Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Toufik-de-planoise!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Toufik-de-planoise!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Photos de "Bernard Girard" edit

Je précise que les oeuvres venant sous le nom de Bernard Girard sont téléversés totalement "légalement". Ce dernier, qui est l'auteur de ces oeuvres, ma donner la permission de publier ces oeuvre sous licence (j'ai un e-mail le confirmant)


File tagging File:Eglise_Saint-Pierre_de_Besançon_-_10.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eglise_Saint-Pierre_de_Besançon_-_10.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Eglise_Saint-Pierre_de_Besançon_-_10.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Croquant (talk) 07:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Eglise_Saint-Pierre_de_Besançon_-_10.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eglise_Saint-Pierre_de_Besançon_-_10.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Eglise_Saint-Pierre_de_Besançon_-_10.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bapti 05:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Planoise_depuis_l'hopital_Jean_Minjoz.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Planoise_depuis_l'hopital_Jean_Minjoz.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Planoise_depuis_l'hopital_Jean_Minjoz.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bapti 05:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


 
Hello Toufik-de-planoise.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Bapti 05:21, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging Image:Centre Nelson Mandela (IDF)2.JPG edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Centre Nelson Mandela (IDF)2.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Centre Nelson Mandela (IDF)2.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bapti 05:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

etc. J'ai hésité à tout virer directement, d'autant que les pages de descriptions sont très mal remplies (erreur de date, pas de catégorie,...)

Ce n'est franchement pas malin d'importer une flopée d'images sans avoir obtenu une permission correcte et validée.--Bapti 05:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Blocage edit

Bapti 05:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Finalement, j'ai commencé à virer la plupart des images pour lesquelles tu ne disposes pas d'une autorisation correcte. Vu ton antécédent sur Wikipédia, tu es bloqué pour trois jours avec ce motif : "Uploading files without source/licensing after warnings: already block on fr.wikipedia for copyvio".--Bapti 05:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tu es de nouveau bloqué, pour deux semaines cette fois.--Bapti 03:49, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Clair_so_montage_général.JPG edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Clair_so_montage_général.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Clair_so_montage_général.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bapti 05:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quel est le problème avec l'image de Clairs-Soleils ? 05:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Toufik-de-planoise (talk • contribs) 5 août 2009 à 06:59 (UTC)
Rien ne prouve ne l'état que les photos utilisées pour ce photo-montage soient bien de toi. Vu tes antécédents, on ne peut malheureusement qu'une confiance très limitée à tes mentions "travail personnel".--Bapti 06:03, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Les photos (à part le montage de Clairs-Soleils) je l'ai ai toutes faites hier— Preceding unsigned comment added by Toufik-de-planoise (talk • contribs) 5 août 2009 à 07:03 (UTC)
J'ai tout les papiers prouvant que ces appareils m'appartiennent (Sony, Canon), que dois je faire pour prouver que je suis bien l'auteur de ces oeuvres ?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Toufik-de-planoise (talk • contribs) 5 août 2009 à 07:05 (UTC)
Merci de montrer un peu de bonne volonté en signant tes messages.
On peut encore une fois douter de ton propos : sur certaines photos, il faut très beau, sur l'autre le ciel est gris. Je veux bien croire que la météo évolue, mais quand même...--Bapti 06:06, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Si c'est pour le montage de Clairs-Soleils, cette "variation" de la couleur du ciel je ne serais l'expliquer, mais si à chaque fois que j'importe un fichier je suis menacer de blocage définitif pour ce genre de détail, sa devient presque de l'acharnement. Je suis d'accord, mes "antécédents" font planer un doute suffisant sur l'origine de mes contributions, alors que faire pour prouver ma bonne foi ? Moi en tout cas, je ne sais plus quoi faire... J'ai tout les documents attestant que les appareils m'appartiennent, après je ne sais pas comment te faire parvenir tout ceci, mais c'est la seule preuve fiable dont je dispose ... si cela ne serais suffire alors comment faire pour prouver ma bonne fois ! pendant ces 2 semaines de blocage je n'ai fait que lire et relire les principes fondateurs, je n'ai fait que tenter de comprendre le système de licences et je sais qu'importer un fichier dont je ne dispose pas des droits d'auteurs ne m'apporterais que des ennuis. J'essai simplement d'illustrer et de remplir les pages sur Besançon, je le fait peut être mal, d'accord, mais il ne faut pas pousser le bouchon trop loin...
Cordialement, Toufik-de-Planoise 06:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Je ne doute pas que tu ais un appareil photo, je n'ai pas besoin de preuve et que tu m'en donnes une à moi personnellement ne changera pas le fait que les photos que tu importes sur Commons sont problématiques. Et malheureusement tes antécédents incitent à douter de tes affirmations "travail personnel" dès qu'il y a une incohérence manifeste.
Les exifs data de tes photos sont ainsi incohérentes : File:Velotte - Commerce.JPG aurait été prise le 4 août 2009 à 04:48 ? Pourquoi ces différences manifestes de couleurs du ciel si les photos ont été prises au même moment ?
Je veux bien croire en ta bonne volonté, mais il y a de quoi s'étonner de ce genre de détails qui s'accumulent. Ce sont des indices très troublants plaidant en ta défaveur. De même que choisir des licences différentes pour une même série de photos (tu as le droit, mais c'est très bizarre et assez peu rigoureux) ou encore ne pas prendre la peine de présenter proprement la page de description.--Bapti 06:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

