User talk:The Cosmonaut/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calico Hills - panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image. --High Contrast 07:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bracebridge Falls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hilton Falls and mill ruins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes.--Jebulon 10:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clarington, Ontario till 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky tends to be slightly noisy at full resolution, but in general a good picture. -- MJJR 19:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unnamed lake - Killarney Provincial Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes to me. --Bartiebert 16:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough Bluffs panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sporadically diffuse/blurred but beautiful composition altogether in my opinion. --Bartiebert 16:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road cut fault - Red Rock Canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 15:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clarington, Ontario Till 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 15:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trametes versicolor stump.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desert varnish - Valley of Fire State Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 16:49, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco Peaks - Bonito Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. There's just a small stitching error, I think. I put a note on it. DimiTalen 06:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Indeed, good catch! The error is now fixed. Óðinn 06:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Good! :) DimiTalen 07:00, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petrified dune - Valley of Fire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. DimiTalen 06:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Overlook trail view - Zion Canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is very good! DimiTalen 06:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse carcass - Moccasin Mountain Dinosaur Tracksite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 21:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Overlook Trail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Temple - Overlook Trail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Spry and the East Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice job. --Vassil 07:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angels Landing and the Great White Throne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. DimiTalen 06:25, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bleached sandstone - Valley of Fire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conchoidal fracture - Aztec Sandstone.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunrise in the Valley of Fire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angels Landing - Zion Canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice photo. --Narrow Major 17:16, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good resolution! Clear QI to me, but the right zone of the image has less details than the center or left zones--Lmbuga 09:53, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:51, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Badwater, Death Valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunset Crater1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soft sediment deformation.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:32, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 18:22, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:49, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Champlain and MS Maasdam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:49, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navajo 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, please, rename the file to a more descriptive title --Poco a poco 20:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC) Done. Óðinn 22:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pine Valley Mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- JLPC 12:38, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staff Headquarters of the Royal 22 Regiment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 09:52, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glacial pothole.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:57, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria Falls, Black River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive --Haneburger 08:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black River panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl Island, Reykjanes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skaftafellsjökull panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skaftafellsjökull panorama1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me; --JLPC 06:18, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skeiðarárjökull and Morsárdalur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magni and Goðahraun.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aztec Sandstone - Red Rock Canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:34, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eldhraun.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 23:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Núpsa and Súla1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 09:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjaðrárgljúfur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 22:46, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magni and Goðahraun1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colours --Moroder 21:18, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suomenlinna visitor centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Burning sky gives a good effect. --Iifar 11:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suomenlinna Church1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me.--JLPC 08:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suomenlinna Church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is tilted Poco a poco 18:37, 28 September 2012 (UTC)  Comment - it was due to perspective correction, actually. Please have another look. Óðinn 15:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC) Better Poco a poco 20:02, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meritullintori 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 14:56, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pietarin kalansaalis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 14:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Silja Symphony.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. - A.Savin 21:34, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voima icebreaker.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Review: Interesting view and potential QI for me - but there are some disturbing leafs in the sky at the front of the ship that should be removed. -- Achim Raschka 16:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC) for me also a QI. From the Ferry to Kerkeasaari or from Tervasaari it may be better? --Ralf Roletschek 17:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)  Done - removed the leaves. --Óðinn 17:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meritullintori and Pohjoisranta.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miltary Museum Manege.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University of Helsinki, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Grand Marina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaasa Barracks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 12:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastion Bielke and Curtain Building.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 09:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Majakkalaiva Relandersgrund.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Suokki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Mariella.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East wing (Noah's Ark).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uspenski Cathedral 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 19:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hull Marina, Jacques-Cartier Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian Museum of Civilization panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:53, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Alexandra.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portage III.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gatineau paper mill effluent treatment plant.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not very sharp but I like the colors. Prenn 07:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottawa skyline panorama1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view but I think there's a problem (see note, please). --JLPC 18:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Yes, there is a problem with one of the source files; got rid of it and restitched.--Óðinn 20:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Good now. --JLPC 10:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#March_7.2C_2013

