.
This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing for more information.

for you. Sorry. -Nard 21:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2010-10-09 Arlbergtunnel.jpgEdit

Schon gesehen? Schönes Bild, finde nicht nur ich! --Kürschner (talk) 07:49, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Schön zu lesen, dass mein Bild gefällt. Vielen Dank :-) Siegele Roland (talk) 16:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Glückwunsch!--Kürschner (talk) 07:45, 23 November 2010 (UTC)