STOP edit

<again>

Merci de présenter proprement les pages de description.

Si tu ne veux pas être à nouveau bloqué (cette fois indéfiniment), il faudrait fournir des informations cohérentes : les dates de tes photos sont toutes les mêmes alors que les conditions et les lieux sont très différents. Merci de fournir des métadonnées correctes.

En attendant de régler les problèmes sur les images que tu viens d'importer, je te conseille de cesser toute importation.--Bapti 06:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sérieusement, si tu ne tiens pas à carreau, comment veux-tu qu'on t'accorde la moindre confiance ?
Je t'ai déjà montrer comment présenter proprement tes pages de descriptions. Autre exemple : une description précise, une catégorie précise (pas besoin de mettre "Besançon" si tu mets la catégorie plus précise "Planoise"), la date doit être présentée selon un format précis pour permettre d'être traduite dans la langue de l'utilisateur.
Merci de corriger tes précédents importations.--Bapti 02:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Voila c'est fait, excuse pour le temps que je te fait perdre Toufik-de-Planoise 03:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
You are welcome, si tu tiens comptes des conseils qui te sont adressés :)
En l'occurrence, tu n'as pas corrigé toutes les images...
Images ok d'un point de vue licence et mise en forme (description, catégorie,...) :
Tu peux les insérer dans les articles de Wikipédia. Attention toutefois à ne pas mettre d'informations hors du modèle {{Information}} à part les catégories et éventuellement la licence.
Images ok mais à mettre en forme correctement :
Images problématiques :
Cordialement.--Bapti 05:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Je voulait te poser une question^^ a t-on le droit de téléverser une photo d'une maison (privée) sans avoir d'autorisations particulières (des propriétaires) ? Toufik-de-Planoise 07:20, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
<soupir>Pourrais-tu attendre d'avoir réglé TOUS les problèmes avant d'importer de nouvelles photos ? C'est franchement décourageant : tu ne lis visiblement même pas les explications que je t'ai donnés...
Images ok mais merci de présenter directement proprement la page de description :
Images ok mais à mettre en forme correctement (cf exemples précédents) :
Images problématiques :
Pour répondre à ta question, non, tu ne peux pas mettre sur Commons des photos dont le sujet est un bâtiment récent (cf Commons:Liberté de panorama qui n'existe pas en France).--Bapti 07:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Okey', et si il a plus de 150 ans ? Toufik-de-Planoise 07:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
As-tu lu la page Commons:Liberté de panorama ?
As-tu lu mon message précédent et notamment ce passage. « Pourrais-tu attendre d'avoir réglé TOUS les problèmes avant d'importer de nouvelles photos ? »
Tu fais indéniablement des efforts, mais le temps que tu passes à importer d'autres images (comme si il y avait une urgence absolue), c'est le temps que tu ne passes pas à fixer les problèmes existants. J'aurais pu t'expliquer comment prouver que File:Clair so montage général.JPG est bien de toi...
Images ok (mais merci de respecter la syntaxe que je t'ai indiqué, demande-moi des explications si besoin) :
Images ok mais à mettre en forme correctement (cf exemples précédents) :
À légender proprement :