Thank you for your feedback. I have fixed the image the way you suggested. --Godot13 (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Rideau Falls.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:57, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Rideau Falls and the John G. Diefenbaker Building.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment too dark imo --Rjcastillo 14:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC)  Done - brighened --Óðinn 02:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tobolsk Kremlin panorama1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 09:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The East Square Tower and the Bishop's Stable.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition and good quality. Pymouss 11:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Gubernatorial Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 09:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Northern Holy Gates.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a slight perspective correction on the right side imo. --JLPC 14:15, 21 September 2013 (UTC)  Done; aslo, the building is just not very symmetrical, it seems. Óðinn 17:48, 21 September 2013 (UTC) OK, then : QI. --JLPC 16:54, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Monks' Building2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:26, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Bishop's Stable.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Northeastern Corner Round Tower and the Monks' Building.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I suggest cut, looks better. See note. imho --Rjcastillo 00:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)  Done --Óðinn 04:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Support OK --Rjcastillo 13:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Northeastern Corner Round Tower.1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Southern Round Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 07:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Bishop's Lodge.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 07:54, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Southern Round Tower2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Southern Round Tower1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Grondin 21:55, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Southeastern Quadrangular Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Somewhat oversharpened, but ok --Smial 15:04, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Monks' Building and the East Square Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 05:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Southeastern Corner Round Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Southeastern Corner Round Tower1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The East Square Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archangel Michael Cathedral.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zachary and Elizabeth Church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect (sharpening haloes) but QI anyway. --Kreuzschnabel 16:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commercial-industrial building, 1 Mir St..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Treasury, Tobolsk Kremlin1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:20, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Bishop's House2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better --Poco a poco 12:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sophia Courtyard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Katrouchka90 08:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Bishop's Lodge1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Kreuzschnabel 16:55, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The water tower on Remezov Square1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Las Cuevas trailhead.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilón Formation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted clockwise. Artefacts in the sky. --Cccefalon 07:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)  Done - fixed. Óðinn 17:13, 3 February 2014 (UTC) The tilt is gone, agreed. But I think, the problem with the artefacts is still present. Please have a look, I made an annotation to point out the issue. Probably (partially?) denoising will resolve the problem. --Cccefalon 06:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)  Done - denoised. Óðinn 18:19, 4 February 2014 (UTC)  Support yes, that works for me. --Cccefalon 19:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Club Amigo Farallon del Caribe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Maestra near Marea del Portillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carretera Granma1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pico Cuba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Maestra panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carretera Granma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Maestra panorama1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 22:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birth of a City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Ural Mining School building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption Cathedral, Omsk1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption Cathedral, Omsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:16, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevastyanov's Mansion.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tobolsk Gate.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tobolsk Gate1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 20:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tobolsk Gate2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Way.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Tukhachevskiy's Quay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower at the City Pond, Yekaterinburg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Too dark. --Hockei 18:38, 4 November 2014 (UTC)  Done - brightened --Óðinn 06:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)  Comment The brightness is good now. But why did you take another picture? The first one was not that close what I find better. Also it needs vertical perspective correction. I had not noticed that before. --Hockei 12:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)  Done - loosened the crop; perspective has been corrected, the stone walls are vertical. The wooden part on top is actually leaning.--Óðinn 07:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Hockei 11:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Battle of Svensksund memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laivastokatu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hostel Suomenlinna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artillery arsenal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 13:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crownwork Ehrensvärd - east wing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irtysh Gate.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark to conduct a reasonable review. First step: brighten it, I will take another look then. --Cccefalon 11:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)  Done - brightened--Óðinn 14:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)  Neutral For a sunny day, it still looks to dark. It feels like seen with sun glasses. --Cccefalon 12:36, 9 November 2014 (UTC) @Cccefalon: I have done a new version, I think this is QI now, but I cannot promote this myself. Mattbuck 20:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Ram-Man 12:30, 13 November 2014 (UTC)  Support I agree --Cccefalon 18:50, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uspenski Cathedral plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:51, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suomenlinnakeskus.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:12, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kruunuvuorenkatu 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kruunuvuorenkatu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kruunuvuorenkatu 5.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:29, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuninkaanportti.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pohjoisesplanadi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:51, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS King.