--Bapti 02:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Oui, pourrais tu m'expliquer comment faire pour régler le problème ave le montage de Clairs-Soleils ? Toufik-de-Planoise 11:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
<soupir>Non, pour le moment. Tu te montres déjà incapable de comprendre mon message précédent : « Pourrais-tu attendre d'avoir réglé TOUS les problèmes avant d'importer de nouvelles photos ? »
Je te signale depuis plusieurs jours que quatre images doivent être mis en forme correctement :
Si tu n'as pas compris ce qu'il faut faire, demande-moi des explications plus détaillées. Mais règle d'abord les problèmes existants avant d'en créer de nouveaux !
File:Poky-à-la-tronçonneuse.JPG n'est pas une photo acceptable sur Commons : il s'agit d'une œuvre dérivée. Ce n'était pas possible de poser la question AVANT d'importer l'image ?
Pour la source, il y a un modèle précis à utiliser quand tu es l'auteur : {{Own}}. Pourquoi es-tu incapable de faire ce que j'ai déjà montré plusieurs fois ? Faire une erreur est compréhensible, la répéter ne l'est pas.
Après mes interventions, les images suivantes sont correctes : File:Ile-de-Malpas-Besançon.JPG, File:Chapelle-de-Buis.JPG, File:Vierge-Marie-Chapelle-des-Buis.JPG, File:Echaugette-Citadelle-de-Besançon.JPG, File:Echaugette-Citadelle-de-Besançon.JPG, File:Interieur-monument-de-la-liberation-Besançon.JPG, File:Statue-Chapelle-des-Buis-Besançon.JPG, File:Statue.Monument-de-la-Liberation-Besançon.JPG, File:Vierge-Marie-Monument-de-la-libération-Besançon.JPG, File:Tag-Planoise-Besançon.JPG, File:Tarragnoz-Besançon.JPG, File:Statue-monument-de-la-liberation-Besançon.JPG.
Mais merci de nommer tes images correctes : l'espace est un caractère acceptée et bien meilleur que le tiret.
Et je ne parles pas des articles de Wikipédia que tu es en train de défigurer. Je répète mon message merci d'attendre d'avoir réglé TOUS les problèmes avant d'importer de nouvelles photos (ce qui implique qu'un autre utilisateur comme moi te confirme que tous les problèmes soient fixés).--Bapti 05:05, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Vu que tu n'avais visiblement pas l'intention de régler les problèmes que tu avais toi-même créé, j'ai directement corrigé File:Velotte - Point de vu.JPG, File:Velotte - Eglise.JPG, File:Velotte - Fontaine.JPG et File:Velotte - Commerce.JPG. À l'instar de File:Batiments IDF secteur Diderot.JPG, tes dernières importations sont correctes (enfin !!!). Merci néanmoins de mettre des accents dans tes phrases, au besoin en installant un correcteur orthographique sur ton navigateur.--Bapti 06:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Je veillerais à ne pas faire de fautes d'orthographes, et surtout merci à toi pour l'incroyable patience dont tu a su faire preuve  

Cordialement, Toufik-de-Planoise 15:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

De rien, mais merci de faire attention :
Je viens de supprimer File:Fresque église Saint-François Planoise.JPG qui n'est pas acceptable dans la mesure où il s'agit d'un gros plan d'une œuvre datant de 1990 (donc encore soumise aux droits d'auteur). Les autres importations sont correctes, mais ne va pas trop vite (exemple, le fichier aurait d'ailleurs du s'appeler File:Statue de la diversité à Planoise.JPG. Merci d'avance--Bapti 02:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Encouragements... edit

Bonjour,

Je viens de vérifier tes importations depuis le 11 août. Globalement, ça va sur la forme et le fond, et ça fait plaisir que tu tiennes (enfin) compte des remarques qui t'ont été adressées.

Mais il reste des erreurs de forme (ne va pas trop vite !), des titres explicites seraient souhaitables (évites de donner à quatre photos un titre similaire à quelques variations typographiques près) et tu as parfois foutu un joli bazar dans les catégories en mettant à la fois une catégorie mère et une catégorie fille (un fichier dans Planoise ne doit pas être aussi dans Area of Besançon vu que la première catégorie est déjà dans le seconde).

Je viens en outre de supprimer Category:Parc des expositions de Besançon et les trois fichiers importés. Comme l'indique COM:FOP et comme déjà expliqué, il n'y a (malheureusement) pas de liberté de panorama en France : il n'est donc pas possible d'importer des photos de bâtiments récents sur Wikimedia Commons. De même avec File:Usine d'Incinération de Planoise.JPG ou File:Centre Nelson Mandela Planoise.JPG.--Bapti 03:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merci pour les encouragements, je veillerais à maintenir mes efforts (pour le parc des expos effectivement je suis très surpris) je téléverserais encore quelques fichier (plus d'une dizaine) jusqu'au 04 septembre (après y'a les cours =[ donc plus le temps) donc je prend "un maximum" de photo avant que je ne puisse plus...
Cordialement Toufik-de-Planoise 26 août 2009 à 15:00 (CEST)
Ok, mais encore une fois, ne va pas trop vite. Au pire, les images que tu n'auras pas le temps d'importer attendront les prochaines vacances scolaires... Si tu mets une catégorie comme Citadelle de Besançon, il ne faut pas mettre en plus Besançon. Attention au nommage des fichiers : pourquoi File:Eglise Sainte-Jeane D'arc Besançon.JPG alors que tu es capable d'écrire File:Église Sainte-Jeanne-d'Arc à Besançon.JPG ?--Bapti 02:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Besoin d'un renseignement edit

Bonjour Bapti, je voulait te demander si le fichier suivant: [1] ne posait pas de problèmes. Toufik-de-Planoise ★ Me parler ★ 31 août 2009 à 19:47 (CEST)

A priori, non, File:Porte Rivotte XXème siècle.jpg ne semble pas posé de problème :)--Bapti 02:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Attention : Wikimedia Commons est un projet multilingue. Il est donc important d'indiquer quand tu écris en français dans une page de description et d'éviter toute mention superflue (genre le nom du site en français alors que tu donnes l'URL.
Concernant File:Planoise Montage.jpg, il faut indiquer la source de chacune des photos en les important si besoin sur Wikimedia Commons. Il va de soit que si l'une des images n'est pas de toi, le photo-montage sera supprimé.--Bapti 22:45, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Concernant le montage, j'ai déjà téléverser tout les fichiers qui apparaissent dessus (ils ont été modifiés au niveau de la couleur, centrés ou rognés) exemple la statue de la diversité, ou j'ai rogné tout le cadre autour. Dois-je mettre un lien pour chaque photos dans « Sources » et indiquer les modifications que j'ai fait ? Toufik-de-Planoise ★ Me parler ★ 4 septembre 2009 à 12:38 CEST)
Exactement. Il faut mettre dans le champ source une mention du genre {{fr|Montage après retouches à partir de [[:File:Bidule]], etc (de gauche à droite, de haut en bas).}}--Bapti 10:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Voila, j'espère que ceci conviendras File:Planoise Montage.jpg  . Cordialement, Toufik-de-Planoise ★ Me parler ★ 4 septembre 2009 à 16:56 (CEST)
Voui, c'est bon, j'ai déjà retiré la demande de source. :) Bonne continuation.--Bapti 14:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour,

J'ai supprimé Planoise FC 1970.jpg qui n'est clairement pas une image sous licence libre. Le bouton "Bloquer" me démange sérieusement : tu sais pertinemment que ce type d'images est potentiellement problématique, demande donc un avis AVANT de les importer. Merci aussi de ne pas prétendre être l'auteur de fichier qui ne sont manifestement pas de toi...