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:24, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katajanokanlaituri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:47, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pohjoisesplanadi1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:39, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastioni Stromberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eteläranta1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastioni Stromberg1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The crop could be better (too much water IMO) but I think it's acceptable for QI. --Code 06:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikku-Mustasaaren silta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. --Code 06:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastioni Scheffer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Obvious QI for me --Ram-Man 03:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merisotakoulun esikunta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luotsikatu 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:08, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikku Mustasaari1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastioni Kunnia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No other opinions, so QI --Ram-Man 16:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Translandia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Uoaei1 11:48, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katariinankatu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:33, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Püha Vaimu kirik torn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit tight at the top but still ok --Poco a poco 10:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikku-Mustasaaren silta1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Minor halos at the buildings on the right.) --XRay 10:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maurinkatu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality.Shadows and lights could be better. --XRay 10:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laukkasarenkatu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kahiluodon kartano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Smart saturation, perfect details. --Johann Jaritz 08:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aitat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maalaiskauppa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent details of the log cabin. --Johann Jaritz 08:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirkkotalli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Finlandia Suite at it`s best. --Johann Jaritz 08:48, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porttirakennus Ivarsin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Smooth wood tone, good details, great colours. --Johann Jaritz 08:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the The Ivars farmstead gatehouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 22:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chair in the the Ivars farmstead gatehouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 22:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gull River formation1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 17:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gull River formation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect quality, wonderful details, balanced symmetry. --Johann Jaritz 07:00, 02 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fireplace in the Ivars farmstead.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 01:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Ivars farmstead1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 01:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Ivars farmstead.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overexposure is insignificant. Good quality. --Ram-Man 03:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of the Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Thibaut120094 02:31, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of San Maurizio al Monastero Maggiore1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coats of arms of the House of Litta, Palazzo Litta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Via Dante.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria della Vittoria1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. The shadow is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 05:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica di San Lorenzo Maggiore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanile of the Basilica of Sant'Eustorgio1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Sant'Eustorgio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atrium of the Basilica of Sant'Ambrogio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanile dei canonici1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 12:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12 Piazza Sant'Ambrogio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonne di San Lorenzo1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Pleease check the image at the top and bottom for the white line.--XRay 05:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)  Done cropped.--Óðinn 14:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of San Maurizio al Monastero Maggiore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it's tilted CW.--XRay 17:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC) [OK]-rotated--Óðinn 17:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment It's not better. Sorry. Please look at the note. --XRay 05:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)  Done applied perspective correction. --Óðinn 14:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La caserma Garibaldi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Cup & Saucer Trail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Love it. --Crisco 1492 04:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Litta façade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sagamok Falls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza Sant'Ambrogio1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please be more specific in the file description.Cheers --Moroder 23:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brera Academy water fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please be less laconic with the file description --Moroder 23:49, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanile dei canonici.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok and QI for me. --Hubertl 21:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Cup & Saucer Trail1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Cup & Saucer Trail2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:55, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsingin Olympiastadion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I don't like too much de crop, but good quality--Lmbuga 16:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinki Olympic Stadium Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The upper crop is a bit tight. --Cayambe 18:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Helsinki Olympic Stadium tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizon is a little curved, but straight enough for the field of view. Technical quality is good. --Crisco 1492 06:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Töölönlahti1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:24, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanile of the Basilica of Sant'Eustorgio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:31, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of the Kallio neigbourhood..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ympyrätalo1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonera Stadium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talvipuutarha ja Linnanmäki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 10:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinki Olympic Stadium Tower1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 07:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Töölönlahti2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granodiorite of the Fennoscandian Shield.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Il Tempio della Vittoria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Helsinki Olympic Stadium tower2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonera Stadium ja Helsingin jäähalli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Helsinki Olympic Stadium tower1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Highly detailed. There are a few blown highlights here and there when pixel peeping, but really only a minor issue. --Slaunger 13:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ympyrätalo ja Säästöpankinranta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanavaranta1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine --Palauenc05 22:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica di San Lorenzo Maggiore1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 33 Mill St., Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building 63 of the Distillery District.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guelph Formation stromatolite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 01:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandbanks Provincial Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Paul's Basilica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Townhouses on Shuter St.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cars second from right wash up. Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filmores Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glenora Fisheries Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McEwen Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Uoaei1 05:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Южные стены и башни Тобольского кремля.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание мужской гимназии, Тобольск.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spencer Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Павлинская башня и соборная колокольня.