Quant aux noms de catégorie, ils répondent à des règles précises expliquées sur COM:CAT (titre en anglais par exemple). Merci de les appliquer à l'avenir mais inutile de repasser bidouiller les sous-catégories de Besançon qui sont déjà dans un sacré bazar.--Bapti 20:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bonsoir
Concernant le fichier de Planoise (1970) il me semblait que les images de Flickr était libres de droits, visiblement j'ai encore fait une bourde, donc je prend bien note de te demander conseil avant de téléversé un fichier qui n'est pas de moi.
Concernant le fichier de la Chapelle des Buis je m'explique: il est bien évident que j'ai n'ai pas pris la photo, milles excuses. Quand on téléverses des fichiers dans "importer un fichier" je clique habituellement sur oeuvre personnelle. Certaines cases se remplisses automatiquement, j'ai tout simplement oublier de remplacer mon nom par un point d'interrogation.
Je veillerais à être BEAUCOUP plus vigilant les prochaines fois. Je sais, mes erreurs sont chiantes à la longue, mais crois moi que je fait de mon mieux pour évité d'en faire. Cordialement, Toufik-de-Planoise ★ Me parler ★ 6 septembre 2009 à 23:59 (CEST)
Les images de Flickr ne sont pas libres de droits (et d'ailleurs libres de droits a un sens très variable). La licence est indiquée dans le champ "Informations supplémentaires" (en l'occurrence, c'était "Tous droits réservés").
Quant à l'image de la Chapelle des Buis, je me doute bien que c'est une erreur de ta part, mais tu aurais du la voir en relisant la page de description. Le meilleur moyen de ne pas faire trop d'erreurs, c'est d'éviter de vouloir aller trop vite ;)--Bapti 11:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Question edit

Bonjour Bapti, je voulait te demander si le fichier suivant File:Grotte Saint-Léonard.jpg ne présentait pas de problèmes. Je te demande ça pcq les infos concernant le fichier mentionne que la photo à été prise entre 1900 et 1940 (pas plus précis), et que si elle date de 1940 son copyright n'est pas périmé. Je préfére te demander avant de téléverser d'autres fichier provenant du même site. Toufik-de-Planoise ★ Me parler ★

Bonjour,
J'ai supprimé le fichier : s'il date de 1940 et même en considérant que son photographe est mort le lendemain de sa prise de vue, la photo n'est pas encore dans le domaine public (70 ans après la mort de son auteur).
Quand tu n'as pas de précisions, il faut que la photographie puisse entre utilisable quelque soit les hypothèses possibles (un photo prise en 1850 ou 1870 est utilisable, pas une photo prise en 1900 ou en 1950 parce que si elle a été prise en 1950, ce n'est pas dans le domaine public).--Bapti 19:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Question (2) edit

Bonjour Bapti, sur le site site de Besançon.fr j'ai trouver l'image suivante: [2] (un chevreuil dans la colline de Planoise). J'ai demander à l'auteur si je pouvait utiliser cette photographie sur Wikipédia il m'a dit que oui (en l'ayant informer qu'il fallait envoyer un courriel). Dois-je d'abord publier l'image et ensuite faire parvenir le courriel à l'OTRS ou d'abord envoyer le courriel puis téléverser l'image ? aussi sur quel modèle dois se baser le courriel (car je ne sais pas si le modèle Aide:Republication/Image convient dans ce cas, vu qu'il n'y a pas eut suppression du fichier avant). Toufik-de-Planoise ★ Me parler ★