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид Тобольска с Тобольксого кремля.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид Тобольска с Тобольксого кремля3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment contrast could be improved. --XRay 06:31, 5 December 2015 (UTC)  Done increased vibrance. --Óðinn 17:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO OK. --XRay 06:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид Тобольска с Тобольксого кремля2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Улица Алябьева1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Храм Пресвятой Троицы (Тобольск).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Обелиск Ермака.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cоборная колокольня.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид Тобольска с Тобольксого кремля4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a little bit soft. More contrast? --XRay 08:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)  Done - increased vibrance. --Óðinn 22:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Улицы Вершина и Казачья.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Прямской взвоз.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Thanks --Moroder 10:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Архиерейский дом, Тобольск.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Монашеский корпус панорама.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Архиерейские конюшни.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 03:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Юго-восточная четырехугольная башня.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Монашеский корпус2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the house needs a little bit more light --Rolf H. 04:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)  Done - thanks for the review! --Óðinn 13:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC) QI now --Rolf H. 16:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Храм Пресвятой Троицы (Тобольск)1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Монашеский корпус1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Восточная стена Tобольского кремля1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид Тобольска с Тобольксого кремля5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:09, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Восточная стена Tобольского кремля.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Софийский собор (Тобольск).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Граница поймы Иртыша.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very nice! --Michael Barera 23:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Тобольское духовное училище.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 23:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание Подгорного гостиного двора.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Прямский взвоз.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Софийский собор (Тобольск)1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:McEwen Bridge.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:McEwen Bridge.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Орловская башня1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:48, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Восточная квадратная башня панорама.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very nice! --Michael Barera 03:11, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Обелиск Ермака1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There are a couple of disturbing things to clone out at the bottom. Cheers --Moroder 08:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)  Comment Tilted. --Medium69 16:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)  Done and  Done. --Óðinn 19:14, 22 December 2015 (UTC) Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Архиерейский дом1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание консистории1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. IMO it should be a little bit brighter and there is color noise in the sky. (And please check your categories.) --XRay 07:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review; brightened and denoised. The category seems to be valid, the red one is generated automatically by the WLM template. --Óðinn 17:17, 24 December 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. Thanks. --XRay 06:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Южная круглая башня.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMHO, slightly titled to the left. --C messier 18:09, 24 December 2015 (UTC)  Done - rotated, thanks for the review. --Óðinn 20:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 18:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Улица Ленина, Тобольск.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Crop is IMHO a bit tight at the bottom and to the right. Is there any more space. --C messier 13:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Unfortunately, it's all there is... --Óðinn 20:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC) Then it's a  weak support. --C messier 18:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ТЭП70БС 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Панорама Тобольского кремля с мыса Чукман.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Обелиск Ермака2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Гостиный двор, Тобольск.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Монашеский корпус панорама1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Красная площадь, Тобольск.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Софийский двор1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Софийский двор2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Софийский двор3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Гостиный двор и Архиерейская гостиница.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Купола Софийского собора.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the image. There are a lot of white spots in the sky. May be oversharpened too. --XRay 07:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)  Done - removed artefacts and softened. Thanks for the review! --Óðinn 23:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. --XRay 06:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Покровский собор, Тобольск.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the image. There are a lot of white spots in the sky, the tower is oversharpened and the clouds looks like oversharpened too. --XRay 07:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)  Done - removed artefacts and softened. Thanks for the review! --Óðinn 23:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. --XRay 06:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Покровский собор, Тобольск1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the image. There are a lot of white spots in the sky. --XRay 07:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC) It also needs a perespective improvement while I don't think it is possible --Michielverbeek 07:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)  Done - removed artefacts and softened. Thanks for the review! Michielverbeek, perspective has been corrected already, to the extent possible. These buildings are all leaning, finding verticals is close to impossible. --Óðinn 23:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. Sharpness at the top isn't the best, but acceptable. May you did not work with RAW data. Looks like "out of the cam". --XRay 06:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cоборная колокольня1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 12:09, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cоборная колокольня2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Панорама Тобольского кремля с мыса Чукман.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Панорама Тобольского кремля с мыса Чукман.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Рентерея.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Гостиный двор, Тобольск1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Софийский собор (Тобольск)3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a Q1 photo --Michielverbeek 20:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Гостиный двор, Тобольск3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A Q1photo, good perspective, the white is not reflecting and sharp enough --Michielverbeek 20:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Гостиный двор, Тобольск2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Софийский собор (Тобольск)2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Иртыш в Тобольске.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Looks a bit soft. --XRay 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Иртыш в Тобольске1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok to me --Carschten 16:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Церковь Марии Египетской1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:55, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Знаменская церковь, Абалакский монастырь1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Uoaei1 05:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Церковь Всех Святых1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe it needs a slight perspective correction, but it is QI for me. --C messier 17:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Церкви Никольская и Марии Египетской.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaver River along the Trans Canada Trail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaver River along the Trans Canada Trail1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 01:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание Финансового техникума.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание Коммерческого училища.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание гауптвахты2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Иртыш и рыборазводные пруды в Абалаке1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание Коммерческого училища1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание гауптвахты1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Cueva de los Petroglifos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Good stitched. --Stepro 06:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabo Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aguada Pico Cuba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The description on the file page is not very "accurate", copy the one you put here in the file page please. Overwise quality is ok. --Christian Ferrer 08:40, 19 March 2016 (UTC)  Done - expanded description; thank you for the review. СССР 04:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC) Boring, but still a QI. Ram-Man 16:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva de los Petroglifos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 21:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa del mar Caribe en Pilón.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El ídolo del agua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 13:43, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Complejo Agroindustrial "Roberto Ramírez Delgado".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly oversharpened but good enough for QI. --Cccefalon 11:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva de los Petroglifos1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McGinnis Lake panorama1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McGinnis Lake panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:56, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Borghese - Tempio di Antonino e Faustina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casina di Raffaello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Carlo Bilotti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portico dei Leoni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are CAs pretty much all over the pic. Think you could fix that? W.carter 10:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Fixed - thank you for the review; cropped out the impacted areas. --СССР 03:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC) Almost there, you missed some spots, see notes. ;) W.carter 09:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)  Done - didn't notice these at all; good eye! Fixed. --СССР 04:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Good enough, QI. --W.carter 08:26, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deloro complex granite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High educative value. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmora Dam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmora Formation closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High educative value andgood quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmora Formation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Crowe River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Crowe River1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 01:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Crowe River2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stazione ferroviaria di Riomaggiore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great scenario and amazing composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Giovanni Battista a Riomaggiore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama di Riomaggiore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two things (the church left and the sea just right from the center) are attracting my attention while it does not give me a feeling of losing my orientation. It is a bit noisy, but for me quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stazione ferroviaria di Riomaggiore1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 19:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Formazione del Macigno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Giovanni Battista a Riomaggiore1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mostra dell'Aqua Felix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Picture size minimum 2 MB required for OIs

Hello CCCP! First of all I thank you for reviewing and promoting some of my nominated photos at the QI community. I also do enjoy your images there, they reach a very smart level. Just one thing has to be mentioned: Pictures at the QIs should not have a picture size below 2MB! That is part of the rules in the community. Three of your photos you nominated today do not have that required picture size of 2MB. This time I will promote them, because they have a good quality, but next time, please, do care about a higher resolution.
The best you can do is to put the camera settings to RAW and the highest possible resolution. The standard for photo editing is Adobe Lightroom. I can recommend it to you. Then you will have a higher picture size. And the danger of posterization will be eliminated by these settings.
To resume, please, do never shoot with JPEG, but only with RAW (NEF). Then you have much more possibilities with editing the photos after. Best wishes and kind regards from Austria! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria della Concezione dei Cappuccini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altona Mennonite Church window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altona Mennonite Church1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altona Mennonite Church2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altona Mennonite Church3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viale Pietro Canonica statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viale Pietro Canonica statue1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Obelisco Vaticano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Formazione del Macigno1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muro di sostegno lungo Via Pecunina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barberini Family bee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cum feris ferus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonna dell'Immacolata bassorilievo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laghetto Borghese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tempio di Esculapio1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

External edit of your image «Via Telemaco Signorini, Riomaggiore»

Hello CCCP, without asking your permission, I re-edited your picture «Via Telemaco Signorini, Riomaggiore» by trying to reduce the visible CA and brighten up the entire image. I uploaded this version. Perhaps it might please to Jacek Halicki now? If you do not agree with my idea, please set it back to the original version. Thank you! Have a nice day and greetings from the Old World. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus pinea Borghese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cinque Terre from Manarola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Formazione del Argille e calcari di Canetolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sedum dasyphyllum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sentiero Azzurro near Manarola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sedum dasyphyllum1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cinque Terre from Manarola1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riomaggiore da Via De Gasperi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Formazione del Argille e calcari di Canetolo1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Via Telemaco Signorini1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sentiero Azzurro near Manarola1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sentiero Azzurro near Manarola2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Formazione del Argille e calcari di Canetolo2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Bravo pour la nomination aux panoramas de POTY 2017 et merci pour ces nombreuses contributions ! 28petals (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trillium grandiflorum at the North Walker Woods1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 14:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sentiero Azzurro near Manarola3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trillium grandiflorum at the North Walker Woods.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Manarola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Staggering! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sideline 30, Pickering.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reminds me much of a David Lynch movie. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corniglia dal Sentiero Azzurro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)