Bonjour,
Je ne peux accéder à l'url que tu donnes...
Si tu as obtenu une autorisation de l'auteur du cliché (un courriel du type fr:Aide:Republication/Courriel_Image envoyée depuis une adresse du type cequetuveux [at] besancon.fr), oui tu peux importer l'image en mettant impérativement {{OTRS pending}} sur la page de description. Ensuite, tu fais suivre le courriel en indiquant explicitement l'url de l'image.--Bapti 16:19, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Pour information, j'ai supprimé File:Plaque Salah Gaham.JPG et File:Archives départementales Doubs.JPG puisque comme expliqué précédemment, il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France (cf Commons:Freedom of panorama)--Bapti 10:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Statue collège Diderot - Planoise.JPG edit

 
File:Statue collège Diderot - Planoise.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--91.168.1.54 17:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Statue de Montrapon.JPG edit

 
File:Statue de Montrapon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--91.168.1.54 17:04, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Les Sentinelles de la Mémoire.JPG edit

 
File:Les Sentinelles de la Mémoire.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--91.168.1.54 17:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Sainte Jeanne d'Arc Church of Besançon.JPG edit

 
File:Sainte Jeanne d'Arc Church of Besançon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--91.168.1.54 17:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Mosquée Al-Fath - Planoise.JPG edit

 
File:Mosquée Al-Fath - Planoise.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--91.168.1.54 17:16, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Église Notre-Dame du foyer - Besançon.JPG edit

 
File:Église Notre-Dame du foyer - Besançon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--91.168.1.54 17:20, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Église Saint-Louis Besançon.JPG edit

 
File:Église Saint-Louis Besançon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--91.168.1.54 17:24, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted edit

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 05:21, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Plaque_commémorative_1ère_armée_française_-_Besançon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Zil (d) 17:11, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Bidonville_des_Founottes_-_Besançon.jpg edit

 
File:Bidonville_des_Founottes_-_Besançon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Zil (d) 17:14, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Les_Sentinelles_de_la_Mémoire_2.JPG edit

 
File:Les_Sentinelles_de_la_Mémoire_2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Zil (d) 17:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:L'amitié(Besançon).JPG edit

 
File:L'amitié(Besançon).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Zil (d) 17:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Files you uploaded may be deleted edit

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 18:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Inauguration de la mosquée Al-Fath de Planoise.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Inauguration de la mosquée Al-Fath de Planoise.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Inauguration de la mosquée Al-Fath de Planoise.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

- Zil (d) 20:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Préfecture de Besançon edit

I see you added a photo of the entrance of the Préfecture by Victor Louis in Besançon. The garden side is especially interesting. If it is accessible, a picture of that side would be a very nice addition. --Robert.Allen (talk) 01:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mur englouti - Besançon.JPG edit

 
File:Mur englouti - Besançon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.44.45.29 20:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Place et fontaine Pasteur - Besançon 2007.jpg edit

 
File:Place et fontaine Pasteur - Besançon 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.44.45.29 20:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Minotaure - Besançon.JPG edit

 
File:Minotaure - Besançon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.44.45.29 20:39, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Delta du Doubs 1 - Besançon.JPG edit

 
File:Delta du Doubs 1 - Besançon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.44.45.29 20:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Il semble que vous n'ayez décidément aucune notion de ce que peut être le droit d'auteur. C'est pourtant simple : en France, une oeuvre, fut-elle installée dans un lieu public, est protégée par le droit d'auteur tant que son créateur est vivant, ou tant que soixante-dix années ne se sont pas écoulées depuis la date de son décès. Veuillez bien vouloir en tenir compte avant de dégainer votre Canon. Merci. --90.44.45.29 20:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Khedafi Djelkhir.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Khedafi Djelkhir.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Khedafi Djelkhir.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Notre dame de la libération.JPG edit

 
File:Notre dame de la libération.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.124.154.115 15:19, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Statue.Monument-de-la-Liberation-Besançon.JPG edit

 
File:Statue.Monument-de-la-Liberation-Besançon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.44.2.16 16:04, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Site officiel edit

Bonjour,
Il faudrait penser à rafraîchir le lien censé mener vers votre "site officiel".
Bien cordialement. 90.43.160.181 20:32, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Détail gravure de Casablanca - 1572.jpg edit

 
File:Détail gravure de Casablanca - 1572.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply